Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
RCUS vs DBVT vs AGEN vs HALO vs MRK
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Drug Manufacturers - General
RCUS vs DBVT vs AGEN vs HALO vs MRK — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Drug Manufacturers - General |
| Market Cap | $2.50B | $1712.35T | $132M | $7.68B | $277.34B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $236M | $0.00 | $114M | $1.40B | $64.93B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-369M | $-168M | $115K | $317M | $18.25B |
| Gross Margin | 90.7% | — | 35.7% | 81.9% | 74.2% |
| Operating Margin | -168.6% | — | -17.7% | 58.4% | 41.1% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 1.8x | 8.1x | 21.9x |
| Total Debt | $99M | $22M | $10M | $0.00 | $50.53B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $222M | $194M | $3M | $134M | $14.56B |
RCUS vs DBVT vs AGEN vs HALO vs MRK — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Arcus Biosciences, … (RCUS) | 100 | 79.1 | -20.9% |
| DBV Technologies S.… (DBVT) | 100 | 41.2 | -58.8% |
| Agenus Inc. (AGEN) | 100 | 5.0 | -95.0% |
| Halozyme Therapeuti… (HALO) | 100 | 268.6 | +168.6% |
| Merck & Co., Inc. (MRK) | 100 | 145.9 | +45.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: RCUS vs DBVT vs AGEN vs HALO vs MRK
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
RCUS ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +209.6% vs HALO's -7.1%
DBVT is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.26, Low D/E 12.8%, current ratio 3.67x
AGEN is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 10.4%, EPS growth 100.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 5.2%
HALO is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding and valuation efficiency is your priority.
- 5.7% 10Y total return vs MRK's 166.5%
- PEG 0.35 vs MRK's 1.03
- Beta 0.56, current ratio 4.66x
- 37.6% revenue growth vs DBVT's -100.0%
MRK carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability.
- Dividend streak 14 yrs, beta 0.48, yield 2.9%
- 28.1% margin vs RCUS's -156.4%
- Beta 0.48 vs AGEN's 2.72
- 2.9% yield; 14-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 37.6% revenue growth vs DBVT's -100.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.1x vs 21.9x), PEG 0.35 vs 1.03 | |
| Quality / Margins | 28.1% margin vs RCUS's -156.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.48 vs AGEN's 2.72 | |
| Dividends | 2.9% yield; 14-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +209.6% vs HALO's -7.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 14.6% ROA vs DBVT's -89.0% |
RCUS vs DBVT vs AGEN vs HALO vs MRK — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
RCUS vs DBVT vs AGEN vs HALO vs MRK — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
HALO leads in 3 of 6 categories
MRK leads 2 • AGEN leads 1 • RCUS leads 0 • DBVT leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HALO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MRK and DBVT operate at a comparable scale, with $64.9B and $0 in trailing revenue. MRK is the more profitable business, keeping 28.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to RCUS's -156.4%. On growth, HALO holds the edge at +51.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $236M | $0 | $114M | $1.4B | $64.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$391M | -$112M | -$10M | $945M | $32.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$369M | -$168M | $115,000 | $317M | $18.3B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$489M | -$151M | -$159M | $645M | $12.4B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +90.7% | — | +35.7% | +81.9% | +74.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -168.6% | — | -17.7% | +58.4% | +41.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -156.4% | — | +0.1% | +22.7% | +28.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -2.1% | — | -139.1% | +46.2% | +19.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -39.3% | — | +27.5% | +51.6% | +4.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +10.5% | +91.5% | +85.3% | -2.1% | -19.6% |
Valuation Metrics
AGEN leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 15.4x trailing earnings, MRK trades at a 39% valuation discount to HALO's 25.5x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), MRK offers better value at 0.73x vs HALO's 1.11x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.5B | $1712.35T | $132M | $7.7B | $277.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.4B | $1712.35T | $140M | $7.5B | $313.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -7.54x | -0.76x | -1102.94x | 25.46x | 15.42x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 1.79x | 8.09x | 21.93x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 1.11x | 0.73x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | 8.34x | 10.68x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 10.11x | — | 1.16x | 5.50x | 4.27x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 4.22x | 0.66x | — | 165.47x | 5.35x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | 11.91x | 22.44x |
Profitability & Efficiency
HALO leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HALO delivers a 6.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $6 in annual profit, vs $-130 for DBVT. DBVT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.13x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MRK's 0.96x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AGEN scores 6/9 vs RCUS's 0/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -69.0% | -130.2% | — | +6.5% | +36.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -35.3% | -89.0% | +0.1% | +12.5% | +14.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -64.1% | — | — | +73.4% | +22.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -42.1% | -145.7% | — | +38.2% | +23.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 0 | 4 | 6 | 5 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.16x | 0.13x | — | — | 0.96x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$123M | -$172M | $7M | -$134M | $36.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $222M | $194M | $3M | $134M | $14.6B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $99M | $22M | $10M | $0 | $50.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -13.38x | -189.82x | 1.11x | 46.08x | 19.68x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
