Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

PHAR vs FOLD vs LGND vs RARE vs BMRN

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
PHAR
Pharming Group N.V.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • NL
Market Cap$843M
5Y Perf.-21.0%
FOLD
Amicus Therapeutics, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$4.55B
5Y Perf.-37.4%
LGND
Ligand Pharmaceuticals Incorporated

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$4.13B
5Y Perf.+111.5%
RARE
Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$2.57B
5Y Perf.-81.1%
BMRN
BioMarin Pharmaceutical Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$10.41B
5Y Perf.-38.3%

PHAR vs FOLD vs LGND vs RARE vs BMRN — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
PHAR logoPHAR
FOLD logoFOLD
LGND logoLGND
RARE logoRARE
BMRN logoBMRN
IndustryBiotechnologyBiotechnologyBiotechnologyBiotechnologyBiotechnology
Market Cap$843M$4.55B$4.13B$2.57B$10.41B
Revenue (TTM)$376M$634M$251M$669M$3.24B
Net Income (TTM)$3M$-27M$49M$-609M$269M
Gross Margin87.9%87.9%85.9%83.6%75.9%
Operating Margin5.8%5.2%7.0%-83.9%13.8%
Forward P/E59.2x40.6x23.6x12.6x
Total Debt$116M$483M$7M$1.28B$643M
Cash & Equiv.$146M$214M$72M$434M$1.31B

PHAR vs FOLD vs LGND vs RARE vs BMRNLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

PHAR
FOLD
LGND
RARE
BMRN
StockDec 20May 26Return
Pharming Group N.V. (PHAR)10079.0-21.0%
Amicus Therapeutics… (FOLD)10062.6-37.4%
Ligand Pharmaceutic… (LGND)100211.5+111.5%
Ultragenyx Pharmace… (RARE)10018.9-81.1%
BioMarin Pharmaceut… (BMRN)10061.7-38.3%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: PHAR vs FOLD vs LGND vs RARE vs BMRN

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: FOLD and LGND are tied at the top with 2 categories each (5-stock set) — the right choice depends on your priorities. Ligand Pharmaceuticals Incorporated is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. BMRN also leads in specific categories worth noting. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
PHAR
Pharming Group N.V.
The Growth Play

PHAR is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 26.9%, EPS growth 123.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 22.4%
Best for: growth exposure
FOLD
Amicus Therapeutics, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

FOLD has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in long-term compounding and defensive.

  • 119.2% 10Y total return vs LGND's 73.0%
  • Beta 0.63, current ratio 2.84x
  • Beta 0.63 vs RARE's 1.42
  • +137.9% vs RARE's -21.8%
Best for: long-term compounding and defensive
LGND
Ligand Pharmaceuticals Incorporated
The Income Pick

LGND is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.

  • Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.99
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.99, Low D/E 0.9%, current ratio 8.93x
  • 27.3% revenue growth vs BMRN's 12.9%
  • 19.3% margin vs RARE's -91.0%
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
RARE
Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc.
The Growth Angle

Among these 5 stocks, RARE doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: healthcare exposure
BMRN
BioMarin Pharmaceutical Inc.
The Value Play

BMRN ranks third and is worth considering specifically for value and efficiency.

  • Better valuation composite
  • 3.4% ROA vs RARE's -45.8%, ROIC 7.4% vs -89.4%
Best for: value and efficiency
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthLGND logoLGND27.3% revenue growth vs BMRN's 12.9%
ValueBMRN logoBMRNBetter valuation composite
Quality / MarginsLGND logoLGND19.3% margin vs RARE's -91.0%
Stability / SafetyFOLD logoFOLDBeta 0.63 vs RARE's 1.42
DividendsTieNone of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)FOLD logoFOLD+137.9% vs RARE's -21.8%
Efficiency (ROA)BMRN logoBMRN3.4% ROA vs RARE's -45.8%, ROIC 7.4% vs -89.4%

PHAR vs FOLD vs LGND vs RARE vs BMRN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

PHARPharming Group N.V.

Segment breakdown not available.

