Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

ONFO vs ITRM vs PRAX vs HIMS vs ACAD

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
ONFO
Onfolio Holdings, Inc.

Internet Content & Information

Communication ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$6M
5Y Perf.-38.7%
ITRM
Iterum Therapeutics plc

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • IE
Market Cap$2M
5Y Perf.-98.8%
PRAX
Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$9.53B
5Y Perf.+605.2%
HIMS
Hims & Hers Health, Inc.

Medical - Equipment & Services

HealthcareNYSE • US
Market Cap$7.30B
5Y Perf.+344.5%
ACAD
ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$3.84B
5Y Perf.+36.3%

ONFO vs ITRM vs PRAX vs HIMS vs ACAD — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
ONFO logoONFO
ITRM logoITRM
PRAX logoPRAX
HIMS logoHIMS
ACAD logoACAD
IndustryInternet Content & InformationBiotechnologyBiotechnologyMedical - Equipment & ServicesBiotechnology
Market Cap$6M$2M$9.53B$7.30B$3.84B
Revenue (TTM)$11M$390K$0.00$2.35B$1.10B
Net Income (TTM)$-2M$-27M$-327M$128M$376M
Gross Margin60.3%-171.3%69.7%91.5%
Operating Margin-19.7%-52.0%4.6%7.4%
Forward P/E58.3x55.6x
Total Debt$3M$46M$110K$1.12B$52M
Cash & Equiv.$477K$24M$357M$229M$178M

ONFO vs ITRM vs PRAX vs HIMS vs ACADLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

ONFO
ITRM
PRAX
HIMS
ACAD
StockAug 22May 26Return
Onfolio Holdings, I… (ONFO)10061.3-38.7%
Iterum Therapeutics… (ITRM)1001.2-98.8%
Praxis Precision Me… (PRAX)100705.2+605.2%
Hims & Hers Health,… (HIMS)100444.5+344.5%
ACADIA Pharmaceutic… (ACAD)100136.3+36.3%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: ONFO vs ITRM vs PRAX vs HIMS vs ACAD

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: ACAD leads in 4 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. Onfolio Holdings, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for dividend income and shareholder returns. PRAX and HIMS also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
ONFO
Onfolio Holdings, Inc.
The Income Pick

ONFO is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if dividends is your priority.

  • 5.5% yield; 4-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Best for: dividends
ITRM
Iterum Therapeutics plc
The Healthcare Pick

Among these 5 stocks, ITRM doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: healthcare exposure
PRAX
Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc.
The Defensive Pick

PRAX ranks third and is worth considering specifically for sleep-well-at-night.

  • Lower volatility, beta 1.40, Low D/E 0.0%, current ratio 10.22x
  • +7.7% vs ITRM's -97.0%
Best for: sleep-well-at-night
HIMS
Hims & Hers Health, Inc.
The Growth Play

HIMS is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.

  • Rev growth 59.0%, EPS growth -3.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 64.5%
  • 188.5% 10Y total return vs PRAX's -20.9%
  • 59.0% revenue growth vs PRAX's -100.0%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
ACAD
ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.
The Income Pick

ACAD carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and defensive.

  • beta 1.11
  • Beta 1.11, current ratio 3.83x
  • Lower P/E (55.6x vs 58.3x)
  • 34.3% margin vs ITRM's -69.1%
Best for: income & stability and defensive
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthHIMS logoHIMS59.0% revenue growth vs PRAX's -100.0%
ValueACAD logoACADLower P/E (55.6x vs 58.3x)
Quality / MarginsACAD logoACAD34.3% margin vs ITRM's -69.1%
Stability / SafetyACAD logoACADBeta 1.11 vs HIMS's 2.48, lower leverage
DividendsONFO logoONFO5.5% yield; 4-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)PRAX logoPRAX+7.7% vs ITRM's -97.0%
Efficiency (ROA)ACAD logoACAD26.2% ROA vs ITRM's -74.8%, ROIC 10.0% vs -117.8%

ONFO vs ITRM vs PRAX vs HIMS vs ACAD — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

ONFOOnfolio Holdings, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

ITRMIterum Therapeutics plc

Segment breakdown not available.

