Beverages - Non-Alcoholic
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
PEP vs MDLZ vs CPB vs GIS vs CAG
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Food Confectioners
Packaged Foods
Packaged Foods
Packaged Foods
PEP vs MDLZ vs CPB vs GIS vs CAG — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Beverages - Non-Alcoholic | Food Confectioners | Packaged Foods | Packaged Foods | Packaged Foods |
| Market Cap | $213.59B | $78.70B | $6.34B | $19.05B | $6.86B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $93.92B | $39.30B | $10.04B | $18.37B | $11.18B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $8.24B | $2.61B | $550M | $2.21B | $13M |
| Gross Margin | 54.1% | 28.8% | 29.3% | 33.0% | 24.6% |
| Operating Margin | 12.2% | 9.4% | 12.1% | 19.1% | 13.1% |
| Forward P/E | 18.0x | 20.1x | 9.7x | 10.4x | 8.4x |
| Total Debt | $49.90B | $22.40B | $7.21B | $15.30B | $8.31B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $9.16B | $2.13B | $132M | $364M | $68M |
PEP vs MDLZ vs CPB vs GIS vs CAG — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| PepsiCo, Inc. (PEP) | 100 | 118.8 | +18.8% |
| Mondelez Internatio… (MDLZ) | 100 | 117.6 | +17.6% |
| Campbell Soup Compa… (CPB) | 100 | 41.7 | -58.3% |
| General Mills, Inc. (GIS) | 100 | 56.6 | -43.4% |
| Conagra Brands, Inc. (CAG) | 100 | 41.2 | -58.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PEP vs MDLZ vs CPB vs GIS vs CAG
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PEP carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 25 yrs, beta 0.03, yield 3.6%
- 89.2% 10Y total return vs MDLZ's 68.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.03, current ratio 0.85x
- Beta 0.03, yield 3.6%, current ratio 0.85x
Among these 5 stocks, MDLZ doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
CPB ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 6.4%, EPS growth 6.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 6.2%
- 6.4% revenue growth vs CAG's -4.8%
GIS is the clearest fit if your priority is quality.
- 12.1% margin vs CAG's 0.1%
CAG is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if valuation efficiency is your priority.
- PEG 1.21 vs PEP's 5.53
- Lower P/E (8.4x vs 10.4x), PEG 1.21 vs 3.64
- 9.8% yield, 6-year raise streak, vs PEP's 3.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 6.4% revenue growth vs CAG's -4.8% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.4x vs 10.4x), PEG 1.21 vs 3.64 | |
| Quality / Margins | 12.1% margin vs CAG's 0.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.03 vs CAG's 0.06 | |
| Dividends | 9.8% yield, 6-year raise streak, vs PEP's 3.6% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +22.8% vs CPB's -35.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 7.7% ROA vs CAG's 0.1%, ROIC 14.9% vs 6.0% |
PEP vs MDLZ vs CPB vs GIS vs CAG — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
PEP vs MDLZ vs CPB vs GIS vs CAG — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
PEP leads in 2 of 6 categories
CAG leads 1 • MDLZ leads 0 • CPB leads 0 • GIS leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — PEP and GIS each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PEP is the larger business by revenue, generating $93.9B annually — 9.4x CPB's $10.0B. GIS is the more profitable business, keeping 12.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CAG's 0.1%. On growth, MDLZ holds the edge at +8.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $93.9B | $39.3B | $10.0B | $18.4B | $11.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $14.3B | $4.9B | $1.6B | $3.9B | $1.9B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $8.2B | $2.6B | $550M | $2.2B | $13M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $7.7B | $2.6B | $919M | $1.7B | $634M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +54.1% | +28.8% | +29.3% | +33.0% | +24.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +12.2% | +9.4% | +12.1% | +19.1% | +13.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +8.8% | +6.6% | +5.5% | +12.1% | +0.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +8.2% | +6.6% | +9.2% | +9.0% | +5.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +5.6% | +8.2% | -4.5% | -8.4% | -6.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +66.7% | +38.7% | -17.2% | -50.0% | -3.4% |
Valuation Metrics
CAG leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 6.0x trailing earnings, CAG trades at a 82% valuation discount to MDLZ's 32.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), CAG offers better value at 0.85x vs PEP's 7.98x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $213.6B | $78.7B | $6.3B | $19.1B | $6.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $254.3B | $99.0B | $13.4B | $34.0B | $15.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 26.05x | 32.44x | 10.57x | 8.71x | 5.95x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 18.05x | 20.06x | 9.74x | 10.43x | 8.44x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 7.98x | — | — | 3.04x | 0.85x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 17.78x | 19.88x | 7.51x | 8.84x | 8.61x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.27x | 2.04x | 0.62x | 0.98x | 0.59x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 10.43x | 3.07x | 1.63x | 2.16x | 0.77x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 27.84x | 24.33x | 8.99x | 8.31x | 5.27x |
Profitability & Efficiency
PEP leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
PEP delivers a 40.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $40 in annual profit, vs $0 for CAG. MDLZ carries lower financial leverage with a 0.87x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PEP's 2.43x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CPB scores 7/9 vs GIS's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +40.1% | +10.0% | +14.0% | +23.7% | +0.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +7.7% | +3.7% | +3.7% | +6.8% | +0.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +14.9% | +6.0% | +9.1% | +10.6% | +6.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +16.1% | +7.3% | +11.4% | +13.3% | +8.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 | 7 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 2.43x | 0.87x | 1.85x | 1.66x | 0.93x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $40.7B | $20.3B | $7.1B | $14.9B | $8.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $9.2B | $2.1B | $132M | $364M | $68M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $49.9B | $22.4B | $7.2B | $15.3B | $8.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 10.34x | 10.01x | 3.14x | 5.01x | 1.56x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PEP leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PEP five years ago would be worth $12,459 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,565 for CAG. Over the past 12 months, PEP leads with a +22.8% total return vs CPB's -35.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PEP at -3.7% vs CPB's -22.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +10.9% | +15.2% | -20.5% | -19.2% | -13.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +22.8% | -5.8% | -35.4% | -29.9% | -31.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -10.8% | -14.5% | -52.6% | -52.3% | -50.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +24.6% | +12.6% | -41.9% | -25.3% | -44.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +89.2% | +68.4% | -44.9% | -9.2% | -27.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -3.7% | -5.1% | -22.0% | -21.8% | -21.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — PEP and GIS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
