Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
QNRX vs PTCT vs RARE vs FOLD vs KRYS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
QNRX vs PTCT vs RARE vs FOLD vs KRYS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $4M | $5.35B | $2.57B | $4.55B | $8.75B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $827M | $669M | $634M | $417M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-15.81B | $-187M | $-609M | $-27M | $225M |
| Gross Margin | — | 49.7% | 83.6% | 87.9% | 92.8% |
| Operating Margin | — | -8.3% | -83.9% | 5.2% | 42.8% |
| Forward P/E | — | 8.3x | — | 40.6x | 39.4x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $492M | $1.28B | $483M | $9M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $3.82B | $985M | $434M | $214M | $496M |
QNRX vs PTCT vs RARE vs FOLD vs KRYS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Quoin Pharmaceutica… (QNRX) | 100 | 0.0 | -100.0% |
| PTC Therapeutics, I… (PTCT) | 100 | 145.3 | +45.3% |
| Ultragenyx Pharmace… (RARE) | 100 | 38.2 | -61.8% |
| Amicus Therapeutics… (FOLD) | 100 | 115.9 | +15.9% |
| Krystal Biotech, In… (KRYS) | 100 | 594.7 | +494.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: QNRX vs PTCT vs RARE vs FOLD vs KRYS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
QNRX ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.00
- Beta 0.00, current ratio 3.61x
- Beta 0.00 vs RARE's 1.42
PTCT has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure.
- Rev growth 114.5%, EPS growth 264.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 35.3%
- 114.5% revenue growth vs QNRX's -1.5K%
- Lower P/E (8.3x vs 39.4x)
Among these 5 stocks, RARE doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
FOLD is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +137.9% vs RARE's -21.8%
KRYS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- 26.9% 10Y total return vs PTCT's 7.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.12, Low D/E 0.8%, current ratio 9.95x
- 53.9% margin vs RARE's -91.0%
- 17.6% ROA vs QNRX's -1.2K%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 114.5% revenue growth vs QNRX's -1.5K% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.3x vs 39.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 53.9% margin vs RARE's -91.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.00 vs RARE's 1.42 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +137.9% vs RARE's -21.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 17.6% ROA vs QNRX's -1.2K% |
QNRX vs PTCT vs RARE vs FOLD vs KRYS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
QNRX vs PTCT vs RARE vs FOLD vs KRYS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
KRYS leads in 3 of 6 categories
PTCT leads 1 • QNRX leads 0 • RARE leads 0 • FOLD leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KRYS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PTCT and QNRX operate at a comparable scale, with $827M and $0 in trailing revenue. KRYS is the more profitable business, keeping 53.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to RARE's -91.0%. On growth, KRYS holds the edge at +31.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $827M | $669M | $634M | $417M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$12M | -$37M | -$536M | $40M | $185M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$15.8B | -$187M | -$609M | -$27M | $225M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$16M | -$229M | -$487M | $30M | $237M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +49.7% | +83.6% | +87.9% | +92.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | -8.3% | -83.9% | +5.2% | +42.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | -22.6% | -91.0% | -4.3% | +53.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | -27.7% | -72.8% | +4.7% | +56.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -76.8% | -2.4% | +23.7% | +31.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +72.8% | -100.3% | -17.2% | -89.0% | +52.5% |
Valuation Metrics
PTCT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 8.3x trailing earnings, PTCT trades at a 81% valuation discount to KRYS's 43.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, PTCT's 5.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than FOLD's 114.9x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $4M | $5.3B | $2.6B | $4.5B | $8.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$3.8B | $4.9B | $3.4B | $4.8B | $8.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.00x | 8.29x | -4.48x | -164.85x | 43.38x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | 40.62x | 39.44x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 5.42x | — | 114.88x | 49.21x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 3.09x | 3.82x | 7.17x | 22.48x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.52x | — | — | 16.29x | 7.29x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 7.61x | — | 152.43x | 46.30x |
Profitability & Efficiency
KRYS leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
KRYS delivers a 19.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $19 in annual profit, vs $-2722 for QNRX. KRYS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FOLD's 1.76x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PTCT scores 7/9 vs QNRX's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -2721.7% | — | -6.1% | -12.0% | +19.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -1229.6% | -6.8% | -45.8% | -3.2% | +17.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | — | -89.4% | +5.3% | +18.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -124.5% | +55.9% | -46.4% | +5.1% | +14.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 7 | 4 | 4 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | — | — | 1.76x | 0.01x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$3.8B | -$492M | $842M | $269M | -$487M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $3.8B | $985M | $434M | $214M | $496M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $492M | $1.3B | $483M | $9M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -1.67x | -14.49x | 1.00x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
