Insurance - Property & Casualty
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
PLMR vs SKWD vs KNSL vs HRTG vs ACGL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Insurance - Property & Casualty
Insurance - Property & Casualty
Insurance - Property & Casualty
Insurance - Diversified
PLMR vs SKWD vs KNSL vs HRTG vs ACGL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Insurance - Property & Casualty | Insurance - Property & Casualty | Insurance - Property & Casualty | Insurance - Property & Casualty | Insurance - Diversified |
| Market Cap | $3.01B | $2.03B | $7.15B | $861M | $33.67B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $874M | $1.47B | $1.92B | $847M | $19.93B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $197M | $174M | $527M | $196M | $4.40B |
| Gross Margin | 56.2% | 43.7% | 36.9% | 47.2% | 37.2% |
| Operating Margin | 29.0% | 15.3% | 27.2% | 31.7% | 25.0% |
| Forward P/E | 11.9x | 9.4x | 15.0x | 6.1x | 10.1x |
| Total Debt | $7M | $120M | $224M | $100M | $2.73B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $107M | $169M | $163M | $559M | $993M |
PLMR vs SKWD vs KNSL vs HRTG vs ACGL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jan 23 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Palomar Holdings, I… (PLMR) | 100 | 222.2 | +122.2% |
| Skyward Specialty I… (SKWD) | 100 | 245.9 | +145.9% |
| Kinsale Capital Gro… (KNSL) | 100 | 110.9 | +10.9% |
| Heritage Insurance … (HRTG) | 100 | 1112.3 | +1012.3% |
| Arch Capital Group … (ACGL) | 100 | 146.9 | +46.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PLMR vs SKWD vs KNSL vs HRTG vs ACGL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PLMR ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure and valuation efficiency.
- Rev growth 58.2%, EPS growth 60.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 38.9%
- PEG 0.12 vs HRTG's 0.39
- 58.2% revenue growth vs HRTG's 3.7%
Among these 5 stocks, SKWD doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
KNSL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 10 yrs, beta 0.29, yield 0.2%
- 16.1% 10Y total return vs ACGL's 324.0%
- Combined ratio 0.7 vs SKWD's 0.8 (lower = better underwriting)
- 0.2% yield, 10-year raise streak, vs ACGL's 0.0%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
HRTG is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value and momentum is your priority.
- Lower P/E (6.1x vs 15.0x)
- +15.3% vs KNSL's -32.7%
ACGL is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.02, Low D/E 11.3%, current ratio 1.21x
- Beta 0.02, yield 0.0%, current ratio 1.21x
- Beta 0.02 vs SKWD's 0.60, lower leverage
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 58.2% revenue growth vs HRTG's 3.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (6.1x vs 15.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Combined ratio 0.7 vs SKWD's 0.8 (lower = better underwriting) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.02 vs SKWD's 0.60, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 0.2% yield, 10-year raise streak, vs ACGL's 0.0%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +15.3% vs KNSL's -32.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 9.1% ROA vs SKWD's 3.8%, ROIC 26.6% vs 18.5% |
PLMR vs SKWD vs KNSL vs HRTG vs ACGL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
PLMR vs SKWD vs KNSL vs HRTG vs ACGL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
HRTG leads in 2 of 6 categories
ACGL leads 1 • KNSL leads 1 • PLMR leads 0 • SKWD leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — PLMR and KNSL and HRTG each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ACGL is the larger business by revenue, generating $19.9B annually — 23.5x HRTG's $847M. KNSL is the more profitable business, keeping 27.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SKWD's 11.8%. On growth, PLMR holds the edge at +62.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $874M | $1.5B | $1.9B | $847M | $19.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $265M | $225M | $533M | $281M | $5.2B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $197M | $174M | $527M | $196M | $4.4B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $406M | $475M | $1.0B | $177M | $6.1B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +56.2% | +43.7% | +36.9% | +47.2% | +37.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +29.0% | +15.3% | +27.2% | +31.7% | +25.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +22.6% | +11.8% | +27.5% | +23.1% | +22.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +46.4% | +32.3% | +52.9% | +20.8% | +30.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +62.8% | +26.6% | +10.2% | +2.4% | +7.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +59.7% | +194.3% | -100.0% | +2.3% | +39.0% |
Valuation Metrics
HRTG leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 4.4x trailing earnings, HRTG trades at a 72% valuation discount to PLMR's 15.8x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), HRTG offers better value at 0.06x vs KNSL's 0.35x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3.0B | $2.0B | $7.2B | $861M | $33.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.9B | $2.0B | $7.2B | $402M | $35.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 15.84x | 11.18x | 14.26x | 4.44x | 8.13x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 11.87x | 9.37x | 14.96x | 6.07x | 10.05x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.16x | — | 0.35x | 0.06x | 0.29x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 11.10x | 9.00x | 11.27x | 1.48x | 6.85x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.44x | 1.43x | 3.82x | 1.02x | 1.69x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.31x | 1.89x | 3.67x | 1.72x | 1.47x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 7.36x | 5.03x | 7.22x | 4.94x | 5.50x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — PLMR and HRTG each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HRTG delivers a 47.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $47 in annual profit, vs $18 for SKWD. PLMR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HRTG's 0.20x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PLMR scores 7/9 vs SKWD's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +22.8% | +18.1% | +28.0% | +47.3% | +19.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +7.6% | +3.8% | +9.1% | +8.4% | +5.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +25.5% | +18.5% | +26.6% | +15.4% | +15.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +11.3% | +9.7% | +14.2% | +11.1% | +11.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 6 | 7 | 7 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.01x | 0.12x | 0.11x | 0.20x | 0.11x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$100M | -$49M | $61M | -$459M | $1.7B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $107M | $169M | $163M | $559M | $993M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $7M | $120M | $224M | $100M | $2.7B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 649.06x | 29.18x | 47.02x | 33.88x | 34.86x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
