Tobacco
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
RLX vs BTI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Tobacco
RLX vs BTI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Tobacco | Tobacco |
| Market Cap | $1.91B | $126.39B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $3.27B | $51.78B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $764M | $-10.75B |
| Gross Margin | 31.9% | 82.5% |
| Operating Margin | 6.1% | -26.8% |
| Forward P/E | 2.1x | 16.1x |
| Total Debt | $58M | $36.95B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $5.59B | $5.30B |
RLX vs BTI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jan 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| RLX Technology Inc. (RLX) | 100 | 9.3 | -90.7% |
| British American To… (BTI) | 100 | 159.5 | +59.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: RLX vs BTI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
RLX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 96.5%, EPS growth 7.5%, 3Y rev CAGR -34.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.56, Low D/E 0.4%, current ratio 10.84x
- 96.5% revenue growth vs BTI's -5.2%
BTI is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 23 yrs, beta 0.29, yield 5.5%
- 41.1% 10Y total return vs RLX's -92.5%
- Beta 0.29, yield 5.5%, current ratio 0.76x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 96.5% revenue growth vs BTI's -5.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (2.1x vs 16.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 23.4% margin vs BTI's -20.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.29 vs RLX's 0.56 | |
| Dividends | 5.5% yield, 23-year raise streak, vs RLX's 0.5% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +42.0% vs RLX's +18.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.4% ROA vs BTI's -9.7%, ROIC -0.7% vs 2.4% |
RLX vs BTI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
RLX vs BTI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RLX leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BTI is the larger business by revenue, generating $51.8B annually — 15.8x RLX's $3.3B. RLX is the more profitable business, keeping 23.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BTI's -20.8%. On growth, RLX holds the edge at +52.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $3.3B | $51.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $218M | -$9.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $764M | -$10.7B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $1.3B | $18.7B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +31.9% | +82.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +6.1% | -26.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +23.4% | -20.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +39.2% | +36.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +52.2% | -2.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +23.1% | +2.0% |
Valuation Metrics
BTI leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 31.6x trailing earnings, BTI trades at a 5% valuation discount to RLX's 33.2x P/E.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.9B | $126.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.1B | $169.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 33.22x | 31.59x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 2.11x | 16.13x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.48x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 21.38x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 5.32x | 3.60x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.15x | 1.91x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 15.43x | 9.79x |
Profitability & Efficiency
RLX leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
RLX delivers a 4.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $5 in annual profit, vs $-23 for BTI. RLX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BTI's 0.74x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +4.7% | -22.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +4.4% | -9.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -0.7% | +2.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -0.7% | +2.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.00x | 0.74x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$5.5B | $31.7B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $5.6B | $5.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $58M | $37.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 3.79x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BTI leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BTI five years ago would be worth $18,408 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,239 for RLX. Over the past 12 months, BTI leads with a +42.0% total return vs RLX's +18.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BTI at 23.9% vs RLX's -1.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -5.2% | +4.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +18.8% | +42.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -4.5% | +90.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -77.6% | +84.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -92.5% | +41.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -1.5% | +23.9% |
Risk & Volatility
BTI leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BTI is the less volatile stock with a 0.29 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RLX's 0.56 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BTI currently trades 92.2% from its 52-week high vs RLX's 73.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.56x | 0.29x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.84 | $63.22 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.80 | $40.12 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +73.9% | +92.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 47.1 | 49.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.0M | 4.3M |
Analyst Outlook
BTI leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates RLX as "Hold" and BTI as "Buy". For income investors, BTI offers the higher dividend yield at 5.45% vs RLX's 0.48%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $40.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 1 | 18 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.5% | +5.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 23 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.07 | $2.34 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +4.5% | +0.9% |
BTI leads in 4 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). RLX leads in 2 (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency).
RLX vs BTI: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is RLX or BTI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, RLX Technology Inc.
(RLX) is the stronger pick with 96. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 2% for British American Tobacco p. l. c. (BTI). British American Tobacco p. l. c. (BTI) offers the better valuation at 31. 6x trailing P/E (16. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate British American Tobacco p. l. c. (BTI) a "Buy" — based on 18 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — RLX or BTI?
On trailing P/E, British American Tobacco p.
l. c. (BTI) is the cheapest at 31. 6x versus RLX Technology Inc. at 33. 2x. On forward P/E, RLX Technology Inc. is actually cheaper at 2. 1x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — RLX or BTI?
Over the past 5 years, British American Tobacco p.
l. c. (BTI) delivered a total return of +84. 1%, compared to -77. 6% for RLX Technology Inc. (RLX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BTI returned +41. 1% versus RLX's -92. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — RLX or BTI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), British American Tobacco p.
l. c. (BTI) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 29β versus RLX Technology Inc. 's 0. 56β — meaning RLX is approximately 93% more volatile than BTI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, RLX Technology Inc. (RLX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 74% for British American Tobacco p. l. c. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — RLX or BTI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), RLX Technology Inc.
(RLX) is pulling ahead at 96. 5% versus -5. 2% for British American Tobacco p. l. c. (BTI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: British American Tobacco p. l. c. grew EPS 121. 0% year-over-year, compared to 7. 5% for RLX Technology Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, BTI leads at 0. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — RLX or BTI?
RLX Technology Inc.
(RLX) is the more profitable company, earning 22. 6% net margin versus 11. 9% for British American Tobacco p. l. c. — meaning it keeps 22. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BTI leads at 10. 6% versus -4. 4% for RLX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BTI leads at 82. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is RLX or BTI more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, RLX Technology Inc.
(RLX) trades at 2. 1x forward P/E versus 16. 1x for British American Tobacco p. l. c. — 14. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — RLX or BTI?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
British American Tobacco p. l. c. (BTI) offers the highest yield at 5. 5%, versus 0. 5% for RLX Technology Inc. (RLX).
09Is RLX or BTI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, British American Tobacco p.
l. c. (BTI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 29), 5. 5% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (BTI: +41. 1%, RLX: -92. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between RLX and BTI?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Defensive sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: RLX is a small-cap high-growth stock; BTI is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. BTI pays a dividend while RLX does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.