Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

QNCX vs FOLD vs RARE vs SRPT vs BMRN

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
QNCX
Quince Therapeutics, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$7M
5Y Perf.-99.7%
FOLD
Amicus Therapeutics, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$4.55B
5Y Perf.+15.9%
RARE
Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$2.57B
5Y Perf.-61.8%
SRPT
Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$2.11B
5Y Perf.-86.9%
BMRN
BioMarin Pharmaceutical Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$10.40B
5Y Perf.-49.3%

QNCX vs FOLD vs RARE vs SRPT vs BMRN — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
QNCX logoQNCX
FOLD logoFOLD
RARE logoRARE
SRPT logoSRPT
BMRN logoBMRN
IndustryBiotechnologyBiotechnologyBiotechnologyBiotechnologyBiotechnology
Market Cap$7M$4.55B$2.57B$2.11B$10.40B
Revenue (TTM)$0.00$634M$669M$2.18B$3.24B
Net Income (TTM)$-84M$-27M$-609M$65M$269M
Gross Margin87.9%83.6%34.4%75.9%
Operating Margin5.2%-83.9%-1.9%13.8%
Forward P/E40.6x5.9x13.6x
Total Debt$18M$483M$1.28B$1.04B$643M
Cash & Equiv.$6M$214M$434M$801M$1.31B

QNCX vs FOLD vs RARE vs SRPT vs BMRNLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

QNCX
FOLD
RARE
SRPT
BMRN
StockMay 20May 26Return
Quince Therapeutics… (QNCX)1000.3-99.7%
Amicus Therapeutics… (FOLD)100115.9+15.9%
Ultragenyx Pharmace… (RARE)10038.2-61.8%
Sarepta Therapeutic… (SRPT)10013.1-86.9%
BioMarin Pharmaceut… (BMRN)10050.7-49.3%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: QNCX vs FOLD vs RARE vs SRPT vs BMRN

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: FOLD and BMRN are tied at the top with 2 categories each (5-stock set) — the right choice depends on your priorities. BioMarin Pharmaceutical Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality and operational efficiency and capital deployment. RARE and SRPT also each lead in at least one category. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
QNCX
Quince Therapeutics, Inc.
The Healthcare Pick

Among these 5 stocks, QNCX doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: healthcare exposure
FOLD
Amicus Therapeutics, Inc.
The Income Pick

FOLD has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability and long-term compounding.

  • beta 0.61
  • 119.2% 10Y total return vs SRPT's 13.2%
  • Beta 0.61, current ratio 2.84x
  • Beta 0.61 vs QNCX's 2.25
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
RARE
Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc.
The Growth Play

RARE ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 20.1%, EPS growth 7.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 22.8%
  • 20.1% revenue growth vs QNCX's -48.0%
Best for: growth exposure
SRPT
Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc.
The Value Play

SRPT is the clearest fit if your priority is value.

  • Better valuation composite
Best for: value
BMRN
BioMarin Pharmaceutical Inc.
The Defensive Pick

BMRN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night is your priority.

  • Lower volatility, beta 0.64, Low D/E 10.6%, current ratio 5.21x
  • 8.3% margin vs RARE's -91.0%
  • 3.4% ROA vs QNCX's -78.5%, ROIC 7.4% vs -485.6%
Best for: sleep-well-at-night
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthRARE logoRARE20.1% revenue growth vs QNCX's -48.0%
ValueSRPT logoSRPTBetter valuation composite
Quality / MarginsBMRN logoBMRN8.3% margin vs RARE's -91.0%
Stability / SafetyFOLD logoFOLDBeta 0.61 vs QNCX's 2.25
DividendsTieNone of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)FOLD logoFOLD+138.3% vs QNCX's -87.6%
Efficiency (ROA)BMRN logoBMRN3.4% ROA vs QNCX's -78.5%, ROIC 7.4% vs -485.6%

QNCX vs FOLD vs RARE vs SRPT vs BMRN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

QNCXQuince Therapeutics, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

FOLDAmicus Therapeutics, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

RAREUltragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc.
FY 2025
Product
54.8%$369M
Royalty
45.2%$304M
SRPTSarepta Therapeutics, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