KRYS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in KRYS five years ago would be worth $41,919 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1 for QNRX. Over the past 12 months, FOLD leads with a +137.9% total return vs RARE's -21.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors KRYS at 50.1% vs QNRX's -70.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -54.8% | -16.0% | +10.7% | +1.5% | +20.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +3.7% | +58.2% | -21.8% | +137.9% | +116.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.3% | +16.1% | -44.5% | +19.0% | +238.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | +60.3% | -77.2% | +48.6% | +319.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | +733.2% | -59.4% | +119.2% | +2688.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -70.1% | +5.1% | -17.8% | +6.0% | +50.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — QNRX and FOLD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
QNRX is the less volatile stock with a 0.00 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RARE's 1.42 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FOLD currently trades 99.9% from its 52-week high vs QNRX's 15.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.04x | 1.03x | 1.36x | 0.61x | 1.02x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $41.80 | $87.50 | $42.37 | $14.50 | $303.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $5.20 | $37.94 | $18.29 | $5.51 | $122.80 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +15.2% | +73.7% | +61.7% | +99.9% | +97.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 49.9 | 45.3 | 66.6 | 72.2 | 64.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 111K | 1.0M | 1.8M | 3.0M | 264K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: PTCT as "Buy", RARE as "Buy", FOLD as "Buy", KRYS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 85.1% upside for RARE (target: $48) vs 0.1% for FOLD (target: $15).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $98.00 | $48.36 | $14.50 | $326.20 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 26 | 33 | 24 | 17 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
KRYS leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). PTCT leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
QNRX vs PTCT vs RARE vs FOLD vs KRYS: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is QNRX or PTCT or RARE or FOLD or KRYS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, PTC Therapeutics, Inc.
(PTCT) is the stronger pick with 114. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 20. 0% for Amicus Therapeutics, Inc. (FOLD). PTC Therapeutics, Inc. (PTCT) offers the better valuation at 8. 3x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate PTC Therapeutics, Inc. (PTCT) a "Buy" — based on 26 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — QNRX or PTCT or RARE or FOLD or KRYS?
On trailing P/E, PTC Therapeutics, Inc.
(PTCT) is the cheapest at 8. 3x versus Krystal Biotech, Inc. at 43. 4x. On forward P/E, Krystal Biotech, Inc. is actually cheaper at 39. 4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — QNRX or PTCT or RARE or FOLD or KRYS?
Over the past 5 years, Krystal Biotech, Inc.
(KRYS) delivered a total return of +319. 2%, compared to -100. 0% for Quoin Pharmaceuticals, Ltd. (QNRX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: KRYS returned +27. 7% versus QNRX's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — QNRX or PTCT or RARE or FOLD or KRYS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Quoin Pharmaceuticals, Ltd.
(QNRX) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 04β versus Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc. 's 1. 36β — meaning RARE is approximately 3470% more volatile than QNRX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Krystal Biotech, Inc. (KRYS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 176% for Amicus Therapeutics, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — QNRX or PTCT or RARE or FOLD or KRYS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), PTC Therapeutics, Inc.
(PTCT) is pulling ahead at 114. 5% versus 20. 0% for Amicus Therapeutics, Inc. (FOLD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: PTC Therapeutics, Inc. grew EPS 264. 5% year-over-year, compared to -220. 3% for Quoin Pharmaceuticals, Ltd.. Over a 3-year CAGR, PTCT leads at 35. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — QNRX or PTCT or RARE or FOLD or KRYS?
Krystal Biotech, Inc.
(KRYS) is the more profitable company, earning 52. 6% net margin versus -85. 4% for Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc. — meaning it keeps 52. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PTCT leads at 49. 5% versus -79. 5% for RARE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PTCT leads at 95. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is QNRX or PTCT or RARE or FOLD or KRYS more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Krystal Biotech, Inc.
(KRYS) trades at 39. 4x forward P/E versus 40. 6x for Amicus Therapeutics, Inc. — 1. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for RARE: 85. 1% to $48. 36.
08Which pays a better dividend — QNRX or PTCT or RARE or FOLD or KRYS?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is QNRX or PTCT or RARE or FOLD or KRYS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Quoin Pharmaceuticals, Ltd.
(QNRX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 04)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (QNRX: -100. 0%, RARE: -59. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between QNRX and PTCT and RARE and FOLD and KRYS?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: QNRX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PTCT is a small-cap high-growth stock; RARE is a small-cap high-growth stock; FOLD is a small-cap high-growth stock; KRYS is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.