Asset Management
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
NTRS vs IVZ vs STT vs BEN vs BK
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Asset Management
Asset Management
Asset Management
Asset Management
NTRS vs IVZ vs STT vs BEN vs BK — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Asset Management | Asset Management | Asset Management | Asset Management | Asset Management |
| Market Cap | $29.66B | $11.92B | $41.99B | $15.86B | $89.95B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $14.30B | $6.38B | $21.97B | $8.77B | $39.55B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $1.74B | $-243M | $2.98B | $812M | $5.24B |
| Gross Margin | 56.5% | 43.2% | 58.5% | 80.3% | 46.0% |
| Operating Margin | 16.3% | -10.9% | 15.5% | 6.9% | 14.8% |
| Forward P/E | 14.8x | 10.4x | 12.0x | 11.2x | 14.9x |
| Total Debt | $16.43B | $10.12B | $36.79B | $13.30B | $45.44B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $61.13B | $1.98B | $116.10B | $3.57B | $101.94B |
NTRS vs IVZ vs STT vs BEN vs BK — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Northern Trust Corp… (NTRS) | 100 | 202.5 | +102.5% |
| Invesco Ltd. (IVZ) | 100 | 336.6 | +236.6% |
| State Street Corpor… (STT) | 100 | 244.1 | +144.1% |
| Franklin Resources,… (BEN) | 100 | 161.8 | +61.8% |
| The Bank of New Yor… (BK) | 100 | 351.6 | +251.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NTRS vs IVZ vs STT vs BEN vs BK
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
NTRS is the clearest fit if your priority is bank quality.
- NIM 1.4% vs STT's 0.8%
IVZ is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value and momentum is your priority.
- Lower P/E (10.4x vs 14.9x)
- +93.1% vs BEN's +55.5%
STT ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure and valuation efficiency.
- Rev growth 19.6%, EPS growth 47.1%
- PEG 1.36 vs BK's 2.89
- 19.6% NII/revenue growth vs NTRS's -9.9%
BEN is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 6 yrs, beta 1.31, yield 4.3%
- Beta 1.31, yield 4.3%, current ratio 2.71x
- 4.3% yield, 6-year raise streak, vs BK's 1.4%
BK carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 267.1% 10Y total return vs STT's 186.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.83, current ratio 0.65x
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs BEN's 0.7% (lower = leaner)
- Beta 0.83 vs IVZ's 1.67
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 19.6% NII/revenue growth vs NTRS's -9.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.4x vs 14.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs BEN's 0.7% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.83 vs IVZ's 1.67 | |
| Dividends | 4.3% yield, 6-year raise streak, vs BK's 1.4% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +93.1% vs BEN's +55.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs BEN's 0.7% |
NTRS vs IVZ vs STT vs BEN vs BK — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
NTRS vs IVZ vs STT vs BEN vs BK — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
IVZ leads in 1 of 6 categories
NTRS leads 1 • BK leads 1 • STT leads 0 • BEN leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — NTRS and BEN each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BK is the larger business by revenue, generating $39.6B annually — 6.2x IVZ's $6.4B. STT is the more profitable business, keeping 12.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to IVZ's -4.4%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $14.3B | $6.4B | $22.0B | $8.8B | $39.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $3.2B | $1.2B | $4.3B | $1.2B | $8.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $1.7B | -$243M | $3.0B | $812M | $5.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $4.7B | $1.9B | -$6.1B | $938M | $1.6B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +56.5% | +43.2% | +58.5% | +80.3% | +46.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +16.3% | -10.9% | +15.5% | +6.9% | +14.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +12.1% | -4.4% | +12.2% | +6.0% | +11.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +38.2% | +22.6% | -64.3% | +10.4% | -2.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +7.1% | +34.2% | +23.0% | +100.0% | +25.3% |
Valuation Metrics
IVZ leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 18.1x trailing earnings, STT trades at a 46% valuation discount to BEN's 33.5x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), NTRS offers better value at 1.86x vs BK's 4.37x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $29.7B | $11.9B | $42.0B | $15.9B | $89.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$15.0B | $20.1B | -$37.3B | $25.6B | $33.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 18.31x | -16.77x | 18.12x | 33.54x | 22.53x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 14.80x | 10.44x | 11.99x | 11.21x | 14.92x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.86x | — | 2.05x | — | 4.37x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | -4.68x | 16.34x | -9.33x | 22.53x | 4.37x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.07x | 1.87x | 1.91x | 1.81x | 2.27x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.33x | 0.94x | 1.78x | 1.11x | 2.34x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 5.43x | 8.27x | — | 17.40x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
NTRS leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NTRS delivers a 13.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $-2 for IVZ. IVZ carries lower financial leverage with a 0.78x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to STT's 1.45x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NTRS scores 6/9 vs STT's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +13.4% | -1.7% | +10.8% | +5.6% | +11.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.0% | -0.9% | +0.8% | +2.5% | +1.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +6.0% | -2.3% | +4.6% | +1.6% | +5.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +9.0% | -2.6% | +4.6% | +2.0% | +6.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 6 | 4 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.27x | 0.78x | 1.45x | 0.94x | 1.09x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$44.7B | $8.1B | -$79.3B | $9.7B | -$56.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $61.1B | $2.0B | $116.1B | $3.6B | $101.9B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $16.4B | $10.1B | $36.8B | $13.3B | $45.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.38x | -6.19x | 0.42x | 15.19x | 0.32x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BK leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BK five years ago would be worth $26,864 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10,740 for BEN. Over the past 12 months, IVZ leads with a +93.1% total return vs BEN's +55.