BMRNBioMarin Pharmaceutical Inc.
FY 2025
Product
98.3%$3.2B
Royalty And Other
1.7%$53M

QNCX vs FOLD vs RARE vs SRPT vs BMRN — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLBMRNLAGGINGSRPT

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

BMRN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

BMRN and QNCX operate at a comparable scale, with $3.2B and $0 in trailing revenue. BMRN is the more profitable business, keeping 8.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to RARE's -91.0%. On growth, FOLD holds the edge at +23.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricQNCX logoQNCXQuince Therapeuti…FOLD logoFOLDAmicus Therapeuti…RARE logoRAREUltragenyx Pharma…SRPT logoSRPTSarepta Therapeut…BMRN logoBMRNBioMarin Pharmace…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$0$634M$669M$2.2B$3.2B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$50M$40M-$536M-$6M$521M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$84M-$27M-$609M$65M$269M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$48M$30M-$487M$107M$767M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+87.9%+83.6%+34.4%+75.9%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+5.2%-83.9%-1.9%+13.8%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-4.3%-91.0%+3.0%+8.3%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+4.7%-72.8%+4.9%+23.7%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+23.7%-2.4%-1.9%+2.8%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-167.9%-89.0%-17.2%+162.6%-43.2%
BMRN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

BMRN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

On an enterprise value basis, BMRN's 15.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than FOLD's 114.9x.

MetricQNCX logoQNCXQuince Therapeuti…FOLD logoFOLDAmicus Therapeuti…RARE logoRAREUltragenyx Pharma…SRPT logoSRPTSarepta Therapeut…BMRN logoBMRNBioMarin Pharmace…
Market CapShares × price$7M$4.5B$2.6B$2.1B$10.4B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$20M$4.8B$3.4B$2.3B$9.7B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-0.08x-164.85x-4.48x-2.80x30.03x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.40.62x5.91x13.65x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple114.88x15.87x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue7.17x3.82x0.96x3.23x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share16.29x1.83x1.75x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF152.43x14.34x
BMRN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

BMRN leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

SRPT delivers a 4.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $5 in annual profit, vs $-6 for RARE. BMRN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.11x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FOLD's 1.76x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BMRN scores 5/9 vs QNCX's 1/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricQNCX logoQNCXQuince Therapeuti…FOLD logoFOLDAmicus Therapeuti…RARE logoRAREUltragenyx Pharma…SRPT logoSRPTSarepta Therapeut…BMRN logoBMRNBioMarin Pharmace…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-12.0%-6.1%+4.9%+4.4%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-78.5%-3.2%-45.8%+1.9%+3.4%
ROICReturn on invested capital-4.9%+5.3%-89.4%-31.4%+7.4%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-64.0%+5.1%-46.4%-24.0%+8.1%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–914445
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage1.76x0.91x0.11x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$13M$269M$842M$238M-$669M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$6M$214M$434M$801M$1.3B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$18M$483M$1.3B$1.0B$643M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense1.00x-14.49x-14.00x16.96x
BMRN leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

FOLD leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in FOLD five years ago would be worth $15,431 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $38 for QNCX. Over the past 12 months, FOLD leads with a +138.3% total return vs QNCX's -87.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FOLD at 6.0% vs QNCX's -57.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricQNCX logoQNCXQuince Therapeuti…FOLD logoFOLDAmicus Therapeuti…RARE logoRAREUltragenyx Pharma…SRPT logoSRPTSarepta Therapeut…BMRN logoBMRNBioMarin Pharmace…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-95.7%+1.5%+10.7%-6.4%-9.1%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-87.6%+138.3%-27.4%-45.4%-9.6%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-92.1%+19.0%-44.5%-84.3%-43.7%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-99.6%+54.3%-76.1%-71.5%-29.2%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-99.6%+119.2%-59.4%+13.2%-35.6%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-57.2%+6.0%-17.8%-46.0%-17.4%
FOLD leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

