Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
OBK vs IBCP vs SFNC vs FFIN vs BANR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
OBK vs IBCP vs SFNC vs FFIN vs BANR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $1.44B | $699M | $3.09B | $4.61B | $2.22B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $599M | $315M | $627M | $739M | $819M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $75M | $69M | $-398M | $243M | $195M |
| Gross Margin | 58.2% | 69.6% | 5.8% | 70.8% | 79.0% |
| Operating Margin | 16.5% | 25.8% | -84.2% | 36.8% | 29.5% |
| Forward P/E | 11.8x | 9.6x | 10.3x | 15.9x | 10.5x |
| Total Debt | $36M | $117M | $641M | $197M | $373M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $73M | $52M | $380M | $763M | $183M |
OBK vs IBCP vs SFNC vs FFIN vs BANR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Origin Bancorp, Inc. (OBK) | 100 | 223.4 | +123.4% |
| Independent Bank Co… (IBCP) | 100 | 245.7 | +145.7% |
| Simmons First Natio… (SFNC) | 100 | 124.5 | +24.5% |
| First Financial Ban… (FFIN) | 100 | 105.7 | +5.7% |
| Banner Corporation (BANR) | 100 | 174.6 | +74.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: OBK vs IBCP vs SFNC vs FFIN vs BANR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
OBK is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if momentum is your priority.
- +46.1% vs FFIN's -3.2%
IBCP ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 11 yrs, beta 0.83, yield 3.0%
- 184.6% 10Y total return vs BANR's 101.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.83, Low D/E 23.2%, current ratio 370.62x
- Beta 0.83, yield 3.0%, current ratio 370.62x
SFNC is the clearest fit if your priority is dividends.
- 4.0% yield, 6-year raise streak, vs IBCP's 3.0%
FFIN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 18.8%, EPS growth 12.2%
- 18.8% NII/revenue growth vs SFNC's -56.7%
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs SFNC's 0.9% (lower = leaner)
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs SFNC's 0.9%
BANR is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency and bank quality.
- PEG 0.90 vs FFIN's 3.05
- NIM 3.6% vs SFNC's 2.9%
- Beta 0.80 vs SFNC's 1.02
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 18.8% NII/revenue growth vs SFNC's -56.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.6x vs 15.9x), PEG 1.82 vs 3.05 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs SFNC's 0.9% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.80 vs SFNC's 1.02 | |
| Dividends | 4.0% yield, 6-year raise streak, vs IBCP's 3.0% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +46.1% vs FFIN's -3.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs SFNC's 0.9% |
OBK vs IBCP vs SFNC vs FFIN vs BANR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
OBK vs IBCP vs SFNC vs FFIN vs BANR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
FFIN leads in 2 of 6 categories
IBCP leads 1 • OBK leads 0 • SFNC leads 0 • BANR leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FFIN leads this category, winning 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BANR is the larger business by revenue, generating $819M annually — 2.6x IBCP's $315M. FFIN is the more profitable business, keeping 30.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SFNC's -63.4%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $599M | $315M | $627M | $739M | $819M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $113M | $89M | -$497M | $310M | $253M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $75M | $69M | -$398M | $243M | $195M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $149M | $70M | $755M | $290M | $248M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +58.2% | +69.6% | +5.8% | +70.8% | +79.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +16.5% | +25.8% | -84.2% | +36.8% | +29.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +12.6% | +21.7% | -63.4% | +30.2% | +23.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +25.2% | +22.2% | +71.7% | +39.6% | +30.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +106.5% | +2.3% | +42.1% | -7.7% | +11.2% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — IBCP and SFNC each lead in 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 10.4x trailing earnings, IBCP trades at a 50% valuation discount to FFIN's 20.8x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), BANR offers better value at 1.00x vs FFIN's 3.98x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.4B | $699M | $3.1B | $4.6B | $2.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.4B | $764M | $3.4B | $4.0B | $2.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 19.42x | 10.38x | -7.24x | 20.76x | 11.63x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 11.81x | 9.56x | 10.35x | 15.92x | 10.47x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 2.13x | 1.97x | — | 3.98x | 1.00x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 12.40x | 9.39x | — | 14.17x | 9.55x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.41x | 2.22x | 4.93x | 6.23x | 2.71x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.16x | 1.41x | 0.84x | 2.89x | 1.16x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 9.56x | 9.96x | 6.88x | 15.73x | 8.96x |
Profitability & Efficiency
FFIN leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
IBCP delivers a 14.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $14 in annual profit, vs $-12 for SFNC. OBK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to IBCP's 0.23x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), IBCP scores 8/9 vs SFNC's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +6.2% | +14.2% | -11.6% | +13.3% | +10.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.8% | +1.3% | -1.6% | +1.6% | +1.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.7% | +10.2% | -9.1% | +11.0% | +7.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.1% | +2.6% | -4.2% | +16.0% | +10.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 8 | 4 | 6 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.03x | 0.23x | 0.19x | 0.12x | 0.19x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$38M | $65M | $261M | -$566M | $190M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $73M | $52M | $380M | $763M | $183M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $36M | $117M | $641M | $197M | $373M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.48x | 0.91x | -1.01x | 1.48x | 1.11x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
