Shell Companies
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
OACC vs BFLY vs EXAS vs RLAY vs GH
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Devices
Medical - Diagnostics & Research
Biotechnology
Medical - Diagnostics & Research
OACC vs BFLY vs EXAS vs RLAY vs GH — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Shell Companies | Medical - Devices | Medical - Diagnostics & Research | Biotechnology | Medical - Diagnostics & Research |
| Market Cap | $263M | $1.09B | $20.02B | $2.41B | $12.55B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $103M | $3.25B | $11M | $1.08B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $5M | $-76M | $-208M | $-273M | $-433M |
| Gross Margin | — | 49.2% | 69.7% | 66.3% | 64.9% |
| Operating Margin | — | -79.5% | -6.4% | -27.8% | -41.4% |
| Forward P/E | 197.4x | — | 582.8x | — | — |
| Total Debt | $12K | $20M | $2.52B | $32M | $1.68B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1M | $150M | $956M | $84M | $378M |
OACC vs BFLY vs EXAS vs RLAY vs GH — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Dec 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oaktree Acquisition… (OACC) | 100 | 107.4 | +7.4% |
| Butterfly Network, … (BFLY) | 100 | 133.3 | +33.3% |
| Exact Sciences Corp… (EXAS) | 100 | 184.0 | +84.0% |
| Relay Therapeutics,… (RLAY) | 100 | 309.7 | +209.7% |
| Guardant Health, In… (GH) | 100 | 313.3 | +213.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: OACC vs BFLY vs EXAS vs RLAY vs GH
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
OACC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.08, Low D/E 0.0%, current ratio 2.14x
- Better valuation composite
- 0.8% margin vs RLAY's -25.5%
- 2.6% ROA vs RLAY's -40.1%
BFLY lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
EXAS ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- beta 0.05
- 16.7% 10Y total return vs OACC's 7.0%
- Beta 0.05, current ratio 2.43x
- Beta 0.05 vs BFLY's 3.23
RLAY is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 53.4%, EPS growth 31.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 123.2%
- 53.4% revenue growth vs EXAS's 17.7%
- +325.3% vs OACC's +2.4%
Among these 5 stocks, GH doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 53.4% revenue growth vs EXAS's 17.7% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 0.8% margin vs RLAY's -25.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.05 vs BFLY's 3.23 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +325.3% vs OACC's +2.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 2.6% ROA vs RLAY's -40.1% |
OACC vs BFLY vs EXAS vs RLAY vs GH — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
OACC vs BFLY vs EXAS vs RLAY vs GH — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
EXAS leads in 3 of 6 categories
OACC leads 1 • BFLY leads 0 • RLAY leads 0 • GH leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
EXAS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
EXAS and OACC operate at a comparable scale, with $3.2B and $0 in trailing revenue. EXAS is the more profitable business, keeping -6.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to RLAY's -25.5%. On growth, GH holds the edge at +48.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $103M | $3.2B | $11M | $1.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$847,195 | -$76M | -$41M | -$298M | -$418M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $5M | -$76M | -$208M | -$273M | -$433M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$278,200 | -$19M | $357M | -$213M | -$225M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +49.2% | +69.7% | +66.3% | +64.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | -79.5% | -6.4% | -27.8% | -41.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | -73.6% | -6.4% | -25.5% | -40.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | -18.3% | +11.0% | -20.0% | -20.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +25.0% | +23.1% | -60.9% | +48.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +16.0% | +90.4% | +10.9% | -10.4% |
Valuation Metrics
EXAS leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $263M | $1.1B | $20.0B | $2.4B | $12.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $262M | $958M | $21.6B | $2.4B | $13.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 197.42x | -13.42x | -95.37x | -7.93x | -28.83x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 582.83x | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 9999.00x | — | — | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 11.15x | 6.16x | 157.23x | 12.78x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.40x | 5.25x | 8.24x | 3.86x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 56.10x | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
OACC leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
OACC delivers a 0.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $0 in annual profit, vs $-44 for RLAY. OACC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to EXAS's 1.05x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), EXAS scores 7/9 vs BFLY's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +0.0% | -36.8% | -8.7% | -43.9% | — |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.6% | -25.6% | -3.5% | -40.1% | -26.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | -76.8% | -3.6% | -37.3% | -34.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -0.0% | -39.3% | -4.0% | -42.7% | -29.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 3 | 7 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.00x | 0.10x | 1.05x | 0.06x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$1M | -$130M | $1.6B | -$52M | $1.