FOLD leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

FOLD is the less volatile stock with a 0.61 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than QNCX's 2.25 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FOLD currently trades 99.9% from its 52-week high vs QNCX's 2.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricQNCX logoQNCXQuince Therapeuti…FOLD logoFOLDAmicus Therapeuti…RARE logoRAREUltragenyx Pharma…SRPT logoSRPTSarepta Therapeut…BMRN logoBMRNBioMarin Pharmace…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5002.25x0.61x1.36x1.95x0.64x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$45.50$14.50$42.37$44.14$66.28
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$0.80$5.51$18.29$10.42$50.76
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+2.8%+99.9%+61.6%+45.2%+81.6%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10044.772.267.748.646.6
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded49.4M2.9M1.8M2.9M1.8M
FOLD leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Analyst consensus: FOLD as "Buy", RARE as "Buy", SRPT as "Buy", BMRN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 85.1% upside for RARE (target: $48) vs 0.1% for FOLD (target: $15).

MetricQNCX logoQNCXQuince Therapeuti…FOLD logoFOLDAmicus Therapeuti…RARE logoRAREUltragenyx Pharma…SRPT logoSRPTSarepta Therapeut…BMRN logoBMRNBioMarin Pharmace…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$14.50$48.36$25.29$91.50
# AnalystsCovering analysts24335441
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises1
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%0.0%+1.2%0.0%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

BMRN leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). FOLD leads in 2 (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility).

Best OverallBioMarin Pharmaceutical Inc. (BMRN)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

QNCX vs FOLD vs RARE vs SRPT vs BMRN: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is QNCX or FOLD or RARE or SRPT or BMRN a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc.

(RARE) is the stronger pick with 20. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 12. 9% for BioMarin Pharmaceutical Inc. (BMRN). BioMarin Pharmaceutical Inc. (BMRN) offers the better valuation at 30. 0x trailing P/E (13. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Amicus Therapeutics, Inc. (FOLD) a "Buy" — based on 24 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — QNCX or FOLD or RARE or SRPT or BMRN?

On forward P/E, Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc.

is actually cheaper at 5. 9x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — QNCX or FOLD or RARE or SRPT or BMRN?

Over the past 5 years, Amicus Therapeutics, Inc.

(FOLD) delivered a total return of +54. 3%, compared to -99. 6% for Quince Therapeutics, Inc. (QNCX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FOLD returned +119. 2% versus QNCX's -99. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — QNCX or FOLD or RARE or SRPT or BMRN?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Amicus Therapeutics, Inc.

(FOLD) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 61β versus Quince Therapeutics, Inc. 's 2. 25β — meaning QNCX is approximately 268% more volatile than FOLD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, BioMarin Pharmaceutical Inc. (BMRN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 11% versus 176% for Amicus Therapeutics, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — QNCX or FOLD or RARE or SRPT or BMRN?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc.

(RARE) is pulling ahead at 20. 1% versus 12. 9% for BioMarin Pharmaceutical Inc. (BMRN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Amicus Therapeutics, Inc. grew EPS 51. 2% year-over-year, compared to -404. 7% for Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SRPT leads at 33. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — QNCX or FOLD or RARE or SRPT or BMRN?

BioMarin Pharmaceutical Inc.

(BMRN) is the more profitable company, earning 10. 8% net margin versus -85. 4% for Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc. — meaning it keeps 10. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BMRN leads at 16. 6% versus -79. 5% for RARE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FOLD leads at 87. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is QNCX or FOLD or RARE or SRPT or BMRN more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc.

(SRPT) trades at 5. 9x forward P/E versus 40. 6x for Amicus Therapeutics, Inc. — 34. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for RARE: 85. 1% to $48. 36.

08

Which pays a better dividend — QNCX or FOLD or RARE or SRPT or BMRN?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

09

Is QNCX or FOLD or RARE or SRPT or BMRN better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Amicus Therapeutics, Inc.

(FOLD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 61), +119. 2% 10Y return). Quince Therapeutics, Inc. (QNCX) carries a higher beta of 2. 25 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (FOLD: +119. 2%, QNCX: -99. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between QNCX and FOLD and RARE and SRPT and BMRN?

Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: QNCX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; FOLD is a small-cap high-growth stock; RARE is a small-cap high-growth stock; SRPT is a small-cap high-growth stock; BMRN is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

QNCX

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

FOLD

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 11%
  • Gross Margin > 52%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

RARE

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 50%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

SRPT

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 20%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

BMRN

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.