GIS is the less volatile stock with a -0.04 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CAG's 0.06 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PEP currently trades 91.1% from its 52-week high vs CPB's 58.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.03x | 0.06x | -0.02x | -0.04x | 0.06x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $171.48 | $71.15 | $36.16 | $55.35 | $23.47 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $127.60 | $51.20 | $19.76 | $33.58 | $13.61 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +91.1% | +86.2% | +58.8% | +64.5% | +61.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 49.9 | 68.7 | 46.7 | 42.2 | 36.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 5.7M | 9.0M | 9.1M | 8.7M | 14.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — PEP and CAG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: PEP as "Hold", MDLZ as "Buy", CPB as "Hold", GIS as "Hold", CAG as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 30.4% upside for GIS (target: $47) vs 9.3% for MDLZ (target: $67). For income investors, CAG offers the higher dividend yield at 9.75% vs MDLZ's 3.13%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Hold | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $174.00 | $67.00 | $25.83 | $46.58 | $17.55 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 45 | 41 | 29 | 34 | 25 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.6% | +3.1% | +7.2% | +6.7% | +9.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 25 | 12 | 1 | 5 | 6 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $5.57 | $1.92 | $1.53 | $2.40 | $1.40 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.5% | +3.0% | +1.0% | +6.3% | +0.9% |
PEP leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). CAG leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 3 tied.
PEP vs MDLZ vs CPB vs GIS vs CAG: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PEP or MDLZ or CPB or GIS or CAG a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Campbell Soup Company (CPB) is the stronger pick with 6.
4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 9% for General Mills, Inc. (GIS). Conagra Brands, Inc. (CAG) offers the better valuation at 6. 0x trailing P/E (8. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Mondelez International, Inc. (MDLZ) a "Buy" — based on 41 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — PEP or MDLZ or CPB or GIS or CAG?
On trailing P/E, Conagra Brands, Inc.
(CAG) is the cheapest at 6. 0x versus Mondelez International, Inc. at 32. 4x. On forward P/E, Conagra Brands, Inc. is actually cheaper at 8. 4x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Conagra Brands, Inc. wins at 1. 21x versus PepsiCo, Inc. 's 5. 53x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — PEP or MDLZ or CPB or GIS or CAG?
Over the past 5 years, PepsiCo, Inc.
(PEP) delivered a total return of +24. 6%, compared to -44. 3% for Conagra Brands, Inc. (CAG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PEP returned +89. 2% versus CPB's -44. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — PEP or MDLZ or CPB or GIS or CAG?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), General Mills, Inc.
(GIS) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 04β versus Conagra Brands, Inc. 's 0. 06β — meaning CAG is approximately -275% more volatile than GIS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Mondelez International, Inc. (MDLZ) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 87% versus 2% for PepsiCo, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — PEP or MDLZ or CPB or GIS or CAG?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Campbell Soup Company (CPB) is pulling ahead at 6.
4% versus -1. 9% for General Mills, Inc. (GIS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Campbell Soup Company grew EPS 6. 3% year-over-year, compared to -44. 7% for Mondelez International, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, MDLZ leads at 7. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — PEP or MDLZ or CPB or GIS or CAG?
General Mills, Inc.
(GIS) is the more profitable company, earning 11. 8% net margin versus 5. 9% for Campbell Soup Company — meaning it keeps 11. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GIS leads at 17. 0% versus 9. 4% for MDLZ. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PEP leads at 54. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is PEP or MDLZ or CPB or GIS or CAG more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Conagra Brands, Inc. (CAG) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 21x versus PepsiCo, Inc. 's 5. 53x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, Conagra Brands, Inc. (CAG) trades at 8. 4x forward P/E versus 20. 1x for Mondelez International, Inc. — 11. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for GIS: 30. 4% to $46. 58.
08Which pays a better dividend — PEP or MDLZ or CPB or GIS or CAG?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Conagra Brands, Inc. (CAG) offers the highest yield at 9. 8%, versus 3. 1% for Mondelez International, Inc. (MDLZ).
09Is PEP or MDLZ or CPB or GIS or CAG better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, PepsiCo, Inc.
(PEP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 03), 3. 6% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (PEP: +89. 2%, CAG: -27. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between PEP and MDLZ and CPB and GIS and CAG?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Defensive sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: PEP is a large-cap income-oriented stock; MDLZ is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; CPB is a small-cap deep-value stock; GIS is a mid-cap deep-value stock; CAG is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.