Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
NVAX vs SNY vs PFE vs GSK
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Drug Manufacturers - General
Drug Manufacturers - General
Drug Manufacturers - General
NVAX vs SNY vs PFE vs GSK — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Drug Manufacturers - General | Drug Manufacturers - General | Drug Manufacturers - General |
| Market Cap | $1.50B | $104.28B | $150.63B | $101.56B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $596M | $46.72B | $63.31B | $33.34B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-88M | $7.81B | $7.49B | $6.40B |
| Gross Margin | 84.6% | 72.3% | 69.3% | 72.9% |
| Operating Margin | -11.2% | 13.6% | 23.4% | 26.9% |
| Forward P/E | 3.6x | 10.3x | 8.9x | 10.4x |
| Total Debt | $249M | $21.79B | $67.42B | $17.69B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $241M | $7.66B | $1.14B | $3.39B |
NVAX vs SNY vs PFE vs GSK — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Novavax, Inc. (NVAX) | 100 | 20.0 | -80.0% |
| Sanofi (SNY) | 100 | 87.9 | -12.1% |
| Pfizer Inc. (PFE) | 100 | 73.1 | -26.9% |
| GSK plc (GSK) | 100 | 120.5 | +20.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NVAX vs SNY vs PFE vs GSK
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
NVAX is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 64.7%, EPS growth 306.5%, 3Y rev CAGR -11.1%
- 64.7% revenue growth vs PFE's -1.6%
- Lower P/E (3.6x vs 10.4x)
- +55.1% vs SNY's -9.8%
SNY is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.51, Low D/E 30.4%, current ratio 1.09x
PFE lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
GSK carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.46, yield 6.6%
- 63.0% 10Y total return vs SNY's 57.1%
- Beta 0.46, yield 6.6%, current ratio 0.82x
- 19.2% margin vs NVAX's -14.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 64.7% revenue growth vs PFE's -1.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (3.6x vs 10.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 19.2% margin vs NVAX's -14.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.46 vs NVAX's 2.11 | |
| Dividends | 6.6% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs PFE's 6.5%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +55.1% vs SNY's -9.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 8.3% ROA vs NVAX's -7.4% |
NVAX vs SNY vs PFE vs GSK — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
NVAX vs SNY vs PFE vs GSK — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
GSK leads in 3 of 6 categories
NVAX leads 1 • SNY leads 0 • PFE leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GSK leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PFE is the larger business by revenue, generating $63.3B annually — 106.2x NVAX's $596M. GSK is the more profitable business, keeping 19.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NVAX's -14.7%. On growth, SNY holds the edge at +59.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $596M | $46.7B | $63.3B | $33.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$47M | $9.6B | $21.0B | $11.7B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$88M | $7.8B | $7.5B | $6.4B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$96M | $8.3B | $9.5B | $7.4B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +84.6% | +72.3% | +69.3% | +72.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -11.2% | +13.6% | +23.4% | +26.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -14.7% | +16.7% | +11.8% | +19.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -16.1% | +17.7% | +15.0% | +22.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -79.1% | +59.9% | +5.4% | +1.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -102.0% | -5.2% | -9.5% | +10.3% |
Valuation Metrics
NVAX leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 3.6x trailing earnings, NVAX trades at a 81% valuation discount to PFE's 19.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, NVAX's 2.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than SNY's 10.8x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.5B | $104.3B | $150.6B | $101.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.5B | $120.9B | $216.9B | $121.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 3.63x | 18.10x | 19.47x | 6.68x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 10.26x | 8.94x | 10.43x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 0.47x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 2.56x | 10.77x | 10.66x | 8.35x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.34x | 1.90x | 2.41x | 2.29x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 1.25x | 1.74x | 2.40x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 9.98x | 16.60x | 12.82x |
Profitability & Efficiency
GSK leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GSK delivers a 31.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $31 in annual profit, vs $8 for PFE. SNY carries lower financial leverage with a 0.30x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to GSK's 1.11x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), GSK scores 8/9 vs NVAX's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | +10.8% | +8.3% | +31.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -7.4% | +6.1% | +3.6% | +8.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +5.5% | +7.5% | +22.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +100.4% | +6.3% | +9.0% | +21.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 7 | 7 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.30x | 0.78x | 1.11x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $8M | $14.1B | $66.3B | $14.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $241M | $7.7B | $1.1B | $3.4B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $249M | $21.8B | $67.4B | $17.7B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -5.10x | 17.51x | 4.02x | 12.86x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
