Gold
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
ORLA vs CAT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Agricultural - Machinery
ORLA vs CAT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Gold | Agricultural - Machinery |
| Market Cap | $4.95B | $431.16B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.21B | $70.75B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $138M | $9.42B |
| Gross Margin | 52.5% | 32.5% |
| Operating Margin | 44.2% | 16.6% |
| Forward P/E | 8.0x | 40.1x |
| Total Debt | $502M | $43.33B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $576M | $9.98B |
ORLA vs CAT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA) | 100 | 590.3 | +490.3% |
| Caterpillar Inc. (CAT) | 100 | 771.4 | +671.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ORLA vs CAT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ORLA is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 0.21
- Rev growth 329.5%, EPS growth 59.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 97.0%
- 14.0% 10Y total return vs CAT's 12.2%
CAT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for quality and dividends.
- 13.3% margin vs ORLA's 11.4%
- 0.6% yield; 8-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend
- +190.7% vs ORLA's +24.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 329.5% revenue growth vs CAT's 4.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.0x vs 40.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 13.3% margin vs ORLA's 11.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.21 vs CAT's 1.54, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 0.6% yield; 8-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +190.7% vs ORLA's +24.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 10.0% ROA vs ORLA's 6.5%, ROIC 15.9% vs 82.1% |
ORLA vs CAT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
ORLA vs CAT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ORLA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CAT is the larger business by revenue, generating $70.8B annually — 58.6x ORLA's $1.2B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 13.3% (CAT) to 11.4% (ORLA). On growth, ORLA holds the edge at +4.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.2B | $70.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $699M | $14.0B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $138M | $9.4B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$71M | $11.4B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +52.5% | +32.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +44.2% | +16.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +11.4% | +13.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -5.9% | +16.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +4.7% | +22.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.7% | +30.2% |
Valuation Metrics
ORLA leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 46.0x trailing earnings, ORLA trades at a 6% valuation discount to CAT's 49.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, ORLA's 7.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CAT's 34.5x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $5.0B | $431.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $4.9B | $464.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 46.04x | 49.21x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 8.03x | 40.13x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.75x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.83x | 34.48x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.56x | 6.38x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 7.75x | 20.39x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 7.32x | 41.97x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ORLA leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CAT delivers a 47.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $48 in annual profit, vs $23 for ORLA. ORLA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.56x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CAT's 2.03x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CAT scores 5/9 vs ORLA's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +22.9% | +47.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +6.5% | +10.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +82.1% | +15.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +48.1% | +19.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.56x | 2.03x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$75M | $33.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $576M | $10.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $502M | $43.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 9.56x | 9.22x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CAT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CAT five years ago would be worth $40,189 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $39,011 for ORLA. Over the past 12 months, CAT leads with a +190.7% total return vs ORLA's +24.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CAT at 63.8% vs ORLA's 45.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +10.7% | +55.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +24.1% | +190.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +209.1% | +339.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +290.1% | +301.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1402.6% | +1223.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +45.7% | +63.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ORLA and CAT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ORLA is the less volatile stock with a 0.21 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CAT's 1.54 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CAT currently trades 99.6% from its 52-week high vs ORLA's 66.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.21x | 1.54x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $21.98 | $930.41 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $8.50 | $318.11 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +66.3% | +99.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 36.9 | 73.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.3M | 2.4M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates ORLA as "Buy" and CAT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply -11.0% upside for CAT (target: $825) vs -71.3% for ORLA (target: $4). CAT is the only dividend payer here at 0.63% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $4.18 | $824.80 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 4 | 53 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 8 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $5.86 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.2% |
ORLA leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). CAT leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.
ORLA vs CAT: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ORLA or CAT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Orla Mining Ltd.
(ORLA) is the stronger pick with 329. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 4. 3% for Caterpillar Inc. (CAT). Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA) offers the better valuation at 46. 0x trailing P/E (8. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA) a "Buy" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ORLA or CAT?
On trailing P/E, Orla Mining Ltd.
(ORLA) is the cheapest at 46. 0x versus Caterpillar Inc. at 49. 2x. On forward P/E, Orla Mining Ltd. is actually cheaper at 8. 0x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ORLA or CAT?
Over the past 5 years, Caterpillar Inc.
(CAT) delivered a total return of +301. 9%, compared to +290. 1% for Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ORLA returned +1403% versus CAT's +1223%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ORLA or CAT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Orla Mining Ltd.
(ORLA) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 21β versus Caterpillar Inc. 's 1. 54β — meaning CAT is approximately 643% more volatile than ORLA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 56% versus 2% for Caterpillar Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ORLA or CAT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Orla Mining Ltd.
(ORLA) is pulling ahead at 329. 5% versus 4. 3% for Caterpillar Inc. (CAT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Orla Mining Ltd. grew EPS 59. 3% year-over-year, compared to -14. 6% for Caterpillar Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ORLA leads at 97. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ORLA or CAT?
Caterpillar Inc.
(CAT) is the more profitable company, earning 13. 1% net margin versus 10. 1% for Orla Mining Ltd. — meaning it keeps 13. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ORLA leads at 43. 5% versus 16. 6% for CAT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ORLA leads at 48. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ORLA or CAT more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Orla Mining Ltd.
(ORLA) trades at 8. 0x forward P/E versus 40. 1x for Caterpillar Inc. — 32. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CAT: -11. 0% to $824. 80.
08Which pays a better dividend — ORLA or CAT?
In this comparison, CAT (0.
6% yield) pays a dividend. ORLA does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is ORLA or CAT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Orla Mining Ltd.
(ORLA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 21), +1403% 10Y return). Caterpillar Inc. (CAT) carries a higher beta of 1. 54 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ORLA: +1403%, CAT: +1223%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ORLA and CAT?
These companies operate in different sectors (ORLA (Basic Materials) and CAT (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: ORLA is a small-cap high-growth stock; CAT is a large-cap quality compounder stock. CAT pays a dividend while ORLA does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.