Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

RIGL vs HALO vs PRTA vs FOLD vs RARE

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
RIGL
Rigel Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$482M
5Y Perf.+33.2%
HALO
Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$7.55B
5Y Perf.+164.2%
PRTA
Prothena Corporation plc

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • IE
Market Cap$578M
5Y Perf.+0.7%
FOLD
Amicus Therapeutics, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$4.55B
5Y Perf.+15.9%
RARE
Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$2.57B
5Y Perf.-61.8%

RIGL vs HALO vs PRTA vs FOLD vs RARE — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
RIGL logoRIGL
HALO logoHALO
PRTA logoPRTA
FOLD logoFOLD
RARE logoRARE
IndustryBiotechnologyBiotechnologyBiotechnologyBiotechnologyBiotechnology
Market Cap$482M$7.55B$578M$4.55B$2.57B
Revenue (TTM)$300M$1.40B$58M$634M$669M
Net Income (TTM)$364M$317M$-151M$-27M$-609M
Gross Margin93.4%81.9%-39.7%87.9%83.6%
Operating Margin41.6%58.4%-210.6%5.2%-83.9%
Forward P/E6.6x8.0x43.2x40.6x
Total Debt$53M$0.00$14M$483M$1.28B
Cash & Equiv.$41M$134M$308M$214M$434M

RIGL vs HALO vs PRTA vs FOLD vs RARELong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

RIGL
HALO
PRTA
FOLD
RARE
StockMay 20May 26Return
Rigel Pharmaceutica… (RIGL)100133.2+33.2%
Halozyme Therapeuti… (HALO)100264.2+164.2%
Prothena Corporatio… (PRTA)100100.7+0.7%
Amicus Therapeutics… (FOLD)100115.9+15.9%
Ultragenyx Pharmace… (RARE)10038.2-61.8%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: RIGL vs HALO vs PRTA vs FOLD vs RARE

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: RIGL leads in 4 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility. FOLD also leads in specific categories worth noting. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
RIGL
Rigel Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
The Growth Play

RIGL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 64.1%, EPS growth 18.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 34.8%
  • 64.1% revenue growth vs PRTA's -92.8%
  • Better valuation composite
  • 121.5% margin vs PRTA's -260.9%
Best for: growth exposure
HALO
Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc.
The Income Pick

HALO is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and long-term compounding is your priority.

  • beta 0.51
  • 5.6% 10Y total return vs FOLD's 119.2%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.51, current ratio 4.66x
  • Beta 0.51, current ratio 4.66x
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
PRTA
Prothena Corporation plc
The Healthcare Pick

PRTA lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: healthcare exposure
FOLD
Amicus Therapeutics, Inc.
The Momentum Pick

FOLD ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.

  • +138.3% vs RARE's -27.4%
Best for: momentum
RARE
Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc.
The Growth Angle

Among these 5 stocks, RARE doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: healthcare exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthRIGL logoRIGL64.1% revenue growth vs PRTA's -92.8%
ValueRIGL logoRIGLBetter valuation composite
Quality / MarginsRIGL logoRIGL121.5% margin vs PRTA's -260.9%
Stability / SafetyHALO logoHALOBeta 0.51 vs RARE's 1.36
DividendsTieNone of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)FOLD logoFOLD+138.3% vs RARE's -27.4%
Efficiency (ROA)RIGL logoRIGL99.3% ROA vs RARE's -45.8%, ROIC 45.8% vs -89.4%

RIGL vs HALO vs PRTA vs FOLD vs RARE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

RIGLRigel Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
FY 2025
Product
107.2%$232M
Contract revenues from collaborations
28.7%$62M
Government Contract
0.1%$265,000
Discounts and allowances
-36.1%$-77,978,000
HALOHalozyme Therapeutics, Inc.
FY 2025
Royalty
53.6%$868M
Product
23.3%$376M
Collaborative Agreements
9.4%$152M
Bulk rHuPH20
8.2%$133M
Sales-based milestone
4.3%$70M
Upfront Fees
1.1%$18M
PRTAProthena Corporation plc
FY 2025
Collaboration
99.5%$10M
License
0.5%$50,000
FOLDAmicus Therapeutics, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

RAREUltragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc.
FY 2025
Product
54.8%$369M
Royalty
45.2%$304M

RIGL vs HALO vs PRTA vs FOLD vs RARE — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLRIGLLAGGINGRARE

