Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

OBA vs ACIC vs BFLY vs HCI vs SONO

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
OBA
Oxley Bridge Acquisition Limited

Shell Companies

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • CA
Market Cap$56K
5Y Perf.+1.7%
ACIC
American Coastal Insurance Corporation

Insurance - Property & Casualty

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$525M
5Y Perf.-2.4%
BFLY
Butterfly Network, Inc.

Medical - Devices

HealthcareNYSE • US
Market Cap$1.11B
5Y Perf.+112.0%
HCI
HCI Group, Inc.

Insurance - Property & Casualty

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$1.99B
5Y Perf.+0.4%
SONO
Sonos, Inc.

Consumer Electronics

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$1.80B
5Y Perf.+37.7%

OBA vs ACIC vs BFLY vs HCI vs SONO — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
OBA logoOBA
ACIC logoACIC
BFLY logoBFLY
HCI logoHCI
SONO logoSONO
IndustryShell CompaniesInsurance - Property & CasualtyMedical - DevicesInsurance - Property & CasualtyConsumer Electronics
Market Cap$56K$525M$1.11B$1.99B$1.80B
Revenue (TTM)$0.00$335M$103M$927M$1.46B
Net Income (TTM)$-117.00$107M$-76M$314M$-41M
Gross Margin63.8%49.2%66.5%44.8%
Operating Margin42.6%-79.5%47.9%2.0%
Forward P/E7.3x9.2x47.3x
Total Debt$133K$152M$20M$68M$60M
Cash & Equiv.$0.00$199M$150M$1.21B$175M

OBA vs ACIC vs BFLY vs HCI vs SONOLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

OBA
ACIC
BFLY
HCI
SONO
StockJun 25May 26Return
Oxley Bridge Acquis… (OBA)100101.7+1.7%
American Coastal In… (ACIC)10097.6-2.4%
Butterfly Network, … (BFLY)100212.0+112.0%
HCI Group, Inc. (HCI)100100.4+0.4%
Sonos, Inc. (SONO)100137.7+37.7%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: OBA vs ACIC vs BFLY vs HCI vs SONO

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: HCI leads in 5 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. American Coastal Insurance Corporation is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency. BFLY also leads in specific categories worth noting. This set spans 3 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
OBA
Oxley Bridge Acquisition Limited
The Financial Play

OBA lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: financial services exposure
ACIC
American Coastal Insurance Corporation
The Insurance Pick

ACIC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value is your priority.

  • Lower P/E (7.3x vs 47.3x)
Best for: value
BFLY
Butterfly Network, Inc.
The Momentum Pick

BFLY ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.

  • +94.5% vs ACIC's -0.3%
Best for: momentum
HCI
HCI Group, Inc.
The Insurance Pick

HCI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.

  • Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.39, yield 1.0%
  • Rev growth 20.2%, EPS growth 179.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 22.3%
  • 436.8% 10Y total return vs ACIC's -22.2%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.39, Low D/E 6.1%, current ratio 1.24x
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
SONO
Sonos, Inc.
The Technology Pick

Among these 5 stocks, SONO doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: technology exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthHCI logoHCI20.2% revenue growth vs SONO's -4.9%
ValueACIC logoACICLower P/E (7.3x vs 47.3x)
Quality / MarginsHCI logoHCI33.9% margin vs BFLY's -73.6%
Stability / SafetyHCI logoHCIBeta 0.39 vs BFLY's 3.28, lower leverage
DividendsHCI logoHCI1.0% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)BFLY logoBFLY+94.5% vs ACIC's -0.3%
Efficiency (ROA)HCI logoHCI13.2% ROA vs BFLY's -25.6%, ROIC 6.8% vs -76.8%

OBA vs ACIC vs BFLY vs HCI vs SONO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

OBAOxley Bridge Acquisition Limited

Segment breakdown not available.

ACICAmerican Coastal Insurance Corporation

Segment breakdown not available.

