Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
PFBC vs FICO vs VRSK vs HAFC vs MSCI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Application
Consulting Services
Banks - Regional
Financial - Data & Stock Exchanges
PFBC vs FICO vs VRSK vs HAFC vs MSCI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Software - Application | Consulting Services | Banks - Regional | Financial - Data & Stock Exchanges |
| Market Cap | $1.15B | $26.20B | $22.89B | $908M | $42.83B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $499M | $2.26B | $3.10B | $445M | $3.13B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $134M | $760M | $910M | $76M | $1.32B |
| Gross Margin | 55.0% | 84.2% | 67.4% | 57.5% | 82.4% |
| Operating Margin | 38.0% | 50.4% | 44.9% | 24.3% | 54.7% |
| Forward P/E | 8.9x | 26.4x | 22.9x | 9.6x | 30.0x |
| Total Debt | $384M | $3.07B | $5.04B | $280M | $6.31B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $807M | $134M | $2.18B | $213M | $515M |
PFBC vs FICO vs VRSK vs HAFC vs MSCI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Preferred Bank (PFBC) | 100 | 252.1 | +152.1% |
| Fair Isaac Corporat… (FICO) | 100 | 280.6 | +180.6% |
| Verisk Analytics, I… (VRSK) | 100 | 101.2 | +1.2% |
| Hanmi Financial Cor… (HAFC) | 100 | 336.4 | +236.4% |
| MSCI Inc. (MSCI) | 100 | 178.9 | +78.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PFBC vs FICO vs VRSK vs HAFC vs MSCI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PFBC is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and valuation efficiency.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.69, Low D/E 48.6%, current ratio 149.60x
- PEG 0.51 vs VRSK's 2.68
- Beta 0.69, yield 3.1%, current ratio 149.60x
- NIM 3.6% vs HAFC's 3.0%
FICO has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 15.9%, EPS growth 29.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 13.1%
- 9.5% 10Y total return vs MSCI's 7.2%
- 15.9% revenue growth vs PFBC's -4.1%
- 39.8% ROA vs HAFC's 1.0%, ROIC 59.7% vs 7.4%
Among these 5 stocks, VRSK doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
HAFC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if dividends and momentum is your priority.
- 3.6% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs MSCI's 1.2%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
- +36.9% vs FICO's -46.1%
MSCI ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability.
- Dividend streak 11 yrs, beta 0.61, yield 1.2%
- 38.4% margin vs HAFC's 17.1%
- Beta 0.61 vs HAFC's 0.92
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 15.9% revenue growth vs PFBC's -4.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.9x vs 30.0x), PEG 0.51 vs 1.77 | |
| Quality / Margins | 38.4% margin vs HAFC's 17.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.61 vs HAFC's 0.92 | |
| Dividends | 3.6% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs MSCI's 1.2%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +36.9% vs FICO's -46.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 39.8% ROA vs HAFC's 1.0%, ROIC 59.7% vs 7.4% |
PFBC vs FICO vs VRSK vs HAFC vs MSCI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
PFBC vs FICO vs VRSK vs HAFC vs MSCI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
PFBC leads in 1 of 6 categories
HAFC leads 1 • FICO leads 0 • VRSK leads 0 • MSCI leads 0 • 4 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — FICO and MSCI each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MSCI is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.1B annually — 7.0x HAFC's $445M. MSCI is the more profitable business, keeping 38.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to HAFC's 17.1%. On growth, FICO holds the edge at +38.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $499M | $2.3B | $3.1B | $445M | $3.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $191M | $1.2B | $1.7B | $110M | $2.0B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $134M | $760M | $910M | $76M | $1.3B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $167M | $893M | $1.1B | $204M | $1.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +55.0% | +84.2% | +67.4% | +57.5% | +82.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +38.0% | +50.4% | +44.9% | +24.3% | +54.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +26.8% | +33.7% | +29.3% | +17.1% | +38.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +33.4% | +39.6% | +36.3% | +45.8% | +49.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +38.7% | +3.9% | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +24.0% | +69.0% | +4.8% | +20.7% | +49.1% |
Valuation Metrics
PFBC leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.1x trailing earnings, PFBC trades at a 79% valuation discount to FICO's 42.6x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), PFBC offers better value at 0.52x vs VRSK's 3.16x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.2B | $26.2B | $22.9B | $908M | $42.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $730M | $29.1B | $25.7B | $976M | $48.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 9.10x | 42.57x | 26.92x | 12.10x | 37.81x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 8.91x | 26.43x | 22.85x | 9.61x | 29.99x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.52x | 1.55x | 3.16x | 0.95x | 2.23x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 3.85x | 31.01x | 15.34x | 8.59x | 25.17x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.31x | 13.16x | 7.45x | 2.04x | 13.67x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.54x | — | 78.44x | 1.15x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 6.92x | 34.03x | 19.20x | 4.46x | 27.65x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — FICO and HAFC each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
VRSK delivers a 4.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $4 in annual profit, vs $10 for HAFC. HAFC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.35x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to VRSK's 16.26x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HAFC scores 9/9 vs VRSK's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +17.3% | — | +4.4% | +9.8% | — |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.8% | +39.8% | +16.7% | +1.0% | +24.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +13.5% | +59.7% | +33.0% | +7.4% | +34.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +4.4% | +78.5% | +39.6% | +2.5% | +44.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 7 | 5 | 9 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.49x | — | 16.26x | 0.35x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$423M | $2.9B | $2.9B | $68M | $5.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $807M | $134M | $2.2B | $213M | $515M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $384M | $3.1B | $5.0B | $280M | $6.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.88x | 7.20x | 7.87x | 0.62x | 7.67x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
