Internet Content & Information
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
NXDR vs NFLX vs PINS vs SNAP vs META
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Entertainment
Internet Content & Information
Internet Content & Information
Internet Content & Information
NXDR vs NFLX vs PINS vs SNAP vs META — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Internet Content & Information | Entertainment | Internet Content & Information | Internet Content & Information | Internet Content & Information |
| Market Cap | $744M | $374.00B | $14.34B | $10.11B | $1.56T |
| Revenue (TTM) | $265M | $45.18B | $4.37B | $6.10B | $214.96B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-44M | $10.98B | $334M | $-410M | $70.59B |
| Gross Margin | 83.9% | 48.5% | 79.9% | 55.8% | 81.9% |
| Operating Margin | -22.7% | 29.5% | 6.3% | -6.8% | 41.2% |
| Forward P/E | — | 24.5x | 11.2x | — | 20.4x |
| Total Debt | $56M | $14.46B | $262M | $4.70B | $83.90B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $63M | $9.03B | $969M | $1.03B | $35.87B |
NXDR vs NFLX vs PINS vs SNAP vs META — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Mar 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nextdoor Holdings, … (NXDR) | 100 | 20.0 | -80.0% |
| Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) | 100 | 167.7 | +67.7% |
| Pinterest, Inc. (PINS) | 100 | 28.7 | -71.3% |
| Snap Inc. (SNAP) | 100 | 11.6 | -88.4% |
| Meta Platforms, Inc. (META) | 100 | 207.0 | +107.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NXDR vs NFLX vs PINS vs SNAP vs META
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
NXDR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if momentum is your priority.
- +27.2% vs SNAP's -26.4%
NFLX ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- beta 0.39
- 8.8% 10Y total return vs META's 421.2%
- PEG 0.74 vs META's 1.11
- Beta 0.39 vs SNAP's 2.14, lower leverage
PINS is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.27, Low D/E 5.5%, current ratio 7.64x
- Beta 1.27, current ratio 7.64x
- Lower P/E (11.2x vs 20.4x)
Among these 5 stocks, SNAP doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
META carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 22.2%, EPS growth -1.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 19.9%
- 22.2% revenue growth vs NXDR's 4.2%
- 32.8% margin vs NXDR's -16.5%
- 0.3% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 22.2% revenue growth vs NXDR's 4.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (11.2x vs 20.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 32.8% margin vs NXDR's -16.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.39 vs SNAP's 2.14, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 0.3% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +27.2% vs SNAP's -26.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 20.8% ROA vs NXDR's -9.1%, ROIC 27.6% vs -12.4% |
NXDR vs NFLX vs PINS vs SNAP vs META — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
NXDR vs NFLX vs PINS vs SNAP vs META — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
NFLX leads in 2 of 6 categories
META leads 1 • NXDR leads 0 • PINS leads 0 • SNAP leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
META leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
META is the larger business by revenue, generating $215.0B annually — 810.8x NXDR's $265M. META is the more profitable business, keeping 32.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NXDR's -16.5%. On growth, META holds the edge at +33.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $265M | $45.2B | $4.4B | $6.1B | $215.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$61M | $30.1B | $294M | -$291M | $109.3B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$44M | $11.0B | $334M | -$410M | $70.6B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $7M | $9.5B | $1.2B | $609M | $48.3B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +83.9% | +48.5% | +79.9% | +55.8% | +81.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -22.7% | +29.5% | +6.3% | -6.8% | +41.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -16.5% | +24.3% | +7.6% | -6.7% | +32.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +2.5% | +20.9% | +27.6% | +10.0% | +22.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +13.8% | +17.6% | +17.8% | +12.1% | +33.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +47.5% | +31.1% | -10.3% | +39.2% | +62.4% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — NFLX and PINS and SNAP each lead in 2 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 26.3x trailing earnings, META trades at a 26% valuation discount to PINS's 35.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), NFLX offers better value at 1.06x vs META's 1.43x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $744M | $374.0B | $14.3B | $10.1B | $1.56T |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $737M | $379.4B | $13.6B | $13.8B | $1.61T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -13.71x | 34.89x | 35.37x | -22.17x | 26.26x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 24.52x | 11.18x | — | 20.36x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.06x | — | — | 1.43x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 12.61x | 39.51x | — | 15.81x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.89x | 8.28x | 3.40x | 1.70x | 7.78x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.72x | 14.32x | 3.13x | 4.51x | 7.31x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 126.36x | 39.53x | 11.46x | 23.12x | 33.90x |
Profitability & Efficiency
NFLX leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NFLX delivers a 41.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $-19 for SNAP. PINS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.06x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SNAP's 2.06x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NFLX scores 7/9 vs META's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -10.3% | +41.3% | +7.8% | -18.9% | +33.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -9.1% | +19.8% | +6.3% | -5.4% | +20.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -12.4% | +29.8% | +6.1% | -6.9% | +27.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -15.3% | +30.5% | +6.4% | -8.1% | +29.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 7 | 6 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.13x | 0.54x | 0.06x | 2.06x | 0.39x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$8M | $5.4B | -$707M | $3.7B | $48.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $63M | $9.0B | $969M | $1.0B | $35.9B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $56M | $14.5B | $262M | $4.7B | $83.