Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
PTGX vs ARDX vs IMVT vs RARE vs PRAX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
PTGX vs ARDX vs IMVT vs RARE vs PRAX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $6.36B | $1.71B | $5.53B | $2.57B | $9.63B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $18M | $428M | $0.00 | $669M | $-92K |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-115M | $-58M | $-464M | $-609M | $-327M |
| Gross Margin | 100.0% | 91.9% | — | 83.6% | — |
| Operating Margin | -8.1% | -8.7% | — | -83.9% | — |
| Forward P/E | 30.6x | — | — | — | — |
| Total Debt | $10M | $212M | $98K | $1.28B | $110K |
| Cash & Equiv. | $128M | $68M | $714M | $434M | $357M |
PTGX vs ARDX vs IMVT vs RARE vs PRAX — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Oct 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Protagonist Therape… (PTGX) | 100 | 521.6 | +421.6% |
| Ardelyx, Inc. (ARDX) | 100 | 545.3 | +445.3% |
| Immunovant, Inc. (IMVT) | 100 | 62.4 | -37.6% |
| Ultragenyx Pharmace… (RARE) | 100 | 26.0 | -74.0% |
| Praxis Precision Me… (PRAX) | 100 | 63.5 | -36.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PTGX vs ARDX vs IMVT vs RARE vs PRAX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PTGX is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and long-term compounding is your priority.
- beta 0.25
- 7.4% 10Y total return vs ARDX's 263.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.25, Low D/E 1.7%, current ratio 12.71x
- Beta 0.25, current ratio 12.71x
ARDX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 22.1%, EPS growth -52.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 98.4%
- 22.1% revenue growth vs PRAX's -100.0%
- -11.8% ROA vs RARE's -45.8%, ROIC -10.7% vs -89.4%
IMVT ranks third and is worth considering specifically for quality.
- 3.2% margin vs PTGX's -6.5%
Among these 5 stocks, RARE doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
PRAX is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +7.7% vs RARE's -21.8%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 22.1% revenue growth vs PRAX's -100.0% | |
| Quality / Margins | 3.2% margin vs PTGX's -6.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.25 vs PRAX's 1.55 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +7.7% vs RARE's -21.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -11.8% ROA vs RARE's -45.8%, ROIC -10.7% vs -89.4% |
PTGX vs ARDX vs IMVT vs RARE vs PRAX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
PTGX vs ARDX vs IMVT vs RARE vs PRAX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ARDX leads in 2 of 6 categories
PRAX leads 1 • PTGX leads 0 • IMVT leads 0 • RARE leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ARDX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RARE and PRAX operate at a comparable scale, with $669M and -$92,000 in trailing revenue. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from -13.6% (ARDX) to -6.5% (PTGX). On growth, ARDX holds the edge at +27.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $18M | $428M | $0 | $669M | -$92,000 |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$141M | -$35M | -$487M | -$536M | -$357M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$115M | -$58M | -$464M | -$609M | -$327M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$116M | -$37M | -$423M | -$487M | -$283M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +100.0% | +91.9% | — | +83.6% | — |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -8.1% | -8.7% | — | -83.9% | — |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -6.5% | -13.6% | — | -91.0% | — |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -6.6% | -8.8% | — | -72.8% | — |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -100.0% | +27.5% | — | -2.4% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +126.3% | +11.8% | +19.7% | -17.2% | +2.7% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — PTGX and IMVT and RARE each lead in 1 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $6.4B | $1.7B | $5.5B | $2.6B | $9.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $6.2B | $1.9B | $4.8B | $3.4B | $9.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -48.22x | -26.85x | -9.97x | -4.48x | -24.72x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 30.60x | — | — | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 138.15x | 4.20x | — | 3.82x | — |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 10.22x | 10.08x | 5.83x | — | 8.54x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 113.36x | — | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
ARDX leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
PTGX delivers a -17.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-18 in annual profit, vs $-6 for RARE. PRAX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ARDX's 1.27x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PTGX scores 4/9 vs IMVT's 2/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -17.8% | -38.1% | -47.1% | -6.1% | -43.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -16.5% | -11.8% | -44.1% | -45.8% | -40.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -21.8% | -10.7% | — | -89.4% | -65.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -23.9% | -10.6% | -66.1% | -46.4% | -49.