Compare Stocks

4 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

PFBC vs FICO vs VRSK vs HAFC

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
PFBC
Preferred Bank

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$1.15B
5Y Perf.+152.1%
FICO
Fair Isaac Corporation

Software - Application

TechnologyNYSE • US
Market Cap$26.20B
5Y Perf.+180.6%
VRSK
Verisk Analytics, Inc.

Consulting Services

IndustrialsNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$22.89B
5Y Perf.+1.2%
HAFC
Hanmi Financial Corporation

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$908M
5Y Perf.+236.4%

PFBC vs FICO vs VRSK vs HAFC — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
PFBC logoPFBC
FICO logoFICO
VRSK logoVRSK
HAFC logoHAFC
IndustryBanks - RegionalSoftware - ApplicationConsulting ServicesBanks - Regional
Market Cap$1.15B$26.20B$22.89B$908M
Revenue (TTM)$499M$2.26B$3.10B$445M
Net Income (TTM)$134M$760M$910M$76M
Gross Margin55.0%84.2%67.4%57.5%
Operating Margin38.0%50.4%44.9%24.3%
Forward P/E8.9x26.4x22.9x9.6x
Total Debt$384M$3.07B$5.04B$280M
Cash & Equiv.$807M$134M$2.18B$213M

PFBC vs FICO vs VRSK vs HAFCLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

PFBC
FICO
VRSK
HAFC
StockMay 20May 26Return
Preferred Bank (PFBC)100252.1+152.1%
Fair Isaac Corporat… (FICO)100280.6+180.6%
Verisk Analytics, I… (VRSK)100101.2+1.2%
Hanmi Financial Cor… (HAFC)100336.4+236.4%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: PFBC vs FICO vs VRSK vs HAFC

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: FICO leads in 3 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. Preferred Bank is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and capital preservation and lower volatility. HAFC also leads in specific categories worth noting. This set spans 3 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
PFBC
Preferred Bank
The Banking Pick

PFBC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.

  • Dividend streak 5 yrs, beta 0.69, yield 3.1%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.69, Low D/E 48.6%, current ratio 149.60x
  • PEG 0.51 vs VRSK's 2.68
  • Beta 0.69, yield 3.1%, current ratio 149.60x
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
FICO
Fair Isaac Corporation
The Growth Play

FICO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.

  • Rev growth 15.9%, EPS growth 29.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 13.1%
  • 9.5% 10Y total return vs PFBC's 256.1%
  • 15.9% revenue growth vs PFBC's -4.1%
  • 33.7% margin vs HAFC's 17.1%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
VRSK
Verisk Analytics, Inc.
The Lower-Volatility Pick

VRSK lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: industrials exposure
HAFC
Hanmi Financial Corporation
The Banking Pick

HAFC is the clearest fit if your priority is dividends and momentum.

  • 3.6% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs VRSK's 1.0%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
  • +36.9% vs FICO's -46.1%
Best for: dividends and momentum
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthFICO logoFICO15.9% revenue growth vs PFBC's -4.1%
ValuePFBC logoPFBCLower P/E (8.9x vs 22.9x), PEG 0.51 vs 2.68
Quality / MarginsFICO logoFICO33.7% margin vs HAFC's 17.1%
Stability / SafetyPFBC logoPFBCBeta 0.69 vs HAFC's 0.92
DividendsHAFC logoHAFC3.6% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs VRSK's 1.0%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)HAFC logoHAFC+36.9% vs FICO's -46.1%
Efficiency (ROA)FICO logoFICO39.8% ROA vs HAFC's 1.0%, ROIC 59.7% vs 7.4%

PFBC vs FICO vs VRSK vs HAFC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

PFBCPreferred Bank

Segment breakdown not available.