FOLDAmicus Therapeutics, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

LGNDLigand Pharmaceuticals Incorporated
FY 2024
Royalty
27.9%$109M
Intangible Royalty Assets
24.4%$95M
Royalty, Kyprolis
9.8%$38M
Material Sales, Captisol, Core
7.9%$31M
Material Sales, Captisol
7.9%$31M
Contract Revenue
7.0%$27M
Service
6.5%$26M
Other (4)
8.5%$33M
RAREUltragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc.
FY 2025
Product
54.8%$369M
Royalty
45.2%$304M
BMRNBioMarin Pharmaceutical Inc.
FY 2025
Product
98.3%$3.2B
Royalty And Other
1.7%$53M

PHAR vs FOLD vs LGND vs RARE vs BMRN — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLLGNDLAGGINGRARE

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

LGND leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

BMRN is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.2B annually — 12.9x LGND's $251M. LGND is the more profitable business, keeping 19.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to RARE's -91.0%. On growth, LGND holds the edge at +122.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricPHAR logoPHARPharming Group N.…FOLD logoFOLDAmicus Therapeuti…LGND logoLGNDLigand Pharmaceut…RARE logoRAREUltragenyx Pharma…BMRN logoBMRNBioMarin Pharmace…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$376M$634M$251M$669M$3.2B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$33M$40M$52M-$536M$521M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$3M-$27M$49M-$609M$269M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$49M$30M$31M-$487M$767M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+87.9%+87.9%+85.9%+83.6%+75.9%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+5.8%+5.2%+7.0%-83.9%+13.8%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+0.7%-4.3%+19.3%-91.0%+8.3%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+12.9%+4.7%+12.2%-72.8%+23.7%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+14.8%+23.7%+122.8%-2.4%+2.8%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+45.8%-89.0%+15.6%-17.2%-43.2%
LGND leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

BMRN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 30.1x trailing earnings, BMRN trades at a 90% valuation discount to PHAR's 300.0x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, BMRN's 15.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than LGND's 322.1x.

MetricPHAR logoPHARPharming Group N.…FOLD logoFOLDAmicus Therapeuti…LGND logoLGNDLigand Pharmaceut…RARE logoRAREUltragenyx Pharma…BMRN logoBMRNBioMarin Pharmace…
Market CapShares × price$843M$4.5B$4.1B$2.6B$10.4B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$813M$4.8B$4.1B$3.4B$9.7B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS300.00x-164.85x-956.05x-4.48x30.07x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.59.17x40.62x23.65x12.60x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple26.54x114.88x322.10x15.89x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue2.23x7.17x24.74x3.82x3.23x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share3.09x16.29x4.63x1.75x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF17.09x152.43x53.41x14.36x
BMRN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

Evenly matched — LGND and BMRN each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

LGND delivers a 5.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $5 in annual profit, vs $-6 for RARE. LGND carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FOLD's 1.76x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PHAR scores 6/9 vs RARE's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricPHAR logoPHARPharming Group N.…FOLD logoFOLDAmicus Therapeuti…LGND logoLGNDLigand Pharmaceut…RARE logoRAREUltragenyx Pharma…BMRN logoBMRNBioMarin Pharmace…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+1.2%-12.0%+5.1%-6.1%+4.4%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+0.6%-3.2%+3.3%-45.8%+3.4%
ROICReturn on invested capital+5.5%+5.3%-2.3%-89.4%+7.4%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+5.5%+5.1%-2.7%-46.4%+8.1%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–964545
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.42x1.76x0.01x0.11x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$30M$269M-$65M$842M-$669M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$146M$214M$72M$434M$1.3B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$116M$483M$7M$1.3B$643M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense3.75x1.00x22.69x-14.49x16.96x
Evenly matched — LGND and BMRN each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

LGND leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in LGND five years ago would be worth $16,102 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,281 for RARE. Over the past 12 months, FOLD leads with a +137.9% total return vs RARE's -21.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors LGND at 39.5% vs RARE's -17.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricPHAR logoPHARPharming Group N.…FOLD logoFOLDAmicus Therapeuti…LGND logoLGNDLigand Pharmaceut…RARE logoRAREUltragenyx Pharma…BMRN logoBMRNBioMarin Pharmace…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-30.0%+1.5%+10.6%+10.7%-9.0%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+33.3%+137.9%+99.1%-21.8%-8.8%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-3.2%+19.0%+171.6%-44.5%-43.6%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-9.1%+48.6%+61.0%-77.2%-30.4%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-28.1%+119.2%+73.0%-59.4%-35.6%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-1.1%+6.0%+39.5%-17.8%-17.4%
LGND leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

