Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
PTCT vs RARE vs BMRN vs SRPT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
PTCT vs RARE vs BMRN vs SRPT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $5.35B | $2.57B | $10.41B | $2.18B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $827M | $669M | $3.24B | $2.18B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-187M | $-609M | $269M | $65M |
| Gross Margin | 49.7% | 83.6% | 75.9% | 34.4% |
| Operating Margin | -8.3% | -83.9% | 13.8% | -1.9% |
| Forward P/E | 8.3x | — | 12.6x | 6.9x |
| Total Debt | $492M | $1.28B | $643M | $1.04B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $985M | $434M | $1.31B | $801M |
PTCT vs RARE vs BMRN vs SRPT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| PTC Therapeutics, I… (PTCT) | 100 | 127.2 | +27.2% |
| Ultragenyx Pharmace… (RARE) | 100 | 38.2 | -61.8% |
| BioMarin Pharmaceut… (BMRN) | 100 | 50.8 | -49.2% |
| Sarepta Therapeutic… (SRPT) | 100 | 13.7 | -86.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PTCT vs RARE vs BMRN vs SRPT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PTCT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 114.5%, EPS growth 264.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 35.3%
- 7.3% 10Y total return vs SRPT's 18.0%
- 114.5% revenue growth vs BMRN's 12.9%
- +58.2% vs SRPT's -43.4%
RARE lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
BMRN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- beta 0.65
- Lower volatility, beta 0.65, Low D/E 10.6%, current ratio 5.21x
- Beta 0.65, current ratio 5.21x
- 8.3% margin vs RARE's -91.0%
SRPT is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Lower P/E (6.9x vs 12.6x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 114.5% revenue growth vs BMRN's 12.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (6.9x vs 12.6x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 8.3% margin vs RARE's -91.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.65 vs SRPT's 2.02, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +58.2% vs SRPT's -43.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 3.4% ROA vs RARE's -45.8%, ROIC 7.4% vs -89.4% |
PTCT vs RARE vs BMRN vs SRPT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
PTCT vs RARE vs BMRN vs SRPT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
BMRN leads in 3 of 6 categories
PTCT leads 1 • RARE leads 0 • SRPT leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BMRN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BMRN is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.2B annually — 4.8x RARE's $669M. BMRN is the more profitable business, keeping 8.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to RARE's -91.0%. On growth, BMRN holds the edge at +2.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $827M | $669M | $3.2B | $2.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$37M | -$536M | $521M | -$6M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$187M | -$609M | $269M | $65M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$229M | -$487M | $767M | $107M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +49.7% | +83.6% | +75.9% | +34.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -8.3% | -83.9% | +13.8% | -1.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -22.6% | -91.0% | +8.3% | +3.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -27.7% | -72.8% | +23.7% | +4.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -76.8% | -2.4% | +2.8% | -1.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -100.3% | -17.2% | -43.2% | +162.6% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — PTCT and SRPT each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 8.3x trailing earnings, PTCT trades at a 72% valuation discount to BMRN's 30.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, PTCT's 5.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than BMRN's 15.9x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $5.3B | $2.6B | $10.4B | $2.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $4.9B | $3.4B | $9.7B | $2.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 8.29x | -4.48x | 30.07x | -2.92x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 12.60x | 6.93x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 5.42x | — | 15.89x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.09x | 3.82x | 3.23x | 0.99x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | — | 1.75x | 1.91x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 7.61x | — | 14.36x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
BMRN leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SRPT delivers a 4.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $5 in annual profit, vs $-6 for RARE. BMRN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.11x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SRPT's 0.91x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PTCT scores 7/9 vs SRPT's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | -6.1% | +4.4% | +4.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -6.8% | -45.8% | +3.4% | +1.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | -89.4% | +7.4% | -31.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +55.9% | -46.4% | +8.1% | -24.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 4 | 5 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | — | 0.11x | 0.91x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$492M | $842M | -$669M | $238M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $985M | $434M | $1.3B | $801M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $492M | $1.3B | $643M | $1.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -1.67x | -14.49x | 16.96x | -14.00x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PTCT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PTCT five years ago would be worth $16,026 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,281 for RARE. Over the past 12 months, PTCT leads with a +58.2% total return vs SRPT's -43.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PTCT at 5.1% vs SRPT's -45.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -16.0% | +10.7% | -9.0% | -2.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +58.2% | -21.8% | -8.8% | -43.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +16.1% | -44.5% | -43.6% | -83.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +60.3% | -77.2% | -30.4% | -72.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +733.2% | -59.4% | -35.6% | +18.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +5.1% | -17.8% | -17.4% | -45.3% |