HAFC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FICO five years ago would be worth $22,769 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10,182 for VRSK. Over the past 12 months, HAFC leads with a +36.9% total return vs FICO's -46.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HAFC at 33.4% vs VRSK's -5.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +0.4% | -31.3% | -20.7% | +15.2% | +4.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +20.9% | -46.1% | -43.0% | +36.9% | +7.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +126.1% | +53.4% | -14.5% | +137.2% | +28.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +56.6% | +127.7% | +1.8% | +64.7% | +27.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +256.1% | +949.1% | +137.1% | +76.5% | +720.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +31.3% | +15.3% | -5.1% | +33.4% | +8.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — VRSK and HAFC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
VRSK is the less volatile stock with a -0.04 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HAFC's 0.92 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. HAFC currently trades 97.2% from its 52-week high vs FICO's 50.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.69x | 0.86x | -0.04x | 0.92x | 0.61x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $103.05 | $2217.60 | $322.92 | $31.27 | $626.28 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $79.60 | $870.01 | $161.70 | $21.84 | $501.08 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +91.9% | +50.9% | +54.1% | +97.2% | +93.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 59.1 | 50.9 | 39.5 | 64.1 | 54.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 102K | 371K | 1.9M | 265K | 520K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — HAFC and MSCI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: PFBC as "Buy", FICO as "Buy", VRSK as "Hold", HAFC as "Hold", MSCI as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 46.0% upside for FICO (target: $1649) vs 7.7% for PFBC (target: $102). For income investors, HAFC offers the higher dividend yield at 3.57% vs VRSK's 1.03%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $102.00 | $1649.11 | $231.25 | $35.00 | $674.33 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 10 | 18 | 25 | 11 | 27 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.1% | — | +1.0% | +3.6% | +1.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 5 | 0 | 7 | 5 | 11 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $2.98 | — | $1.81 | $1.09 | $7.20 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +8.1% | +5.4% | +2.7% | +1.0% | +5.8% |
PFBC leads in 1 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics). HAFC leads in 1 (Total Returns). 4 tied.
PFBC vs FICO vs VRSK vs HAFC vs MSCI: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PFBC or FICO or VRSK or HAFC or MSCI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Fair Isaac Corporation (FICO) is the stronger pick with 15.
9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -4. 1% for Preferred Bank (PFBC). Preferred Bank (PFBC) offers the better valuation at 9. 1x trailing P/E (8. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Preferred Bank (PFBC) a "Buy" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — PFBC or FICO or VRSK or HAFC or MSCI?
On trailing P/E, Preferred Bank (PFBC) is the cheapest at 9.
1x versus Fair Isaac Corporation at 42. 6x. On forward P/E, Preferred Bank is actually cheaper at 8. 9x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Preferred Bank wins at 0. 51x versus Verisk Analytics, Inc. 's 2. 68x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — PFBC or FICO or VRSK or HAFC or MSCI?
Over the past 5 years, Fair Isaac Corporation (FICO) delivered a total return of +127.
7%, compared to +1. 8% for Verisk Analytics, Inc. (VRSK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FICO returned +949. 1% versus HAFC's +76. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — PFBC or FICO or VRSK or HAFC or MSCI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Verisk Analytics, Inc.
(VRSK) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 04β versus Hanmi Financial Corporation's 0. 92β — meaning HAFC is approximately -2662% more volatile than VRSK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Hanmi Financial Corporation (HAFC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 35% versus 16% for Verisk Analytics, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — PFBC or FICO or VRSK or HAFC or MSCI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Fair Isaac Corporation (FICO) is pulling ahead at 15.
9% versus -4. 1% for Preferred Bank (PFBC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Fair Isaac Corporation grew EPS 29. 8% year-over-year, compared to -3. 3% for Verisk Analytics, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, FICO leads at 13. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — PFBC or FICO or VRSK or HAFC or MSCI?
MSCI Inc.
(MSCI) is the more profitable company, earning 38. 4% net margin versus 17. 1% for Hanmi Financial Corporation — meaning it keeps 38. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MSCI leads at 54. 7% versus 24. 3% for HAFC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MSCI leads at 82. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is PFBC or FICO or VRSK or HAFC or MSCI more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Preferred Bank (PFBC) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 51x versus Verisk Analytics, Inc. 's 2. 68x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Preferred Bank (PFBC) trades at 8. 9x forward P/E versus 30. 0x for MSCI Inc. — 21. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FICO: 46. 0% to $1649. 11.
08Which pays a better dividend — PFBC or FICO or VRSK or HAFC or MSCI?
In this comparison, HAFC (3.
6% yield), PFBC (3. 1% yield), MSCI (1. 2% yield), VRSK (1. 0% yield) pay a dividend. FICO does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is PFBC or FICO or VRSK or HAFC or MSCI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Verisk Analytics, Inc.
(VRSK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 04), 1. 0% yield, +137. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (VRSK: +137. 1%, HAFC: +76. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between PFBC and FICO and VRSK and HAFC and MSCI?
These companies operate in different sectors (PFBC (Financial Services) and FICO (Technology) and VRSK (Industrials) and HAFC (Financial Services) and MSCI (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: PFBC is a small-cap deep-value stock; FICO is a mid-cap high-growth stock; VRSK is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; HAFC is a small-cap deep-value stock; MSCI is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. PFBC, VRSK, HAFC, MSCI pay a dividend while FICO does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.