Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
RNST vs SRCE vs FFIN vs SFNC vs FIS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Information Technology Services
RNST vs SRCE vs FFIN vs SFNC vs FIS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Information Technology Services |
| Market Cap | $3.78B | $1.79B | $4.61B | $3.09B | $24.47B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.44B | $600M | $739M | $627M | $10.89B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $181M | $161M | $243M | $-398M | $382M |
| Gross Margin | 60.8% | 70.3% | 70.8% | 5.8% | 38.1% |
| Operating Margin | 15.7% | 34.2% | 36.8% | -84.2% | 17.5% |
| Forward P/E | 10.7x | 10.9x | 15.9x | 10.3x | 7.5x |
| Total Debt | $1.06B | $341M | $197M | $641M | $4.01B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.07B | $69M | $763M | $380M | $599M |
RNST vs SRCE vs FFIN vs SFNC vs FIS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Renasant Corporation (RNST) | 100 | 166.7 | +66.7% |
| 1st Source Corporat… (SRCE) | 100 | 213.0 | +113.0% |
| First Financial Ban… (FFIN) | 100 | 105.7 | +5.7% |
| Simmons First Natio… (SFNC) | 100 | 124.5 | +24.5% |
| Fidelity National I… (FIS) | 100 | 34.0 | -66.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: RNST vs SRCE vs FFIN vs SFNC vs FIS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
RNST is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 39.1%, EPS growth -36.7%
- 39.1% NII/revenue growth vs SFNC's -56.7%
SRCE carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 30 yrs, beta 0.74, yield 2.1%
- 154.9% 10Y total return vs RNST's 46.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.74, Low D/E 25.8%, current ratio 12.62x
- Beta 0.74, yield 2.1%, current ratio 12.62x
FFIN ranks third and is worth considering specifically for quality.
- 30.2% margin vs SFNC's -63.4%
SFNC is the clearest fit if your priority is dividends.
- 4.0% yield, 6-year raise streak, vs SRCE's 2.1%
FIS is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.31 vs FFIN's 3.05
- Lower P/E (7.5x vs 15.9x), PEG 0.31 vs 3.05
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 39.1% NII/revenue growth vs SFNC's -56.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (7.5x vs 15.9x), PEG 0.31 vs 3.05 | |
| Quality / Margins | 30.2% margin vs SFNC's -63.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.74 vs RNST's 1.03, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 4.0% yield, 6-year raise streak, vs SRCE's 2.1% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +24.9% vs FIS's -35.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 1.8% ROA vs SFNC's -1.6%, ROIC 9.7% vs -9.1% |
RNST vs SRCE vs FFIN vs SFNC vs FIS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
RNST vs SRCE vs FFIN vs SFNC vs FIS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
FFIN leads in 2 of 6 categories
SRCE leads 2 • RNST leads 0 • SFNC leads 0 • FIS leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FFIN leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FIS is the larger business by revenue, generating $10.9B annually — 18.2x SRCE's $600M. FFIN is the more profitable business, keeping 30.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SFNC's -63.4%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.4B | $600M | $739M | $627M | $10.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $243M | $163M | $310M | -$497M | $3.8B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $181M | $161M | $243M | -$398M | $382M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $221M | $152M | $290M | $755M | $2.8B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +60.8% | +70.3% | +70.8% | +5.8% | +38.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +15.7% | +34.2% | +36.8% | -84.2% | +17.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +12.6% | +26.4% | +30.2% | -63.4% | +3.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +16.5% | +35.5% | +39.6% | +71.7% | +26.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — | +8.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +18.6% | +7.2% | -7.7% | +42.1% | +92.3% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — SFNC and FIS each lead in 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 11.4x trailing earnings, SRCE trades at a 82% valuation discount to FIS's 63.0x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), SRCE offers better value at 0.75x vs FFIN's 3.98x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3.8B | $1.8B | $4.6B | $3.1B | $24.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.8B | $2.1B | $4.0B | $3.4B | $27.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 19.42x | 11.40x | 20.76x | -7.24x | 63.00x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 10.71x | 10.85x | 15.92x | 10.35x | 7.54x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 2.80x | 0.75x | 3.98x | — | 2.58x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 15.52x | 9.64x | 14.17x | — | 7.66x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.62x | 2.99x | 6.23x | 4.93x | 2.29x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.98x | 1.36x | 2.89x | 0.84x | 1.76x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 15.92x | 8.41x | 15.73x | 6.88x | 9.97x |
Profitability & Efficiency
FFIN leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FFIN delivers a 13.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $-12 for SFNC. FFIN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.12x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FIS's 0.29x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SRCE scores 8/9 vs SFNC's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +5.1% | +12.4% | +13.3% | -11.6% | +2.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.7% | +1.8% | +1.6% | -1.6% | +1.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.2% | +9.7% | +11.0% | -9.1% | +6.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +1.5% | +4.0% | +16.0% | -4.2% | +6.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 8 | 6 | 4 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.27x | 0.26x | 0.12x | 0.19x | 0.29x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$15M | $271M | -$566M | $261M | $3.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.1B | $69M | $763M | $380M | $599M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.1B | $341M | $197M | $641M | $4.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.49x | 0.98x | 1.48x | -1.01x | 4.64x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SRCE leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SRCE five years ago would be worth $16,454 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,685 for FIS. Over the past 12 months, SRCE leads with a +24.9% total return vs FIS's -35.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SRCE at 23.6% vs FIS's -2.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +14.3% | +19.3% | +8.5% | +14.6% | -27.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +24.8% | +24.9% | -3.2% | +16.7% | -35.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +67.2% | +88.8% | +29.1% | +53.4% | -6.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -0.4% | +64.5% | -28.2% | -15.4% | -63.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +46.8% | +154.9% | +145.4% | +25.2% | -13.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +18.7% | +23.6% | +8.9% | +15.3% | -2.2% |