Risk & Volatility
BMRN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BMRN is the less volatile stock with a 0.65 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SRPT's 2.02 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BMRN currently trades 81.7% from its 52-week high vs SRPT's 47.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.13x | 1.42x | 0.65x | 2.02x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $87.50 | $42.37 | $66.28 | $44.14 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $37.94 | $18.29 | $50.76 | $10.42 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +73.7% | +61.7% | +81.7% | +47.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 45.3 | 66.6 | 48.7 | 63.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.0M | 1.8M | 1.8M | 3.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: PTCT as "Buy", RARE as "Buy", BMRN as "Buy", SRPT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 97.1% upside for RARE (target: $52) vs 18.4% for SRPT (target: $25).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $89.67 | $51.50 | $89.64 | $24.63 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 26 | 33 | 41 | 54 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +1.1% |
BMRN leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). PTCT leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.
PTCT vs RARE vs BMRN vs SRPT: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PTCT or RARE or BMRN or SRPT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, PTC Therapeutics, Inc.
(PTCT) is the stronger pick with 114. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 12. 9% for BioMarin Pharmaceutical Inc. (BMRN). PTC Therapeutics, Inc. (PTCT) offers the better valuation at 8. 3x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate PTC Therapeutics, Inc. (PTCT) a "Buy" — based on 26 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — PTCT or RARE or BMRN or SRPT?
On trailing P/E, PTC Therapeutics, Inc.
(PTCT) is the cheapest at 8. 3x versus BioMarin Pharmaceutical Inc. at 30. 1x. On forward P/E, Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc. is actually cheaper at 6. 9x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — PTCT or RARE or BMRN or SRPT?
Over the past 5 years, PTC Therapeutics, Inc.
(PTCT) delivered a total return of +60. 3%, compared to -77. 2% for Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc. (RARE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PTCT returned +733. 2% versus RARE's -59. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — PTCT or RARE or BMRN or SRPT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), BioMarin Pharmaceutical Inc.
(BMRN) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 65β versus Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc. 's 2. 02β — meaning SRPT is approximately 211% more volatile than BMRN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, BioMarin Pharmaceutical Inc. (BMRN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 11% versus 91% for Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — PTCT or RARE or BMRN or SRPT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), PTC Therapeutics, Inc.
(PTCT) is pulling ahead at 114. 5% versus 12. 9% for BioMarin Pharmaceutical Inc. (BMRN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: PTC Therapeutics, Inc. grew EPS 264. 5% year-over-year, compared to -404. 7% for Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, PTCT leads at 35. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — PTCT or RARE or BMRN or SRPT?
PTC Therapeutics, Inc.
(PTCT) is the more profitable company, earning 39. 4% net margin versus -85. 4% for Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc. — meaning it keeps 39. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PTCT leads at 49. 5% versus -79. 5% for RARE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PTCT leads at 95. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is PTCT or RARE or BMRN or SRPT more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc.
(SRPT) trades at 6. 9x forward P/E versus 12. 6x for BioMarin Pharmaceutical Inc. — 5. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for RARE: 97. 1% to $51. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — PTCT or RARE or BMRN or SRPT?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is PTCT or RARE or BMRN or SRPT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, PTC Therapeutics, Inc.
(PTCT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 13), +733. 2% 10Y return). Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc. (SRPT) carries a higher beta of 2. 02 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (PTCT: +733. 2%, SRPT: +18. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between PTCT and RARE and BMRN and SRPT?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: PTCT is a small-cap high-growth stock; RARE is a small-cap high-growth stock; BMRN is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; SRPT is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.