Beverages - Non-Alcoholic
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
PEP vs MDLZ vs CPB vs GIS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Food Confectioners
Packaged Foods
Packaged Foods
PEP vs MDLZ vs CPB vs GIS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Beverages - Non-Alcoholic | Food Confectioners | Packaged Foods | Packaged Foods |
| Market Cap | $213.59B | $78.70B | $6.34B | $19.05B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $93.92B | $39.30B | $10.04B | $18.37B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $8.24B | $2.61B | $550M | $2.21B |
| Gross Margin | 54.1% | 28.8% | 29.3% | 33.0% |
| Operating Margin | 12.2% | 9.4% | 12.1% | 19.1% |
| Forward P/E | 18.0x | 20.1x | 9.7x | 10.4x |
| Total Debt | $49.90B | $22.40B | $7.21B | $15.30B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $9.16B | $2.13B | $132M | $364M |
PEP vs MDLZ vs CPB vs GIS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| PepsiCo, Inc. (PEP) | 100 | 118.8 | +18.8% |
| Mondelez Internatio… (MDLZ) | 100 | 117.6 | +17.6% |
| Campbell Soup Compa… (CPB) | 100 | 41.7 | -58.3% |
| General Mills, Inc. (GIS) | 100 | 56.6 | -43.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PEP vs MDLZ vs CPB vs GIS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PEP carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 25 yrs, beta 0.03, yield 3.6%
- 89.2% 10Y total return vs MDLZ's 68.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.03, current ratio 0.85x
- Beta 0.03, yield 3.6%, current ratio 0.85x
MDLZ lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
CPB is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 6.4%, EPS growth 6.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 6.2%
- 6.4% revenue growth vs GIS's -1.9%
- 7.2% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs PEP's 3.6%
GIS is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency.
- PEG 3.64 vs PEP's 5.53
- Lower P/E (10.4x vs 20.1x)
- 12.1% margin vs CPB's 5.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 6.4% revenue growth vs GIS's -1.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.4x vs 20.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 12.1% margin vs CPB's 5.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.03 vs MDLZ's 0.06 | |
| Dividends | 7.2% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs PEP's 3.6% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +22.8% vs CPB's -35.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 7.7% ROA vs CPB's 3.7%, ROIC 14.9% vs 9.1% |
PEP vs MDLZ vs CPB vs GIS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
PEP vs MDLZ vs CPB vs GIS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
PEP leads in 2 of 6 categories
CPB leads 1 • MDLZ leads 0 • GIS leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — PEP and GIS each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PEP is the larger business by revenue, generating $93.9B annually — 9.4x CPB's $10.0B. GIS is the more profitable business, keeping 12.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CPB's 5.5%. On growth, MDLZ holds the edge at +8.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $93.9B | $39.3B | $10.0B | $18.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $14.3B | $4.9B | $1.6B | $3.9B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $8.2B | $2.6B | $550M | $2.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $7.7B | $2.6B | $919M | $1.7B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +54.1% | +28.8% | +29.3% | +33.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +12.2% | +9.4% | +12.1% | +19.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +8.8% | +6.6% | +5.5% | +12.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +8.2% | +6.6% | +9.2% | +9.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +5.6% | +8.2% | -4.5% | -8.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +66.7% | +38.7% | -17.2% | -50.0% |
Valuation Metrics
CPB leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 8.7x trailing earnings, GIS trades at a 73% valuation discount to MDLZ's 32.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), GIS offers better value at 3.04x vs PEP's 7.98x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $213.6B | $78.7B | $6.3B | $19.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $254.3B | $99.0B | $13.4B | $34.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 26.05x | 32.44x | 10.57x | 8.71x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 18.05x | 20.06x | 9.74x | 10.43x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 7.98x | — | — | 3.04x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 17.78x | 19.88x | 7.51x | 8.84x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.27x | 2.04x | 0.62x | 0.98x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 10.43x | 3.07x | 1.63x | 2.16x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 27.84x | 24.33x | 8.99x | 8.31x |
Profitability & Efficiency
PEP leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
PEP delivers a 40.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $40 in annual profit, vs $10 for MDLZ. MDLZ carries lower financial leverage with a 0.87x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PEP's 2.43x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CPB scores 7/9 vs GIS's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +40.1% | +10.0% | +14.0% | +23.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +7.7% | +3.7% | +3.7% | +6.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +14.9% | +6.0% | +9.1% | +10.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +16.1% | +7.3% | +11.4% | +13.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 | 7 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 2.43x | 0.87x | 1.85x | 1.66x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $40.7B | $20.3B | $7.1B | $14.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $9.2B | $2.1B | $132M | $364M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $49.9B | $22.4B | $7.2B | $15.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 10.34x | 10.01x | 3.14x | 5.01x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PEP leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PEP five years ago would be worth $12,459 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,806 for CPB. Over the past 12 months, PEP leads with a +22.8% total return vs CPB's -35.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PEP at -3.7% vs CPB's -22.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +10.9% | +15.2% | -20.5% | -19.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +22.8% | -5.8% | -35.4% | -29.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -10.8% | -14.5% | -52.6% | -52.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +24.6% | +12.6% | -41.9% | -25.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +89.2% | +68.4% | -44.9% | -9.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -3.7% | -5.1% | -22.0% | -21.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — PEP and GIS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
