Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
PFBC vs EWBC vs HAFC vs HOPE vs CVBF
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Diversified
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
PFBC vs EWBC vs HAFC vs HOPE vs CVBF — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Diversified | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $1.15B | $16.78B | $908M | $1.60B | $2.78B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $499M | $4.69B | $445M | $968M | $643M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $134M | $1.33B | $76M | $59M | $209M |
| Gross Margin | 55.0% | 60.1% | 57.5% | 48.6% | 79.9% |
| Operating Margin | 38.0% | 37.4% | 24.3% | 8.3% | 43.8% |
| Forward P/E | 8.9x | 11.5x | 9.6x | 11.7x | 14.2x |
| Total Debt | $384M | $3.17B | $280M | $396M | $991M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $807M | $656M | $213M | $560M | $108M |
PFBC vs EWBC vs HAFC vs HOPE vs CVBF — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Preferred Bank (PFBC) | 100 | 252.1 | +152.1% |
| East West Bancorp, … (EWBC) | 100 | 348.9 | +248.9% |
| Hanmi Financial Cor… (HAFC) | 100 | 336.4 | +236.4% |
| Hope Bancorp, Inc. (HOPE) | 100 | 131.9 | +31.9% |
| CVB Financial Corp. (CVBF) | 100 | 105.1 | +5.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PFBC vs EWBC vs HAFC vs HOPE vs CVBF
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PFBC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 5 yrs, beta 0.69, yield 3.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.69, Low D/E 48.6%, current ratio 149.60x
- PEG 0.51 vs CVBF's 4.48
- Beta 0.69, yield 3.1%, current ratio 149.60x
EWBC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 4.6%, EPS growth 14.3%
- 281.4% 10Y total return vs PFBC's 256.1%
- 4.6% NII/revenue growth vs PFBC's -4.1%
- +42.7% vs CVBF's +13.1%
HAFC lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
HOPE ranks third and is worth considering specifically for dividends.
- 4.4% yield, vs EWBC's 2.0%
Among these 5 stocks, CVBF doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 4.6% NII/revenue growth vs PFBC's -4.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.9x vs 14.2x), PEG 0.51 vs 4.48 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs HOPE's 0.4% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.69 vs EWBC's 1.22 | |
| Dividends | 4.4% yield, vs EWBC's 2.0% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +42.7% vs CVBF's +13.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs HOPE's 0.4% |
PFBC vs EWBC vs HAFC vs HOPE vs CVBF — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
PFBC vs EWBC vs HAFC vs HOPE vs CVBF — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
PFBC leads in 2 of 6 categories
CVBF leads 1 • EWBC leads 1 • HAFC leads 0 • HOPE leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CVBF leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
EWBC is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.7B annually — 10.5x HAFC's $445M. CVBF is the more profitable business, keeping 32.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to HOPE's 6.0%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $499M | $4.7B | $445M | $968M | $643M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $191M | $2.0B | $110M | $84M | $294M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $134M | $1.3B | $76M | $59M | $209M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $167M | $1.5B | $204M | $147M | $217M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +55.0% | +60.1% | +57.5% | +48.6% | +79.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +38.0% | +37.4% | +24.3% | +8.3% | +43.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +26.8% | +28.3% | +17.1% | +6.0% | +32.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +33.4% | +32.0% | +45.8% | +15.6% | +33.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +24.0% | +21.4% | +20.7% | +35.0% | +11.1% |
Valuation Metrics
PFBC leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.1x trailing earnings, PFBC trades at a 67% valuation discount to HOPE's 27.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), PFBC offers better value at 0.52x vs CVBF's 4.25x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.2B | $16.8B | $908M | $1.6B | $2.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $730M | $19.3B | $976M | $1.4B | $3.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 9.10x | 12.81x | 12.10x | 27.22x | 13.49x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 8.91x | 11.47x | 9.61x | 11.70x | 14.24x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.52x | 0.67x | 0.95x | — | 4.25x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 3.85x | 9.49x | 8.59x | 17.18x | 13.02x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.31x | 3.58x | 2.04x | 1.66x | 4.33x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.54x | 1.91x | 1.15x | 0.71x | 1.21x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 6.92x | 11.17x | 4.46x | 10.58x | 12.81x |
Profitability & Efficiency
PFBC leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
PFBC delivers a 17.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $17 in annual profit, vs $3 for HOPE. HOPE carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PFBC's 0.49x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HAFC scores 9/9 vs CVBF's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +17.3% | +15.8% | +9.8% | +2.6% | +9.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.8% | +1.7% | +1.0% | +0.3% | +1.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +13.5% | +11.2% | +7.4% | +2.3% | +6.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +4.4% | +3.9% | +2.5% | +0.9% | +9.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 8 | 9 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.49x | 0.36x | 0.35x | 0.17x | 0.43x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$423M | $2.5B | $68M | -$164M | $883M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $807M | $656M | $213M | $560M | $108M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $384M | $3.2B | $280M | $396M | $991M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.88x | 1.01x | 0.62x | 0.17x | 2.12x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