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

Evenly matched — RIGL and HALO and PRTA each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

HALO is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.4B annually — 24.1x PRTA's $58M. RIGL is the more profitable business, keeping 121.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PRTA's -2.6%. On growth, PRTA holds the edge at +17.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricRIGL logoRIGLRigel Pharmaceuti…HALO logoHALOHalozyme Therapeu…PRTA logoPRTAProthena Corporat…FOLD logoFOLDAmicus Therapeuti…RARE logoRAREUltragenyx Pharma…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$300M$1.4B$58M$634M$669M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$126M$945M-$121M$40M-$536M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$364M$317M-$151M-$27M-$609M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$79M$645M-$81M$30M-$487M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+93.4%+81.9%-39.7%+87.9%+83.6%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+41.6%+58.4%-2.1%+5.2%-83.9%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+121.5%+22.7%-2.6%-4.3%-91.0%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+26.4%+46.2%-140.6%+4.7%-72.8%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+10.3%+51.6%+17.1%+23.7%-2.4%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-30.2%-2.1%+153.6%-89.0%-17.2%
Evenly matched — RIGL and HALO and PRTA each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

RIGL leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 1.3x trailing earnings, RIGL trades at a 95% valuation discount to HALO's 25.0x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, RIGL's 3.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than FOLD's 114.9x.

MetricRIGL logoRIGLRigel Pharmaceuti…HALO logoHALOHalozyme Therapeu…PRTA logoPRTAProthena Corporat…FOLD logoFOLDAmicus Therapeuti…RARE logoRAREUltragenyx Pharma…
Market CapShares × price$482M$7.6B$578M$4.5B$2.6B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$495M$7.4B$284M$4.8B$3.4B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS1.34x25.05x-2.37x-164.85x-4.48x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.6.62x7.96x43.21x40.62x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate1.09x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple3.87x8.20x114.88x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue1.64x5.41x59.65x7.17x3.82x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.25x162.76x2.06x16.29x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF6.37x11.72x152.43x
RIGL leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

HALO leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

HALO delivers a 6.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $6 in annual profit, vs $-6 for RARE. PRTA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.05x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FOLD's 1.76x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), RIGL scores 6/9 vs PRTA's 1/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricRIGL logoRIGLRigel Pharmaceuti…HALO logoHALOHalozyme Therapeu…PRTA logoPRTAProthena Corporat…FOLD logoFOLDAmicus Therapeuti…RARE logoRAREUltragenyx Pharma…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+147.0%+6.5%-49.9%-12.0%-6.1%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+99.3%+12.5%-42.3%-3.2%-45.8%
ROICReturn on invested capital+45.8%+73.4%-21.0%+5.3%-89.4%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+48.7%+38.2%-47.0%+5.1%-46.4%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–965144
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.14x0.05x1.76x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$13M-$134M-$294M$269M$842M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$41M$134M$308M$214M$434M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$53M$0$14M$483M$1.3B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense30.74x46.08x1.00x-14.49x
HALO leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

Evenly matched — RIGL and FOLD each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in FOLD five years ago would be worth $15,431 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,391 for RARE. Over the past 12 months, FOLD leads with a +138.3% total return vs RARE's -27.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors RIGL at 29.8% vs PRTA's -48.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricRIGL logoRIGLRigel Pharmaceuti…HALO logoHALOHalozyme Therapeu…PRTA logoPRTAProthena Corporat…FOLD logoFOLDAmicus Therapeuti…RARE logoRAREUltragenyx Pharma…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-37.7%-8.8%+16.6%+1.5%+10.7%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+37.8%-5.3%+51.1%+138.3%-27.4%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+118.8%+111.8%-86.0%+19.0%-44.5%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-17.9%+39.1%-54.1%+54.3%-76.1%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+6.3%+559.7%-72.5%+119.2%-59.4%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+29.8%+28.4%-48.1%+6.0%-17.8%
Evenly matched — RIGL and FOLD each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — HALO and FOLD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

