Internet Content & Information
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
NXDR vs NFLX vs PINS vs SNAP
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Entertainment
Internet Content & Information
Internet Content & Information
NXDR vs NFLX vs PINS vs SNAP — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Internet Content & Information | Entertainment | Internet Content & Information | Internet Content & Information |
| Market Cap | $744M | $374.00B | $14.34B | $10.11B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $265M | $45.18B | $4.37B | $6.10B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-44M | $10.98B | $334M | $-410M |
| Gross Margin | 83.9% | 48.5% | 79.9% | 55.8% |
| Operating Margin | -22.7% | 29.5% | 6.3% | -6.8% |
| Forward P/E | — | 24.8x | 11.8x | — |
| Total Debt | $56M | $14.46B | $262M | $4.70B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $63M | $9.03B | $969M | $1.03B |
NXDR vs NFLX vs PINS vs SNAP — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Mar 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nextdoor Holdings, … (NXDR) | 100 | 19.0 | -81.0% |
| Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) | 100 | 169.2 | +69.2% |
| Pinterest, Inc. (PINS) | 100 | 29.1 | -70.9% |
| Snap Inc. (SNAP) | 100 | 11.4 | -88.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NXDR vs NFLX vs PINS vs SNAP
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
NXDR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if momentum is your priority.
- +27.2% vs SNAP's -26.4%
NFLX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 0.39
- Rev growth 15.9%, EPS growth 27.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 12.6%
- 8.8% 10Y total return vs PINS's -11.6%
- 15.9% revenue growth vs NXDR's 4.2%
PINS is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.27, Low D/E 5.5%, current ratio 7.64x
- Beta 1.27, current ratio 7.64x
- Better valuation composite
SNAP lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 15.9% revenue growth vs NXDR's 4.2% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 24.3% margin vs NXDR's -16.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.39 vs SNAP's 2.14, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +27.2% vs SNAP's -26.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 19.8% ROA vs NXDR's -9.1%, ROIC 29.8% vs -12.4% |
NXDR vs NFLX vs PINS vs SNAP — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
NXDR vs NFLX vs PINS vs SNAP — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
NFLX leads in 3 of 6 categories
NXDR leads 0 • PINS leads 0 • SNAP leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — NXDR and NFLX and PINS each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NFLX is the larger business by revenue, generating $45.2B annually — 170.4x NXDR's $265M. NFLX is the more profitable business, keeping 24.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NXDR's -16.5%. On growth, PINS holds the edge at +17.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $265M | $45.2B | $4.4B | $6.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$61M | $30.1B | $294M | -$291M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$44M | $11.0B | $334M | -$410M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $7M | $9.5B | $1.2B | $609M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +83.9% | +48.5% | +79.9% | +55.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -22.7% | +29.5% | +6.3% | -6.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -16.5% | +24.3% | +7.6% | -6.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +2.5% | +20.9% | +27.6% | +10.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +13.8% | +17.6% | +17.8% | +12.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +47.5% | +31.1% | -10.3% | +39.2% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — PINS and SNAP each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 34.9x trailing earnings, NFLX trades at a 1% valuation discount to PINS's 35.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, NFLX's 12.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than PINS's 39.5x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $744M | $374.0B | $14.3B | $10.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $737M | $379.4B | $13.6B | $13.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -13.71x | 34.89x | 35.37x | -22.17x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 24.80x | 11.84x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.06x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 12.61x | 39.51x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.89x | 8.28x | 3.40x | 1.70x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.72x | 14.32x | 3.13x | 4.51x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 126.36x | 39.53x | 11.46x | 23.12x |
Profitability & Efficiency
NFLX leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NFLX delivers a 41.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $-19 for SNAP. PINS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.06x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SNAP's 2.06x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NFLX scores 7/9 vs SNAP's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -10.3% | +41.3% | +7.8% | -18.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -9.1% | +19.8% | +6.3% | -5.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -12.4% | +29.8% | +6.1% | -6.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -15.3% | +30.5% | +6.4% | -8.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 7 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.13x | 0.54x | 0.06x | 2.06x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$8M | $5.4B | -$707M | $3.7B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $63M | $9.0B | $969M | $1.