Renewable Utilities
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
RAIN vs PESI vs CWST vs OESX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Waste Management
Waste Management
Electrical Equipment & Parts
RAIN vs PESI vs CWST vs OESX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Renewable Utilities | Waste Management | Waste Management | Electrical Equipment & Parts |
| Market Cap | $3M | $207M | $5.35B | $33M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $59M | $1.88B | $81M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-6M | $-18M | $7M | $-5M |
| Gross Margin | — | 4.1% | 17.4% | 29.9% |
| Operating Margin | — | -26.3% | 4.5% | -4.3% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 63.9x | — |
| Total Debt | $4M | $4M | $1.24B | $10M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $33K | $12M | $124M | $6M |
RAIN vs PESI vs CWST vs OESX — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jan 25 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rain Enhancement Te… (RAIN) | 100 | 39.0 | -61.0% |
| Perma-Fix Environme… (PESI) | 100 | 109.2 | +9.2% |
| Casella Waste Syste… (CWST) | 100 | 79.5 | -20.5% |
| Orion Energy System… (OESX) | 100 | 117.1 | +17.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: RAIN vs PESI vs CWST vs OESX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
RAIN plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.
PESI lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
CWST carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.32
- Rev growth 18.0%, EPS growth -47.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 19.2%
- 10.6% 10Y total return vs PESI's 178.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.32, Low D/E 79.0%, current ratio 1.26x
OESX is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if momentum is your priority.
- +31.2% vs RAIN's -75.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 18.0% revenue growth vs RAIN's -121.2% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 0.4% margin vs PESI's -30.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.32 vs PESI's 1.85 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +31.2% vs RAIN's -75.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 0.2% ROA vs RAIN's -298.9% |
RAIN vs PESI vs CWST vs OESX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
RAIN vs PESI vs CWST vs OESX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
CWST leads in 2 of 6 categories
OESX leads 1 • PESI leads 1 • RAIN leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — CWST and OESX each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CWST and RAIN operate at a comparable scale, with $1.9B and $0 in trailing revenue. CWST is the more profitable business, keeping 0.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PESI's -30.1%. On growth, CWST holds the edge at +9.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $59M | $1.9B | $81M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$5M | -$14M | $414M | -$1M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$6M | -$18M | $7M | -$5M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$4M | -$14M | $102M | $348M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +4.1% | +17.4% | +29.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | -26.3% | +4.5% | -4.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | -30.1% | +0.4% | -5.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | -23.4% | +5.5% | +4.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -20.1% | +9.6% | +7.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -110.5% | -18.6% | +109.6% |
Valuation Metrics
OESX leads this category, winning 2 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3M | $207M | $5.4B | $33M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $6M | $200M | $6.5B | $37M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.64x | -14.89x | 712.08x | -2.57x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 63.93x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 15.74x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 3.36x | 2.91x | 0.41x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 4.11x | 3.46x | 2.56x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 63.17x | 66.51x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CWST leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CWST delivers a 0.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $0 in annual profit, vs $-34 for PESI. PESI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.09x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to OESX's 0.87x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PESI scores 5/9 vs RAIN's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | -34.5% | +0.5% | -0.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -3.0% | -20.2% | +0.2% | -0.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | -21.7% | +2.6% | -34.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | — | -16.7% | +2.9% | -34.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 5 | 4 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.09x | 0.79x | 0.87x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $3M | -$7M | $1.1B | $4M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $32,604 | $12M | $124M | $6M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $4M | $4M | $1.2B | $10M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -148.90x | -42.14x | 1.12x | -3.29x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PESI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PESI five years ago would be worth $14,563 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,637 for OESX. Over the past 12 months, OESX leads with a +31.2% total return vs RAIN's -75.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PESI at 6.8% vs RAIN's -41.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -70.8% | -8.8% | -13.4% | -38.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -75.1% | +26.2% | -28.9% | +31.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -80.0% | +21.7% | -6.3% | -38.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -80.0% | +45.6% | +25.7% | -83.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -80.0% | +178.6% | +1059.4% | -32.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -41.5% | +6.8% | -2.2% | -15.1% |
Risk & Volatility
CWST leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CWST is the less volatile stock with a 0.32 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PESI's 1.85 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CWST currently trades 70.5% from its 52-week high vs RAIN's 15.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.20x | 1.85x | 0.32x | 1.10x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $9.58 | $16.50 | $121.24 | $18.64 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.43 | $8.02 | $74.05 | $5.50 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +15.2% | +67.7% | +70.5% | +49.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 33.7 | 41.5 | 52.8 | 41.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 19K | 164K | 874K | 39K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: PESI as "Hold", CWST as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 61.1% upside for PESI (target: $18) vs 39.3% for CWST (target: $119).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Buy | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $18.00 | $119.00 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 1 | 19 | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.0% |
CWST leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Risk & Volatility). OESX leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
RAIN vs PESI vs CWST vs OESX: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is RAIN or PESI or CWST or OESX a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Casella Waste Systems, Inc.
(CWST) is the stronger pick with 18. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -12. 0% for Orion Energy Systems, Inc. (OESX). Casella Waste Systems, Inc. (CWST) offers the better valuation at 712. 1x trailing P/E (63. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Casella Waste Systems, Inc. (CWST) a "Buy" — based on 19 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — RAIN or PESI or CWST or OESX?
Over the past 5 years, Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc.
(PESI) delivered a total return of +45. 6%, compared to -83. 6% for Orion Energy Systems, Inc. (OESX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CWST returned +1059% versus RAIN's -80. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — RAIN or PESI or CWST or OESX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Casella Waste Systems, Inc.
(CWST) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 32β versus Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc. 's 1. 85β — meaning PESI is approximately 472% more volatile than CWST relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc. (PESI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 9% versus 87% for Orion Energy Systems, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — RAIN or PESI or CWST or OESX?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Casella Waste Systems, Inc.
(CWST) is pulling ahead at 18. 0% versus -12. 0% for Orion Energy Systems, Inc. (OESX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc. grew EPS 43. 6% year-over-year, compared to -34. 9% for Rain Enhancement Technologies Holdco Inc. Over a 3-year CAGR, CWST leads at 19. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — RAIN or PESI or CWST or OESX?
Casella Waste Systems, Inc.
(CWST) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 4% net margin versus -22. 3% for Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc. — meaning it keeps 0. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CWST leads at 4. 9% versus -19. 0% for PESI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — OESX leads at 25. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is RAIN or PESI or CWST or OESX more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PESI: 61.
1% to $18. 00.
07Which pays a better dividend — RAIN or PESI or CWST or OESX?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is RAIN or PESI or CWST or OESX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Casella Waste Systems, Inc.
(CWST) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 32), +1059% 10Y return). Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc. (PESI) carries a higher beta of 1. 85 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CWST: +1059%, PESI: +178. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between RAIN and PESI and CWST and OESX?
These companies operate in different sectors (RAIN (Utilities) and PESI (Industrials) and CWST (Industrials) and OESX (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: RAIN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PESI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CWST is a small-cap high-growth stock; OESX is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.