IBCP leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in IBCP five years ago would be worth $16,369 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,178 for FFIN. Over the past 12 months, OBK leads with a +46.1% total return vs FFIN's -3.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors IBCP at 32.1% vs FFIN's 8.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +24.2% | +7.2% | +14.6% | +8.5% | +6.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +46.1% | +12.6% | +16.7% | -3.2% | +9.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +75.9% | +130.6% | +53.4% | +29.1% | +60.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +10.7% | +63.7% | -15.4% | -28.2% | +29.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +48.1% | +184.6% | +25.2% | +145.4% | +101.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +20.7% | +32.1% | +15.3% | +8.9% | +17.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — OBK and BANR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BANR is the less volatile stock with a 0.80 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SFNC's 1.02 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. OBK currently trades 96.9% from its 52-week high vs FFIN's 83.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.92x | 0.83x | 1.02x | 0.95x | 0.80x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $48.12 | $37.39 | $22.18 | $38.74 | $69.83 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $32.13 | $29.63 | $17.00 | $28.11 | $57.05 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +96.9% | +90.8% | +96.3% | +83.6% | +93.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 64.8 | 50.6 | 62.3 | 58.2 | 58.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 176K | 176K | 1.2M | 740K | 292K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — IBCP and SFNC and FFIN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: OBK as "Buy", IBCP as "Hold", SFNC as "Buy", FFIN as "Hold", BANR as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 21.2% upside for FFIN (target: $39) vs 6.1% for SFNC (target: $23). For income investors, SFNC offers the higher dividend yield at 4.00% vs OBK's 1.30%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Buy | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $51.50 | $38.00 | $22.67 | $39.25 | $70.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 5 | 7 | 9 | 15 | 13 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.3% | +3.0% | +4.0% | +2.2% | +3.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 6 | 11 | 6 | 11 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.61 | $1.03 | $0.85 | $0.72 | $1.96 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.1% | +1.8% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +1.6% |
FFIN leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). IBCP leads in 1 (Total Returns). 3 tied.
OBK vs IBCP vs SFNC vs FFIN vs BANR: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is OBK or IBCP or SFNC or FFIN or BANR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, First Financial Bankshares, Inc.
(FFIN) is the stronger pick with 18. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -56. 7% for Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC). Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) offers the better valuation at 10. 4x trailing P/E (9. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Origin Bancorp, Inc. (OBK) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — OBK or IBCP or SFNC or FFIN or BANR?
On trailing P/E, Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) is the cheapest at 10.
4x versus First Financial Bankshares, Inc. at 20. 8x. On forward P/E, Independent Bank Corporation is actually cheaper at 9. 6x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Banner Corporation wins at 0. 90x versus First Financial Bankshares, Inc. 's 3. 05x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — OBK or IBCP or SFNC or FFIN or BANR?
Over the past 5 years, Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) delivered a total return of +63.
7%, compared to -28. 2% for First Financial Bankshares, Inc. (FFIN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IBCP returned +184. 6% versus SFNC's +25. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — OBK or IBCP or SFNC or FFIN or BANR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Banner Corporation (BANR) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
80β versus Simmons First National Corporation's 1. 02β — meaning SFNC is approximately 29% more volatile than BANR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Origin Bancorp, Inc. (OBK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 23% for Independent Bank Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — OBK or IBCP or SFNC or FFIN or BANR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), First Financial Bankshares, Inc.
(FFIN) is pulling ahead at 18. 8% versus -56. 7% for Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Banner Corporation grew EPS 15. 6% year-over-year, compared to -343. 8% for Simmons First National Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — OBK or IBCP or SFNC or FFIN or BANR?
First Financial Bankshares, Inc.
(FFIN) is the more profitable company, earning 30. 2% net margin versus -63. 4% for Simmons First National Corporation — meaning it keeps 30. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FFIN leads at 36. 8% versus -84. 2% for SFNC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BANR leads at 79. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is OBK or IBCP or SFNC or FFIN or BANR more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Banner Corporation (BANR) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 90x versus First Financial Bankshares, Inc. 's 3. 05x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) trades at 9. 6x forward P/E versus 15. 9x for First Financial Bankshares, Inc. — 6. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FFIN: 21. 2% to $39. 25.
08Which pays a better dividend — OBK or IBCP or SFNC or FFIN or BANR?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC) offers the highest yield at 4. 0%, versus 1. 3% for Origin Bancorp, Inc. (OBK).
09Is OBK or IBCP or SFNC or FFIN or BANR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
83), 3. 0% yield, +184. 6% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (IBCP: +184. 6%, SFNC: +25. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between OBK and IBCP and SFNC and FFIN and BANR?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: OBK is a small-cap quality compounder stock; IBCP is a small-cap deep-value stock; SFNC is a small-cap income-oriented stock; FFIN is a small-cap high-growth stock; BANR is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.