HALO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MRK five years ago would be worth $17,024 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $611 for AGEN. Over the past 12 months, RCUS leads with a +209.6% total return vs HALO's -7.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HALO at 29.1% vs AGEN's -51.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +6.5% | +4.9% | +16.1% | -7.3% | +6.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +209.6% | +110.4% | +27.1% | -7.1% | +46.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +24.9% | +19.7% | -88.2% | +115.3% | +2.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -18.6% | -69.1% | -93.9% | +37.0% | +70.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +45.9% | -87.0% | -94.3% | +570.7% | +166.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +7.7% | +6.2% | -51.0% | +29.1% | +0.9% |
Risk & Volatility
MRK leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MRK is the less volatile stock with a 0.48 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AGEN's 2.72 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MRK currently trades 89.7% from its 52-week high vs AGEN's 51.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.95x | 1.26x | 2.72x | 0.56x | 0.48x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $28.72 | $26.18 | $7.34 | $82.22 | $125.14 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $7.06 | $7.53 | $2.71 | $47.50 | $73.31 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +86.3% | +76.3% | +51.1% | +79.3% | +89.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 60.5 | 48.1 | 48.8 | 52.4 | 46.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.2M | 252K | 814K | 1.4M | 7.3M |
Analyst Outlook
MRK leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: RCUS as "Buy", DBVT as "Buy", AGEN as "Buy", HALO as "Buy", MRK as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 131.8% upside for DBVT (target: $46) vs 15.2% for MRK (target: $129). MRK is the only dividend payer here at 2.90% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $30.00 | $46.33 | $7.33 | $78.33 | $129.31 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 18 | 15 | 11 | 27 | 37 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | +2.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 | 1 | — | 14 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | $3.26 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.1% | +4.5% | +1.8% |
HALO leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). MRK leads in 2 (Risk & Volatility, Analyst Outlook).
RCUS vs DBVT vs AGEN vs HALO vs MRK: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is RCUS or DBVT or AGEN or HALO or MRK a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc.
(HALO) is the stronger pick with 37. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -4. 3% for Arcus Biosciences, Inc. (RCUS). Merck & Co. , Inc. (MRK) offers the better valuation at 15. 4x trailing P/E (21. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Arcus Biosciences, Inc. (RCUS) a "Buy" — based on 18 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — RCUS or DBVT or AGEN or HALO or MRK?
On trailing P/E, Merck & Co.
, Inc. (MRK) is the cheapest at 15. 4x versus Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc. at 25. 5x. On forward P/E, Agenus Inc. is actually cheaper at 1. 8x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc. wins at 0. 35x versus Merck & Co. , Inc. 's 1. 03x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — RCUS or DBVT or AGEN or HALO or MRK?
Over the past 5 years, Merck & Co.
, Inc. (MRK) delivered a total return of +70. 2%, compared to -93. 9% for Agenus Inc. (AGEN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HALO returned +570. 7% versus AGEN's -94. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — RCUS or DBVT or AGEN or HALO or MRK?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Merck & Co.
, Inc. (MRK) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 48β versus Agenus Inc. 's 2. 72β — meaning AGEN is approximately 472% more volatile than MRK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, DBV Technologies S. A. (DBVT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 13% versus 96% for Merck & Co. , Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — RCUS or DBVT or AGEN or HALO or MRK?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc.
(HALO) is pulling ahead at 37. 6% versus -4. 3% for Arcus Biosciences, Inc. (RCUS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Agenus Inc. grew EPS 100. 0% year-over-year, compared to -347. 5% for DBV Technologies S. A.. Over a 3-year CAGR, RCUS leads at 30. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — RCUS or DBVT or AGEN or HALO or MRK?
Merck & Co.
, Inc. (MRK) is the more profitable company, earning 28. 1% net margin versus -142. 9% for Arcus Biosciences, Inc. — meaning it keeps 28. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HALO leads at 58. 4% versus -156. 3% for RCUS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RCUS leads at 96. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is RCUS or DBVT or AGEN or HALO or MRK more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc. (HALO) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 35x versus Merck & Co. , Inc. 's 1. 03x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Agenus Inc. (AGEN) trades at 1. 8x forward P/E versus 21. 9x for Merck & Co. , Inc. — 20. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for DBVT: 131. 8% to $46. 33.
08Which pays a better dividend — RCUS or DBVT or AGEN or HALO or MRK?
In this comparison, MRK (2.
9% yield) pays a dividend. RCUS, DBVT, AGEN, HALO do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is RCUS or DBVT or AGEN or HALO or MRK better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Merck & Co.
, Inc. (MRK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 48), 2. 9% yield, +166. 5% 10Y return). Agenus Inc. (AGEN) carries a higher beta of 2. 72 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MRK: +166. 5%, AGEN: -94. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between RCUS and DBVT and AGEN and HALO and MRK?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: RCUS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; DBVT is a mega-cap quality compounder stock; AGEN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; HALO is a small-cap high-growth stock; MRK is a large-cap deep-value stock. MRK pays a dividend while RCUS, DBVT, AGEN, HALO do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.