Software - Application
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
OCFT vs NCNO vs OPEN vs FISV vs ORCL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Application
Real Estate - Services
Information Technology Services
Software - Infrastructure
OCFT vs NCNO vs OPEN vs FISV vs ORCL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Software - Application | Real Estate - Services | Information Technology Services | Software - Infrastructure |
| Market Cap | $308M | $2.11B | $4.08B | $30.38B | $559.27B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.63B | $586M | $3.94B | $21.09B | $64.08B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-677M | $-22M | $-1.39B | $3.20B | $16.21B |
| Gross Margin | 29.9% | 60.1% | 7.9% | 60.8% | 66.4% |
| Operating Margin | -18.6% | -0.8% | -9.9% | 24.4% | 30.8% |
| Forward P/E | 4.7x | 19.6x | — | 6.8x | 26.2x |
| Total Debt | $44M | $237M | $193M | $29.12B | $104.10B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.95B | $121M | $962M | $798M | $10.79B |
OCFT vs NCNO vs OPEN vs FISV vs ORCL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jul 20 | Nov 25 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| OneConnect Financia… (OCFT) | 100 | 3.3 | -96.7% |
| nCino, Inc. (NCNO) | 100 | 33.7 | -66.3% |
| Opendoor Technologi… (OPEN) | 100 | 71.6 | -28.4% |
| Fiserv, Inc. (FISV) | 100 | 66.8 | -33.2% |
| Oracle Corporation (ORCL) | 100 | 473.6 | +373.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: OCFT vs NCNO vs OPEN vs FISV vs ORCL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
OCFT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- beta 0.33
- Lower volatility, beta 0.33, Low D/E 1.7%, current ratio 2.36x
- Beta 0.33, current ratio 2.36x
- Lower P/E (4.7x vs 26.2x)
NCNO ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 13.5%, EPS growth 13.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 25.4%
- 13.5% revenue growth vs OCFT's -38.7%
OPEN is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +5.1% vs FISV's -68.8%
FISV is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.19 vs ORCL's 3.69
ORCL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- 425.1% 10Y total return vs FISV's 9.7%
- 25.3% margin vs OCFT's -41.5%
- 0.9% yield; 18-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
- 8.1% ROA vs OPEN's -53.6%, ROIC 12.8% vs -15.8%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 13.5% revenue growth vs OCFT's -38.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (4.7x vs 26.2x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 25.3% margin vs OCFT's -41.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.33 vs OPEN's 3.09, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 0.9% yield; 18-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +5.1% vs FISV's -68.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 8.1% ROA vs OPEN's -53.6%, ROIC 12.8% vs -15.8% |
OCFT vs NCNO vs OPEN vs FISV vs ORCL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
OCFT vs NCNO vs OPEN vs FISV vs ORCL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ORCL leads in 2 of 6 categories
OCFT leads 2 • NCNO leads 0 • OPEN leads 0 • FISV leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ORCL leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ORCL is the larger business by revenue, generating $64.1B annually — 109.3x NCNO's $586M. ORCL is the more profitable business, keeping 25.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to OCFT's -41.5%. On growth, ORCL holds the edge at +21.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.6B | $586M | $3.9B | $21.1B | $64.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$262M | $27M | -$363M | $7.5B | $26.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$677M | -$22M | -$1.4B | $3.2B | $16.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$192M | $60M | $1.1B | $4.0B | -$24.7B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +29.9% | +60.1% | +7.9% | +60.8% | +66.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -18.6% | -0.8% | -9.9% | +24.4% | +30.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -41.5% | -3.7% | -35.2% | +15.2% | +25.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -11.8% | +10.2% | +27.2% | +19.0% | -38.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -37.4% | +9.6% | -37.6% | -2.0% | +21.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -139.1% | +2.3% | -50.0% | -29.1% | +24.5% |
Valuation Metrics
OCFT leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.0x trailing earnings, FISV trades at a 80% valuation discount to ORCL's 44.8x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), FISV offers better value at 0.25x vs ORCL's 6.31x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $308M | $2.1B | $4.1B | $30.4B | $559.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$1.6B | $2.2B | $3.3B | $58.7B | $652.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.63x | -53.88x | -3.13x | 8.96x | 44.82x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 4.69x | 19.61x | — | 6.82x | 26.18x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 0.25x | 6.31x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 121.97x | — | 6.63x | 27.36x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.14x | 3.89x | 0.93x | 1.43x | 9.74x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.11x | 1.87x | 4.06x | 1.21x | 26.59x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 39.45x | 3.93x | 7.00x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
ORCL leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ORCL delivers a 56.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $56 in annual profit, vs $-163 for OPEN. OCFT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ORCL's 4.96x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ORCL scores 6/9 vs FISV's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -28.1% | -2.1% | -163.2% | +12.4% | +56.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -18.2% | -1.4% | -53.6% | +4.0% | +8.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -18.0% | -1.2% | -15.8% | +8.1% | +12.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -11.0% | -1.5% | -11.7% | +10.2% | +14.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.02x | 0.22x | 0.19x | 1.13x | 4.96x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$1.9B | $116M | -$769M | $28.3B | $93.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.9B | $121M | $962M | $798M | $10.8B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $44M | $237M | $193M | $29.1B | $104.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -38.58x | -0.51x | -8.92x | 6.39x | 5.44x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — OPEN and ORCL each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ORCL five years ago would be worth $25,183 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $561 for OCFT. Over the past 12 months, OPEN leads with a +510.1% total return vs FISV's -68.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors OPEN at 37.4% vs FISV's -22.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | — | -27.9% | -12.4% | -13.4% | -0.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +28.3% | -22.1% | +510.1% | -68.8% | +31.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +59.7% | -21.0% | +159.5% | -52.5% | +106.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -94.4% | -68.6% | -71.6% | -51.7% | +151.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -92.1% | -80.6% | -50.8% | +9.7% | +425.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +16.9% | -7.6% | +37.4% | -22.0% | +27.3% |
