Software - Infrastructure
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
RELY vs FLYW vs EVTC vs V vs MA
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Information Technology Services
Software - Infrastructure
Financial - Credit Services
Financial - Credit Services
RELY vs FLYW vs EVTC vs V vs MA — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Infrastructure | Information Technology Services | Software - Infrastructure | Financial - Credit Services | Financial - Credit Services |
| Market Cap | $5.06B | $2.06B | $1.48B | $611.58B | $438.61B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.73B | $188.60B | $951M | $40.00B | $32.79B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $106M | $12.54B | $133M | $22.24B | $15.57B |
| Gross Margin | 59.2% | 0.2% | 46.4% | 80.4% | 83.4% |
| Operating Margin | 7.6% | 5.7% | 19.1% | 60.0% | 59.2% |
| Forward P/E | 39.7x | 41.5x | 6.1x | 24.3x | 25.2x |
| Total Debt | $220M | $0.00 | $1.13B | $25.17B | $19.00B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $542M | $330M | $306M | $20.15B | $10.57B |
RELY vs FLYW vs EVTC vs V vs MA — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Sep 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Remitly Global, Inc. (RELY) | 100 | 65.5 | -34.5% |
| Flywire Corporation (FLYW) | 100 | 39.3 | -60.7% |
| EVERTEC, Inc. (EVTC) | 100 | 52.5 | -47.5% |
| Visa Inc. (V) | 100 | 143.1 | +43.1% |
| Mastercard Incorpor… (MA) | 100 | 142.5 | +42.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: RELY vs FLYW vs EVTC vs V vs MA
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
RELY ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 29.4%, EPS growth 263.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 35.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.13, Low D/E 25.4%, current ratio 3.30x
- 29.4% revenue growth vs EVTC's 10.2%
FLYW is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +54.9% vs EVTC's -31.8%
EVTC has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in valuation efficiency and defensive.
- PEG 0.68 vs V's 1.53
- Beta 0.77, yield 0.8%, current ratio 2.07x
- Lower P/E (6.1x vs 25.2x), PEG 0.68 vs 1.20
- 0.8% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs V's 0.7%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
V is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 0.65, yield 0.7%
- 50.1% margin vs RELY's 6.1%
MA is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.
- 431.5% 10Y total return vs V's 325.9%
- Beta 0.62 vs FLYW's 1.48
- 29.5% ROA vs FLYW's 4.3%, ROIC 56.5% vs 2.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 29.4% revenue growth vs EVTC's 10.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (6.1x vs 25.2x), PEG 0.68 vs 1.20 | |
| Quality / Margins | 50.1% margin vs RELY's 6.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.62 vs FLYW's 1.48 | |
| Dividends | 0.8% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs V's 0.7%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +54.9% vs EVTC's -31.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 29.5% ROA vs FLYW's 4.3%, ROIC 56.5% vs 2.1% |
RELY vs FLYW vs EVTC vs V vs MA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
RELY vs FLYW vs EVTC vs V vs MA — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
V leads in 2 of 6 categories
EVTC leads 1 • MA leads 1 • RELY leads 0 • FLYW leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
V leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FLYW is the larger business by revenue, generating $188.6B annually — 198.3x EVTC's $951M. V is the more profitable business, keeping 50.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to RELY's 6.1%. On growth, FLYW holds the edge at +1408.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.7B | $188.6B | $951M | $40.0B | $32.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $161M | $10.8B | $316M | $27.6B | $21.6B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $106M | $12.5B | $133M | $22.2B | $15.6B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $252M | -$15.8B | $165M | $21.2B | $17.7B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +59.2% | +0.2% | +46.4% | +80.4% | +83.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +7.6% | +5.7% | +19.1% | +60.0% | +59.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +6.1% | +6.6% | +13.9% | +50.1% | +45.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +14.6% | -8.4% | +17.4% | +53.9% | +51.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +25.2% | +1408.6% | +8.4% | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +3.6% | +4.0% | -24.0% | +35.3% | +21.2% |
Valuation Metrics
EVTC leads this category, winning 7 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 10.9x trailing earnings, EVTC trades at a 93% valuation discount to FLYW's 156.6x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), EVTC offers better value at 1.21x vs V's 1.97x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $5.1B | $2.1B | $1.5B | $611.6B | $438.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $4.7B | $1.7B | $2.3B | $616.6B | $447.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 77.55x | 156.64x | 10.91x | 31.25x | 29.99x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 39.71x | 41.52x | 6.14x | 24.28x | 25.19x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 1.21x | 1.97x | 1.43x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 44.43x | 46.20x | 7.47x | 24.45x | 21.76x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.10x | 3.30x | 1.59x | 15.29x | 13.38x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 6.02x | 2.64x | 2.17x | 16.53x | 57.44x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 17.12x | 20.81x | 10.92x | 28.34x | 25.93x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MA leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MA delivers a 2.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $2 in annual profit, vs $6 for FLYW. RELY carries lower financial leverage with a 0.25x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MA's 2.45x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MA scores 9/9 vs V's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +12.7% | +5.9% | +18.7% | +58.9% | +2.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +8.1% | +4.3% | +6.1% | +22.7% | +29.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +14.2% | +2.1% | +10.2% | +29.2% | +56.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +9.4% | +1.3% | +10.5% | +36.2% | +64.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 5 | 9 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.25x | — | 1.58x | 0.66x | 2.45x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$322M | -$330M | $824M | $5.0B | $8.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $542M | $330M | $306M | $20.2B | $10.6B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $220M | $0 | $1.1B | $25.2B | $19.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 13.43x | 1.84x | 3.10x | 26.72x | 27.23x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
V leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in V five years ago would be worth $14,538 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,909 for FLYW. Over the past 12 months, FLYW leads with a +54.9% total return vs EVTC's -31.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors V at 11.9% vs FLYW's -16.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +81.9% | +24.0% | -16.1% | -7.8% | -11.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -0.5% | +54.9% | -31.8% | -8.5% | -12.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +32.2% | -41.8% | -29.9% | +40.1% | +30.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -50.4% | -50.9% | -41.8% | +45.4% | +38.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -50.4% | -50.9% | +94.4% | +325.9% | +431.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +9.8% | -16.5% | -11.2% | +11.9% | +9.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — RELY and MA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MA is the less volatile stock with a 0.62 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FLYW's 1.48 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. RELY currently trades 97.3% from its 52-week high vs EVTC's 62.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.13x | 1.48x | 0.77x | 0.65x | 0.62x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $24.71 | $18.05 | $38.56 | $375.51 | $601.77 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $12.08 | $9.97 | $21.82 | $293.89 | $480.50 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +97.3% | +95.5% | +62.3% | +84.9% | +82.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 71.9 | 83.6 | 21.5 | 55.6 | 47.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3.5M | 1.9M | 453K | 6.9M | 3.2M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — EVTC and V each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: RELY as "Buy", FLYW as "Buy", EVTC as "Buy", V as "Buy", MA as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 41.6% upside for EVTC (target: $34) vs -2.3% for RELY (target: $24). For income investors, EVTC offers the higher dividend yield at 0.83% vs MA's 0.62%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $23.50 | $18.75 | $34.00 | $362.45 | $657.38 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 13 | 19 | 18 | 61 | 64 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +0.8% | +0.7% | +0.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 1 | 15 | 14 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $0.20 | $2.36 | $3.07 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.0% | +3.8% | +4.7% | +2.2% | +2.7% |
V leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). EVTC leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
RELY vs FLYW vs EVTC vs V vs MA: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is RELY or FLYW or EVTC or V or MA a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Remitly Global, Inc.
(RELY) is the stronger pick with 29. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 10. 2% for EVERTEC, Inc. (EVTC). EVERTEC, Inc. (EVTC) offers the better valuation at 10. 9x trailing P/E (6. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Remitly Global, Inc. (RELY) a "Buy" — based on 13 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — RELY or FLYW or EVTC or V or MA?
On trailing P/E, EVERTEC, Inc.
(EVTC) is the cheapest at 10. 9x versus Flywire Corporation at 156. 6x. On forward P/E, EVERTEC, Inc. is actually cheaper at 6. 1x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: EVERTEC, Inc. wins at 0. 68x versus Visa Inc. 's 1. 53x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — RELY or FLYW or EVTC or V or MA?
Over the past 5 years, Visa Inc.
(V) delivered a total return of +45. 4%, compared to -50. 9% for Flywire Corporation (FLYW). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MA returned +431. 5% versus FLYW's -50. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — RELY or FLYW or EVTC or V or MA?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Mastercard Incorporated (MA) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
62β versus Flywire Corporation's 1. 48β — meaning FLYW is approximately 141% more volatile than MA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Remitly Global, Inc. (RELY) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 25% versus 2% for Mastercard Incorporated — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — RELY or FLYW or EVTC or V or MA?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Remitly Global, Inc.
(RELY) is pulling ahead at 29. 4% versus 10. 2% for EVERTEC, Inc. (EVTC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Flywire Corporation grew EPS 391. 1% year-over-year, compared to 4. 8% for Visa Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, RELY leads at 35. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — RELY or FLYW or EVTC or V or MA?
Visa Inc.
(V) is the more profitable company, earning 50. 1% net margin versus 2. 2% for Flywire Corporation — meaning it keeps 50. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: V leads at 60. 0% versus 1. 8% for FLYW. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MA leads at 83. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is RELY or FLYW or EVTC or V or MA more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, EVERTEC, Inc. (EVTC) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 68x versus Visa Inc. 's 1. 53x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, EVERTEC, Inc. (EVTC) trades at 6. 1x forward P/E versus 41. 5x for Flywire Corporation — 35. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for EVTC: 41. 6% to $34. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — RELY or FLYW or EVTC or V or MA?
In this comparison, EVTC (0.
8% yield), V (0. 7% yield), MA (0. 6% yield) pay a dividend. RELY, FLYW do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is RELY or FLYW or EVTC or V or MA better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Mastercard Incorporated (MA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
62), 0. 6% yield, +431. 5% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (MA: +431. 5%, FLYW: -50. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between RELY and FLYW and EVTC and V and MA?
These companies operate in different sectors (RELY (Technology) and FLYW (Technology) and EVTC (Technology) and V (Financial Services) and MA (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: RELY is a small-cap high-growth stock; FLYW is a small-cap high-growth stock; EVTC is a small-cap deep-value stock; V is a large-cap quality compounder stock; MA is a large-cap high-growth stock. EVTC, V, MA pay a dividend while RELY, FLYW do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.