Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
REGN vs BMRN vs ALNY vs BEAM vs NTLA
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
REGN vs BMRN vs ALNY vs BEAM vs NTLA — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $73.68B | $10.41B | $39.48B | $3.23B | $1.62B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $14.92B | $3.24B | $4.29B | $132M | $68M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $4.42B | $269M | $577M | $-65M | $-413M |
| Gross Margin | 84.5% | 75.9% | 80.9% | -64.2% | -25.6% |
| Operating Margin | 24.3% | 13.8% | 17.5% | -281.0% | -6.5% |
| Forward P/E | 15.3x | 13.6x | 39.9x | — | — |
| Total Debt | $2.71B | $643M | $1.28B | $294M | $93M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $3.12B | $1.31B | $1.66B | $295M | $155M |
REGN vs BMRN vs ALNY vs BEAM vs NTLA — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Regeneron Pharmaceu… (REGN) | 100 | 116.7 | +16.7% |
| BioMarin Pharmaceut… (BMRN) | 100 | 50.7 | -49.3% |
| Alnylam Pharmaceuti… (ALNY) | 100 | 218.1 | +118.1% |
| Beam Therapeutics I… (BEAM) | 100 | 126.5 | +26.5% |
| Intellia Therapeuti… (NTLA) | 100 | 80.5 | -19.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: REGN vs BMRN vs ALNY vs BEAM vs NTLA
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
REGN has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in quality and dividends.
- 29.6% margin vs NTLA's -6.1%
- 0.5% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
BMRN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- beta 0.65
- Lower volatility, beta 0.65, Low D/E 10.6%, current ratio 5.21x
- Beta 0.65, current ratio 5.21x
- Better valuation composite
ALNY is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 65.2%, EPS growth 206.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 53.0%
- 411.9% 10Y total return vs REGN's 90.0%
- 11.8% ROA vs NTLA's -45.2%, ROIC 33.4% vs -44.0%
BEAM ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth and momentum.
- 120.0% revenue growth vs REGN's 1.0%
- +93.9% vs BMRN's -8.8%
Among these 5 stocks, NTLA doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 120.0% revenue growth vs REGN's 1.0% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 29.6% margin vs NTLA's -6.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.65 vs NTLA's 2.37, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 0.5% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +93.9% vs BMRN's -8.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.8% ROA vs NTLA's -45.2%, ROIC 33.4% vs -44.0% |
REGN vs BMRN vs ALNY vs BEAM vs NTLA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
REGN vs BMRN vs ALNY vs BEAM vs NTLA — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ALNY leads in 2 of 6 categories
REGN leads 1 • BMRN leads 1 • BEAM leads 0 • NTLA leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
REGN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
REGN is the larger business by revenue, generating $14.9B annually — 220.5x NTLA's $68M. REGN is the more profitable business, keeping 29.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NTLA's -6.1%. On growth, ALNY holds the edge at +96.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $14.9B | $3.2B | $4.3B | $132M | $68M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $4.2B | $521M | $677M | -$355M | -$431M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $4.4B | $269M | $577M | -$65M | -$413M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $4.2B | $767M | $641M | -$384M | -$396M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +84.5% | +75.9% | +80.9% | -64.2% | -25.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +24.3% | +13.8% | +17.5% | -2.8% | -6.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +29.6% | +8.3% | +13.5% | -49.2% | -6.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +27.9% | +23.7% | +15.0% | -2.9% | -5.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +19.0% | +2.8% | +96.4% | -100.0% | +78.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -7.2% | -43.2% | +4.4% | +26.6% | +34.6% |
Valuation Metrics
BMRN leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 17.1x trailing earnings, REGN trades at a 87% valuation discount to ALNY's 127.0x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, BMRN's 15.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ALNY's 70.2x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $73.7B | $10.4B | $39.5B | $3.2B | $1.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $73.3B | $9.7B | $39.1B | $3.2B | $1.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 17.09x | 30.07x | 127.00x | -38.85x | -3.60x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 15.35x | 13.65x | 39.92x | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 2.70x | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 17.78x | 15.89x | 70.17x | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 5.14x | 3.23x | 10.63x | 23.14x | 23.93x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.46x | 1.75x | 50.50x | 2.51x | 2.21x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 18.06x | 14.36x | 84.84x | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
ALNY leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ALNY delivers a 98.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $98 in annual profit, vs $-57 for NTLA. REGN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.09x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ALNY's 1.62x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ALNY scores 6/9 vs NTLA's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +14.3% | +4.4% | +98.3% | -5.9% | -56.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +11.1% | +3.4% | +11.8% | -4.6% | -45.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +8.9% | +7.4% | +33.4% | -31.1% | -44.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +10.2% | +8.1% | +15.3% | -33.3% | -48.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 4 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.09x | 0.11x | 1.62x | 0.24x | 0.14x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$412M | -$669M | -$379M | -$1M | -$62M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $3.1B | $1.3B | $1.7B | $295M | $155M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2.7B | $643M | $1.3B | $294M | $93M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 108.44x | 16.96x | 2.02x | 1.08x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ALNY leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ALNY five years ago would be worth $22,537 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,024 for NTLA. Over the past 12 months, BEAM leads with a +93.9% total return vs BMRN's -8.