Software - Application
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
NTWK vs DSGX vs SAIA vs GTLS vs FWRD
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Application
Trucking
Industrial - Machinery
Integrated Freight & Logistics
NTWK vs DSGX vs SAIA vs GTLS vs FWRD — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Software - Application | Trucking | Industrial - Machinery | Integrated Freight & Logistics |
| Market Cap | $49M | $6.31B | $11.97B | $9.93B | $547M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $70M | $731M | $3.25B | $4.26B | $2.46B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $4M | $164M | $255M | $40M | $-91M |
| Gross Margin | 48.8% | 71.4% | 18.4% | 32.6% | 23.1% |
| Operating Margin | 6.0% | 30.4% | 10.8% | 8.5% | 2.1% |
| Forward P/E | 16.6x | 39.3x | 42.3x | 16.4x | — |
| Total Debt | $9M | $8M | $418M | $3.74B | $2.16B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $17M | $354M | $20M | $366M | $106M |
NTWK vs DSGX vs SAIA vs GTLS vs FWRD — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| NetSol Technologies… (NTWK) | 100 | 130.4 | +30.4% |
| The Descartes Syste… (DSGX) | 100 | 154.2 | +54.2% |
| Saia, Inc. (SAIA) | 100 | 414.0 | +314.0% |
| Chart Industries, I… (GTLS) | 100 | 528.4 | +428.4% |
| Forward Air Corpora… (FWRD) | 100 | 34.9 | -65.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NTWK vs DSGX vs SAIA vs GTLS vs FWRD
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
NTWK ranks third and is worth considering specifically for valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.65 vs SAIA's 3.29
- Better valuation composite
DSGX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 14.4%, EPS growth 16.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 15.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.71, Low D/E 0.5%, current ratio 2.16x
- Beta 0.71, current ratio 2.16x
- 14.4% revenue growth vs SAIA's 0.8%
SAIA is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 15.7% 10Y total return vs GTLS's 7.7%
- +72.7% vs DSGX's -31.7%
GTLS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.56, yield 0.3%
- Beta 0.56 vs FWRD's 2.28, lower leverage
- 0.3% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Among these 5 stocks, FWRD doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 14.4% revenue growth vs SAIA's 0.8% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 22.5% margin vs FWRD's -3.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.56 vs FWRD's 2.28, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 0.3% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +72.7% vs DSGX's -31.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 9.2% ROA vs FWRD's -3.3%, ROIC 14.9% vs 1.2% |
NTWK vs DSGX vs SAIA vs GTLS vs FWRD — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
NTWK vs DSGX vs SAIA vs GTLS vs FWRD — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
DSGX leads in 2 of 6 categories
NTWK leads 1 • GTLS leads 1 • FWRD leads 1 • SAIA leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DSGX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GTLS is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.3B annually — 61.1x NTWK's $70M. DSGX is the more profitable business, keeping 22.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FWRD's -3.7%. On growth, NTWK holds the edge at +21.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $70M | $731M | $3.3B | $4.3B | $2.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $5M | $310M | $602M | $644M | $206M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $4M | $164M | $255M | $40M | -$91M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$1M | $261M | $261M | $203M | $38M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +48.8% | +71.4% | +18.4% | +32.6% | +23.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +6.0% | +30.4% | +10.8% | +8.5% | +2.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +5.1% | +22.5% | +7.8% | +0.9% | -3.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -1.5% | +35.8% | +8.0% | +4.8% | +1.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +21.1% | +17.2% | +2.4% | -2.5% | -5.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +120.0% | +23.3% | 0.0% | -36.1% | +35.1% |
Valuation Metrics
NTWK leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 16.6x trailing earnings, NTWK trades at a 97% valuation discount to GTLS's 628.5x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), NTWK offers better value at 0.65x vs SAIA's 3.67x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $49M | $6.3B | $12.0B | $9.9B | $547M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $41M | $6.0B | $12.4B | $13.3B | $2.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 16.64x | 38.42x | 47.16x | 628.45x | -4.98x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 39.34x | 42.28x | 16.40x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.65x | 1.50x | 3.67x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 8.24x | 18.10x | 20.59x | 14.33x | 13.75x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.74x | 8.47x | 3.70x | 2.33x | 0.22x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.14x | 3.99x | 4.67x | 2.79x | 3.32x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 23.71x | 438.03x | 48.95x | 35.82x |
Profitability & Efficiency
DSGX leads this category, winning 9 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
DSGX delivers a 10.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $11 in annual profit, vs $-53 for FWRD. DSGX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FWRD's 13.36x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), DSGX scores 7/9 vs FWRD's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +8.5% | +10.7% | +10.0% | +1.2% | -52.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +5.7% | +9.2% | +7.3% | +0.4% | -3.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +8.5% | +14.9% | +9.4% | +7.4% | +1.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +8.4% | +15.6% | +11.5% | +8.6% | +1.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 7 | 6 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.22x | 0.01x | 0.16x | 1.11x | 13.36x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$8M | -$346M | $398M | $3.4B | $2.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $17M | $354M | $20M | $366M | $106M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $9M | $8M | $418M | $3.7B | $2.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 13.34x | 229.22x | 23.88x | 1.08x | 0.32x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — NTWK and SAIA each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SAIA five years ago would be worth $18,332 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,978 for FWRD. Over the past 12 months, SAIA leads with a +72.7% total return vs DSGX's -31.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NTWK at 19.1% vs FWRD's -42.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +43.4% | -13.8% | +33.1% | +0.6% | -31.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +69.8% | -31.7% | +72.7% | +37.6% | +0.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +69.1% | -5.1% | +56.0% | +62.7% | -81.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -2.1% | +19.7% | +83.3% | +29.5% | -80.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -40.2% | +295.4% | +1567.7% | +772.5% | -47.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +19.1% | -1.7% | +16.0% | +17.6% | -42.8% |