BFLYButterfly Network, Inc.
FY 2025
Product
65.0%$63M
Software And Other Services
35.0%$34M
HCIHCI Group, Inc.
FY 2025
Real Estate Operations
100.0%$15M
SONOSonos, Inc.
FY 2025
Sonos Speakers
77.7%$1.1B
Sonos System Products
17.3%$249M
Partner Products And Other Revenue
5.0%$72M

OBA vs ACIC vs BFLY vs HCI vs SONO — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLHCILAGGINGSONO

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

HCI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

SONO and OBA operate at a comparable scale, with $1.5B and $0 in trailing revenue. HCI is the more profitable business, keeping 33.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BFLY's -73.6%. On growth, BFLY holds the edge at +25.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricOBA logoOBAOxley Bridge Acqu…ACIC logoACICAmerican Coastal …BFLY logoBFLYButterfly Network…HCI logoHCIHCI Group, Inc.SONO logoSONOSonos, Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$0$335M$103M$927M$1.5B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$154M-$76M$454M$61M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$107M-$76M$314M-$41M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$71M-$19M$431M$118M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+63.8%+49.2%+66.5%+44.8%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+42.6%-79.5%+47.9%+2.0%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+31.9%-73.6%+33.9%-2.8%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+21.1%-18.3%+46.4%+8.1%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+9.3%+25.0%+11.9%+8.4%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+4.3%+16.0%+23.4%-29.3%
HCI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — ACIC and HCI each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 5.0x trailing earnings, ACIC trades at a 18% valuation discount to HCI's 6.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, HCI's 1.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than SONO's 142.1x.

MetricOBA logoOBAOxley Bridge Acqu…ACIC logoACICAmerican Coastal …BFLY logoBFLYButterfly Network…HCI logoHCIHCI Group, Inc.SONO logoSONOSonos, Inc.
Market CapShares × price$55,990$525M$1.1B$2.0B$1.8B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$188,842$478M$979M$844M$1.7B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-477.93x5.05x-13.68x6.15x-29.20x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.7.33x9.19x47.27x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.13x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple2.93x1.92x142.14x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue1.56x11.37x2.20x1.25x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.70x5.35x1.77x5.06x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF7.40x4.47x16.64x
Evenly matched — ACIC and HCI each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

HCI leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

ACIC delivers a 35.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $36 in annual profit, vs $-37 for BFLY. HCI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.06x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ACIC's 0.48x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HCI scores 8/9 vs BFLY's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricOBA logoOBAOxley Bridge Acqu…ACIC logoACICAmerican Coastal …BFLY logoBFLYButterfly Network…HCI logoHCIHCI Group, Inc.SONO logoSONOSonos, Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+35.7%-36.8%+32.0%-10.4%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-0.1%+9.0%-25.6%+13.2%-4.8%
ROICReturn on invested capital+41.0%-76.8%+6.8%-13.4%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+26.0%-39.3%+40.6%-9.9%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–936384
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.48x0.10x0.06x0.17x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$132,852-$46M-$130M-$1.1B-$115M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$0$199M$150M$1.2B$175M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$132,852$152M$20M$68M$60M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense14.20x-71.59x67.24x2587.88x
HCI leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

HCI leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in ACIC five years ago would be worth $20,705 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,490 for BFLY. Over the past 12 months, BFLY leads with a +94.5% total return vs ACIC's -0.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HCI at 45.7% vs SONO's -11.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricOBA logoOBAOxley Bridge Acqu…ACIC logoACICAmerican Coastal …BFLY logoBFLYButterfly Network…HCI logoHCIHCI Group, Inc.SONO logoSONOSonos, Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+1.0%+1.9%+13.1%-16.7%-14.9%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+1.8%-0.3%+94.5%+2.4%+66.0%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+1.8%+159.1%+100.9%+209.6%-31.6%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+1.8%+107.0%-65.1%+105.3%-60.4%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+1.8%-22.2%-57.2%+436.8%-25.2%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+0.6%+37.3%+26.2%+45.7%-11.9%
HCI leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

OBA leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

OBA is the less volatile stock with a -0.00 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BFLY's 3.28 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. OBA currently trades 99.6% from its 52-week high vs HCI's 72.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricOBA logoOBAOxley Bridge Acqu…ACIC logoACICAmerican Coastal …BFLY logoBFLYButterfly Network…HCI logoHCIHCI Group, Inc.SONO logoSONOSonos, Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500-0.00x0.39x3.28x0.39x1.75x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$10.22$13.06$5.72$210.50$19.82
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$9.93$9.79$1.32$136.37$8.73
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+99.6%+83.1%+74.1%+72.6%+75.1%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10057.831.046.248.756.1
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded24K188K6.4M167K1.3M
OBA leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

