Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
PBYI vs PTCT vs ACAD vs IQV vs CRL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Medical - Diagnostics & Research
Medical - Diagnostics & Research
PBYI vs PTCT vs ACAD vs IQV vs CRL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Medical - Diagnostics & Research | Medical - Diagnostics & Research |
| Market Cap | $369M | $5.35B | $3.86B | $30.32B | $8.98B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $227M | $827M | $1.10B | $16.63B | $4.03B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $24M | $-187M | $376M | $1.39B | $-185M |
| Gross Margin | 74.4% | 49.7% | 91.5% | 26.1% | 24.9% |
| Operating Margin | 13.0% | -8.3% | 7.4% | 13.9% | 11.8% |
| Forward P/E | 29.0x | 8.3x | 50.9x | 14.1x | 16.4x |
| Total Debt | $29M | $492M | $52M | $16.17B | $3.07B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $30M | $985M | $178M | $1.98B | $214M |
PBYI vs PTCT vs ACAD vs IQV vs CRL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Puma Biotechnology,… (PBYI) | 100 | 71.1 | -28.9% |
| PTC Therapeutics, I… (PTCT) | 100 | 127.2 | +27.2% |
| ACADIA Pharmaceutic… (ACAD) | 100 | 45.4 | -54.6% |
| IQVIA Holdings Inc. (IQV) | 100 | 119.5 | +19.5% |
| Charles River Labor… (CRL) | 100 | 101.3 | +1.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PBYI vs PTCT vs ACAD vs IQV vs CRL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PBYI has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.11, Low D/E 21.9%, current ratio 2.00x
- Beta 1.11, current ratio 2.00x
- Beta 1.11 vs CRL's 1.52, lower leverage
- +142.8% vs IQV's +16.5%
PTCT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 114.5%, EPS growth 264.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 35.3%
- 7.3% 10Y total return vs IQV's 166.5%
- 114.5% revenue growth vs PBYI's -0.9%
- Lower P/E (8.3x vs 16.4x)
ACAD ranks third and is worth considering specifically for quality and efficiency.
- 34.3% margin vs PTCT's -22.6%
- 26.2% ROA vs PTCT's -6.8%
IQV is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 1.33
Among these 5 stocks, CRL doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 114.5% revenue growth vs PBYI's -0.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.3x vs 16.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 34.3% margin vs PTCT's -22.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.11 vs CRL's 1.52, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +142.8% vs IQV's +16.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 26.2% ROA vs PTCT's -6.8% |
PBYI vs PTCT vs ACAD vs IQV vs CRL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
PBYI vs PTCT vs ACAD vs IQV vs CRL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
PBYI leads in 3 of 6 categories
ACAD leads 1 • IQV leads 1 • PTCT leads 0 • CRL leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ACAD leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
IQV is the larger business by revenue, generating $16.6B annually — 73.2x PBYI's $227M. ACAD is the more profitable business, keeping 34.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PTCT's -22.6%. On growth, ACAD holds the edge at +9.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $227M | $827M | $1.1B | $16.6B | $4.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $43M | -$37M | $96M | $3.5B | $757M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $24M | -$187M | $376M | $1.4B | -$185M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $38M | -$229M | $212M | $2.7B | $391M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +74.4% | +49.7% | +91.5% | +26.1% | +24.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +13.0% | -8.3% | +7.4% | +13.9% | +11.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +10.7% | -22.6% | +34.3% | +8.3% | -4.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +16.8% | -27.7% | +19.4% | +16.1% | +9.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.6% | -76.8% | +9.7% | +8.4% | +1.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.2% | -100.3% | -81.8% | +15.0% | -160.0% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — PTCT and CRL each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 8.3x trailing earnings, PTCT trades at a 64% valuation discount to IQV's 22.8x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, PTCT's 5.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ACAD's 26.9x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $369M | $5.3B | $3.9B | $30.3B | $9.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $368M | $4.9B | $3.7B | $44.5B | $11.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 11.90x | 8.29x | 9.85x | 22.79x | -62.52x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 29.04x | — | 50.91x | 14.06x | 16.42x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 0.56x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.64x | 5.42x | 26.91x | 12.97x | 12.98x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.62x | 3.09x | 3.61x | 1.86x | 2.24x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.82x | — | 3.15x | 4.67x | 2.81x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 8.85x | 7.61x | 36.74x | 14.78x | 17.31x |
Profitability & Efficiency
PBYI leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ACAD delivers a 35.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $36 in annual profit, vs $-6 for CRL. ACAD carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to IQV's 2.44x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PBYI scores 7/9 vs CRL's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +27.7% | — | +35.6% | +22.1% | -5.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +13.6% | -6.8% | +26.2% | +4.7% | -2.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +24.7% | — | +10.0% | +8.7% | +6.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +29.6% | +55.9% | +10.1% | +11.0% | +8.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 7 | 6 | 4 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.22x | — | 0.04x | 2.44x | 0.95x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$1M | -$492M | -$126M | $14.2B | $2.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $30M | $985M | $178M | $2.0B | $214M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $29M | $492M | $52M | $16.2B | $3.