Risk & Volatility
SRCE leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SRCE is the less volatile stock with a 0.74 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RNST's 1.03 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SRCE currently trades 97.4% from its 52-week high vs FIS's 57.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.03x | 0.74x | 0.95x | 1.02x | 0.76x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $42.11 | $75.64 | $38.74 | $22.18 | $82.74 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $32.74 | $56.89 | $28.11 | $17.00 | $43.30 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +95.5% | +97.4% | +83.6% | +96.3% | +57.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 63.7 | 56.4 | 58.2 | 62.3 | 43.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 632K | 147K | 740K | 1.2M | 5.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — SRCE and SFNC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: RNST as "Buy", SRCE as "Hold", FFIN as "Hold", SFNC as "Buy", FIS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 42.6% upside for FIS (target: $67) vs -3.5% for RNST (target: $39). For income investors, SFNC offers the higher dividend yield at 4.00% vs RNST's 2.05%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $38.80 | $81.00 | $39.25 | $22.67 | $67.38 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 16 | 4 | 15 | 9 | 37 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.1% | +2.1% | +2.2% | +4.0% | +3.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 30 | 11 | 6 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.83 | $1.58 | $0.72 | $0.85 | $1.63 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.4% | +0.8% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
FFIN leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). SRCE leads in 2 (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility). 2 tied.
RNST vs SRCE vs FFIN vs SFNC vs FIS: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is RNST or SRCE or FFIN or SFNC or FIS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Renasant Corporation (RNST) is the stronger pick with 39.
1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -56. 7% for Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC). 1st Source Corporation (SRCE) offers the better valuation at 11. 4x trailing P/E (10. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Renasant Corporation (RNST) a "Buy" — based on 16 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — RNST or SRCE or FFIN or SFNC or FIS?
On trailing P/E, 1st Source Corporation (SRCE) is the cheapest at 11.
4x versus Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. at 63. 0x. On forward P/E, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. is actually cheaper at 7. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. wins at 0. 31x versus First Financial Bankshares, Inc. 's 3. 05x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — RNST or SRCE or FFIN or SFNC or FIS?
Over the past 5 years, 1st Source Corporation (SRCE) delivered a total return of +64.
5%, compared to -63. 2% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SRCE returned +154. 9% versus FIS's -13. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — RNST or SRCE or FFIN or SFNC or FIS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), 1st Source Corporation (SRCE) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
74β versus Renasant Corporation's 1. 03β — meaning RNST is approximately 39% more volatile than SRCE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, First Financial Bankshares, Inc. (FFIN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 12% versus 29% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — RNST or SRCE or FFIN or SFNC or FIS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Renasant Corporation (RNST) is pulling ahead at 39.
1% versus -56. 7% for Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: 1st Source Corporation grew EPS 20. 5% year-over-year, compared to -343. 8% for Simmons First National Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — RNST or SRCE or FFIN or SFNC or FIS?
First Financial Bankshares, Inc.
(FFIN) is the more profitable company, earning 30. 2% net margin versus -63. 4% for Simmons First National Corporation — meaning it keeps 30. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FFIN leads at 36. 8% versus -84. 2% for SFNC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FFIN leads at 70. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is RNST or SRCE or FFIN or SFNC or FIS more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 31x versus First Financial Bankshares, Inc. 's 3. 05x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) trades at 7. 5x forward P/E versus 15. 9x for First Financial Bankshares, Inc. — 8. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FIS: 42. 6% to $67. 38.
08Which pays a better dividend — RNST or SRCE or FFIN or SFNC or FIS?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC) offers the highest yield at 4. 0%, versus 2. 1% for Renasant Corporation (RNST).
09Is RNST or SRCE or FFIN or SFNC or FIS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, 1st Source Corporation (SRCE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
74), 2. 1% yield, +154. 9% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SRCE: +154. 9%, SFNC: +25. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between RNST and SRCE and FFIN and SFNC and FIS?
These companies operate in different sectors (RNST (Financial Services) and SRCE (Financial Services) and FFIN (Financial Services) and SFNC (Financial Services) and FIS (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: RNST is a small-cap high-growth stock; SRCE is a small-cap deep-value stock; FFIN is a small-cap high-growth stock; SFNC is a small-cap income-oriented stock; FIS is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.