Banks - Diversified
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
NTB vs WSFS vs FIBK vs BOKF vs IBCP
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
NTB vs WSFS vs FIBK vs BOKF vs IBCP — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Diversified | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $2.21B | $3.71B | $3.37B | $9.94B | $691M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $800M | $1.36B | $1.06B | $3.36B | $315M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $232M | $287M | $302M | $537M | $69M |
| Gross Margin | 75.9% | 74.7% | 97.5% | 57.1% | 69.6% |
| Operating Margin | 29.8% | 28.0% | 37.0% | 19.8% | 25.8% |
| Forward P/E | 8.8x | 11.5x | 12.9x | 12.5x | 9.4x |
| Total Debt | $39M | $303M | $776M | $4.45B | $117M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.61B | $1.33B | $358M | $1.43B | $52M |
NTB vs WSFS vs FIBK vs BOKF vs IBCP — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| The Bank of N.T. Bu… (NTB) | 100 | 226.6 | +126.6% |
| WSFS Financial Corp… (WSFS) | 100 | 254.5 | +154.5% |
| BOK Financial Corpo… (BOKF) | 100 | 253.3 | +153.3% |
| Independent Bank Co… (IBCP) | 100 | 242.8 | +142.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NTB vs WSFS vs FIBK vs BOKF vs IBCP
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
NTB carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.65, yield 3.3%
- 187.7% 10Y total return vs IBCP's 182.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.65, Low D/E 3.4%, current ratio 516.92x
- PEG 0.65 vs FIBK's 4.23
WSFS is the clearest fit if your priority is bank quality.
- NIM 3.4% vs BOKF's 2.4%
FIBK ranks third and is worth considering specifically for dividends.
- 5.5% yield, vs IBCP's 3.1%
BOKF is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 10.4%, EPS growth 1.5%
- 10.4% NII/revenue growth vs FIBK's -28.5%
- Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs FIBK's 0.6% (lower = leaner)
- Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs FIBK's 0.6%
Among these 5 stocks, IBCP doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 10.4% NII/revenue growth vs FIBK's -28.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.8x vs 9.4x), PEG 0.65 vs 1.79 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs FIBK's 0.6% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.65 vs BOKF's 1.00, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 5.5% yield, vs IBCP's 3.1% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +35.0% vs FIBK's +2.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs FIBK's 0.6% |
NTB vs WSFS vs FIBK vs BOKF vs IBCP — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
NTB vs WSFS vs FIBK vs BOKF vs IBCP — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
NTB leads in 3 of 6 categories
FIBK leads 1 • WSFS leads 0 • BOKF leads 0 • IBCP leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FIBK leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BOKF is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.4B annually — 10.7x IBCP's $315M. NTB is the more profitable business, keeping 29.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BOKF's 15.6%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $800M | $1.4B | $1.1B | $3.4B | $315M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $267M | $408M | $428M | $797M | $89M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $232M | $287M | $302M | $537M | $69M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $255M | $214M | $278M | $1.5B | $70M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +75.9% | +74.7% | +97.5% | +57.1% | +69.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +29.8% | +28.0% | +37.0% | +19.8% | +25.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +29.0% | +21.1% | +28.5% | +15.6% | +21.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +31.9% | +15.7% | +26.2% | +42.6% | +22.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +12.4% | +22.9% | +116.0% | +1.8% | +2.3% |
Valuation Metrics
NTB leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 10.1x trailing earnings, NTB trades at a 36% valuation discount to BOKF's 15.9x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), NTB offers better value at 0.75x vs BOKF's 5.33x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.2B | $3.7B | $3.4B | $9.9B | $691M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $644M | $2.7B | $3.8B | $13.0B | $755M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 10.12x | 13.84x | 11.77x | 15.85x | 10.26x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 8.76x | 11.53x | 12.91x | 12.55x | 9.45x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.75x | 0.79x | 3.86x | 5.33x | 1.95x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 2.42x | 6.59x | 9.68x | 16.79x | 9.29x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.76x | 2.73x | 3.19x | 2.96x | 2.19x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.06x | 1.41x | 1.03x | 1.48x | 1.39x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 8.68x | 17.38x | 12.14x | 6.95x | 9.84x |
Profitability & Efficiency
NTB leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NTB delivers a 21.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $21 in annual profit, vs $9 for FIBK. NTB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BOKF's 0.80x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NTB scores 8/9 vs BOKF's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +21.2% | +10.6% | +8.8% | +8.9% | +14.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.6% | +1.4% | +1.1% | +1.1% | +1.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +14.9% | +9.5% | +5.9% | +4.1% | +10.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +3.1% | +10.3% | +4.3% | +5.5% | +2.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 6 | 7 | 6 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.03x | 0.11x | 0.23x | 0.80x | 0.23x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$1.6B | -$1.0B | $418M | $3.0B | $65M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.6B | $1.3B | $358M | $1.4B | $52M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $39M | $303M | $776M | $4.5B | $117M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.23x | 1.30x | 1.11x | 0.55x | 0.91x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NTB leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NTB five years ago would be worth $17,083 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $12,099 for FIBK. Over the past 12 months, NTB leads with a +35.0% total return vs FIBK's +2.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NTB at 36.6% vs FIBK's 3.