Staffing & Employment Services
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
NSP vs ASGN vs G vs MAN vs TASK
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Information Technology Services
Information Technology Services
Staffing & Employment Services
Information Technology Services
NSP vs ASGN vs G vs MAN vs TASK — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Staffing & Employment Services | Information Technology Services | Information Technology Services | Staffing & Employment Services | Information Technology Services |
| Market Cap | $1.25B | $895M | $5.85B | $1.41B | $573M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $6.81B | $3.98B | $5.16B | $17.96B | $1.21B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-7M | $114M | $570M | $-13M | $105M |
| Gross Margin | 13.2% | 28.4% | 36.3% | 16.7% | 35.5% |
| Operating Margin | -0.1% | 6.1% | 14.9% | 0.8% | 11.6% |
| Forward P/E | 15.3x | 5.8x | 8.6x | 8.3x | 4.6x |
| Total Debt | $435M | $1.17B | $1.76B | $2.39B | $298M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $642M | $102M | $854M | $871M | $212M |
NSP vs ASGN vs G vs MAN vs TASK — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Insperity, Inc. (NSP) | 100 | 36.2 | -63.8% |
| ASGN Incorporated (ASGN) | 100 | 39.9 | -60.1% |
| Genpact Limited (G) | 100 | 75.9 | -24.1% |
| ManpowerGroup Inc. (MAN) | 100 | 25.6 | -74.4% |
| TaskUs, Inc. (TASK) | 100 | 18.6 | -81.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NSP vs ASGN vs G vs MAN vs TASK
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
NSP ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 1.06, yield 7.2%
- 59.4% 10Y total return vs G's 42.5%
- 7.2% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs G's 1.9%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
Among these 5 stocks, ASGN doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
G is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night and defensive is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.67, Low D/E 69.2%, current ratio 1.66x
- Beta 0.67, yield 1.9%, current ratio 1.66x
- 11.0% margin vs NSP's -0.1%
- Beta 0.67 vs ASGN's 1.34
MAN is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- -17.0% vs ASGN's -61.5%
TASK carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and valuation efficiency.
- Rev growth 19.0%, EPS growth 120.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 7.2%
- PEG 0.18 vs G's 0.58
- 19.0% revenue growth vs ASGN's -2.9%
- Lower P/E (4.6x vs 8.3x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 19.0% revenue growth vs ASGN's -2.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (4.6x vs 8.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 11.0% margin vs NSP's -0.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.67 vs ASGN's 1.34 | |
| Dividends | 7.2% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs G's 1.9%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | -17.0% vs ASGN's -61.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 10.3% ROA vs NSP's -0.3% |
NSP vs ASGN vs G vs MAN vs TASK — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
NSP vs ASGN vs G vs MAN vs TASK — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
G leads in 3 of 6 categories
TASK leads 1 • NSP leads 0 • ASGN leads 0 • MAN leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
G leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MAN is the larger business by revenue, generating $18.0B annually — 14.8x TASK's $1.2B. G is the more profitable business, keeping 11.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NSP's -0.1%. On growth, TASK holds the edge at +10.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $6.8B | $4.0B | $5.2B | $18.0B | $1.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $35M | $360M | $819M | $236M | $204M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$7M | $114M | $570M | -$13M | $105M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$309M | $288M | $666M | -$161M | $88M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +13.2% | +28.4% | +36.3% | +16.7% | +35.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -0.1% | +6.1% | +14.9% | +0.8% | +11.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -0.1% | +2.9% | +11.0% | -0.1% | +8.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -4.5% | +7.2% | +12.9% | -0.9% | +7.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +3.4% | -0.5% | +6.7% | +7.1% | +10.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -3.0% | -37.9% | +17.8% | +36.2% | +13.0% |
Valuation Metrics
TASK leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 5.8x trailing earnings, TASK trades at a 47% valuation discount to G's 11.0x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), TASK offers better value at 0.23x vs G's 0.74x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.2B | $895M | $5.9B | $1.4B | $573M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.0B | $2.0B | $6.8B | $2.9B | $660M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -181.61x | 8.06x | 11.02x | -104.90x | 5.79x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 15.27x | 5.80x | 8.58x | 8.28x | 4.58x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 0.74x | — | 0.23x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 29.74x | 5.30x | 7.91x | 9.02x | 3.26x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.18x | 0.22x | 1.15x | 0.08x | 0.48x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 27.00x | 0.51x | 2.39x | 0.69x | 0.99x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 3.11x | 7.97x | — | 7.78x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — G and TASK each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
G delivers a 22.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $22 in annual profit, vs $-8 for NSP. TASK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.50x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NSP's 9.46x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TASK scores 7/9 vs MAN's 1/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -7.7% | +6.3% | +22.4% | -0.6% | +21.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -0.3% | +3.1% | +10.3% | -0.1% | +10.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +6.9% | +17.2% | +5.6% | +16.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -1.6% | +7.2% | +18.4% | +6.2% | +16.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 5 | 5 | 1 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 9.46x | 0.65x | 0.69x | 1.16x | 0.50x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$207M | $1.1B | $911M | $1.5B | $86M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $642M | $102M | $854M | $871M | $212M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $435M | $1.2B | $1.8B | $2.4B | $298M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.29x | 1.96x | 16.55x | 1.98x | 7.12x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
G leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in G five years ago would be worth $7,921 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,958 for ASGN. Over the past 12 months, MAN leads with a -17.0% total return vs ASGN's -61.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors G at -2.5% vs ASGN's -31.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -13.8% | -55.1% | -24.5% | +1.2% | -12.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -46.2% | -61.5% | -29.0% | -17.0% | -28.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -65.6% | -68.2% | -7.4% | -46.4% | -18.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -48.6% | -80.4% | -20.8% | -64.9% | -67.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +59.4% | -41.9% | +42.5% | -30.8% | -67.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -29.9% | -31.7% | -2.5% | -18.8% | -6.4% |
Risk & Volatility
G leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
G is the less volatile stock with a 0.67 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ASGN's 1.34 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. G currently trades 68.6% from its 52-week high vs ASGN's 34.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.06x | 1.34x | 0.67x | 1.03x | 1.12x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $72.23 | $60.75 | $50.24 | $47.34 | $18.39 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $18.57 | $19.31 | $33.12 | $25.15 | $5.89 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +45.3% | +34.5% | +68.6% | +64.3% | +34.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 46.6 | 18.4 | 35.4 | 47.1 | 42.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 972K | 947K | 2.3M | 1.1M | 736K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — NSP and G each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: NSP as "Hold", ASGN as "Hold", G as "Hold", MAN as "Hold", TASK as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 111.9% upside for TASK (target: $14) vs 24.5% for MAN (target: $38). For income investors, NSP offers the higher dividend yield at 7.25% vs G's 1.93%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Hold | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $48.60 | $37.60 | $46.00 | $37.86 | $13.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 8 | 13 | 39 | 29 | 11 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +7.2% | — | +1.9% | +4.7% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 3 | — | 8 | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $2.37 | — | $0.67 | $1.43 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.5% | +19.0% | +4.8% | +2.7% | +4.8% |
G leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). TASK leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
NSP vs ASGN vs G vs MAN vs TASK: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NSP or ASGN or G or MAN or TASK a better buy right now?
For growth investors, TaskUs, Inc.
(TASK) is the stronger pick with 19. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 9% for ASGN Incorporated (ASGN). TaskUs, Inc. (TASK) offers the better valuation at 5. 8x trailing P/E (4. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate TaskUs, Inc. (TASK) a "Buy" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — NSP or ASGN or G or MAN or TASK?
On trailing P/E, TaskUs, Inc.
(TASK) is the cheapest at 5. 8x versus Genpact Limited at 11. 0x. On forward P/E, TaskUs, Inc. is actually cheaper at 4. 6x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: TaskUs, Inc. wins at 0. 18x versus Genpact Limited's 0. 58x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — NSP or ASGN or G or MAN or TASK?
Over the past 5 years, Genpact Limited (G) delivered a total return of -20.
8%, compared to -80. 4% for ASGN Incorporated (ASGN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NSP returned +59. 4% versus TASK's -67. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — NSP or ASGN or G or MAN or TASK?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Genpact Limited (G) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
67β versus ASGN Incorporated's 1. 34β — meaning ASGN is approximately 100% more volatile than G relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, TaskUs, Inc. (TASK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 50% versus 9% for Insperity, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — NSP or ASGN or G or MAN or TASK?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), TaskUs, Inc.
(TASK) is pulling ahead at 19. 0% versus -2. 9% for ASGN Incorporated (ASGN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: TaskUs, Inc. grew EPS 120. 0% year-over-year, compared to -109. 6% for ManpowerGroup Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, TASK leads at 7. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — NSP or ASGN or G or MAN or TASK?
Genpact Limited (G) is the more profitable company, earning 10.
9% net margin versus -0. 1% for Insperity, Inc. — meaning it keeps 10. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: G leads at 15. 0% versus -0. 1% for NSP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — G leads at 35. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is NSP or ASGN or G or MAN or TASK more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, TaskUs, Inc. (TASK) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 18x versus Genpact Limited's 0. 58x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, TaskUs, Inc. (TASK) trades at 4. 6x forward P/E versus 15. 3x for Insperity, Inc. — 10. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TASK: 111. 9% to $13. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — NSP or ASGN or G or MAN or TASK?
In this comparison, NSP (7.
2% yield), MAN (4. 7% yield), G (1. 9% yield) pay a dividend. ASGN, TASK do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is NSP or ASGN or G or MAN or TASK better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Genpact Limited (G) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
67), 1. 9% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (G: +42. 5%, ASGN: -41. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between NSP and ASGN and G and MAN and TASK?
These companies operate in different sectors (NSP (Industrials) and ASGN (Technology) and G (Technology) and MAN (Industrials) and TASK (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: NSP is a small-cap income-oriented stock; ASGN is a small-cap deep-value stock; G is a small-cap deep-value stock; MAN is a small-cap income-oriented stock; TASK is a small-cap high-growth stock. NSP, G, MAN pay a dividend while ASGN, TASK do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.