Information Technology Services
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
PAY vs PRTH vs EVTC vs FLYW vs FIS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Infrastructure
Software - Infrastructure
Information Technology Services
Information Technology Services
PAY vs PRTH vs EVTC vs FLYW vs FIS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Information Technology Services | Software - Infrastructure | Software - Infrastructure | Information Technology Services | Information Technology Services |
| Market Cap | $3.34B | $460M | $1.48B | $2.06B | $22.48B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.28B | $953M | $951M | $188.60B | $11.66B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $74M | $56M | $133M | $12.54B | $2.67B |
| Gross Margin | 24.7% | 21.4% | 46.4% | 0.2% | 37.6% |
| Operating Margin | 6.8% | 14.8% | 19.1% | 5.7% | 17.0% |
| Forward P/E | 32.3x | 5.9x | 6.1x | 41.5x | 6.9x |
| Total Debt | $11M | $1.05B | $1.13B | $0.00 | $4.01B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $325M | $77M | $306M | $330M | $599M |
PAY vs PRTH vs EVTC vs FLYW vs FIS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Paymentus Holdings,… (PAY) | 100 | 87.3 | -12.7% |
| Priority Technology… (PRTH) | 100 | 72.5 | -27.5% |
| EVERTEC, Inc. (EVTC) | 100 | 55.2 | -44.8% |
| Flywire Corporation (FLYW) | 100 | 50.2 | -49.8% |
| Fidelity National I… (FIS) | 100 | 29.2 | -70.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PAY vs PRTH vs EVTC vs FLYW vs FIS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PAY is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 37.3%, EPS growth 48.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 34.0%
- -6.9% 10Y total return vs EVTC's 94.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.87, Low D/E 2.0%, current ratio 4.46x
- 37.3% revenue growth vs FIS's 5.4%
PRTH ranks third and is worth considering specifically for value.
- Lower P/E (5.9x vs 41.5x)
Among these 5 stocks, EVTC doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
FLYW is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +54.9% vs FIS's -42.1%
FIS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and valuation efficiency.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.65, yield 3.8%
- PEG 0.28 vs EVTC's 0.68
- Beta 0.65, yield 3.8%, current ratio 0.59x
- 22.9% margin vs PAY's 5.8%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 37.3% revenue growth vs FIS's 5.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (5.9x vs 41.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 22.9% margin vs PAY's 5.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.65 vs PRTH's 2.00 | |
| Dividends | 3.8% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs EVTC's 0.8%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +54.9% vs FIS's -42.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.3% ROA vs PRTH's 2.6%, ROIC 21.2% vs 13.4% |
PAY vs PRTH vs EVTC vs FLYW vs FIS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
PAY vs PRTH vs EVTC vs FLYW vs FIS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
PAY leads in 2 of 6 categories
FIS leads 1 • PRTH leads 1 • EVTC leads 0 • FLYW leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FIS leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FLYW is the larger business by revenue, generating $188.6B annually — 198.3x EVTC's $951M. FIS is the more profitable business, keeping 22.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PAY's 5.8%. On growth, FLYW holds the edge at +1408.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.3B | $953M | $951M | $188.6B | $11.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $127M | $204M | $316M | $10.8B | $3.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $74M | $56M | $133M | $12.5B | $2.7B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $132M | $75M | $165M | -$15.8B | $2.7B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +24.7% | +21.4% | +46.4% | +0.2% | +37.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +6.8% | +14.8% | +19.1% | +5.7% | +17.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +5.8% | +5.8% | +13.9% | +6.6% | +22.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +10.3% | +7.9% | +17.4% | -8.4% | +23.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +30.2% | +8.8% | +8.4% | +1408.6% | +30.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +45.5% | +3.1% | -24.0% | +4.0% | +30.6% |
Valuation Metrics
PRTH leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 8.3x trailing earnings, PRTH trades at a 95% valuation discount to FLYW's 156.6x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), PAY offers better value at 1.07x vs FIS's 2.38x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3.3B | $460M | $1.5B | $2.1B | $22.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.0B | $1.4B | $2.3B | $1.7B | $25.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 51.23x | 8.26x | 10.91x | 156.64x | 58.00x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 32.26x | 5.89x | 6.14x | 41.52x | 6.94x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.07x | — | 1.21x | — | 2.38x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 25.93x | 6.99x | 7.47x | 46.20x | 7.11x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.79x | 0.48x | 1.59x | 3.30x | 2.11x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 6.15x | — | 2.17x | 2.64x | 1.62x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 20.63x | 6.13x | 10.92x | 20.81x | 8.00x |
Profitability & Efficiency
PAY leads this category, winning 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
EVTC delivers a 18.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $19 in annual profit, vs $6 for FLYW. PAY carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to EVTC's 1.58x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), EVTC scores 7/9 vs FIS's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +13.5% | — | +18.7% | +5.9% | +18.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +11.3% | +2.6% | +6.1% | +4.3% | +7.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +21.2% | +13.4% | +10.2% | +2.1% | +6.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +14.2% | +16.0% | +10.5% | +1.3% | +6.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 6 | 7 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.02x | — | 1.58x | — | 0.29x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$313M | $969M | $824M | -$330M | $3.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $325M | $77M | $306M | $330M | $599M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $11M | $1.0B | $1.1B | $0 | $4.