Asset Management
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
OXLCI vs ARCC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Asset Management
OXLCI vs ARCC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Asset Management | Asset Management |
| Market Cap | $6.12B | $13.61B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $307M | $3.15B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $545M | $1.15B |
| Gross Margin | 74.7% | 75.7% |
| Operating Margin | 73.4% | 69.7% |
| Forward P/E | 6.4x | 9.9x |
| Total Debt | $478M | $15.99B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $43M | $924M |
OXLCI vs ARCC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jul 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oxford Lane Capital… (OXLCI) | 100 | 99.5 | -0.5% |
| Ares Capital Corpor… (ARCC) | 100 | 90.5 | -9.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: OXLCI vs ARCC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
OXLCI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.57, yield 2.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.57, Low D/E 40.8%, current ratio 0.70x
- Beta 0.57, yield 2.7%, current ratio 0.70x
ARCC is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 32.9%, EPS growth -23.8%
- 139.2% 10Y total return vs OXLCI's 15.6%
- 32.9% NII/revenue growth vs OXLCI's 26.9%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 32.9% NII/revenue growth vs OXLCI's 26.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (6.4x vs 9.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.1% vs OXLCI's 0.3% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.57 vs ARCC's 0.77, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.7% yield, vs ARCC's 2.0% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +9.5% vs ARCC's +0.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.1% vs OXLCI's 0.3% |
OXLCI vs ARCC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
OXLCI leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ARCC is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.1B annually — 10.3x OXLCI's $307M. OXLCI is the more profitable business, keeping 76.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ARCC's 41.3%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $307M | $3.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $338M | $2.0B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $545M | $1.1B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $782M | $1.1B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +74.7% | +75.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +73.4% | +69.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +76.6% | +41.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -40.4% | +36.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +100.0% | -63.9% |
Valuation Metrics
ARCC leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 10.2x trailing earnings, ARCC trades at a 61% valuation discount to OXLCI's 26.1x P/E.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $6.1B | $13.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $6.6B | $28.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 26.11x | 10.19x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 6.41x | 9.92x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.99x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 13.09x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 19.95x | 4.33x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 5.23x | 0.93x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 11.92x |
Profitability & Efficiency
OXLCI leads this category, winning 8 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
OXLCI delivers a 33.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $34 in annual profit, vs $8 for ARCC. OXLCI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.41x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ARCC's 1.12x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), OXLCI scores 5/9 vs ARCC's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +33.9% | +8.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +24.4% | +3.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +11.4% | +5.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +15.4% | +7.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.41x | 1.12x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $435M | $15.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $43M | $924M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $478M | $16.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 2.98x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ARCC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ARCC five years ago would be worth $14,704 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,563 for OXLCI. Over the past 12 months, OXLCI leads with a +9.5% total return vs ARCC's +0.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ARCC at 10.3% vs OXLCI's 5.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +2.1% | -4.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +9.5% | +0.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +15.6% | +34.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +15.6% | +47.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +15.6% | +139.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +5.0% | +10.3% |
Risk & Volatility
OXLCI leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
OXLCI is the less volatile stock with a 0.57 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ARCC's 0.77 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. OXLCI currently trades 97.5% from its 52-week high vs ARCC's 81.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.57x | 0.77x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $26.25 | $23.42 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $7.89 | $17.40 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +97.5% | +81.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 73.2 | 56.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 6K | 7.5M |
Analyst Outlook
OXLCI leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
For income investors, OXLCI offers the higher dividend yield at 2.72% vs ARCC's 2.02%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $21.88 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 32 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.7% | +2.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.70 | $0.38 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
OXLCI leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). ARCC leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns).
OXLCI vs ARCC: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is OXLCI or ARCC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Ares Capital Corporation (ARCC) is the stronger pick with 32.
9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 26. 9% for Oxford Lane Capital Corp. (OXLCI). Ares Capital Corporation (ARCC) offers the better valuation at 10. 2x trailing P/E (9. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Ares Capital Corporation (ARCC) a "Buy" — based on 32 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — OXLCI or ARCC?
On trailing P/E, Ares Capital Corporation (ARCC) is the cheapest at 10.
2x versus Oxford Lane Capital Corp. at 26. 1x. On forward P/E, Oxford Lane Capital Corp. is actually cheaper at 6. 4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — OXLCI or ARCC?
Over the past 5 years, Ares Capital Corporation (ARCC) delivered a total return of +47.
0%, compared to +15. 6% for Oxford Lane Capital Corp. (OXLCI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ARCC returned +139. 2% versus OXLCI's +15. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — OXLCI or ARCC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Oxford Lane Capital Corp.
(OXLCI) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 57β versus Ares Capital Corporation's 0. 77β — meaning ARCC is approximately 36% more volatile than OXLCI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Oxford Lane Capital Corp. (OXLCI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 41% versus 112% for Ares Capital Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — OXLCI or ARCC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Ares Capital Corporation (ARCC) is pulling ahead at 32.
9% versus 26. 9% for Oxford Lane Capital Corp. (OXLCI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Oxford Lane Capital Corp. grew EPS 186. 0% year-over-year, compared to -23. 8% for Ares Capital Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — OXLCI or ARCC?
Oxford Lane Capital Corp.
(OXLCI) is the more profitable company, earning 76. 6% net margin versus 41. 3% for Ares Capital Corporation — meaning it keeps 76. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: OXLCI leads at 73. 4% versus 69. 7% for ARCC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ARCC leads at 75. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is OXLCI or ARCC more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Oxford Lane Capital Corp.
(OXLCI) trades at 6. 4x forward P/E versus 9. 9x for Ares Capital Corporation — 3. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — OXLCI or ARCC?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Oxford Lane Capital Corp. (OXLCI) offers the highest yield at 2. 7%, versus 2. 0% for Ares Capital Corporation (ARCC).
09Is OXLCI or ARCC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Oxford Lane Capital Corp.
(OXLCI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 57), 2. 7% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (OXLCI: +15. 6%, ARCC: +139. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between OXLCI and ARCC?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.
Compare ARCC vs GBDC
GBDC is one of the most direct listed alternatives to ARCC.
Compare OXLCI vs OXLC
OXLC is one of the most direct listed alternatives to OXLCI.
Expand With GBDC + TPVG
GBDC and TPVG are the strongest missing peers across the current compare set.