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 17.33x | 23.20x | -7.67x | 78.84x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NFLX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in META five years ago would be worth $19,476 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,094 for SNAP. Over the past 12 months, NXDR leads with a +27.2% total return vs SNAP's -26.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NFLX at 38.6% vs SNAP's -10.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -7.7% | -3.0% | -18.8% | -26.4% | -5.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +27.2% | -23.6% | -21.1% | -26.4% | +3.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -6.3% | +166.5% | -0.1% | -28.9% | +166.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -81.1% | +75.2% | -64.0% | -89.1% | +94.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -80.8% | +875.3% | -11.6% | -75.6% | +421.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -2.2% | +38.6% | -0.0% | -10.8% | +38.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — NFLX and META each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NFLX is the less volatile stock with a 0.39 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SNAP's 2.14 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. META currently trades 77.5% from its 52-week high vs NXDR's 51.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.48x | 0.35x | 1.18x | 2.09x | 1.55x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $3.72 | $134.12 | $39.93 | $10.41 | $796.25 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.32 | $75.01 | $13.84 | $3.81 | $520.26 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +51.6% | +65.8% | +54.0% | +57.5% | +77.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 60.1 | 35.3 | 60.2 | 61.6 | 42.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3.6M | 44.0M | 16.1M | 49.1M | 15.6M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: NXDR as "Hold", NFLX as "Buy", PINS as "Buy", SNAP as "Hold", META as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 33.2% upside for META (target: $822) vs 17.2% for NXDR (target: $2). META is the only dividend payer here at 0.34% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $2.25 | $115.59 | $25.66 | $7.75 | $821.80 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 5 | 99 | 48 | 72 | 60 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | +0.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | — | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | $2.07 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.5% | +2.4% | +6.5% | +27.2% | +1.7% |
NFLX leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). META leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.
NXDR vs NFLX vs PINS vs SNAP vs META: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NXDR or NFLX or PINS or SNAP or META a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Meta Platforms, Inc.
(META) is the stronger pick with 22. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 4. 2% for Nextdoor Holdings, Inc. (NXDR). Meta Platforms, Inc. (META) offers the better valuation at 26. 3x trailing P/E (20. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) a "Buy" — based on 99 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — NXDR or NFLX or PINS or SNAP or META?
On trailing P/E, Meta Platforms, Inc.
(META) is the cheapest at 26. 3x versus Pinterest, Inc. at 35. 4x. On forward P/E, Pinterest, Inc. is actually cheaper at 11. 2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Netflix, Inc. wins at 0. 74x versus Meta Platforms, Inc. 's 1. 11x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — NXDR or NFLX or PINS or SNAP or META?
Over the past 5 years, Meta Platforms, Inc.
(META) delivered a total return of +94. 8%, compared to -89. 1% for Snap Inc. (SNAP). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NFLX returned +866. 6% versus NXDR's -79. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — NXDR or NFLX or PINS or SNAP or META?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Netflix, Inc.
(NFLX) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 35β versus Snap Inc. 's 2. 09β — meaning SNAP is approximately 490% more volatile than NFLX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Pinterest, Inc. (PINS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 6% versus 2% for Snap Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — NXDR or NFLX or PINS or SNAP or META?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Meta Platforms, Inc.
(META) is pulling ahead at 22. 2% versus 4. 2% for Nextdoor Holdings, Inc. (NXDR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Nextdoor Holdings, Inc. grew EPS 44. 0% year-over-year, compared to -77. 2% for Pinterest, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, META leads at 19. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — NXDR or NFLX or PINS or SNAP or META?
Meta Platforms, Inc.
(META) is the more profitable company, earning 30. 1% net margin versus -21. 0% for Nextdoor Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 30. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: META leads at 41. 4% versus -27. 9% for NXDR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NXDR leads at 84. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is NXDR or NFLX or PINS or SNAP or META more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 74x versus Meta Platforms, Inc. 's 1. 11x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Pinterest, Inc. (PINS) trades at 11. 2x forward P/E versus 24. 5x for Netflix, Inc. — 13. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for META: 33. 2% to $821. 80.
08Which pays a better dividend — NXDR or NFLX or PINS or SNAP or META?
In this comparison, META (0.
3% yield) pays a dividend. NXDR, NFLX, PINS, SNAP do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is NXDR or NFLX or PINS or SNAP or META better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Netflix, Inc.
(NFLX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 35), +866. 6% 10Y return). Snap Inc. (SNAP) carries a higher beta of 2. 09 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (NFLX: +866. 6%, SNAP: -75. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between NXDR and NFLX and PINS and SNAP and META?
Both stocks operate in the Communication Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: NXDR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NFLX is a large-cap high-growth stock; PINS is a mid-cap high-growth stock; SNAP is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; META is a mega-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Revenue Growth > 6%
- Gross Margin > 50%
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.