Internet Content & Information
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
ONFO vs ITRM vs PRAX vs HIMS vs ACAD
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Medical - Equipment & Services
Biotechnology
ONFO vs ITRM vs PRAX vs HIMS vs ACAD — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Internet Content & Information | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Medical - Equipment & Services | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $6M | $2M | $9.53B | $7.30B | $3.84B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $11M | $390K | $0.00 | $2.35B | $1.10B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-2M | $-27M | $-327M | $128M | $376M |
| Gross Margin | 60.3% | -171.3% | — | 69.7% | 91.5% |
| Operating Margin | -19.7% | -52.0% | — | 4.6% | 7.4% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | — | 58.3x | 55.6x |
| Total Debt | $3M | $46M | $110K | $1.12B | $52M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $477K | $24M | $357M | $229M | $178M |
ONFO vs ITRM vs PRAX vs HIMS vs ACAD — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Aug 22 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Onfolio Holdings, I… (ONFO) | 100 | 61.3 | -38.7% |
| Iterum Therapeutics… (ITRM) | 100 | 1.2 | -98.8% |
| Praxis Precision Me… (PRAX) | 100 | 705.2 | +605.2% |
| Hims & Hers Health,… (HIMS) | 100 | 444.5 | +344.5% |
| ACADIA Pharmaceutic… (ACAD) | 100 | 136.3 | +36.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ONFO vs ITRM vs PRAX vs HIMS vs ACAD
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ONFO is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if dividends is your priority.
- 5.5% yield; 4-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Among these 5 stocks, ITRM doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
PRAX ranks third and is worth considering specifically for sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.40, Low D/E 0.0%, current ratio 10.22x
- +7.7% vs ITRM's -97.0%
HIMS is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 59.0%, EPS growth -3.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 64.5%
- 188.5% 10Y total return vs PRAX's -20.9%
- 59.0% revenue growth vs PRAX's -100.0%
ACAD carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and defensive.
- beta 1.11
- Beta 1.11, current ratio 3.83x
- Lower P/E (55.6x vs 58.3x)
- 34.3% margin vs ITRM's -69.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 59.0% revenue growth vs PRAX's -100.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (55.6x vs 58.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 34.3% margin vs ITRM's -69.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.11 vs HIMS's 2.48, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 5.5% yield; 4-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +7.7% vs ITRM's -97.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 26.2% ROA vs ITRM's -74.8%, ROIC 10.0% vs -117.8% |
ONFO vs ITRM vs PRAX vs HIMS vs ACAD — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
ONFO vs ITRM vs PRAX vs HIMS vs ACAD — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ACAD leads in 2 of 6 categories
PRAX leads 1 • ONFO leads 0 • ITRM leads 0 • HIMS leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ACAD leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HIMS and PRAX operate at a comparable scale, with $2.3B and $0 in trailing revenue. ACAD is the more profitable business, keeping 34.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ITRM's -69.1%. On growth, ONFO holds the edge at +36.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $11M | $390,000 | $0 | $2.3B | $1.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$1M | -$19M | -$357M | $164M | $96M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$2M | -$27M | -$327M | $128M | $376M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$1M | -$20M | -$283M | $73M | $212M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +60.3% | -171.3% | — | +69.7% | +91.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -19.7% | -52.0% | — | +4.6% | +7.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -17.2% | -69.1% | — | +5.5% | +34.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -9.0% | -51.1% | — | +3.1% | +19.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +36.3% | — | — | +28.4% | +9.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -45.5% | +33.3% | +2.7% | -27.3% | -81.8% |
Valuation Metrics
ACAD leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.8x trailing earnings, ACAD trades at a 82% valuation discount to HIMS's 55.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, ACAD's 26.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than HIMS's 46.5x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $6M | $2M | $9.5B | $7.3B | $3.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $8M | $23M | $9.2B | $8.2B | $3.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -2.78x | -0.02x | -24.48x | 55.43x | 9.78x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | 58.29x | 55.62x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | 46.50x | 26.71x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.74x | — | — | 3.11x | 3.58x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.34x | — | 8.46x | 13.50x | 3.13x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | 98.70x | 36.48x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — PRAX and ACAD each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ACAD delivers a 35.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $36 in annual profit, vs $-52 for ONFO. PRAX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HIMS's 2.07x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ACAD scores 6/9 vs ITRM's 1/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -51.7% | — | -43.0% | +23.7% | +35.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -23.3% | -74.8% | -40.2% | +6.0% | +26.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -38.2% | -117.8% | -65.0% | +10.7% | +10.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -51.5% | -94.1% | -49.3% | +10.9% | +10.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.60x | — | 0.00x | 2.07x | 0.04x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2M | $21M | -$357M | $892M | -$126M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $476,874 | $24M | $357M | $229M | $178M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $3M | $46M | $110,000 | $1.1B | $52M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -6.65x | -10.61x | — | — | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PRAX leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in HIMS five years ago would be worth $27,393 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $20 for ITRM. Over the past 12 months, PRAX leads with a +767.1% total return vs ITRM's -97.