HALO is the less volatile stock with a 0.51 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RARE's 1.36 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FOLD currently trades 99.9% from its 52-week high vs RIGL's 49.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricRIGL logoRIGLRigel Pharmaceuti…HALO logoHALOHalozyme Therapeu…PRTA logoPRTAProthena Corporat…FOLD logoFOLDAmicus Therapeuti…RARE logoRAREUltragenyx Pharma…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.90x0.51x0.96x0.61x1.36x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$52.24$82.22$11.80$14.50$42.37
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$16.88$47.50$4.32$5.51$18.29
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+49.8%+78.0%+90.9%+99.9%+61.6%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10032.447.749.672.267.7
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded360K1.4M483K2.9M1.8M
Evenly matched — HALO and FOLD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Analyst consensus: RIGL as "Buy", HALO as "Buy", PRTA as "Buy", FOLD as "Buy", RARE as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 85.1% upside for RARE (target: $48) vs 0.1% for FOLD (target: $15).

MetricRIGL logoRIGLRigel Pharmaceuti…HALO logoHALOHalozyme Therapeu…PRTA logoPRTAProthena Corporat…FOLD logoFOLDAmicus Therapeuti…RARE logoRAREUltragenyx Pharma…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$27.33$75.60$19.00$14.50$48.36
# AnalystsCovering analysts1527282433
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises1
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+4.5%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

RIGL leads in 1 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics). HALO leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 3 tied.

Best OverallRigel Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (RIGL)Leads 1 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

RIGL vs HALO vs PRTA vs FOLD vs RARE: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is RIGL or HALO or PRTA or FOLD or RARE a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Rigel Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

(RIGL) is the stronger pick with 64. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -92. 8% for Prothena Corporation plc (PRTA). Rigel Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (RIGL) offers the better valuation at 1. 3x trailing P/E (6. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Rigel Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (RIGL) a "Buy" — based on 15 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — RIGL or HALO or PRTA or FOLD or RARE?

On trailing P/E, Rigel Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

(RIGL) is the cheapest at 1. 3x versus Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc. at 25. 0x. On forward P/E, Rigel Pharmaceuticals, Inc. is actually cheaper at 6. 6x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — RIGL or HALO or PRTA or FOLD or RARE?

Over the past 5 years, Amicus Therapeutics, Inc.

(FOLD) delivered a total return of +54. 3%, compared to -76. 1% for Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc. (RARE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HALO returned +559. 7% versus PRTA's -72. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — RIGL or HALO or PRTA or FOLD or RARE?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc.

(HALO) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 51β versus Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc. 's 1. 36β — meaning RARE is approximately 166% more volatile than HALO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Prothena Corporation plc (PRTA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 5% versus 176% for Amicus Therapeutics, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — RIGL or HALO or PRTA or FOLD or RARE?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Rigel Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

(RIGL) is pulling ahead at 64. 1% versus -92. 8% for Prothena Corporation plc (PRTA). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Rigel Pharmaceuticals, Inc. grew EPS 1868% year-over-year, compared to -99. 6% for Prothena Corporation plc. Over a 3-year CAGR, RIGL leads at 34. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — RIGL or HALO or PRTA or FOLD or RARE?

Rigel Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

(RIGL) is the more profitable company, earning 124. 7% net margin versus -25. 2% for Prothena Corporation plc — meaning it keeps 124. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HALO leads at 58. 4% versus -1905. 8% for PRTA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RIGL leads at 93. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is RIGL or HALO or PRTA or FOLD or RARE more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Rigel Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

(RIGL) trades at 6. 6x forward P/E versus 43. 2x for Prothena Corporation plc — 36. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for RARE: 85. 1% to $48. 36.

08

Which pays a better dividend — RIGL or HALO or PRTA or FOLD or RARE?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

09

Is RIGL or HALO or PRTA or FOLD or RARE better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc.

(HALO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 51), +559. 7% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (HALO: +559. 7%, RARE: -59. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between RIGL and HALO and PRTA and FOLD and RARE?

Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: RIGL is a small-cap high-growth stock; HALO is a small-cap high-growth stock; PRTA is a small-cap quality compounder stock; FOLD is a small-cap high-growth stock; RARE is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

RIGL

Quality Mega-Cap Compounder

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 72%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

HALO

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 25%
  • Net Margin > 13%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

PRTA

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 853%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

FOLD

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 11%
  • Gross Margin > 52%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

RARE

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 50%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform RIGL and HALO and PRTA and FOLD and RARE on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(RIGL: 10.3% · HALO: 51.6%)
Net Margin>
%
(RIGL: 121.5% · HALO: 22.7%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(RIGL: 1.3x · HALO: 25.0x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.