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ALNY at 12.1% vs NTLA's -31.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -8.5% | -9.0% | -26.1% | +16.0% | +48.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +27.1% | -8.8% | +7.0% | +93.9% | +88.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -5.1% | -43.6% | +40.9% | -5.6% | -68.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +43.6% | -30.4% | +125.4% | -55.6% | -79.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +90.0% | -35.6% | +411.9% | +67.8% | -42.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -1.7% | -17.4% | +12.1% | -1.9% | -31.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — BMRN and BEAM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BMRN is the less volatile stock with a 0.65 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NTLA's 2.37 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BEAM currently trades 86.4% from its 52-week high vs NTLA's 48.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.77x | 0.64x | 0.74x | 2.08x | 2.21x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $821.11 | $66.28 | $495.55 | $36.44 | $28.25 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $476.49 | $50.76 | $245.96 | $15.35 | $6.83 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +86.4% | +81.7% | +59.7% | +86.4% | +48.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 44.9 | 48.7 | 43.8 | 60.9 | 50.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 631K | 1.8M | 1.1M | 2.0M | 5.3M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: REGN as "Buy", BMRN as "Buy", ALNY as "Buy", BEAM as "Buy", NTLA as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 69.1% upside for BMRN (target: $92) vs 22.1% for REGN (target: $866). REGN is the only dividend payer here at 0.48% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $865.68 | $91.50 | $445.67 | $40.83 | $20.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 48 | 41 | 52 | 27 | 39 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.5% | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $3.41 | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +5.4% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
ALNY leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). REGN leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 1 tied.
REGN vs BMRN vs ALNY vs BEAM vs NTLA: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is REGN or BMRN or ALNY or BEAM or NTLA a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Beam Therapeutics Inc.
(BEAM) is the stronger pick with 120. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 0% for Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (REGN). Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (REGN) offers the better valuation at 17. 1x trailing P/E (15. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (REGN) a "Buy" — based on 48 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — REGN or BMRN or ALNY or BEAM or NTLA?
On trailing P/E, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(REGN) is the cheapest at 17. 1x versus Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc. at 127. 0x. On forward P/E, BioMarin Pharmaceutical Inc. is actually cheaper at 13. 6x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — REGN or BMRN or ALNY or BEAM or NTLA?
Over the past 5 years, Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(ALNY) delivered a total return of +125. 4%, compared to -79. 8% for Intellia Therapeutics, Inc. (NTLA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ALNY returned +410. 4% versus NTLA's -41. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — REGN or BMRN or ALNY or BEAM or NTLA?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), BioMarin Pharmaceutical Inc.
(BMRN) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 64β versus Intellia Therapeutics, Inc. 's 2. 21β — meaning NTLA is approximately 248% more volatile than BMRN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (REGN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 9% versus 162% for Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — REGN or BMRN or ALNY or BEAM or NTLA?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Beam Therapeutics Inc.
(BEAM) is pulling ahead at 120. 0% versus 1. 0% for Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (REGN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc. grew EPS 206. 9% year-over-year, compared to -18. 6% for BioMarin Pharmaceutical Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ALNY leads at 53. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — REGN or BMRN or ALNY or BEAM or NTLA?
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(REGN) is the more profitable company, earning 31. 4% net margin versus -609. 9% for Intellia Therapeutics, Inc. — meaning it keeps 31. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: REGN leads at 24. 9% versus -651. 7% for NTLA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — REGN leads at 85. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is REGN or BMRN or ALNY or BEAM or NTLA more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, BioMarin Pharmaceutical Inc.
(BMRN) trades at 13. 6x forward P/E versus 39. 9x for Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc. — 26. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BMRN: 69. 1% to $91. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — REGN or BMRN or ALNY or BEAM or NTLA?
In this comparison, REGN (0.
5% yield) pays a dividend. BMRN, ALNY, BEAM, NTLA do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is REGN or BMRN or ALNY or BEAM or NTLA better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(ALNY) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 74), +410. 4% 10Y return). Intellia Therapeutics, Inc. (NTLA) carries a higher beta of 2. 21 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ALNY: +410. 4%, NTLA: -41. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between REGN and BMRN and ALNY and BEAM and NTLA?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: REGN is a mid-cap deep-value stock; BMRN is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; ALNY is a mid-cap high-growth stock; BEAM is a small-cap high-growth stock; NTLA is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.