EWBC leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in EWBC five years ago would be worth $16,812 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $9,800 for HOPE. Over the past 12 months, EWBC leads with a +42.7% total return vs CVBF's +13.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors EWBC at 42.2% vs HOPE's 21.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +0.4% | +7.4% | +15.2% | +15.3% | +10.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +20.9% | +42.7% | +36.9% | +30.4% | +13.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +126.1% | +187.3% | +137.2% | +80.7% | +94.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +56.6% | +68.1% | +64.7% | -2.0% | +12.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +256.1% | +281.4% | +76.5% | +18.8% | +67.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +31.3% | +42.2% | +33.4% | +21.8% | +24.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — PFBC and HAFC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PFBC is the less volatile stock with a 0.69 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than EWBC's 1.22 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. HAFC currently trades 97.2% from its 52-week high vs PFBC's 91.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.69x | 1.22x | 0.92x | 1.10x | 0.94x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $103.05 | $127.52 | $31.27 | $13.02 | $21.48 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $79.60 | $86.58 | $21.84 | $9.44 | $17.95 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +91.9% | +95.6% | +97.2% | +96.2% | +95.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 59.1 | 66.3 | 64.1 | 59.1 | 57.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 102K | 1.0M | 265K | 902K | 1.6M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — EWBC and HOPE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: PFBC as "Buy", EWBC as "Buy", HAFC as "Hold", HOPE as "Hold", CVBF as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 20.7% upside for CVBF (target: $25) vs 7.2% for EWBC (target: $131). For income investors, HOPE offers the higher dividend yield at 4.39% vs EWBC's 1.97%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $102.00 | $130.67 | $35.00 | $14.50 | $24.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 10 | 24 | 11 | 6 | 16 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.1% | +2.0% | +3.6% | +4.4% | +4.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 5 | 9 | 5 | 0 | 4 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $2.98 | $2.40 | $1.09 | $0.55 | $0.82 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +8.1% | +0.7% | +1.0% | 0.0% | +2.9% |
PFBC leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). CVBF leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.
PFBC vs EWBC vs HAFC vs HOPE vs CVBF: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PFBC or EWBC or HAFC or HOPE or CVBF a better buy right now?
For growth investors, East West Bancorp, Inc.
(EWBC) is the stronger pick with 4. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -4. 1% for Preferred Bank (PFBC). Preferred Bank (PFBC) offers the better valuation at 9. 1x trailing P/E (8. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Preferred Bank (PFBC) a "Buy" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — PFBC or EWBC or HAFC or HOPE or CVBF?
On trailing P/E, Preferred Bank (PFBC) is the cheapest at 9.
1x versus Hope Bancorp, Inc. at 27. 2x. On forward P/E, Preferred Bank is actually cheaper at 8. 9x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Preferred Bank wins at 0. 51x versus CVB Financial Corp. 's 4. 48x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — PFBC or EWBC or HAFC or HOPE or CVBF?
Over the past 5 years, East West Bancorp, Inc.
(EWBC) delivered a total return of +68. 1%, compared to -2. 0% for Hope Bancorp, Inc. (HOPE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: EWBC returned +281. 4% versus HOPE's +18. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — PFBC or EWBC or HAFC or HOPE or CVBF?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Preferred Bank (PFBC) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
69β versus East West Bancorp, Inc. 's 1. 22β — meaning EWBC is approximately 75% more volatile than PFBC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Hope Bancorp, Inc. (HOPE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 49% for Preferred Bank — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — PFBC or EWBC or HAFC or HOPE or CVBF?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), East West Bancorp, Inc.
(EWBC) is pulling ahead at 4. 6% versus -4. 1% for Preferred Bank (PFBC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Hanmi Financial Corporation grew EPS 22. 4% year-over-year, compared to -43. 9% for Hope Bancorp, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — PFBC or EWBC or HAFC or HOPE or CVBF?
CVB Financial Corp.
(CVBF) is the more profitable company, earning 32. 5% net margin versus 6. 0% for Hope Bancorp, Inc. — meaning it keeps 32. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CVBF leads at 43. 8% versus 8. 3% for HOPE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CVBF leads at 79. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is PFBC or EWBC or HAFC or HOPE or CVBF more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Preferred Bank (PFBC) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 51x versus CVB Financial Corp. 's 4. 48x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Preferred Bank (PFBC) trades at 8. 9x forward P/E versus 14. 2x for CVB Financial Corp. — 5. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CVBF: 20. 7% to $24. 75.
08Which pays a better dividend — PFBC or EWBC or HAFC or HOPE or CVBF?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Hope Bancorp, Inc. (HOPE) offers the highest yield at 4. 4%, versus 2. 0% for East West Bancorp, Inc. (EWBC).
09Is PFBC or EWBC or HAFC or HOPE or CVBF better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Preferred Bank (PFBC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
69), 3. 1% yield, +256. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (PFBC: +256. 1%, HOPE: +18. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between PFBC and EWBC and HAFC and HOPE and CVBF?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: PFBC is a small-cap deep-value stock; EWBC is a mid-cap deep-value stock; HAFC is a small-cap deep-value stock; HOPE is a small-cap income-oriented stock; CVBF is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.