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $56M | $14.5B | $262M | $4.7B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 17.33x | 23.20x | -7.67x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NFLX leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NFLX five years ago would be worth $17,519 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,094 for SNAP. Over the past 12 months, NXDR leads with a +27.2% total return vs SNAP's -26.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NFLX at 38.6% vs SNAP's -10.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -7.7% | -3.0% | -18.8% | -26.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +27.2% | -23.6% | -21.1% | -26.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -6.3% | +166.5% | -0.1% | -28.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -81.1% | +75.2% | -64.0% | -89.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -80.8% | +875.3% | -11.6% | -75.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -2.2% | +38.6% | -0.0% | -10.8% |
Risk & Volatility
NFLX leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NFLX is the less volatile stock with a 0.39 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SNAP's 2.14 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NFLX currently trades 65.8% from its 52-week high vs NXDR's 51.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.48x | 0.39x | 1.27x | 2.14x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $3.72 | $134.12 | $39.93 | $10.41 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.32 | $75.01 | $13.84 | $3.81 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +51.6% | +65.8% | +54.0% | +57.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 60.1 | 35.3 | 60.2 | 61.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3.6M | 44.0M | 16.1M | 49.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: NXDR as "Hold", NFLX as "Buy", PINS as "Buy", SNAP as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 69.3% upside for NXDR (target: $3) vs 17.5% for PINS (target: $25).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $3.25 | $116.29 | $25.36 | $7.89 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 5 | 99 | 47 | 72 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.5% | +2.4% | +6.5% | +27.2% |
NFLX leads in 3 of 6 categories — strongest in Profitability & Efficiency and Total Returns. 2 categories are tied.
NXDR vs NFLX vs PINS vs SNAP: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NXDR or NFLX or PINS or SNAP a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Netflix, Inc.
(NFLX) is the stronger pick with 15. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 4. 2% for Nextdoor Holdings, Inc. (NXDR). Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) offers the better valuation at 34. 9x trailing P/E (24. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) a "Buy" — based on 99 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — NXDR or NFLX or PINS or SNAP?
On trailing P/E, Netflix, Inc.
(NFLX) is the cheapest at 34. 9x versus Pinterest, Inc. at 35. 4x. On forward P/E, Pinterest, Inc. is actually cheaper at 11. 8x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — NXDR or NFLX or PINS or SNAP?
Over the past 5 years, Netflix, Inc.
(NFLX) delivered a total return of +75. 2%, compared to -89. 1% for Snap Inc. (SNAP). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NFLX returned +875. 3% versus NXDR's -80. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — NXDR or NFLX or PINS or SNAP?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Netflix, Inc.
(NFLX) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 39β versus Snap Inc. 's 2. 14β — meaning SNAP is approximately 450% more volatile than NFLX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Pinterest, Inc. (PINS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 6% versus 2% for Snap Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — NXDR or NFLX or PINS or SNAP?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Netflix, Inc.
(NFLX) is pulling ahead at 15. 9% versus 4. 2% for Nextdoor Holdings, Inc. (NXDR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Nextdoor Holdings, Inc. grew EPS 44. 0% year-over-year, compared to -77. 2% for Pinterest, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, PINS leads at 14. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — NXDR or NFLX or PINS or SNAP?
Netflix, Inc.
(NFLX) is the more profitable company, earning 24. 3% net margin versus -21. 0% for Nextdoor Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 24. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NFLX leads at 29. 5% versus -27. 9% for NXDR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NXDR leads at 84. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is NXDR or NFLX or PINS or SNAP more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Pinterest, Inc.
(PINS) trades at 11. 8x forward P/E versus 24. 8x for Netflix, Inc. — 13. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NXDR: 69. 3% to $3. 25.
08Which pays a better dividend — NXDR or NFLX or PINS or SNAP?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is NXDR or NFLX or PINS or SNAP better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Netflix, Inc.
(NFLX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 39), +875. 3% 10Y return). Snap Inc. (SNAP) carries a higher beta of 2. 14 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (NFLX: +875. 3%, SNAP: -75. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between NXDR and NFLX and PINS and SNAP?
Both stocks operate in the Communication Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: NXDR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NFLX is a large-cap high-growth stock; PINS is a mid-cap high-growth stock; SNAP is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Revenue Growth > 6%
- Gross Margin > 50%
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.