Insurance - Property & Casualty
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
NODK vs ERIE vs ACGL vs HRTG vs ALL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Insurance - Brokers
Insurance - Diversified
Insurance - Property & Casualty
Insurance - Property & Casualty
NODK vs ERIE vs ACGL vs HRTG vs ALL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Insurance - Property & Casualty | Insurance - Brokers | Insurance - Diversified | Insurance - Property & Casualty | Insurance - Property & Casualty |
| Market Cap | $267M | $10.01B | $33.67B | $861M | $55.00B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $298M | $4.33B | $19.93B | $847M | $67.14B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $3M | $571M | $4.40B | $196M | $12.14B |
| Gross Margin | 13.3% | 18.1% | 37.2% | 47.2% | 39.8% |
| Operating Margin | 1.5% | 17.0% | 25.0% | 31.7% | 23.3% |
| Forward P/E | — | 17.1x | 10.1x | 6.1x | 7.9x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $0.00 | $2.73B | $100M | $7.49B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $678K | $346M | $993M | $559M | $678M |
NODK vs ERIE vs ACGL vs HRTG vs ALL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| NI Holdings, Inc. (NODK) | 100 | 86.2 | -13.8% |
| Erie Indemnity Comp… (ERIE) | 100 | 120.3 | +20.3% |
| Arch Capital Group … (ACGL) | 100 | 334.9 | +234.9% |
| Heritage Insurance … (HRTG) | 100 | 223.5 | +123.5% |
| The Allstate Corpor… (ALL) | 100 | 218.5 | +118.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NODK vs ERIE vs ACGL vs HRTG vs ALL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
NODK lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
ERIE is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and defensive is your priority.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.16, yield 2.2%
- Beta 0.16, yield 2.2%, current ratio 1.27x
- 2.2% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs ALL's 1.8%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
- 17.3% ROA vs NODK's 0.5%
ACGL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 14.3%, EPS growth 3.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 27.3%
- 324.0% 10Y total return vs ALL's 258.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.02, Low D/E 11.3%, current ratio 1.21x
- PEG 0.35 vs ERIE's 1.26
HRTG ranks third and is worth considering specifically for quality and momentum.
- Combined ratio 0.7 vs ERIE's 0.8 (lower = better underwriting)
- +15.3% vs ERIE's -38.7%
Among these 5 stocks, ALL doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 14.3% revenue growth vs NODK's -100.0% | |
| Value | PEG 0.35 vs 0.46 | |
| Quality / Margins | Combined ratio 0.7 vs ERIE's 0.8 (lower = better underwriting) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.02 vs NODK's 0.57 | |
| Dividends | 2.2% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs ALL's 1.8%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +15.3% vs ERIE's -38.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 17.3% ROA vs NODK's 0.5% |
NODK vs ERIE vs ACGL vs HRTG vs ALL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
NODK vs ERIE vs ACGL vs HRTG vs ALL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
HRTG leads in 4 of 6 categories
NODK leads 0 • ERIE leads 0 • ACGL leads 0 • ALL leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HRTG leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ALL is the larger business by revenue, generating $67.1B annually — 225.3x NODK's $298M. HRTG is the more profitable business, keeping 23.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NODK's 0.9%. On growth, ACGL holds the edge at +7.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $298M | $4.3B | $19.9B | $847M | $67.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $5M | $786M | $5.2B | $281M | $16.0B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $3M | $571M | $4.4B | $196M | $12.1B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$7M | $537M | $6.1B | $177M | $11.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +13.3% | +18.1% | +37.2% | +47.2% | +39.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +1.5% | +17.0% | +25.0% | +31.7% | +23.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +0.9% | +13.2% | +22.1% | +23.1% | +18.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -2.4% | +12.4% | +30.7% | +20.8% | +17.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -14.0% | +2.3% | +7.3% | +2.4% | +4.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +38.5% | +7.9% | +39.0% | +2.3% | +3.4% |
Valuation Metrics
HRTG leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 4.4x trailing earnings, HRTG trades at a 78% valuation discount to ERIE's 20.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), HRTG offers better value at 0.06x vs ERIE's 1.50x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $267M | $10.0B | $33.7B | $861M | $55.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $266M | $9.7B | $35.4B | $402M | $61.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | — | 20.41x | 8.13x | 4.44x | 5.59x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 17.15x | 10.05x | 6.07x | 7.87x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.50x | 0.29x | 0.06x | 0.33x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 12.14x | 6.85x | 1.48x | 4.53x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 2.46x | 1.69x | 1.02x | 0.83x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 5.00x | 1.47x | 1.72x | 1.85x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 133.00x | 17.53x | 5.50x | 4.94x | 5.57x |
Profitability & Efficiency
HRTG leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HRTG delivers a 47.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $47 in annual profit, vs $1 for NODK. ACGL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.11x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ALL's 0.24x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ACGL scores 7/9 vs ERIE's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +1.1% | +25.0% | +19.0% | +47.3% | +42.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.5% | +17.3% | +5.9% | +8.4% | +10.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +29.5% | +15.4% | +15.4% | +29.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | — | +32.0% | +11.6% | +11.1% | +29.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 4 | 7 | 7 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | — | 0.11x | 0.20x | 0.24x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$678,000 | -$346M | $1.7B | -$459M | $6.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $678,000 | $346M | $993M | $559M | $678M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $0 | $2.7B | $100M | $7.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | — | 34.86x | 33.88x | 40.22x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