GIS is the less volatile stock with a -0.04 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MDLZ's 0.06 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PEP currently trades 91.1% from its 52-week high vs CPB's 58.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.03x | 0.06x | -0.02x | -0.04x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $171.48 | $71.15 | $36.16 | $55.35 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $127.60 | $51.20 | $19.76 | $33.58 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +91.1% | +86.2% | +58.8% | +64.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 49.9 | 68.7 | 46.7 | 42.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 5.7M | 9.0M | 9.1M | 8.7M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — PEP and CPB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: PEP as "Hold", MDLZ as "Buy", CPB as "Hold", GIS as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 30.4% upside for GIS (target: $47) vs 9.3% for MDLZ (target: $67). For income investors, CPB offers the higher dividend yield at 7.20% vs MDLZ's 3.13%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $174.00 | $67.00 | $25.83 | $46.58 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 45 | 41 | 29 | 34 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.6% | +3.1% | +7.2% | +6.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 25 | 12 | 1 | 5 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $5.57 | $1.92 | $1.53 | $2.40 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.5% | +3.0% | +1.0% | +6.3% |
PEP leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). CPB leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 3 tied.
PEP vs MDLZ vs CPB vs GIS: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PEP or MDLZ or CPB or GIS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Campbell Soup Company (CPB) is the stronger pick with 6.
4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 9% for General Mills, Inc. (GIS). General Mills, Inc. (GIS) offers the better valuation at 8. 7x trailing P/E (10. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Mondelez International, Inc. (MDLZ) a "Buy" — based on 41 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — PEP or MDLZ or CPB or GIS?
On trailing P/E, General Mills, Inc.
(GIS) is the cheapest at 8. 7x versus Mondelez International, Inc. at 32. 4x. On forward P/E, Campbell Soup Company is actually cheaper at 9. 7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: General Mills, Inc. wins at 3. 64x versus PepsiCo, Inc. 's 5. 53x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — PEP or MDLZ or CPB or GIS?
Over the past 5 years, PepsiCo, Inc.
(PEP) delivered a total return of +24. 6%, compared to -41. 9% for Campbell Soup Company (CPB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PEP returned +89. 2% versus CPB's -44. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — PEP or MDLZ or CPB or GIS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), General Mills, Inc.
(GIS) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 04β versus Mondelez International, Inc. 's 0. 06β — meaning MDLZ is approximately -267% more volatile than GIS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Mondelez International, Inc. (MDLZ) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 87% versus 2% for PepsiCo, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — PEP or MDLZ or CPB or GIS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Campbell Soup Company (CPB) is pulling ahead at 6.
4% versus -1. 9% for General Mills, Inc. (GIS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Campbell Soup Company grew EPS 6. 3% year-over-year, compared to -44. 7% for Mondelez International, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, MDLZ leads at 7. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — PEP or MDLZ or CPB or GIS?
General Mills, Inc.
(GIS) is the more profitable company, earning 11. 8% net margin versus 5. 9% for Campbell Soup Company — meaning it keeps 11. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GIS leads at 17. 0% versus 9. 4% for MDLZ. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PEP leads at 54. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is PEP or MDLZ or CPB or GIS more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, General Mills, Inc. (GIS) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 3. 64x versus PepsiCo, Inc. 's 5. 53x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, Campbell Soup Company (CPB) trades at 9. 7x forward P/E versus 20. 1x for Mondelez International, Inc. — 10. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for GIS: 30. 4% to $46. 58.
08Which pays a better dividend — PEP or MDLZ or CPB or GIS?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Campbell Soup Company (CPB) offers the highest yield at 7. 2%, versus 3. 1% for Mondelez International, Inc. (MDLZ).
09Is PEP or MDLZ or CPB or GIS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, PepsiCo, Inc.
(PEP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 03), 3. 6% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (PEP: +89. 2%, CPB: -44. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between PEP and MDLZ and CPB and GIS?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Defensive sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: PEP is a large-cap income-oriented stock; MDLZ is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; CPB is a small-cap deep-value stock; GIS is a mid-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.