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.02x | 1.27x | 0.00x | — | 0.00x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$118M | $144M | -$714M | $842M | -$357M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $128M | $68M | $714M | $434M | $357M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $10M | $212M | $98,000 | $1.3B | $110,000 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -0.28x | — | -14.49x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PRAX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ARDX five years ago would be worth $41,302 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,281 for RARE. Over the past 12 months, PRAX leads with a +775.0% total return vs RARE's -21.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PRAX at 174.9% vs RARE's -17.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +13.4% | +13.5% | +5.1% | +10.7% | +16.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +129.4% | +88.6% | +96.1% | -21.8% | +775.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +296.5% | +66.6% | +40.9% | -44.5% | +1976.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +238.8% | +313.0% | +62.4% | -77.2% | -20.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +744.9% | +263.5% | +173.6% | -59.4% | -20.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +58.3% | +18.5% | +12.1% | -17.8% | +174.9% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — PTGX and PRAX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PTGX is the less volatile stock with a 0.25 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PRAX's 1.55 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PRAX currently trades 93.6% from its 52-week high vs RARE's 61.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.25x | 0.87x | 1.37x | 1.42x | 1.55x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $107.84 | $8.40 | $30.09 | $42.37 | $356.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $41.29 | $3.21 | $13.36 | $18.29 | $35.18 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +91.7% | +83.1% | +90.5% | +61.7% | +93.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 56.4 | 68.6 | 60.2 | 66.6 | 55.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 752K | 3.5M | 1.4M | 1.8M | 378K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: PTGX as "Buy", ARDX as "Buy", IMVT as "Buy", RARE as "Buy", PRAX as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 143.6% upside for ARDX (target: $17) vs 18.1% for PTGX (target: $117).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $116.75 | $17.00 | $45.50 | $51.50 | $544.40 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 26 | 16 | 23 | 33 | 16 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | 1 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
ARDX leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). PRAX leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
PTGX vs ARDX vs IMVT vs RARE vs PRAX: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PTGX or ARDX or IMVT or RARE or PRAX a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Ardelyx, Inc.
(ARDX) is the stronger pick with 22. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX). Analysts rate Protagonist Therapeutics, Inc. (PTGX) a "Buy" — based on 26 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — PTGX or ARDX or IMVT or RARE or PRAX?
Over the past 5 years, Ardelyx, Inc.
(ARDX) delivered a total return of +313. 0%, compared to -77. 2% for Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc. (RARE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PTGX returned +744. 9% versus RARE's -59. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — PTGX or ARDX or IMVT or RARE or PRAX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Protagonist Therapeutics, Inc.
(PTGX) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 25β versus Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. 's 1. 55β — meaning PRAX is approximately 517% more volatile than PTGX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 127% for Ardelyx, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — PTGX or ARDX or IMVT or RARE or PRAX?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Ardelyx, Inc.
(ARDX) is pulling ahead at 22. 1% versus -100. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc. grew EPS 7. 3% year-over-year, compared to -148. 5% for Protagonist Therapeutics, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ARDX leads at 98. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — PTGX or ARDX or IMVT or RARE or PRAX?
Immunovant, Inc.
(IMVT) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 0% net margin versus -282. 8% for Protagonist Therapeutics, Inc. — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: IMVT leads at 0. 0% versus -343. 6% for PTGX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PTGX leads at 97. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is PTGX or ARDX or IMVT or RARE or PRAX more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ARDX: 143.
6% to $17. 00.
07Which pays a better dividend — PTGX or ARDX or IMVT or RARE or PRAX?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is PTGX or ARDX or IMVT or RARE or PRAX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Protagonist Therapeutics, Inc.
(PTGX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 25), +744. 9% 10Y return). Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX) carries a higher beta of 1. 55 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (PTGX: +744. 9%, PRAX: -20. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between PTGX and ARDX and IMVT and RARE and PRAX?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: PTGX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ARDX is a small-cap high-growth stock; IMVT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; RARE is a small-cap high-growth stock; PRAX is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.