Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
OFG vs FBP vs BPOP vs NBTB vs HBAN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
OFG vs FBP vs BPOP vs NBTB vs HBAN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $1.96B | $3.74B | $9.67B | $2.35B | $25.63B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $863M | $1.26B | $4.43B | $867M | $12.48B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $205M | $345M | $833M | $169M | $2.21B |
| Gross Margin | 71.2% | 72.9% | 66.1% | 72.1% | 61.7% |
| Operating Margin | 30.8% | 33.2% | 22.7% | 25.3% | 21.5% |
| Forward P/E | 9.7x | 10.8x | 10.0x | 10.8x | 11.1x |
| Total Debt | $580M | $364M | $1.58B | $327M | $18.48B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.04B | $657M | $403M | $185M | $1.78B |
OFG vs FBP vs BPOP vs NBTB vs HBAN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| OFG Bancorp (OFG) | 100 | 375.5 | +275.5% |
| First BanCorp. (FBP) | 100 | 438.6 | +338.6% |
| Popular, Inc. (BPOP) | 100 | 376.9 | +276.9% |
| NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) | 100 | 143.9 | +43.9% |
| Huntington Bancshar… (HBAN) | 100 | 182.1 | +82.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: OFG vs FBP vs BPOP vs NBTB vs HBAN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
OFG is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if bank quality is your priority.
- NIM 4.9% vs HBAN's 2.7%
- Beta 0.70 vs HBAN's 1.09, lower leverage
FBP carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 6.4% 10Y total return vs OFG's 5.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.79, Low D/E 18.5%, current ratio 6.85x
- PEG 0.30 vs NBTB's 1.53
- Beta 0.79, yield 3.0%, current ratio 6.85x
BPOP ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 5.7%, EPS growth 43.7%
- +53.3% vs NBTB's +9.0%
NBTB is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 0.89, yield 3.2%
- 10.4% NII/revenue growth vs HBAN's 4.4%
HBAN is the clearest fit if your priority is dividends.
- 3.7% yield, vs NBTB's 3.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 10.4% NII/revenue growth vs HBAN's 4.4% | |
| Value | PEG 0.30 vs 1.53 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs NBTB's 0.5% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.70 vs HBAN's 1.09, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.7% yield, vs NBTB's 3.2% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +53.3% vs NBTB's +9.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs NBTB's 0.5% |
OFG vs FBP vs BPOP vs NBTB vs HBAN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
OFG vs FBP vs BPOP vs NBTB vs HBAN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
FBP leads in 2 of 6 categories
OFG leads 1 • BPOP leads 1 • NBTB leads 0 • HBAN leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FBP leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HBAN is the larger business by revenue, generating $12.5B annually — 14.5x OFG's $863M. FBP is the more profitable business, keeping 27.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to HBAN's 17.7%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $863M | $1.3B | $4.4B | $867M | $12.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $285M | $433M | $1.0B | $241M | $3.1B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $205M | $345M | $833M | $169M | $2.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $199M | $440M | $681M | $225M | $2.3B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +71.2% | +72.9% | +66.1% | +72.1% | +61.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +30.8% | +33.2% | +22.7% | +25.3% | +21.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +23.8% | +27.4% | +18.8% | +19.5% | +17.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +23.1% | +34.5% | +15.4% | +25.2% | +18.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +8.3% | +19.6% | +40.6% | +39.5% | -11.8% |
Valuation Metrics
OFG leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 10.2x trailing earnings, OFG trades at a 25% valuation discount to NBTB's 13.5x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), FBP offers better value at 0.31x vs NBTB's 1.92x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.0B | $3.7B | $9.7B | $2.4B | $25.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.5B | $3.4B | $10.9B | $2.5B | $42.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 10.16x | 11.16x | 12.10x | 13.53x | 11.65x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 9.68x | 10.84x | 9.97x | 10.80x | 11.10x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.37x | 0.31x | 0.76x | 1.92x | 0.77x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 5.28x | 8.26x | 10.78x | 10.35x | 15.75x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.28x | 2.97x | 2.18x | 2.71x | 2.05x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.55x | 1.96x | 1.61x | 1.21x | 1.00x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 9.86x | 8.61x | 14.20x | 10.75x | 11.25x |
Profitability & Efficiency
FBP leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FBP delivers a 18.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $18 in annual profit, vs $10 for NBTB. NBTB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HBAN's 0.76x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FBP scores 9/9 vs OFG's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +15.2% | +18.4% | +13.8% | +9.5% | +10.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.7% | +1.8% | +1.1% | +1.1% | +1.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +10.9% | +13.7% | +10.2% | +7.9% | +5.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +14.4% | +3.9% | +14.1% | +2.4% | +4.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 9 | 7 | 7 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.42x | 0.19x | 0.25x | 0.17x | 0.76x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$460M | -$293M | $1.2B | $142M | $16.7B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.0B | $657M | $403M | $185M | $1.8B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $580M | $364M | $1.6B | $327M | $18.