PRAXPraxis Precision Medicines, Inc.
FY 2024
License
76.8%$9M
Upfront Payment
23.2%$3M
HIMSHims & Hers Health, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

ACADACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.
FY 2018
Product
100.0%$224M

ONFO vs ITRM vs PRAX vs HIMS vs ACAD — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLACADLAGGINGHIMS

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

ACAD leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

HIMS and PRAX operate at a comparable scale, with $2.3B and $0 in trailing revenue. ACAD is the more profitable business, keeping 34.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ITRM's -69.1%. On growth, ONFO holds the edge at +36.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricONFO logoONFOOnfolio Holdings,…ITRM logoITRMIterum Therapeuti…PRAX logoPRAXPraxis Precision …HIMS logoHIMSHims & Hers Healt…ACAD logoACADACADIA Pharmaceut…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$11M$390,000$0$2.3B$1.1B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$1M-$19M-$357M$164M$96M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$2M-$27M-$327M$128M$376M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$1M-$20M-$283M$73M$212M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+60.3%-171.3%+69.7%+91.5%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-19.7%-52.0%+4.6%+7.4%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-17.2%-69.1%+5.5%+34.3%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-9.0%-51.1%+3.1%+19.4%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+36.3%+28.4%+9.7%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-45.5%+33.3%+2.7%-27.3%-81.8%
ACAD leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

ACAD leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 9.8x trailing earnings, ACAD trades at a 82% valuation discount to HIMS's 55.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, ACAD's 26.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than HIMS's 46.5x.

MetricONFO logoONFOOnfolio Holdings,…ITRM logoITRMIterum Therapeuti…PRAX logoPRAXPraxis Precision …HIMS logoHIMSHims & Hers Healt…ACAD logoACADACADIA Pharmaceut…
Market CapShares × price$6M$2M$9.5B$7.3B$3.8B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$8M$23M$9.2B$8.2B$3.7B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-2.78x-0.02x-24.48x55.43x9.78x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.58.29x55.62x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple46.50x26.71x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.74x3.11x3.58x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.34x8.46x13.50x3.13x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF98.70x36.48x
ACAD leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

Evenly matched — PRAX and ACAD each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.

ACAD delivers a 35.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $36 in annual profit, vs $-52 for ONFO. PRAX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HIMS's 2.07x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ACAD scores 6/9 vs ITRM's 1/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricONFO logoONFOOnfolio Holdings,…ITRM logoITRMIterum Therapeuti…PRAX logoPRAXPraxis Precision …HIMS logoHIMSHims & Hers Healt…ACAD logoACADACADIA Pharmaceut…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-51.7%-43.0%+23.7%+35.6%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-23.3%-74.8%-40.2%+6.0%+26.2%
ROICReturn on invested capital-38.2%-117.8%-65.0%+10.7%+10.0%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-51.5%-94.1%-49.3%+10.9%+10.1%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–921346
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.60x0.00x2.07x0.04x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$2M$21M-$357M$892M-$126M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$476,874$24M$357M$229M$178M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$3M$46M$110,000$1.1B$52M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-6.65x-10.61x
Evenly matched — PRAX and ACAD each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

PRAX leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in HIMS five years ago would be worth $27,393 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $20 for ITRM. Over the past 12 months, PRAX leads with a +767.1% total return vs ITRM's -97.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PRAX at 174.0% vs ITRM's -69.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricONFO logoONFOOnfolio Holdings,…ITRM logoITRMIterum Therapeuti…PRAX logoPRAXPraxis Precision …HIMS logoHIMSHims & Hers Healt…ACAD logoACADACADIA Pharmaceut…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+52.0%-90.2%+15.2%-15.4%-14.3%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+8.6%-97.0%+767.1%-45.0%+32.3%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-2.1%-97.2%+1956.2%+138.6%+3.9%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-52.5%-99.8%-14.9%+173.9%+6.6%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-52.5%-100.0%-20.9%+188.5%-23.4%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-0.7%-69.7%+174.0%+33.6%+1.3%
PRAX leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — PRAX and ACAD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