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BK at 48.7% vs BEN's 10.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +15.5% | +0.4% | +16.6% | +29.6% | +12.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +66.6% | +93.1% | +66.2% | +55.5% | +58.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +131.7% | +79.8% | +128.4% | +35.3% | +228.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +46.7% | +8.2% | +86.2% | +7.4% | +168.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +170.2% | +22.1% | +186.8% | +23.5% | +267.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +32.3% | +21.6% | +31.7% | +10.6% | +48.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — BEN and BK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BK is the less volatile stock with a 0.83 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than IVZ's 1.67 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BEN currently trades 97.1% from its 52-week high vs IVZ's 90.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.14x | 1.67x | 1.19x | 1.31x | 0.83x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $173.19 | $29.61 | $156.18 | $31.44 | $139.15 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $97.00 | $14.10 | $90.94 | $20.08 | $82.91 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +92.4% | +90.6% | +95.3% | +97.1% | +93.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 59.4 | 69.4 | 63.9 | 78.4 | 60.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.1M | 5.1M | 2.0M | 5.1M | 3.3M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — BEN and BK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: NTRS as "Hold", IVZ as "Hold", STT as "Buy", BEN as "Hold", BK as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 10.8% upside for IVZ (target: $30) vs -5.8% for BEN (target: $29). For income investors, BEN offers the higher dividend yield at 4.35% vs BK's 1.38%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $153.75 | $29.72 | $160.44 | $28.75 | $139.86 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 35 | 28 | 37 | 27 | 35 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.0% | +3.1% | +2.3% | +4.3% | +1.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 4 | 3 | 6 | 14 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $3.14 | $0.83 | $3.42 | $1.33 | $1.80 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +4.3% | +15.6% | +6.9% | +1.5% | +3.4% |
IVZ leads in 1 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics). NTRS leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 3 tied.
NTRS vs IVZ vs STT vs BEN vs BK: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NTRS or IVZ or STT or BEN or BK a better buy right now?
For growth investors, State Street Corporation (STT) is the stronger pick with 19.
6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -9. 9% for Northern Trust Corporation (NTRS). State Street Corporation (STT) offers the better valuation at 18. 1x trailing P/E (12. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate State Street Corporation (STT) a "Buy" — based on 37 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — NTRS or IVZ or STT or BEN or BK?
On trailing P/E, State Street Corporation (STT) is the cheapest at 18.
1x versus Franklin Resources, Inc. at 33. 5x. On forward P/E, Invesco Ltd. is actually cheaper at 10. 4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: State Street Corporation wins at 1. 36x versus The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation's 2. 89x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — NTRS or IVZ or STT or BEN or BK?
Over the past 5 years, The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation (BK) delivered a total return of +168.
6%, compared to +7. 4% for Franklin Resources, Inc. (BEN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BK returned +267. 1% versus IVZ's +22. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — NTRS or IVZ or STT or BEN or BK?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation (BK) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
83β versus Invesco Ltd. 's 1. 67β — meaning IVZ is approximately 102% more volatile than BK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Invesco Ltd. (IVZ) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 78% versus 145% for State Street Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — NTRS or IVZ or STT or BEN or BK?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), State Street Corporation (STT) is pulling ahead at 19.
6% versus -9. 9% for Northern Trust Corporation (NTRS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation grew EPS 49. 1% year-over-year, compared to -235. 6% for Invesco Ltd.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — NTRS or IVZ or STT or BEN or BK?
State Street Corporation (STT) is the more profitable company, earning 12.
2% net margin versus -4. 4% for Invesco Ltd. — meaning it keeps 12. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NTRS leads at 16. 3% versus -10. 9% for IVZ. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BEN leads at 80. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is NTRS or IVZ or STT or BEN or BK more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, State Street Corporation (STT) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 36x versus The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation's 2. 89x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, Invesco Ltd. (IVZ) trades at 10. 4x forward P/E versus 14. 9x for The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation — 4. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for IVZ: 10. 8% to $29. 72.
08Which pays a better dividend — NTRS or IVZ or STT or BEN or BK?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Franklin Resources, Inc. (BEN) offers the highest yield at 4. 3%, versus 1. 4% for The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation (BK).
09Is NTRS or IVZ or STT or BEN or BK better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation (BK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
83), 1. 4% yield, +267. 1% 10Y return). Invesco Ltd. (IVZ) carries a higher beta of 1. 67 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (BK: +267. 1%, IVZ: +22. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between NTRS and IVZ and STT and BEN and BK?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: NTRS is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; IVZ is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; STT is a mid-cap high-growth stock; BEN is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; BK is a mid-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.