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 9.91x | -1.67x | — | 3.10x | 6.38x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PBYI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PTCT five years ago would be worth $16,026 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,311 for CRL. Over the past 12 months, PBYI leads with a +142.8% total return vs IQV's +16.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PBYI at 31.4% vs IQV's -2.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +25.8% | -16.0% | -13.7% | -20.7% | -10.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +142.8% | +58.2% | +52.4% | +16.5% | +32.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +126.9% | +16.1% | +4.7% | -5.9% | -4.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -25.8% | +60.3% | +7.1% | -23.8% | -46.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -70.4% | +733.2% | -22.9% | +166.5% | +119.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +31.4% | +5.1% | +1.5% | -2.0% | -1.4% |
Risk & Volatility
PBYI leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PBYI is the less volatile stock with a 1.11 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CRL's 1.52 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PBYI currently trades 91.9% from its 52-week high vs IQV's 72.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.11x | 1.13x | 1.26x | 1.33x | 1.52x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $7.90 | $87.50 | $27.81 | $247.05 | $228.88 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.85 | $37.94 | $14.45 | $134.65 | $131.30 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +91.9% | +73.7% | +81.1% | +72.3% | +79.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 56.5 | 45.3 | 44.2 | 58.5 | 57.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 335K | 1.0M | 1.8M | 1.6M | 806K |
Analyst Outlook
IQV leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: PBYI as "Buy", PTCT as "Buy", ACAD as "Buy", IQV as "Buy", CRL as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 54.1% upside for ACAD (target: $35) vs 12.9% for CRL (target: $205).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $89.67 | $34.78 | $225.63 | $205.43 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 19 | 26 | 37 | 44 | 36 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | 2 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +4.1% | +4.0% |
PBYI leads in 3 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). ACAD leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 1 tied.
PBYI vs PTCT vs ACAD vs IQV vs CRL: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PBYI or PTCT or ACAD or IQV or CRL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, PTC Therapeutics, Inc.
(PTCT) is the stronger pick with 114. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -0. 9% for Puma Biotechnology, Inc. (PBYI). PTC Therapeutics, Inc. (PTCT) offers the better valuation at 8. 3x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Puma Biotechnology, Inc. (PBYI) a "Buy" — based on 19 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — PBYI or PTCT or ACAD or IQV or CRL?
On trailing P/E, PTC Therapeutics, Inc.
(PTCT) is the cheapest at 8. 3x versus IQVIA Holdings Inc. at 22. 8x. On forward P/E, IQVIA Holdings Inc. is actually cheaper at 14. 1x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — PBYI or PTCT or ACAD or IQV or CRL?
Over the past 5 years, PTC Therapeutics, Inc.
(PTCT) delivered a total return of +60. 3%, compared to -46. 9% for Charles River Laboratories International, Inc. (CRL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PTCT returned +733. 2% versus PBYI's -70. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — PBYI or PTCT or ACAD or IQV or CRL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Puma Biotechnology, Inc.
(PBYI) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 11β versus Charles River Laboratories International, Inc. 's 1. 52β — meaning CRL is approximately 37% more volatile than PBYI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. (ACAD) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 2% for IQVIA Holdings Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — PBYI or PTCT or ACAD or IQV or CRL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), PTC Therapeutics, Inc.
(PTCT) is pulling ahead at 114. 5% versus -0. 9% for Puma Biotechnology, Inc. (PBYI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: PTC Therapeutics, Inc. grew EPS 264. 5% year-over-year, compared to -1555. 0% for Charles River Laboratories International, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, PTCT leads at 35. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — PBYI or PTCT or ACAD or IQV or CRL?
PTC Therapeutics, Inc.
(PTCT) is the more profitable company, earning 39. 4% net margin versus -3. 6% for Charles River Laboratories International, Inc. — meaning it keeps 39. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PTCT leads at 49. 5% versus 9. 8% for ACAD. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PTCT leads at 95. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is PBYI or PTCT or ACAD or IQV or CRL more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, IQVIA Holdings Inc.
(IQV) trades at 14. 1x forward P/E versus 50. 9x for ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. — 36. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ACAD: 54. 1% to $34. 78.
08Which pays a better dividend — PBYI or PTCT or ACAD or IQV or CRL?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is PBYI or PTCT or ACAD or IQV or CRL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, PTC Therapeutics, Inc.
(PTCT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 13), +733. 2% 10Y return). Charles River Laboratories International, Inc. (CRL) carries a higher beta of 1. 52 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (PTCT: +733. 2%, CRL: +119. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between PBYI and PTCT and ACAD and IQV and CRL?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: PBYI is a small-cap deep-value stock; PTCT is a small-cap high-growth stock; ACAD is a small-cap deep-value stock; IQV is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; CRL is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.