HRTG leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in HRTG five years ago would be worth $30,138 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,916 for NODK. Over the past 12 months, HRTG leads with a +15.3% total return vs ERIE's -38.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HRTG at 89.9% vs NODK's -0.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -2.6% | -20.9% | +0.7% | +2.7% | +5.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +4.3% | -38.7% | +2.0% | +15.3% | +6.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -2.7% | -0.2% | +30.7% | +585.3% | +93.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -30.8% | +14.8% | +144.0% | +201.4% | +75.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -12.4% | +171.6% | +324.0% | +119.4% | +258.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -0.9% | -0.1% | +9.3% | +89.9% | +24.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ACGL and ALL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ACGL is the less volatile stock with a 0.02 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NODK's 0.57 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ALL currently trades 96.2% from its 52-week high vs ERIE's 56.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.57x | 0.16x | 0.02x | 0.50x | 0.12x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $14.70 | $380.67 | $103.39 | $31.98 | $222.22 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $12.01 | $210.06 | $82.45 | $16.83 | $188.08 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +87.9% | +56.9% | +91.4% | +87.6% | +96.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 47.5 | 33.6 | 46.3 | 55.7 | 56.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 17K | 231K | 1.9M | 282K | 1.3M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — ERIE and ALL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ACGL as "Buy", HRTG as "Buy", ALL as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 39.1% upside for HRTG (target: $39) vs 10.0% for ACGL (target: $104). For income investors, ERIE offers the higher dividend yield at 2.23% vs ALL's 1.83%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $104.00 | $39.00 | $244.38 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — | 34 | 9 | 44 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +2.2% | +0.0% | — | +1.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 12 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $4.83 | $0.02 | — | $3.91 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +5.6% | +0.3% | +2.2% |
HRTG leads in 4 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Valuation Metrics. 2 categories are tied.
NODK vs ERIE vs ACGL vs HRTG vs ALL: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NODK or ERIE or ACGL or HRTG or ALL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Arch Capital Group Ltd.
(ACGL) is the stronger pick with 14. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for NI Holdings, Inc. (NODK). Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc. (HRTG) offers the better valuation at 4. 4x trailing P/E (6. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Arch Capital Group Ltd. (ACGL) a "Buy" — based on 34 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — NODK or ERIE or ACGL or HRTG or ALL?
On trailing P/E, Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc.
(HRTG) is the cheapest at 4. 4x versus Erie Indemnity Company at 20. 4x. On forward P/E, Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc. is actually cheaper at 6. 1x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Arch Capital Group Ltd. wins at 0. 35x versus Erie Indemnity Company's 1. 26x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — NODK or ERIE or ACGL or HRTG or ALL?
Over the past 5 years, Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc.
(HRTG) delivered a total return of +201. 4%, compared to -30. 8% for NI Holdings, Inc. (NODK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ACGL returned +324. 0% versus NODK's -12. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — NODK or ERIE or ACGL or HRTG or ALL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Arch Capital Group Ltd.
(ACGL) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 02β versus NI Holdings, Inc. 's 0. 57β — meaning NODK is approximately 3607% more volatile than ACGL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Arch Capital Group Ltd. (ACGL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 11% versus 24% for The Allstate Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — NODK or ERIE or ACGL or HRTG or ALL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Arch Capital Group Ltd.
(ACGL) is pulling ahead at 14. 3% versus -100. 0% for NI Holdings, Inc. (NODK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc. grew EPS 214. 4% year-over-year, compared to -100. 0% for NI Holdings, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ACGL leads at 27. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — NODK or ERIE or ACGL or HRTG or ALL?
Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc.
(HRTG) is the more profitable company, earning 23. 1% net margin versus 0. 9% for NI Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 23. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HRTG leads at 30. 6% versus 1. 5% for NODK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HRTG leads at 63. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is NODK or ERIE or ACGL or HRTG or ALL more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Arch Capital Group Ltd. (ACGL) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 35x versus Erie Indemnity Company's 1. 26x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc. (HRTG) trades at 6. 1x forward P/E versus 17. 1x for Erie Indemnity Company — 11. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for HRTG: 39. 1% to $39. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — NODK or ERIE or ACGL or HRTG or ALL?
In this comparison, ERIE (2.
2% yield), ALL (1. 8% yield) pay a dividend. NODK, ACGL, HRTG do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is NODK or ERIE or ACGL or HRTG or ALL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Allstate Corporation (ALL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
12), 1. 8% yield, +258. 7% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ALL: +258. 7%, NODK: -12. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between NODK and ERIE and ACGL and HRTG and ALL?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: NODK is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ERIE is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; ACGL is a mid-cap deep-value stock; HRTG is a small-cap deep-value stock; ALL is a mid-cap deep-value stock. ERIE, ALL pay a dividend while NODK, ACGL, HRTG do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.