FICOFair Isaac Corporation
FY 2025
Scores
58.7%$1.2B
Applications
41.3%$822M
VRSKVerisk Analytics, Inc.
FY 2025
Insurance
100.0%$2.2B
HAFCHanmi Financial Corporation
FY 2025
Banking Segment
100.0%$270M

PFBC vs FICO vs VRSK vs HAFC — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLPFBCLAGGINGVRSK

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

FICO leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

VRSK is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.1B annually — 7.0x HAFC's $445M. FICO is the more profitable business, keeping 33.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to HAFC's 17.1%. On growth, FICO holds the edge at +38.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricPFBC logoPFBCPreferred BankFICO logoFICOFair Isaac Corpor…VRSK logoVRSKVerisk Analytics,…HAFC logoHAFCHanmi Financial C…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$499M$2.3B$3.1B$445M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$191M$1.2B$1.7B$110M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$134M$760M$910M$76M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$167M$893M$1.1B$204M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+55.0%+84.2%+67.4%+57.5%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+38.0%+50.4%+44.9%+24.3%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+26.8%+33.7%+29.3%+17.1%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+33.4%+39.6%+36.3%+45.8%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+38.7%+3.9%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+24.0%+69.0%+4.8%+20.7%
FICO leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

PFBC leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 9.1x trailing earnings, PFBC trades at a 79% valuation discount to FICO's 42.6x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), PFBC offers better value at 0.52x vs VRSK's 3.16x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricPFBC logoPFBCPreferred BankFICO logoFICOFair Isaac Corpor…VRSK logoVRSKVerisk Analytics,…HAFC logoHAFCHanmi Financial C…
Market CapShares × price$1.2B$26.2B$22.9B$908M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$730M$29.1B$25.7B$976M
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS9.10x42.57x26.92x12.10x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.8.91x26.43x22.85x9.61x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.52x1.55x3.16x0.95x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple3.85x31.01x15.34x8.59x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue2.31x13.16x7.45x2.04x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.54x78.44x1.15x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF6.92x34.03x19.20x4.46x
PFBC leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

Evenly matched — FICO and HAFC each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.

VRSK delivers a 4.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $4 in annual profit, vs $10 for HAFC. HAFC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.35x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to VRSK's 16.26x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HAFC scores 9/9 vs VRSK's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricPFBC logoPFBCPreferred BankFICO logoFICOFair Isaac Corpor…VRSK logoVRSKVerisk Analytics,…HAFC logoHAFCHanmi Financial C…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+17.3%+4.4%+9.8%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+1.8%+39.8%+16.7%+1.0%
ROICReturn on invested capital+13.5%+59.7%+33.0%+7.4%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+4.4%+78.5%+39.6%+2.5%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–96759
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.49x16.26x0.35x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$423M$2.9B$2.9B$68M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$807M$134M$2.2B$213M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$384M$3.1B$5.0B$280M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense0.88x7.20x7.87x0.62x
Evenly matched — FICO and HAFC each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

HAFC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in FICO five years ago would be worth $22,769 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10,182 for VRSK. Over the past 12 months, HAFC leads with a +36.9% total return vs FICO's -46.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HAFC at 33.4% vs VRSK's -5.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricPFBC logoPFBCPreferred BankFICO logoFICOFair Isaac Corpor…VRSK logoVRSKVerisk Analytics,…HAFC logoHAFCHanmi Financial C…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+0.4%-31.3%-20.7%+15.2%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+20.9%-46.1%-43.0%+36.9%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+126.1%+53.4%-14.5%+137.2%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+56.6%+127.7%+1.8%+64.7%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+256.1%+949.1%+137.1%+76.5%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+31.3%+15.3%-5.1%+33.4%
HAFC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — VRSK and HAFC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

VRSK is the less volatile stock with a -0.04 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HAFC's 0.92 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. HAFC currently trades 97.2% from its 52-week high vs FICO's 50.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricPFBC logoPFBCPreferred BankFICO logoFICOFair Isaac Corpor…VRSK logoVRSKVerisk Analytics,…HAFC logoHAFCHanmi Financial C…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.69x0.86x-0.04x0.92x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$103.05$2217.60$322.92$31.27
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$79.60$870.01$161.70$21.84
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+91.9%+50.9%+54.1%+97.2%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10059.150.939.564.1
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded102K371K1.9M265K
Evenly matched — VRSK and HAFC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — VRSK and HAFC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: PFBC as "Buy", FICO as "Buy", VRSK as "Hold", HAFC as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 46.0% upside for FICO (target: $1649) vs 7.7% for PFBC (target: $102). For income investors, HAFC offers the higher dividend yield at 3.57% vs VRSK's 1.03%.

