REIT - Retail
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
NNN vs MCD vs YUM vs O
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Restaurants
Restaurants
REIT - Retail
NNN vs MCD vs YUM vs O — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | REIT - Retail | Restaurants | Restaurants | REIT - Retail |
| Market Cap | $8.47B | $201.63B | $43.48B | $57.62B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $936M | $27.45B | $8.48B | $5.92B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $387M | $8.68B | $1.74B | $800M |
| Gross Margin | 81.4% | 44.1% | 45.7% | 68.6% |
| Operating Margin | 63.3% | 46.3% | 31.5% | 29.3% |
| Forward P/E | 21.7x | 21.5x | 23.3x | 37.1x |
| Total Debt | $4.82B | $54.81B | $11.91B | $32.85B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $5M | $774M | $709M | $435M |
NNN vs MCD vs YUM vs O — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| NNN REIT, Inc. (NNN) | 100 | 141.8 | +41.8% |
| McDonald's Corporat… (MCD) | 100 | 152.2 | +52.2% |
| Yum! Brands, Inc. (YUM) | 100 | 175.3 | +75.3% |
| Realty Income Corpo… (O) | 100 | 115.4 | +15.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NNN vs MCD vs YUM vs O
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
NNN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality and dividends is your priority.
- 41.4% margin vs O's 13.5%
- 5.3% yield, 9-year raise streak, vs MCD's 2.5%
MCD is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Lower P/E (21.5x vs 37.1x), PEG 2.81 vs 71.28
YUM is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.
- 200.9% 10Y total return vs MCD's 157.7%
- PEG 1.71 vs MCD's 2.81
- 22.8% ROA vs O's 1.1%, ROIC 48.1% vs 1.8%
O carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 14 yrs, beta 0.09, yield 5.2%
- Rev growth 9.1%, EPS growth 19.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 19.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.09, Low D/E 81.9%, current ratio 0.51x
- Beta 0.09, yield 5.2%, current ratio 0.51x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 9.1% FFO/revenue growth vs MCD's 3.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (21.5x vs 37.1x), PEG 2.81 vs 71.28 | |
| Quality / Margins | 41.4% margin vs O's 13.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.09 vs YUM's 0.19 | |
| Dividends | 5.3% yield, 9-year raise streak, vs MCD's 2.5% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +14.6% vs MCD's -8.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 22.8% ROA vs O's 1.1%, ROIC 48.1% vs 1.8% |
NNN vs MCD vs YUM vs O — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
NNN vs MCD vs YUM vs O — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
NNN leads in 2 of 6 categories
YUM leads 1 • MCD leads 0 • O leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NNN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MCD is the larger business by revenue, generating $27.4B annually — 29.3x NNN's $936M. NNN is the more profitable business, keeping 41.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to O's 13.5%. On growth, YUM holds the edge at +15.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $936M | $27.4B | $8.5B | $5.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $867M | $14.4B | $2.8B | $4.2B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $387M | $8.7B | $1.7B | $800M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $464M | $7.2B | $1.6B | $4.0B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +81.4% | +44.1% | +45.7% | +68.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +63.3% | +46.3% | +31.5% | +29.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +41.4% | +31.6% | +20.5% | +13.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +49.6% | +26.2% | +19.4% | +67.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +4.1% | +9.4% | +15.2% | +12.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.0% | +6.9% | +72.2% | -103.6% |
Valuation Metrics
NNN leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 21.5x trailing earnings, NNN trades at a 59% valuation discount to O's 52.8x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), MCD offers better value at 1.74x vs O's 71.28x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $8.5B | $201.6B | $43.5B | $57.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $13.3B | $255.7B | $54.7B | $90.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 21.50x | 23.74x | 28.29x | 52.81x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 21.69x | 21.51x | 23.30x | 37.13x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.93x | 1.74x | 2.08x | 71.28x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 15.85x | 17.57x | 19.98x | 21.96x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 9.14x | 7.50x | 5.29x | 10.02x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.90x | — | — | 1.39x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 12.69x | 28.06x | 26.53x | 14.91x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — NNN and YUM each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NNN delivers a 8.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $9 in annual profit, vs $2 for O. O carries lower financial leverage with a 0.82x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NNN's 1.09x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MCD scores 7/9 vs NNN's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +8.8% | — | — | +2.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +4.1% | +14.5% | +22.8% | +1.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.8% | +18.7% | +48.1% | +1.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +6.4% | +23.3% | +41.7% | +2.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 7 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.09x | — | — | 0.82x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $4.8B | $54.0B | $11.2B | $32.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $5M | $774M | $709M | $435M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $4.8B | $54.8B | $11.9B | $32.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.93x | 6.09x | 5.26x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