HRTG leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in HRTG five years ago would be worth $30,138 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $16,795 for PLMR. Over the past 12 months, HRTG leads with a +15.3% total return vs KNSL's -32.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HRTG at 89.9% vs KNSL's -2.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -13.8% | -6.4% | -21.2% | +2.7% | +0.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -27.6% | -22.7% | -32.7% | +15.3% | +2.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +124.0% | +106.0% | -6.9% | +585.3% | +30.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +68.0% | +138.3% | +85.2% | +201.4% | +144.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +498.1% | +138.3% | +1606.7% | +119.4% | +324.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +30.8% | +27.2% | -2.3% | +89.9% | +9.3% |
Risk & Volatility
ACGL leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ACGL is the less volatile stock with a 0.02 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SKWD's 0.60 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ACGL currently trades 91.4% from its 52-week high vs KNSL's 60.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.24x | 0.60x | 0.29x | 0.50x | 0.02x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $175.85 | $65.05 | $512.76 | $31.98 | $103.39 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $107.75 | $40.60 | $293.78 | $16.83 | $82.45 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +64.6% | +70.0% | +60.2% | +87.6% | +91.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 27.9 | 41.1 | 26.3 | 55.7 | 46.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 234K | 410K | 256K | 282K | 1.9M |
Analyst Outlook
KNSL leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: PLMR as "Buy", SKWD as "Buy", KNSL as "Hold", HRTG as "Buy", ACGL as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 55.1% upside for SKWD (target: $71) vs -2.9% for PLMR (target: $110). KNSL is the only dividend payer here at 0.22% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $110.25 | $70.60 | $433.00 | $39.00 | $104.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 11 | 11 | 13 | 9 | 34 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +0.2% | — | +0.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | — | 10 | 1 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $0.68 | — | $0.02 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.2% | 0.0% | +1.3% | +0.3% | +5.6% |
HRTG leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). ACGL leads in 1 (Risk & Volatility). 2 tied.
PLMR vs SKWD vs KNSL vs HRTG vs ACGL: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PLMR or SKWD or KNSL or HRTG or ACGL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Palomar Holdings, Inc.
(PLMR) is the stronger pick with 58. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 7% for Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc. (HRTG). Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc. (HRTG) offers the better valuation at 4. 4x trailing P/E (6. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Palomar Holdings, Inc. (PLMR) a "Buy" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — PLMR or SKWD or KNSL or HRTG or ACGL?
On trailing P/E, Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc.
(HRTG) is the cheapest at 4. 4x versus Palomar Holdings, Inc. at 15. 8x. On forward P/E, Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc. is actually cheaper at 6. 1x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Palomar Holdings, Inc. wins at 0. 12x versus Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc. 's 0. 39x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — PLMR or SKWD or KNSL or HRTG or ACGL?
Over the past 5 years, Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc.
(HRTG) delivered a total return of +201. 4%, compared to +68. 0% for Palomar Holdings, Inc. (PLMR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: KNSL returned +1607% versus HRTG's +119. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — PLMR or SKWD or KNSL or HRTG or ACGL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Arch Capital Group Ltd.
(ACGL) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 02β versus Skyward Specialty Insurance Group, Inc. 's 0. 60β — meaning SKWD is approximately 3795% more volatile than ACGL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Palomar Holdings, Inc. (PLMR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 20% for Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — PLMR or SKWD or KNSL or HRTG or ACGL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Palomar Holdings, Inc.
(PLMR) is pulling ahead at 58. 2% versus 3. 7% for Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc. (HRTG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc. grew EPS 214. 4% year-over-year, compared to 3. 8% for Arch Capital Group Ltd.. Over a 3-year CAGR, PLMR leads at 38. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — PLMR or SKWD or KNSL or HRTG or ACGL?
Kinsale Capital Group, Inc.
(KNSL) is the more profitable company, earning 26. 9% net margin versus 12. 0% for Skyward Specialty Insurance Group, Inc. — meaning it keeps 26. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KNSL leads at 33. 8% versus 15. 3% for SKWD. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PLMR leads at 73. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is PLMR or SKWD or KNSL or HRTG or ACGL more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Palomar Holdings, Inc. (PLMR) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 12x versus Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc. 's 0. 39x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc. (HRTG) trades at 6. 1x forward P/E versus 15. 0x for Kinsale Capital Group, Inc. — 8. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SKWD: 55. 1% to $70. 60.
08Which pays a better dividend — PLMR or SKWD or KNSL or HRTG or ACGL?
In this comparison, KNSL (0.
2% yield) pays a dividend. PLMR, SKWD, HRTG, ACGL do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is PLMR or SKWD or KNSL or HRTG or ACGL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Kinsale Capital Group, Inc.
(KNSL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 29), +1607% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (KNSL: +1607%, SKWD: +138. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between PLMR and SKWD and KNSL and HRTG and ACGL?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: PLMR is a small-cap high-growth stock; SKWD is a small-cap high-growth stock; KNSL is a small-cap high-growth stock; HRTG is a small-cap deep-value stock; ACGL is a mid-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.