Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
PALI vs NKTR vs HALO vs AGEN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
PALI vs NKTR vs HALO vs AGEN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $111M | $1.69B | $7.68B | $132M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $55M | $1.40B | $114M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-17M | $-164M | $317M | $115K |
| Gross Margin | — | 99.6% | 81.9% | 35.7% |
| Operating Margin | — | -237.9% | 58.4% | -17.7% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 8.1x | 1.8x |
| Total Debt | $71K | $149M | $0.00 | $10M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $133M | $15M | $134M | $3M |
PALI vs NKTR vs HALO vs AGEN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Palisade Bio, Inc. (PALI) | 100 | 0.0 | -100.0% |
| Nektar Therapeutics (NKTR) | 100 | 25.6 | -74.4% |
| Halozyme Therapeuti… (HALO) | 100 | 268.6 | +168.6% |
| Agenus Inc. (AGEN) | 100 | 5.0 | -95.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PALI vs NKTR vs HALO vs AGEN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PALI is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.44, Low D/E 0.1%, current ratio 28.95x
- Beta 1.44, current ratio 28.95x
NKTR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if momentum is your priority.
- +8.2% vs HALO's -7.1%
HALO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 0.56
- Rev growth 37.6%, EPS growth -25.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 28.4%
- 5.7% 10Y total return vs NKTR's -59.1%
- 37.6% revenue growth vs NKTR's -43.9%
AGEN is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Lower P/E (1.8x vs 8.1x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 37.6% revenue growth vs NKTR's -43.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (1.8x vs 8.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 22.7% margin vs NKTR's -297.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.56 vs AGEN's 2.72 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +8.2% vs HALO's -7.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 12.5% ROA vs NKTR's -62.8%, ROIC 73.4% vs -57.2% |
PALI vs NKTR vs HALO vs AGEN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
PALI vs NKTR vs HALO vs AGEN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
HALO leads in 3 of 6 categories
AGEN leads 1 • NKTR leads 1 • PALI leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HALO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HALO and PALI operate at a comparable scale, with $1.4B and $0 in trailing revenue. HALO is the more profitable business, keeping 22.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NKTR's -3.0%. On growth, HALO holds the edge at +51.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $55M | $1.4B | $114M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$18M | -$130M | $945M | -$10M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$17M | -$164M | $317M | $115,000 |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$11M | -$209M | $645M | -$159M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +99.6% | +81.9% | +35.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | -2.4% | +58.4% | -17.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | -3.0% | +22.7% | +0.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | -3.8% | +46.2% | -139.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -25.3% | +51.6% | +27.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +85.7% | -4.5% | -2.1% | +85.3% |
Valuation Metrics
AGEN leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $111M | $1.7B | $7.7B | $132M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$23M | $1.8B | $7.5B | $140M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -6.63x | -8.57x | 25.46x | -1102.94x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 8.09x | 1.79x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 1.11x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 8.34x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 30.64x | 5.50x | 1.16x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.86x | 15.66x | 165.47x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 11.91x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
HALO leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HALO delivers a 6.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $6 in annual profit, vs $-4 for NKTR. PALI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NKTR's 1.66x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AGEN scores 6/9 vs NKTR's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -47.8% | -4.0% | +6.5% | — |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -43.0% | -62.8% | +12.5% | +0.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | -57.2% | +73.4% | — |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -26.3% | -55.7% | +38.2% | — |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 2 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.00x | 1.66x | — | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$133M | $134M | -$134M | $7M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $133M | $15M | $134M | $3M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $71,000 | $149M | $0 | $10M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -1805.60x | -4.74x | 46.08x | 1.11x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NKTR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in HALO five years ago would be worth $13,704 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4 for PALI. Over the past 12 months, NKTR leads with a +818.2% total return vs HALO's -7.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NKTR at 93.3% vs PALI's -56.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -20.4% | +92.0% | -7.3% | +16.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +161.8% | +818.2% | -7.1% | +27.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -92.0% | +621.8% | +115.3% | -88.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | -72.3% | +37.0% | -93.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | -59.1% | +570.7% | -94.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -56.9% | +93.3% | +29.1% | -51.0% |
Risk & Volatility
HALO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
HALO is the less volatile stock with a 0.56 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AGEN's 2.72 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. HALO currently trades 79.3% from its 52-week high vs AGEN's 51.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.44x | 1.85x | 0.56x | 2.72x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.85 | $109.00 | $82.22 | $7.34 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.53 | $7.99 | $47.50 | $2.71 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +69.7% | +76.5% | +79.3% | +51.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 47.9 | 53.4 | 52.4 | 48.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3.9M | 991K | 1.4M | 814K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: PALI as "Buy", NKTR as "Buy", HALO as "Buy", AGEN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 95.5% upside for AGEN (target: $7) vs -24.6% for PALI (target: $2).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $1.50 | $132.83 | $78.33 | $7.33 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 3 | 33 | 27 | 11 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +4.5% | +0.1% |
HALO leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). AGEN leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
PALI vs NKTR vs HALO vs AGEN: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PALI or NKTR or HALO or AGEN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc.
(HALO) is the stronger pick with 37. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -43. 9% for Nektar Therapeutics (NKTR). Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc. (HALO) offers the better valuation at 25. 5x trailing P/E (8. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Palisade Bio, Inc. (PALI) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — PALI or NKTR or HALO or AGEN?
On forward P/E, Agenus Inc.
is actually cheaper at 1. 8x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — PALI or NKTR or HALO or AGEN?
Over the past 5 years, Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc.
(HALO) delivered a total return of +37. 0%, compared to -100. 0% for Palisade Bio, Inc. (PALI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HALO returned +570. 7% versus PALI's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — PALI or NKTR or HALO or AGEN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc.
(HALO) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 56β versus Agenus Inc. 's 2. 72β — meaning AGEN is approximately 388% more volatile than HALO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Palisade Bio, Inc. (PALI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 166% for Nektar Therapeutics — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — PALI or NKTR or HALO or AGEN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc.
(HALO) is pulling ahead at 37. 6% versus -43. 9% for Nektar Therapeutics (NKTR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Agenus Inc. grew EPS 100. 0% year-over-year, compared to -25. 4% for Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, HALO leads at 28. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — PALI or NKTR or HALO or AGEN?
Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc.
(HALO) is the more profitable company, earning 22. 7% net margin versus -297. 1% for Nektar Therapeutics — meaning it keeps 22. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HALO leads at 58. 4% versus -236. 8% for NKTR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NKTR leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is PALI or NKTR or HALO or AGEN more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Agenus Inc.
(AGEN) trades at 1. 8x forward P/E versus 8. 1x for Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc. — 6. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for AGEN: 95. 5% to $7. 33.
08Which pays a better dividend — PALI or NKTR or HALO or AGEN?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is PALI or NKTR or HALO or AGEN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc.
(HALO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 56), +570. 7% 10Y return). Agenus Inc. (AGEN) carries a higher beta of 2. 72 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (HALO: +570. 7%, AGEN: -94. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between PALI and NKTR and HALO and AGEN?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: PALI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NKTR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; HALO is a small-cap high-growth stock; AGEN is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.