YUM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in YUM five years ago would be worth $14,002 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,498 for NNN. Over the past 12 months, O leads with a +14.6% total return vs MCD's -8.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors YUM at 6.6% vs MCD's 0.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +15.6% | -5.8% | +5.0% | +9.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +12.4% | -8.6% | +7.1% | +14.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +15.1% | +2.5% | +21.1% | +13.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +15.0% | +34.3% | +40.0% | +16.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +37.8% | +157.7% | +200.9% | +45.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +4.8% | +0.8% | +6.6% | +4.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — NNN and O each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
O is the less volatile stock with a 0.09 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than YUM's 0.19 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NNN currently trades 96.7% from its 52-week high vs MCD's 83.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.15x | 0.11x | 0.19x | 0.09x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $46.03 | $341.75 | $169.39 | $67.94 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $38.90 | $282.15 | $137.33 | $54.38 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +96.7% | +83.0% | +92.9% | +90.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 58.4 | 30.9 | 44.9 | 53.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.5M | 3.0M | 1.6M | 5.6M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — NNN and MCD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: NNN as "Hold", MCD as "Buy", YUM as "Hold", O as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 24.2% upside for MCD (target: $352) vs 3.5% for NNN (target: $46). For income investors, NNN offers the higher dividend yield at 5.30% vs YUM's 1.80%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $46.06 | $352.25 | $174.38 | $65.25 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 29 | 62 | 51 | 34 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +5.3% | +2.5% | +1.8% | +5.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 9 | 27 | 8 | 14 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $2.36 | $7.14 | $2.84 | $3.23 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.0% | +1.3% | 0.0% |
NNN leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). YUM leads in 1 (Total Returns). 3 tied.
NNN vs MCD vs YUM vs O: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NNN or MCD or YUM or O a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Realty Income Corporation (O) is the stronger pick with 9.
1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 7% for McDonald's Corporation (MCD). NNN REIT, Inc. (NNN) offers the better valuation at 21. 5x trailing P/E (21. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate McDonald's Corporation (MCD) a "Buy" — based on 62 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — NNN or MCD or YUM or O?
On trailing P/E, NNN REIT, Inc.
(NNN) is the cheapest at 21. 5x versus Realty Income Corporation at 52. 8x. On forward P/E, McDonald's Corporation is actually cheaper at 21. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Yum! Brands, Inc. wins at 1. 71x versus Realty Income Corporation's 71. 28x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — NNN or MCD or YUM or O?
Over the past 5 years, Yum!
Brands, Inc. (YUM) delivered a total return of +40. 0%, compared to +15. 0% for NNN REIT, Inc. (NNN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: YUM returned +200. 9% versus NNN's +37. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — NNN or MCD or YUM or O?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Realty Income Corporation (O) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
09β versus Yum! Brands, Inc. 's 0. 19β — meaning YUM is approximately 110% more volatile than O relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Realty Income Corporation (O) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 82% versus 109% for NNN REIT, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — NNN or MCD or YUM or O?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Realty Income Corporation (O) is pulling ahead at 9.
1% versus 3. 7% for McDonald's Corporation (MCD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Realty Income Corporation grew EPS 19. 4% year-over-year, compared to -3. 7% for NNN REIT, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, O leads at 19. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — NNN or MCD or YUM or O?
NNN REIT, Inc.
(NNN) is the more profitable company, earning 42. 1% net margin versus 18. 4% for Realty Income Corporation — meaning it keeps 42. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NNN leads at 61. 5% versus 28. 3% for O. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — O leads at 89. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is NNN or MCD or YUM or O more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Yum! Brands, Inc. (YUM) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 71x versus Realty Income Corporation's 71. 28x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, McDonald's Corporation (MCD) trades at 21. 5x forward P/E versus 37. 1x for Realty Income Corporation — 15. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MCD: 24. 2% to $352. 25.
08Which pays a better dividend — NNN or MCD or YUM or O?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
NNN REIT, Inc. (NNN) offers the highest yield at 5. 3%, versus 1. 8% for Yum! Brands, Inc. (YUM).
09Is NNN or MCD or YUM or O better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, McDonald's Corporation (MCD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
11), 2. 5% yield, +157. 7% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (MCD: +157. 7%, NNN: +37. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between NNN and MCD and YUM and O?
These companies operate in different sectors (NNN (Real Estate) and MCD (Consumer Cyclical) and YUM (Consumer Cyclical) and O (Real Estate)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: NNN is a small-cap income-oriented stock; MCD is a large-cap quality compounder stock; YUM is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; O is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.