Risk & Volatility
OCFT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
OCFT is the less volatile stock with a 0.33 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than OPEN's 3.09 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. OCFT currently trades 99.6% from its 52-week high vs FISV's 29.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.30x | 1.12x | 3.05x | 0.87x | 1.58x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $7.92 | $33.92 | $10.87 | $191.91 | $345.72 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $6.09 | $13.80 | $0.51 | $52.91 | $134.57 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +99.6% | +52.4% | +48.9% | +29.6% | +56.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 68.7 | 50.1 | 56.2 | 36.5 | 68.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 0 | 2.7M | 36.3M | 5.3M | 26.3M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: OCFT as "Hold", NCNO as "Buy", OPEN as "Hold", FISV as "Buy", ORCL as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 81.8% upside for NCNO (target: $32) vs -98.5% for OCFT (target: $0). ORCL is the only dividend payer here at 0.85% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $0.12 | $32.33 | $6.17 | $74.08 | $257.09 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 7 | 23 | 26 | 60 | 86 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | +0.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | — | 18 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | $1.65 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +19.4% | +0.3% |
ORCL leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). OCFT leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Risk & Volatility). 1 tied.
OCFT vs NCNO vs OPEN vs FISV vs ORCL: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is OCFT or NCNO or OPEN or FISV or ORCL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, nCino, Inc.
(NCNO) is the stronger pick with 13. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -38. 7% for OneConnect Financial Technology Co. , Ltd. (OCFT). Fiserv, Inc. (FISV) offers the better valuation at 9. 0x trailing P/E (6. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate nCino, Inc. (NCNO) a "Buy" — based on 23 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — OCFT or NCNO or OPEN or FISV or ORCL?
On trailing P/E, Fiserv, Inc.
(FISV) is the cheapest at 9. 0x versus Oracle Corporation at 44. 8x. On forward P/E, OneConnect Financial Technology Co. , Ltd. is actually cheaper at 4. 7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Fiserv, Inc. wins at 0. 19x versus Oracle Corporation's 3. 69x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — OCFT or NCNO or OPEN or FISV or ORCL?
Over the past 5 years, Oracle Corporation (ORCL) delivered a total return of +151.
8%, compared to -94. 4% for OneConnect Financial Technology Co. , Ltd. (OCFT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ORCL returned +428. 7% versus OCFT's -92. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — OCFT or NCNO or OPEN or FISV or ORCL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), OneConnect Financial Technology Co.
, Ltd. (OCFT) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 30β versus Opendoor Technologies Inc. 's 3. 05β — meaning OPEN is approximately 919% more volatile than OCFT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, OneConnect Financial Technology Co. , Ltd. (OCFT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 5% for Oracle Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — OCFT or NCNO or OPEN or FISV or ORCL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), nCino, Inc.
(NCNO) is pulling ahead at 13. 5% versus -38. 7% for OneConnect Financial Technology Co. , Ltd. (OCFT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Fiserv, Inc. grew EPS 17. 8% year-over-year, compared to -203. 6% for Opendoor Technologies Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, NCNO leads at 25. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — OCFT or NCNO or OPEN or FISV or ORCL?
Oracle Corporation (ORCL) is the more profitable company, earning 21.
7% net margin versus -29. 7% for Opendoor Technologies Inc. — meaning it keeps 21. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ORCL leads at 30. 8% versus -13. 5% for OCFT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ORCL leads at 70. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is OCFT or NCNO or OPEN or FISV or ORCL more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Fiserv, Inc. (FISV) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 19x versus Oracle Corporation's 3. 69x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, OneConnect Financial Technology Co. , Ltd. (OCFT) trades at 4. 7x forward P/E versus 26. 2x for Oracle Corporation — 21. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NCNO: 81. 8% to $32. 33.
08Which pays a better dividend — OCFT or NCNO or OPEN or FISV or ORCL?
In this comparison, ORCL (0.
9% yield) pays a dividend. OCFT, NCNO, OPEN, FISV do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is OCFT or NCNO or OPEN or FISV or ORCL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, OneConnect Financial Technology Co.
, Ltd. (OCFT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 30)). Opendoor Technologies Inc. (OPEN) carries a higher beta of 3. 05 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (OCFT: -92. 1%, OPEN: -53. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between OCFT and NCNO and OPEN and FISV and ORCL?
These companies operate in different sectors (OCFT (Technology) and NCNO (Technology) and OPEN (Real Estate) and FISV (Technology) and ORCL (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: OCFT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NCNO is a small-cap quality compounder stock; OPEN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; FISV is a mid-cap deep-value stock; ORCL is a large-cap quality compounder stock. ORCL pays a dividend while OCFT, NCNO, OPEN, FISV do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.