HCI leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Analyst consensus: ACIC as "Hold", BFLY as "Buy", HCI as "Buy", SONO as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 31.0% upside for SONO (target: $20) vs -82.5% for ACIC (target: $2). HCI is the only dividend payer here at 0.98% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricOBA logoOBAOxley Bridge Acqu…ACIC logoACICAmerican Coastal …BFLY logoBFLYButterfly Network…HCI logoHCIHCI Group, Inc.SONO logoSONOSonos, Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$1.90$5.42$126.50$19.50
# AnalystsCovering analysts57149
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+1.0%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises12
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$1.50
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%0.0%+0.1%+4.5%
HCI leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

HCI leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). OBA leads in 1 (Risk & Volatility). 1 tied.

Best OverallHCI Group, Inc. (HCI)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

OBA vs ACIC vs BFLY vs HCI vs SONO: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is OBA or ACIC or BFLY or HCI or SONO a better buy right now?

For growth investors, HCI Group, Inc.

(HCI) is the stronger pick with 20. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -4. 9% for Sonos, Inc. (SONO). American Coastal Insurance Corporation (ACIC) offers the better valuation at 5. 0x trailing P/E (7. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Butterfly Network, Inc. (BFLY) a "Buy" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — OBA or ACIC or BFLY or HCI or SONO?

On trailing P/E, American Coastal Insurance Corporation (ACIC) is the cheapest at 5.

0x versus HCI Group, Inc. at 6. 1x. On forward P/E, American Coastal Insurance Corporation is actually cheaper at 7. 3x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — OBA or ACIC or BFLY or HCI or SONO?

Over the past 5 years, American Coastal Insurance Corporation (ACIC) delivered a total return of +107.

0%, compared to -65. 1% for Butterfly Network, Inc. (BFLY). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HCI returned +436. 8% versus BFLY's -57. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — OBA or ACIC or BFLY or HCI or SONO?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Oxley Bridge Acquisition Limited (OBA) is the lower-risk stock at -0.

00β versus Butterfly Network, Inc. 's 3. 28β — meaning BFLY is approximately -86321% more volatile than OBA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, HCI Group, Inc. (HCI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 6% versus 48% for American Coastal Insurance Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — OBA or ACIC or BFLY or HCI or SONO?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), HCI Group, Inc.

(HCI) is pulling ahead at 20. 2% versus -4. 9% for Sonos, Inc. (SONO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: HCI Group, Inc. grew EPS 179. 8% year-over-year, compared to -64. 5% for Sonos, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, HCI leads at 22. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — OBA or ACIC or BFLY or HCI or SONO?

HCI Group, Inc.

(HCI) is the more profitable company, earning 33. 2% net margin versus -79. 0% for Butterfly Network, Inc. — meaning it keeps 33. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HCI leads at 47. 7% versus -88. 5% for BFLY. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ACIC leads at 86. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is OBA or ACIC or BFLY or HCI or SONO more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, American Coastal Insurance Corporation (ACIC) trades at 7.

3x forward P/E versus 47. 3x for Sonos, Inc. — 39. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SONO: 31. 0% to $19. 50.

08

Which pays a better dividend — OBA or ACIC or BFLY or HCI or SONO?

In this comparison, HCI (1.

0% yield) pays a dividend. OBA, ACIC, BFLY, SONO do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is OBA or ACIC or BFLY or HCI or SONO better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, HCI Group, Inc.

(HCI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 39), 1. 0% yield, +436. 8% 10Y return). Butterfly Network, Inc. (BFLY) carries a higher beta of 3. 28 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (HCI: +436. 8%, BFLY: -57. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between OBA and ACIC and BFLY and HCI and SONO?

These companies operate in different sectors (OBA (Financial Services) and ACIC (Financial Services) and BFLY (Healthcare) and HCI (Financial Services) and SONO (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: OBA is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ACIC is a small-cap deep-value stock; BFLY is a small-cap high-growth stock; HCI is a small-cap high-growth stock; SONO is a small-cap quality compounder stock. HCI pays a dividend while OBA, ACIC, BFLY, SONO do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

OBA

Quality Business

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $2B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

ACIC

Quality Mega-Cap Compounder

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 19%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

BFLY

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 12%
  • Gross Margin > 29%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

HCI

Quality Mega-Cap Compounder

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 20%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

SONO

Quality Business

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Gross Margin > 26%
Run This Screen

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.