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 1.51x | 3.10x | 1.84x | 15.37x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PAY leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PAY five years ago would be worth $9,311 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,487 for FIS. Over the past 12 months, FLYW leads with a +54.9% total return vs FIS's -42.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PAY at 49.1% vs FLYW's -16.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -6.4% | +5.6% | -16.1% | +24.0% | -33.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -27.9% | -16.2% | -31.8% | +54.9% | -42.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +231.3% | +53.6% | -29.9% | -41.8% | -13.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -6.9% | -13.5% | -41.8% | -50.9% | -65.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -6.9% | -42.7% | +94.4% | -50.9% | -18.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +49.1% | +15.4% | -11.2% | -16.5% | -4.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — FLYW and FIS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FIS is the less volatile stock with a 0.65 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PRTH's 2.00 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FLYW currently trades 95.5% from its 52-week high vs FIS's 52.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.87x | 2.00x | 0.77x | 1.48x | 0.65x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $40.43 | $8.89 | $38.56 | $18.05 | $82.74 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $22.02 | $4.44 | $21.82 | $9.97 | $43.28 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +65.9% | +63.2% | +62.3% | +95.5% | +52.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 54.9 | 60.9 | 21.5 | 83.6 | 50.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 495K | 252K | 453K | 1.9M | 5.6M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — PRTH and FIS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: PAY as "Hold", PRTH as "Buy", EVTC as "Buy", FLYW as "Buy", FIS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 113.5% upside for PRTH (target: $12) vs 8.8% for FLYW (target: $19). For income investors, FIS offers the higher dividend yield at 3.75% vs EVTC's 0.83%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $34.50 | $12.00 | $34.00 | $18.75 | $67.14 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 10 | 5 | 18 | 19 | 37 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +0.8% | — | +3.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 3 | 1 | — | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $0.20 | — | $1.63 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +2.2% | +4.7% | +3.8% | +6.3% |
PAY leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). FIS leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.
PAY vs PRTH vs EVTC vs FLYW vs FIS: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PAY or PRTH or EVTC or FLYW or FIS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Paymentus Holdings, Inc.
(PAY) is the stronger pick with 37. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 5. 4% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS). Priority Technology Holdings, Inc. (PRTH) offers the better valuation at 8. 3x trailing P/E (5. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Priority Technology Holdings, Inc. (PRTH) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — PAY or PRTH or EVTC or FLYW or FIS?
On trailing P/E, Priority Technology Holdings, Inc.
(PRTH) is the cheapest at 8. 3x versus Flywire Corporation at 156. 6x. On forward P/E, Priority Technology Holdings, Inc. is actually cheaper at 5. 9x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. wins at 0. 28x versus EVERTEC, Inc. 's 0. 68x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — PAY or PRTH or EVTC or FLYW or FIS?
Over the past 5 years, Paymentus Holdings, Inc.
(PAY) delivered a total return of -6. 9%, compared to -65. 1% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: EVTC returned +94. 4% versus FLYW's -50. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — PAY or PRTH or EVTC or FLYW or FIS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.
(FIS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 65β versus Priority Technology Holdings, Inc. 's 2. 00β — meaning PRTH is approximately 208% more volatile than FIS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Paymentus Holdings, Inc. (PAY) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 158% for EVERTEC, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — PAY or PRTH or EVTC or FLYW or FIS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Paymentus Holdings, Inc.
(PAY) is pulling ahead at 37. 3% versus 5. 4% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Flywire Corporation grew EPS 391. 1% year-over-year, compared to -47. 2% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, PAY leads at 34. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — PAY or PRTH or EVTC or FLYW or FIS?
EVERTEC, Inc.
(EVTC) is the more profitable company, earning 15. 2% net margin versus 2. 2% for Flywire Corporation — meaning it keeps 15. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: EVTC leads at 20. 0% versus 1. 8% for FLYW. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FLYW leads at 61. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is PAY or PRTH or EVTC or FLYW or FIS more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 28x versus EVERTEC, Inc. 's 0. 68x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Priority Technology Holdings, Inc. (PRTH) trades at 5. 9x forward P/E versus 41. 5x for Flywire Corporation — 35. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PRTH: 113. 5% to $12. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — PAY or PRTH or EVTC or FLYW or FIS?
In this comparison, FIS (3.
8% yield), EVTC (0. 8% yield) pay a dividend. PAY, PRTH, FLYW do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is PAY or PRTH or EVTC or FLYW or FIS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.
(FIS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 65), 3. 8% yield). Priority Technology Holdings, Inc. (PRTH) carries a higher beta of 2. 00 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (FIS: -18. 4%, PRTH: -42. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between PAY and PRTH and EVTC and FLYW and FIS?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: PAY is a small-cap high-growth stock; PRTH is a small-cap deep-value stock; EVTC is a small-cap deep-value stock; FLYW is a small-cap high-growth stock; FIS is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. EVTC, FIS pay a dividend while PAY, PRTH, FLYW do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.