Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
PBFS vs NBTB
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
PBFS vs NBTB — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $366M | $2.36B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $88M | $867M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $20M | $169M |
| Gross Margin | 100.0% | 72.1% |
| Operating Margin | 37.3% | 25.3% |
| Forward P/E | 19.2x | 10.8x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $327M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $119M | $185M |
PBFS vs NBTB — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pioneer Bancorp, In… (PBFS) | 100 | 153.0 | +53.0% |
| NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) | 100 | 144.3 | +44.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PBFS vs NBTB
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PBFS is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- beta 0.52
- Lower volatility, beta 0.52, current ratio 0.24x
- PEG 0.66 vs NBTB's 1.54
NBTB carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 10.4%, EPS growth 12.5%
- 102.2% 10Y total return vs PBFS's -0.9%
- 10.4% NII/revenue growth vs PBFS's -10.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 10.4% NII/revenue growth vs PBFS's -10.7% | |
| Value | PEG 0.66 vs 1.54 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.5% vs PBFS's 0.6% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.52 vs NBTB's 0.89 | |
| Dividends | 3.2% yield; 12-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +29.4% vs NBTB's +9.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.5% vs PBFS's 0.6% |
PBFS vs NBTB — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
PBFS vs NBTB — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PBFS leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NBTB is the larger business by revenue, generating $867M annually — 9.8x PBFS's $88M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 21.8% (PBFS) to 19.5% (NBTB).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $88M | $867M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $28M | $241M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $20M | $169M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $9M | $225M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +100.0% | +72.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +37.3% | +25.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +21.8% | +19.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +36.5% | +25.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +15.4% | +39.5% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — PBFS and NBTB each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 13.6x trailing earnings, NBTB trades at a 29% valuation discount to PBFS's 19.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), PBFS offers better value at 0.66x vs NBTB's 1.93x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $366M | $2.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $247M | $2.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 19.22x | 13.57x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 10.83x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.66x | 1.93x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.52x | 10.38x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.16x | 2.72x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.17x | 1.21x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 11.38x | 10.78x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — PBFS and NBTB each lead in 4 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NBTB delivers a 9.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $10 in annual profit, vs $6 for PBFS. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NBTB scores 7/9 vs PBFS's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +6.4% | +9.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.9% | +1.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +8.1% | +7.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +9.7% | +2.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.17x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$119M | $142M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $119M | $185M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $327M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.87x | 1.05x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PBFS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NBTB five years ago would be worth $12,950 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $12,277 for PBFS. Over the past 12 months, PBFS leads with a +29.4% total return vs NBTB's +9.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PBFS at 19.3% vs NBTB's 15.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +9.8% | +9.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +29.4% | +9.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +69.7% | +54.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +22.8% | +29.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -0.9% | +102.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +19.3% | +15.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — PBFS and NBTB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PBFS is the less volatile stock with a 0.52 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NBTB's 0.89 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.52x | 0.89x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $15.18 | $46.92 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $11.09 | $39.20 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +96.2% | +96.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 54.6 | 54.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 13K | 234K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
NBTB is the only dividend payer here at 3.16% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $46.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 10 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +3.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 12 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.43 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.7% | +0.4% |
PBFS leads in 2 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Total Returns. 3 categories are tied.
PBFS vs NBTB: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PBFS or NBTB a better buy right now?
For growth investors, NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) is the stronger pick with 10. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -10. 7% for Pioneer Bancorp, Inc. (PBFS). NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) offers the better valuation at 13. 6x trailing P/E (10. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) a "Hold" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — PBFS or NBTB?
On trailing P/E, NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) is the cheapest at 13. 6x versus Pioneer Bancorp, Inc. at 19. 2x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — PBFS or NBTB?
Over the past 5 years, NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) delivered a total return of +29. 5%, compared to +22. 8% for Pioneer Bancorp, Inc. (PBFS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NBTB returned +102. 2% versus PBFS's -0. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — PBFS or NBTB?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Pioneer Bancorp, Inc.
(PBFS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 52β versus NBT Bancorp Inc. 's 0. 89β — meaning NBTB is approximately 72% more volatile than PBFS relative to the S&P 500.
05Which is growing faster — PBFS or NBTB?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) is pulling ahead at 10. 4% versus -10. 7% for Pioneer Bancorp, Inc. (PBFS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Pioneer Bancorp, Inc. grew EPS 24. 6% year-over-year, compared to 12. 5% for NBT Bancorp Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — PBFS or NBTB?
Pioneer Bancorp, Inc.
(PBFS) is the more profitable company, earning 21. 8% net margin versus 19. 5% for NBT Bancorp Inc. — meaning it keeps 21. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PBFS leads at 37. 3% versus 25. 3% for NBTB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PBFS leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Which pays a better dividend — PBFS or NBTB?
In this comparison, NBTB (3.
2% yield) pays a dividend. PBFS does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is PBFS or NBTB better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 89), 3. 2% yield, +102. 2% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (NBTB: +102. 2%, PBFS: -0. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between PBFS and NBTB?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: PBFS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NBTB is a small-cap deep-value stock. NBTB pays a dividend while PBFS does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.