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PRAX at 174.0% vs ITRM's -69.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +52.0% | -90.2% | +15.2% | -15.4% | -14.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +8.6% | -97.0% | +767.1% | -45.0% | +32.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -2.1% | -97.2% | +1956.2% | +138.6% | +3.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -52.5% | -99.8% | -14.9% | +173.9% | +6.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -52.5% | -100.0% | -20.9% | +188.5% | -23.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -0.7% | -69.7% | +174.0% | +33.6% | +1.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — PRAX and ACAD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ACAD is the less volatile stock with a 1.11 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HIMS's 2.48 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PRAX currently trades 92.7% from its 52-week high vs ITRM's 2.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.45x | 1.41x | 1.40x | 2.48x | 1.11x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.48 | $1.28 | $356.00 | $70.43 | $27.81 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.45 | $0.03 | $35.21 | $13.74 | $14.68 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +46.0% | +2.4% | +92.7% | +40.1% | +80.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 52.8 | 29.6 | 53.3 | 50.2 | 53.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 5.9M | 38.4M | 376K | 34.8M | 1.7M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: PRAX as "Buy", HIMS as "Hold", ACAD as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 66.3% upside for PRAX (target: $549) vs -7.3% for HIMS (target: $26). ONFO is the only dividend payer here at 5.51% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $548.80 | $26.20 | $34.78 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — | 16 | 19 | 37 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +5.5% | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 4 | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.06 | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +1.2% | 0.0% |
ACAD leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). PRAX leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
ONFO vs ITRM vs PRAX vs HIMS vs ACAD: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ONFO or ITRM or PRAX or HIMS or ACAD a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Hims & Hers Health, Inc.
(HIMS) is the stronger pick with 59. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX). ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. (ACAD) offers the better valuation at 9. 8x trailing P/E (55. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX) a "Buy" — based on 16 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ONFO or ITRM or PRAX or HIMS or ACAD?
On trailing P/E, ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.
(ACAD) is the cheapest at 9. 8x versus Hims & Hers Health, Inc. at 55. 4x. On forward P/E, ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. is actually cheaper at 55. 6x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ONFO or ITRM or PRAX or HIMS or ACAD?
Over the past 5 years, Hims & Hers Health, Inc.
(HIMS) delivered a total return of +173. 9%, compared to -99. 8% for Iterum Therapeutics plc (ITRM). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HIMS returned +188. 5% versus ITRM's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ONFO or ITRM or PRAX or HIMS or ACAD?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.
(ACAD) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 11β versus Hims & Hers Health, Inc. 's 2. 48β — meaning HIMS is approximately 122% more volatile than ACAD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 2% for Hims & Hers Health, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ONFO or ITRM or PRAX or HIMS or ACAD?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Hims & Hers Health, Inc.
(HIMS) is pulling ahead at 59. 0% versus -100. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Onfolio Holdings, Inc. grew EPS 75. 0% year-over-year, compared to -32. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, HIMS leads at 64. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ONFO or ITRM or PRAX or HIMS or ACAD?
ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.
(ACAD) is the more profitable company, earning 36. 5% net margin versus -69. 1% for Iterum Therapeutics plc — meaning it keeps 36. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ACAD leads at 9. 8% versus -52. 0% for ITRM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ACAD leads at 91. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ONFO or ITRM or PRAX or HIMS or ACAD more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.
(ACAD) trades at 55. 6x forward P/E versus 58. 3x for Hims & Hers Health, Inc. — 2. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PRAX: 66. 3% to $548. 80.
08Which pays a better dividend — ONFO or ITRM or PRAX or HIMS or ACAD?
In this comparison, ONFO (5.
5% yield) pays a dividend. ITRM, PRAX, HIMS, ACAD do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is ONFO or ITRM or PRAX or HIMS or ACAD better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Onfolio Holdings, Inc.
(ONFO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (5. 5% yield). Hims & Hers Health, Inc. (HIMS) carries a higher beta of 2. 48 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ONFO: -52. 5%, HIMS: +188. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ONFO and ITRM and PRAX and HIMS and ACAD?
These companies operate in different sectors (ONFO (Communication Services) and ITRM (Healthcare) and PRAX (Healthcare) and HIMS (Healthcare) and ACAD (Healthcare)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: ONFO is a small-cap high-growth stock; ITRM is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PRAX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; HIMS is a small-cap high-growth stock; ACAD is a small-cap deep-value stock. ONFO pays a dividend while ITRM, PRAX, HIMS, ACAD do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Revenue Growth > 18%
- Gross Margin > 36%
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.