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.54x | 1.64x | 0.81x | 1.05x | 0.62x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BPOP leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in OFG five years ago would be worth $20,478 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $12,203 for HBAN. Over the past 12 months, BPOP leads with a +53.3% total return vs NBTB's +9.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BPOP at 40.7% vs NBTB's 15.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +12.1% | +15.7% | +18.8% | +9.3% | -6.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +14.8% | +22.9% | +53.3% | +9.0% | +12.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +106.8% | +137.0% | +178.4% | +54.1% | +85.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +104.8% | +104.7% | +103.3% | +29.9% | +22.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +538.3% | +644.5% | +473.6% | +102.2% | +121.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +27.4% | +33.3% | +40.7% | +15.5% | +22.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — OFG and FBP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
OFG is the less volatile stock with a 0.70 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HBAN's 1.09 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FBP currently trades 97.6% from its 52-week high vs HBAN's 83.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.70x | 0.79x | 0.94x | 0.89x | 1.09x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $46.85 | $24.57 | $152.95 | $46.92 | $19.46 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $35.71 | $19.16 | $98.51 | $39.20 | $14.87 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +97.4% | +97.6% | +97.3% | +96.1% | +83.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 64.8 | 62.1 | 61.5 | 57.3 | 53.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 295K | 1.4M | 499K | 236K | 24.3M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — BPOP and NBTB and HBAN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: OFG as "Buy", FBP as "Buy", BPOP as "Buy", NBTB as "Hold", HBAN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 25.9% upside for HBAN (target: $20) vs -2.5% for OFG (target: $45). For income investors, HBAN offers the higher dividend yield at 3.73% vs BPOP's 1.96%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $44.50 | $25.50 | $159.33 | $46.00 | $20.38 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 12 | 16 | 20 | 10 | 48 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.4% | +3.0% | +2.0% | +3.2% | +3.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 9 | 9 | 12 | 12 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.10 | $0.72 | $2.92 | $1.43 | $0.60 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +4.7% | +4.1% | +5.2% | +0.4% | 0.0% |
FBP leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). OFG leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
OFG vs FBP vs BPOP vs NBTB vs HBAN: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is OFG or FBP or BPOP or NBTB or HBAN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) is the stronger pick with 10. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 4. 4% for Huntington Bancshares Incorporated (HBAN). OFG Bancorp (OFG) offers the better valuation at 10. 2x trailing P/E (9. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate OFG Bancorp (OFG) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — OFG or FBP or BPOP or NBTB or HBAN?
On trailing P/E, OFG Bancorp (OFG) is the cheapest at 10.
2x versus NBT Bancorp Inc. at 13. 5x. On forward P/E, OFG Bancorp is actually cheaper at 9. 7x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: First BanCorp. wins at 0. 30x versus NBT Bancorp Inc. 's 1. 53x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — OFG or FBP or BPOP or NBTB or HBAN?
Over the past 5 years, OFG Bancorp (OFG) delivered a total return of +104.
8%, compared to +22. 0% for Huntington Bancshares Incorporated (HBAN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FBP returned +644. 5% versus NBTB's +102. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — OFG or FBP or BPOP or NBTB or HBAN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), OFG Bancorp (OFG) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
70β versus Huntington Bancshares Incorporated's 1. 09β — meaning HBAN is approximately 55% more volatile than OFG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 76% for Huntington Bancshares Incorporated — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — OFG or FBP or BPOP or NBTB or HBAN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) is pulling ahead at 10. 4% versus 4. 4% for Huntington Bancshares Incorporated (HBAN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Popular, Inc. grew EPS 43. 7% year-over-year, compared to 6. 1% for OFG Bancorp. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — OFG or FBP or BPOP or NBTB or HBAN?
First BanCorp.
(FBP) is the more profitable company, earning 27. 4% net margin versus 17. 7% for Huntington Bancshares Incorporated — meaning it keeps 27. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FBP leads at 33. 2% versus 21. 5% for HBAN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FBP leads at 72. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is OFG or FBP or BPOP or NBTB or HBAN more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, First BanCorp. (FBP) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 30x versus NBT Bancorp Inc. 's 1. 53x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, OFG Bancorp (OFG) trades at 9. 7x forward P/E versus 11. 1x for Huntington Bancshares Incorporated — 1. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for HBAN: 25. 9% to $20. 38.
08Which pays a better dividend — OFG or FBP or BPOP or NBTB or HBAN?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Huntington Bancshares Incorporated (HBAN) offers the highest yield at 3. 7%, versus 2. 0% for Popular, Inc. (BPOP).
09Is OFG or FBP or BPOP or NBTB or HBAN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, OFG Bancorp (OFG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
70), 2. 4% yield, +538. 3% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (OFG: +538. 3%, HBAN: +121. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between OFG and FBP and BPOP and NBTB and HBAN?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.