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1M | $150M | $956M | $84M | $378M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $11,824 | $20M | $2.5B | $32M | $1.7B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -71.59x | -5.47x | — | -250.66x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — RLAY and GH each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in OACC five years ago would be worth $10,700 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,711 for BFLY. Over the past 12 months, RLAY leads with a +325.3% total return vs OACC's +2.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GH at 59.6% vs OACC's 2.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +0.8% | +10.9% | +3.1% | +56.0% | -5.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +2.4% | +83.3% | +97.7% | +325.3% | +129.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +7.0% | +97.2% | +53.0% | +17.9% | +306.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +7.0% | -62.9% | +6.1% | -54.0% | -21.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +7.0% | -58.0% | +1669.1% | -63.6% | +197.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +2.3% | +25.4% | +15.2% | +5.7% | +59.6% |
Risk & Volatility
EXAS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
EXAS is the less volatile stock with a 0.05 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BFLY's 3.23 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. EXAS currently trades 99.9% from its 52-week high vs BFLY's 72.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.08x | 3.23x | 0.05x | 1.77x | 0.86x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $10.74 | $5.72 | $104.98 | $17.31 | $120.74 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $10.30 | $1.32 | $38.81 | $2.67 | $36.36 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +99.6% | +72.7% | +99.9% | +73.7% | +79.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 47.6 | 41.6 | 76.4 | 43.0 | 55.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 38K | 5.2M | 4.3M | 3.1M | 1.9M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: BFLY as "Buy", EXAS as "Buy", RLAY as "Buy", GH as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 69.3% upside for RLAY (target: $22) vs 0.1% for EXAS (target: $105).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $5.42 | $105.00 | $21.60 | $133.14 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 7 | 41 | 15 | 30 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.1% | 0.0% | +0.1% |
EXAS leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). OACC leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 1 tied.
OACC vs BFLY vs EXAS vs RLAY vs GH: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is OACC or BFLY or EXAS or RLAY or GH a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Relay Therapeutics, Inc.
(RLAY) is the stronger pick with 53. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 17. 7% for Exact Sciences Corporation (EXAS). Oaktree Acquisition Corp. III Life Sciences (OACC) offers the better valuation at 197. 4x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Butterfly Network, Inc. (BFLY) a "Buy" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — OACC or BFLY or EXAS or RLAY or GH?
Over the past 5 years, Oaktree Acquisition Corp.
III Life Sciences (OACC) delivered a total return of +7. 0%, compared to -62. 9% for Butterfly Network, Inc. (BFLY). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: EXAS returned +1669% versus RLAY's -63. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — OACC or BFLY or EXAS or RLAY or GH?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Exact Sciences Corporation (EXAS) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
05β versus Butterfly Network, Inc. 's 3. 23β — meaning BFLY is approximately 6042% more volatile than EXAS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Oaktree Acquisition Corp. III Life Sciences (OACC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 105% for Exact Sciences Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — OACC or BFLY or EXAS or RLAY or GH?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Relay Therapeutics, Inc.
(RLAY) is pulling ahead at 53. 4% versus 17. 7% for Exact Sciences Corporation (EXAS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Exact Sciences Corporation grew EPS 80. 3% year-over-year, compared to 6. 7% for Guardant Health, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, RLAY leads at 123. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — OACC or BFLY or EXAS or RLAY or GH?
Oaktree Acquisition Corp.
III Life Sciences (OACC) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 0% net margin versus -1800. 6% for Relay Therapeutics, Inc. — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: OACC leads at 0. 0% versus -1971. 6% for RLAY. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RLAY leads at 76. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is OACC or BFLY or EXAS or RLAY or GH more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for RLAY: 69.
3% to $21. 60.
07Which pays a better dividend — OACC or BFLY or EXAS or RLAY or GH?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is OACC or BFLY or EXAS or RLAY or GH better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Exact Sciences Corporation (EXAS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
05), +1669% 10Y return). Butterfly Network, Inc. (BFLY) carries a higher beta of 3. 23 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (EXAS: +1669%, BFLY: -58. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between OACC and BFLY and EXAS and RLAY and GH?
These companies operate in different sectors (OACC (Financial Services) and BFLY (Healthcare) and EXAS (Healthcare) and RLAY (Healthcare) and GH (Healthcare)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: OACC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BFLY is a small-cap high-growth stock; EXAS is a mid-cap high-growth stock; RLAY is a small-cap high-growth stock; GH is a mid-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.