Risk & Volatility
GTLS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
GTLS is the less volatile stock with a 0.56 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FWRD's 2.28 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GTLS currently trades 99.5% from its 52-week high vs FWRD's 53.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.94x | 0.71x | 1.90x | 0.56x | 2.28x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $5.75 | $117.35 | $457.99 | $208.51 | $32.47 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.34 | $62.56 | $248.37 | $140.50 | $14.81 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +72.3% | +62.5% | +98.0% | +99.5% | +53.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 68.4 | 47.7 | 60.4 | 51.2 | 42.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 28K | 583K | 523K | 1.6M | 733K |
Analyst Outlook
FWRD leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: DSGX as "Buy", SAIA as "Buy", GTLS as "Buy", FWRD as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 113.5% upside for FWRD (target: $37) vs -6.5% for GTLS (target: $194). GTLS is the only dividend payer here at 0.29% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $103.50 | $422.67 | $193.81 | $37.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 14 | 32 | 37 | 21 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | +0.3% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | — | — | 1 | 8 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | $0.60 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +3.1% | +0.0% | +0.1% | 0.0% | +0.2% |
DSGX leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). NTWK leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
NTWK vs DSGX vs SAIA vs GTLS vs FWRD: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NTWK or DSGX or SAIA or GTLS or FWRD a better buy right now?
For growth investors, The Descartes Systems Group Inc.
(DSGX) is the stronger pick with 14. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 0. 8% for Saia, Inc. (SAIA). NetSol Technologies, Inc. (NTWK) offers the better valuation at 16. 6x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate The Descartes Systems Group Inc. (DSGX) a "Buy" — based on 14 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — NTWK or DSGX or SAIA or GTLS or FWRD?
On trailing P/E, NetSol Technologies, Inc.
(NTWK) is the cheapest at 16. 6x versus Chart Industries, Inc. at 628. 5x. On forward P/E, Chart Industries, Inc. is actually cheaper at 16. 4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: The Descartes Systems Group Inc. wins at 1. 53x versus Saia, Inc. 's 3. 29x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — NTWK or DSGX or SAIA or GTLS or FWRD?
Over the past 5 years, Saia, Inc.
(SAIA) delivered a total return of +83. 3%, compared to -80. 2% for Forward Air Corporation (FWRD). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SAIA returned +1568% versus FWRD's -47. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — NTWK or DSGX or SAIA or GTLS or FWRD?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Chart Industries, Inc.
(GTLS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 56β versus Forward Air Corporation's 2. 28β — meaning FWRD is approximately 310% more volatile than GTLS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, The Descartes Systems Group Inc. (DSGX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 13% for Forward Air Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — NTWK or DSGX or SAIA or GTLS or FWRD?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), The Descartes Systems Group Inc.
(DSGX) is pulling ahead at 14. 4% versus 0. 8% for Saia, Inc. (SAIA). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: NetSol Technologies, Inc. grew EPS 316. 7% year-over-year, compared to -92. 0% for Chart Industries, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, GTLS leads at 38. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — NTWK or DSGX or SAIA or GTLS or FWRD?
The Descartes Systems Group Inc.
(DSGX) is the more profitable company, earning 22. 5% net margin versus -4. 3% for Forward Air Corporation — meaning it keeps 22. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: DSGX leads at 32. 3% versus 1. 5% for FWRD. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — DSGX leads at 65. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is NTWK or DSGX or SAIA or GTLS or FWRD more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, The Descartes Systems Group Inc. (DSGX) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 53x versus Saia, Inc. 's 3. 29x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, Chart Industries, Inc. (GTLS) trades at 16. 4x forward P/E versus 42. 3x for Saia, Inc. — 25. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FWRD: 113. 5% to $37. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — NTWK or DSGX or SAIA or GTLS or FWRD?
In this comparison, GTLS (0.
3% yield) pays a dividend. NTWK, DSGX, SAIA, FWRD do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is NTWK or DSGX or SAIA or GTLS or FWRD better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Chart Industries, Inc.
(GTLS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 56), +772. 5% 10Y return). Forward Air Corporation (FWRD) carries a higher beta of 2. 28 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (GTLS: +772. 5%, FWRD: -47. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between NTWK and DSGX and SAIA and GTLS and FWRD?
These companies operate in different sectors (NTWK (Technology) and DSGX (Technology) and SAIA (Industrials) and GTLS (Industrials) and FWRD (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: NTWK is a small-cap deep-value stock; DSGX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SAIA is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; GTLS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; FWRD is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.