FOLD leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

FOLD is the less volatile stock with a 0.63 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RARE's 1.42 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FOLD currently trades 99.9% from its 52-week high vs PHAR's 56.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricPHAR logoPHARPharming Group N.…FOLD logoFOLDAmicus Therapeuti…LGND logoLGNDLigand Pharmaceut…RARE logoRAREUltragenyx Pharma…BMRN logoBMRNBioMarin Pharmace…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.22x0.63x0.99x1.42x0.65x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$21.34$14.50$247.38$42.37$66.28
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$8.60$5.51$98.89$18.29$50.76
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+56.2%+99.9%+85.0%+61.7%+81.7%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10046.572.259.366.648.7
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded18K3.0M226K1.8M1.8M
FOLD leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Analyst consensus: PHAR as "Buy", FOLD as "Buy", LGND as "Buy", RARE as "Buy", BMRN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 222.3% upside for PHAR (target: $39) vs 0.1% for FOLD (target: $15).

MetricPHAR logoPHARPharming Group N.…FOLD logoFOLDAmicus Therapeuti…LGND logoLGNDLigand Pharmaceut…RARE logoRAREUltragenyx Pharma…BMRN logoBMRNBioMarin Pharmace…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$38.67$14.50$267.75$51.50$89.64
# AnalystsCovering analysts224173341
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises11
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

LGND leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). BMRN leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.

Best OverallLigand Pharmaceuticals Inco… (LGND)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

PHAR vs FOLD vs LGND vs RARE vs BMRN: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is PHAR or FOLD or LGND or RARE or BMRN a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Ligand Pharmaceuticals Incorporated (LGND) is the stronger pick with 27.

3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 12. 9% for BioMarin Pharmaceutical Inc. (BMRN). BioMarin Pharmaceutical Inc. (BMRN) offers the better valuation at 30. 1x trailing P/E (12. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Pharming Group N. V. (PHAR) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — PHAR or FOLD or LGND or RARE or BMRN?

On trailing P/E, BioMarin Pharmaceutical Inc.

(BMRN) is the cheapest at 30. 1x versus Pharming Group N. V. at 300. 0x. On forward P/E, BioMarin Pharmaceutical Inc. is actually cheaper at 12. 6x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — PHAR or FOLD or LGND or RARE or BMRN?

Over the past 5 years, Ligand Pharmaceuticals Incorporated (LGND) delivered a total return of +61.

0%, compared to -77. 2% for Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc. (RARE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FOLD returned +119. 2% versus RARE's -59. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — PHAR or FOLD or LGND or RARE or BMRN?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Amicus Therapeutics, Inc.

(FOLD) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 63β versus Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc. 's 1. 42β — meaning RARE is approximately 125% more volatile than FOLD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Ligand Pharmaceuticals Incorporated (LGND) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 176% for Amicus Therapeutics, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — PHAR or FOLD or LGND or RARE or BMRN?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Ligand Pharmaceuticals Incorporated (LGND) is pulling ahead at 27.

3% versus 12. 9% for BioMarin Pharmaceutical Inc. (BMRN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Pharming Group N. V. grew EPS 123. 5% year-over-year, compared to -107. 5% for Ligand Pharmaceuticals Incorporated. Over a 3-year CAGR, FOLD leads at 24. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — PHAR or FOLD or LGND or RARE or BMRN?

BioMarin Pharmaceutical Inc.

(BMRN) is the more profitable company, earning 10. 8% net margin versus -85. 4% for Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc. — meaning it keeps 10. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BMRN leads at 16. 6% versus -79. 5% for RARE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — LGND leads at 93. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is PHAR or FOLD or LGND or RARE or BMRN more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, BioMarin Pharmaceutical Inc.

(BMRN) trades at 12. 6x forward P/E versus 59. 2x for Pharming Group N. V. — 46. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PHAR: 222. 3% to $38. 67.

08

Which pays a better dividend — PHAR or FOLD or LGND or RARE or BMRN?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

09

Is PHAR or FOLD or LGND or RARE or BMRN better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Amicus Therapeutics, Inc.

(FOLD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 63), +119. 2% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (FOLD: +119. 2%, RARE: -59. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between PHAR and FOLD and LGND and RARE and BMRN?

Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: PHAR is a small-cap high-growth stock; FOLD is a small-cap high-growth stock; LGND is a small-cap high-growth stock; RARE is a small-cap high-growth stock; BMRN is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

PHAR

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 7%
  • Gross Margin > 52%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

FOLD

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 11%
  • Gross Margin > 52%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

LGND

High-Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 61%
  • Net Margin > 11%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

RARE

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 50%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

BMRN

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform PHAR and FOLD and LGND and RARE and BMRN on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(PHAR: 14.8% · FOLD: 23.7%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.