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +12.4% | +28.6% | -1.6% | +9.2% | +6.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +35.0% | +29.5% | +2.3% | +33.1% | +6.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +155.0% | +138.5% | +11.4% | +79.4% | +135.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +70.8% | +45.4% | +21.0% | +61.8% | +70.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +187.7% | +123.0% | +39.2% | +154.3% | +182.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +36.6% | +33.6% | +3.7% | +21.5% | +33.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — NTB and WSFS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NTB is the less volatile stock with a 0.65 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BOKF's 1.00 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WSFS currently trades 96.2% from its 52-week high vs FIBK's 88.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.65x | 0.87x | — | 1.00x | 0.81x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $57.84 | $73.22 | $39.26 | $139.73 | $37.39 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $40.59 | $49.92 | $31.62 | $91.35 | $29.63 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +95.7% | +96.2% | +88.1% | +92.3% | +89.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 53.9 | 55.7 | 50.8 | 41.6 | 48.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 145K | 388K | 1.2M | 313K | 176K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — FIBK and BOKF and IBCP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: NTB as "Hold", WSFS as "Hold", FIBK as "Hold", BOKF as "Hold", IBCP as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 13.3% upside for IBCP (target: $38) vs 2.0% for BOKF (target: $132). For income investors, FIBK offers the higher dividend yield at 5.46% vs WSFS's 0.97%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Hold | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $57.00 | $79.00 | $38.33 | $131.57 | $38.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 7 | 13 | 15 | 21 | 7 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.3% | +1.0% | +5.5% | +1.7% | +3.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 1 | 0 | 11 | 11 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.83 | $0.68 | $1.89 | $2.24 | $1.03 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +6.6% | +7.8% | +3.6% | +0.9% | +1.8% |
NTB leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). FIBK leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.
NTB vs WSFS vs FIBK vs BOKF vs IBCP: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NTB or WSFS or FIBK or BOKF or IBCP a better buy right now?
For growth investors, BOK Financial Corporation (BOKF) is the stronger pick with 10.
4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -28. 5% for First Interstate BancSystem, Inc. (FIBK). The Bank of N. T. Butterfield & Son Limited (NTB) offers the better valuation at 10. 1x trailing P/E (8. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate The Bank of N. T. Butterfield & Son Limited (NTB) a "Hold" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — NTB or WSFS or FIBK or BOKF or IBCP?
On trailing P/E, The Bank of N.
T. Butterfield & Son Limited (NTB) is the cheapest at 10. 1x versus BOK Financial Corporation at 15. 9x. On forward P/E, The Bank of N. T. Butterfield & Son Limited is actually cheaper at 8. 8x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: The Bank of N. T. Butterfield & Son Limited wins at 0. 65x versus First Interstate BancSystem, Inc. 's 4. 23x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — NTB or WSFS or FIBK or BOKF or IBCP?
Over the past 5 years, The Bank of N.
T. Butterfield & Son Limited (NTB) delivered a total return of +70. 8%, compared to +21. 0% for First Interstate BancSystem, Inc. (FIBK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NTB returned +187. 7% versus FIBK's +39. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — NTB or WSFS or FIBK or BOKF or IBCP?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Bank of N.
T. Butterfield & Son Limited (NTB) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 65β versus BOK Financial Corporation's 1. 00β — meaning BOKF is approximately 55% more volatile than NTB relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, The Bank of N. T. Butterfield & Son Limited (NTB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 80% for BOK Financial Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — NTB or WSFS or FIBK or BOKF or IBCP?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), BOK Financial Corporation (BOKF) is pulling ahead at 10.
4% versus -28. 5% for First Interstate BancSystem, Inc. (FIBK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: First Interstate BancSystem, Inc. grew EPS 34. 2% year-over-year, compared to 1. 5% for BOK Financial Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — NTB or WSFS or FIBK or BOKF or IBCP?
The Bank of N.
T. Butterfield & Son Limited (NTB) is the more profitable company, earning 29. 0% net margin versus 15. 6% for BOK Financial Corporation — meaning it keeps 29. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FIBK leads at 37. 0% versus 19. 8% for BOKF. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FIBK leads at 97. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is NTB or WSFS or FIBK or BOKF or IBCP more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, The Bank of N. T. Butterfield & Son Limited (NTB) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 65x versus First Interstate BancSystem, Inc. 's 4. 23x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, The Bank of N. T. Butterfield & Son Limited (NTB) trades at 8. 8x forward P/E versus 12. 9x for First Interstate BancSystem, Inc. — 4. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for IBCP: 13. 3% to $38. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — NTB or WSFS or FIBK or BOKF or IBCP?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
First Interstate BancSystem, Inc. (FIBK) offers the highest yield at 5. 5%, versus 1. 0% for WSFS Financial Corporation (WSFS).
09Is NTB or WSFS or FIBK or BOKF or IBCP better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Bank of N.
T. Butterfield & Son Limited (NTB) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 65), 3. 3% yield, +187. 7% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (NTB: +187. 7%, FIBK: +39. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between NTB and WSFS and FIBK and BOKF and IBCP?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.