ACAD is the less volatile stock with a 1.11 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HIMS's 2.48 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PRAX currently trades 92.7% from its 52-week high vs ITRM's 2.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricONFO logoONFOOnfolio Holdings,…ITRM logoITRMIterum Therapeuti…PRAX logoPRAXPraxis Precision …HIMS logoHIMSHims & Hers Healt…ACAD logoACADACADIA Pharmaceut…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.45x1.41x1.40x2.48x1.11x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$2.48$1.28$356.00$70.43$27.81
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$0.45$0.03$35.21$13.74$14.68
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+46.0%+2.4%+92.7%+40.1%+80.5%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10052.829.653.350.253.8
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded5.9M38.4M376K34.8M1.7M
Evenly matched — PRAX and ACAD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Analyst consensus: PRAX as "Buy", HIMS as "Hold", ACAD as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 66.3% upside for PRAX (target: $549) vs -7.3% for HIMS (target: $26). ONFO is the only dividend payer here at 5.51% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricONFO logoONFOOnfolio Holdings,…ITRM logoITRMIterum Therapeuti…PRAX logoPRAXPraxis Precision …HIMS logoHIMSHims & Hers Healt…ACAD logoACADACADIA Pharmaceut…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyHoldBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$548.80$26.20$34.78
# AnalystsCovering analysts161937
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+5.5%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises4
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.06
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%0.0%+1.2%0.0%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

ACAD leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). PRAX leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.

Best OverallACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. (ACAD)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

ONFO vs ITRM vs PRAX vs HIMS vs ACAD: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is ONFO or ITRM or PRAX or HIMS or ACAD a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Hims & Hers Health, Inc.

(HIMS) is the stronger pick with 59. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX). ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. (ACAD) offers the better valuation at 9. 8x trailing P/E (55. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX) a "Buy" — based on 16 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — ONFO or ITRM or PRAX or HIMS or ACAD?

On trailing P/E, ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.

(ACAD) is the cheapest at 9. 8x versus Hims & Hers Health, Inc. at 55. 4x. On forward P/E, ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. is actually cheaper at 55. 6x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — ONFO or ITRM or PRAX or HIMS or ACAD?

Over the past 5 years, Hims & Hers Health, Inc.

(HIMS) delivered a total return of +173. 9%, compared to -99. 8% for Iterum Therapeutics plc (ITRM). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HIMS returned +188. 5% versus ITRM's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — ONFO or ITRM or PRAX or HIMS or ACAD?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.

(ACAD) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 11β versus Hims & Hers Health, Inc. 's 2. 48β — meaning HIMS is approximately 122% more volatile than ACAD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 2% for Hims & Hers Health, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — ONFO or ITRM or PRAX or HIMS or ACAD?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Hims & Hers Health, Inc.

(HIMS) is pulling ahead at 59. 0% versus -100. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Onfolio Holdings, Inc. grew EPS 75. 0% year-over-year, compared to -32. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, HIMS leads at 64. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — ONFO or ITRM or PRAX or HIMS or ACAD?

ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.

(ACAD) is the more profitable company, earning 36. 5% net margin versus -69. 1% for Iterum Therapeutics plc — meaning it keeps 36. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ACAD leads at 9. 8% versus -52. 0% for ITRM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ACAD leads at 91. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is ONFO or ITRM or PRAX or HIMS or ACAD more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.

(ACAD) trades at 55. 6x forward P/E versus 58. 3x for Hims & Hers Health, Inc. — 2. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PRAX: 66. 3% to $548. 80.

08

Which pays a better dividend — ONFO or ITRM or PRAX or HIMS or ACAD?

In this comparison, ONFO (5.

5% yield) pays a dividend. ITRM, PRAX, HIMS, ACAD do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is ONFO or ITRM or PRAX or HIMS or ACAD better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Onfolio Holdings, Inc.

(ONFO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (5. 5% yield). Hims & Hers Health, Inc. (HIMS) carries a higher beta of 2. 48 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ONFO: -52. 5%, HIMS: +188. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between ONFO and ITRM and PRAX and HIMS and ACAD?

These companies operate in different sectors (ONFO (Communication Services) and ITRM (Healthcare) and PRAX (Healthcare) and HIMS (Healthcare) and ACAD (Healthcare)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: ONFO is a small-cap high-growth stock; ITRM is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PRAX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; HIMS is a small-cap high-growth stock; ACAD is a small-cap deep-value stock. ONFO pays a dividend while ITRM, PRAX, HIMS, ACAD do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

ONFO

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Communication Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 18%
  • Gross Margin > 36%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

ITRM

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

PRAX

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

HIMS

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 14%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

ACAD

Quality Mega-Cap Compounder

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 20%
Run This Screen

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.