MetricPFBC logoPFBCPreferred BankFICO logoFICOFair Isaac Corpor…VRSK logoVRSKVerisk Analytics,…HAFC logoHAFCHanmi Financial C…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyHoldHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$102.00$1649.11$231.25$35.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts10182511
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+3.1%+1.0%+3.6%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises5075
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$2.98$1.81$1.09
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+8.1%+5.4%+2.7%+1.0%
Evenly matched — VRSK and HAFC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

FICO leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). PFBC leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 3 tied.

Best OverallPreferred Bank (PFBC)Leads 1 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

PFBC vs FICO vs VRSK vs HAFC: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is PFBC or FICO or VRSK or HAFC a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Fair Isaac Corporation (FICO) is the stronger pick with 15.

9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -4. 1% for Preferred Bank (PFBC). Preferred Bank (PFBC) offers the better valuation at 9. 1x trailing P/E (8. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Preferred Bank (PFBC) a "Buy" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — PFBC or FICO or VRSK or HAFC?

On trailing P/E, Preferred Bank (PFBC) is the cheapest at 9.

1x versus Fair Isaac Corporation at 42. 6x. On forward P/E, Preferred Bank is actually cheaper at 8. 9x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Preferred Bank wins at 0. 51x versus Verisk Analytics, Inc. 's 2. 68x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — PFBC or FICO or VRSK or HAFC?

Over the past 5 years, Fair Isaac Corporation (FICO) delivered a total return of +127.

7%, compared to +1. 8% for Verisk Analytics, Inc. (VRSK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FICO returned +949. 1% versus HAFC's +76. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — PFBC or FICO or VRSK or HAFC?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Verisk Analytics, Inc.

(VRSK) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 04β versus Hanmi Financial Corporation's 0. 92β — meaning HAFC is approximately -2662% more volatile than VRSK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Hanmi Financial Corporation (HAFC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 35% versus 16% for Verisk Analytics, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — PFBC or FICO or VRSK or HAFC?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Fair Isaac Corporation (FICO) is pulling ahead at 15.

9% versus -4. 1% for Preferred Bank (PFBC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Fair Isaac Corporation grew EPS 29. 8% year-over-year, compared to -3. 3% for Verisk Analytics, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, FICO leads at 13. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — PFBC or FICO or VRSK or HAFC?

Fair Isaac Corporation (FICO) is the more profitable company, earning 32.

7% net margin versus 17. 1% for Hanmi Financial Corporation — meaning it keeps 32. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FICO leads at 46. 5% versus 24. 3% for HAFC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FICO leads at 82. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is PFBC or FICO or VRSK or HAFC more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Preferred Bank (PFBC) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 51x versus Verisk Analytics, Inc. 's 2. 68x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Preferred Bank (PFBC) trades at 8. 9x forward P/E versus 26. 4x for Fair Isaac Corporation — 17. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FICO: 46. 0% to $1649. 11.

08

Which pays a better dividend — PFBC or FICO or VRSK or HAFC?

In this comparison, HAFC (3.

6% yield), PFBC (3. 1% yield), VRSK (1. 0% yield) pay a dividend. FICO does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is PFBC or FICO or VRSK or HAFC better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Verisk Analytics, Inc.

(VRSK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 04), 1. 0% yield, +137. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (VRSK: +137. 1%, HAFC: +76. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between PFBC and FICO and VRSK and HAFC?

These companies operate in different sectors (PFBC (Financial Services) and FICO (Technology) and VRSK (Industrials) and HAFC (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: PFBC is a small-cap deep-value stock; FICO is a mid-cap high-growth stock; VRSK is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; HAFC is a small-cap deep-value stock. PFBC, VRSK, HAFC pay a dividend while FICO does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

PFBC

Dividend Mega-Cap Quality

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 16%
  • Dividend Yield > 1.2%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

FICO

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 19%
  • Net Margin > 20%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

VRSK

Quality Mega-Cap Compounder

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 17%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

HAFC

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 10%
  • Dividend Yield > 1.4%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform PFBC and FICO and VRSK and HAFC on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(PFBC: -4.1% · FICO: 38.7%)
Net Margin>
%
(PFBC: 26.8% · FICO: 33.7%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(PFBC: 9.1x · FICO: 42.6x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.