GSK leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GSK five years ago would be worth $15,357 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $524 for NVAX. Over the past 12 months, NVAX leads with a +55.1% total return vs SNY's -9.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GSK at 14.6% vs PFE's -6.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +29.5% | -6.8% | +6.9% | +2.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +55.1% | -9.8% | +23.7% | +40.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +23.9% | -7.0% | -18.4% | +50.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -94.8% | +2.5% | -13.3% | +53.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -90.4% | +57.1% | +29.6% | +63.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +7.4% | -2.4% | -6.6% | +14.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — PFE and GSK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
GSK is the less volatile stock with a 0.46 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NVAX's 2.11 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PFE currently trades 92.1% from its 52-week high vs NVAX's 77.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.11x | 0.51x | 0.54x | 0.46x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $11.97 | $53.36 | $28.75 | $61.70 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $5.80 | $43.09 | $21.97 | $35.45 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +77.1% | +80.9% | +92.1% | +81.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 64.4 | 34.1 | 44.2 | 31.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 4.4M | 3.2M | 33.3M | 4.4M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — PFE and GSK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: NVAX as "Buy", SNY as "Buy", PFE as "Hold", GSK as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 95.0% upside for NVAX (target: $18) vs 3.0% for PFE (target: $27). For income investors, GSK offers the higher dividend yield at 6.56% vs SNY's 5.11%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $18.00 | $50.00 | $27.27 | $52.45 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 23 | 27 | 39 | 29 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +5.1% | +6.5% | +6.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 0 | 15 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.88 | $1.72 | $2.44 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.3% | +5.4% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
GSK leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). NVAX leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
NVAX vs SNY vs PFE vs GSK: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NVAX or SNY or PFE or GSK a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Novavax, Inc.
(NVAX) is the stronger pick with 64. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 6% for Pfizer Inc. (PFE). Novavax, Inc. (NVAX) offers the better valuation at 3. 6x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Novavax, Inc. (NVAX) a "Buy" — based on 23 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — NVAX or SNY or PFE or GSK?
On trailing P/E, Novavax, Inc.
(NVAX) is the cheapest at 3. 6x versus Pfizer Inc. at 19. 5x. On forward P/E, Pfizer Inc. is actually cheaper at 8. 9x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — NVAX or SNY or PFE or GSK?
Over the past 5 years, GSK plc (GSK) delivered a total return of +53.
6%, compared to -94. 8% for Novavax, Inc. (NVAX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GSK returned +63. 0% versus NVAX's -90. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — NVAX or SNY or PFE or GSK?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), GSK plc (GSK) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
46β versus Novavax, Inc. 's 2. 11β — meaning NVAX is approximately 354% more volatile than GSK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Sanofi (SNY) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 30% versus 111% for GSK plc — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — NVAX or SNY or PFE or GSK?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Novavax, Inc.
(NVAX) is pulling ahead at 64. 7% versus -1. 6% for Pfizer Inc. (PFE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: GSK plc grew EPS 348. 4% year-over-year, compared to -7. 3% for Sanofi. Over a 3-year CAGR, SNY leads at 4. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — NVAX or SNY or PFE or GSK?
Novavax, Inc.
(NVAX) is the more profitable company, earning 39. 2% net margin versus 12. 4% for Pfizer Inc. — meaning it keeps 39. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NVAX leads at 50. 1% versus 13. 6% for SNY. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NVAX leads at 93. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is NVAX or SNY or PFE or GSK more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Pfizer Inc.
(PFE) trades at 8. 9x forward P/E versus 10. 4x for GSK plc — 1. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NVAX: 95. 0% to $18. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — NVAX or SNY or PFE or GSK?
In this comparison, GSK (6.
6% yield), PFE (6. 5% yield), SNY (5. 1% yield) pay a dividend. NVAX does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is NVAX or SNY or PFE or GSK better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, GSK plc (GSK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
46), 6. 6% yield). Novavax, Inc. (NVAX) carries a higher beta of 2. 11 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (GSK: +63. 0%, NVAX: -90. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between NVAX and SNY and PFE and GSK?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: NVAX is a small-cap high-growth stock; SNY is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; PFE is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; GSK is a mid-cap deep-value stock. SNY, PFE, GSK pay a dividend while NVAX does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.