Software - Infrastructure
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
RPAY vs PRTH vs USIO vs EVTC vs FLYW
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Infrastructure
Information Technology Services
Software - Infrastructure
Information Technology Services
RPAY vs PRTH vs USIO vs EVTC vs FLYW — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Infrastructure | Software - Infrastructure | Information Technology Services | Software - Infrastructure | Information Technology Services |
| Market Cap | $307M | $451M | $36M | $1.44B | $2.12B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $313M | $953M | $85M | $951M | $188.60B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-259M | $56M | $-3M | $133M | $12.54B |
| Gross Margin | 55.4% | 21.4% | 23.1% | 46.4% | 0.2% |
| Operating Margin | -35.9% | 14.8% | -2.6% | 19.1% | 5.7% |
| Forward P/E | 3.9x | 5.8x | — | 6.0x | 49.5x |
| Total Debt | $437M | $1.05B | $3M | $1.13B | $0.00 |
| Cash & Equiv. | $116M | $77M | $7M | $306M | $330M |
RPAY vs PRTH vs USIO vs EVTC vs FLYW — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Repay Holdings Corp… (RPAY) | 100 | 15.4 | -84.6% |
| Priority Technology… (PRTH) | 100 | 71.1 | -28.9% |
| Usio, Inc. (USIO) | 100 | 22.5 | -77.5% |
| EVERTEC, Inc. (EVTC) | 100 | 53.7 | -46.3% |
| Flywire Corporation (FLYW) | 100 | 51.6 | -48.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: RPAY vs PRTH vs USIO vs EVTC vs FLYW
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
RPAY ranks third and is worth considering specifically for value.
- Lower P/E (3.9x vs 49.5x)
Among these 5 stocks, PRTH doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
USIO is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.60, Low D/E 14.1%, current ratio 1.08x
- Beta 0.60 vs PRTH's 2.12
EVTC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.76, yield 0.8%
- 89.5% 10Y total return vs PRTH's -43.8%
- Beta 0.76, yield 0.8%, current ratio 2.07x
- 13.9% margin vs RPAY's -82.7%
FLYW is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 26.6%, EPS growth 391.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 29.1%
- 26.6% revenue growth vs RPAY's -1.2%
- +62.7% vs EVTC's -31.9%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 26.6% revenue growth vs RPAY's -1.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (3.9x vs 49.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 13.9% margin vs RPAY's -82.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.60 vs PRTH's 2.12 | |
| Dividends | 0.8% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +62.7% vs EVTC's -31.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.1% ROA vs RPAY's -20.3%, ROIC 10.2% vs -1.0% |
RPAY vs PRTH vs USIO vs EVTC vs FLYW — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
RPAY vs PRTH vs USIO vs EVTC vs FLYW — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
PRTH leads in 2 of 6 categories
RPAY leads 1 • EVTC leads 1 • USIO leads 0 • FLYW leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — EVTC and FLYW each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FLYW is the larger business by revenue, generating $188.6B annually — 2208.6x USIO's $85M. EVTC is the more profitable business, keeping 13.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to RPAY's -82.7%. On growth, FLYW holds the edge at +1408.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $313M | $953M | $85M | $951M | $188.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$10M | $204M | -$298,381 | $316M | $10.8B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$259M | $56M | -$3M | $133M | $12.5B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $61M | $75M | $1.08T | $145M | -$15.8B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +55.4% | +21.4% | +23.1% | +46.4% | +0.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -35.9% | +14.8% | -2.6% | +19.1% | +5.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -82.7% | +5.8% | -2.9% | +13.9% | +6.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +19.4% | +7.9% | +12632.5% | +15.2% | -8.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +4.5% | +8.8% | +8.2% | +8.4% | +1408.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -34.4% | +3.1% | -3.3% | -24.0% | +4.0% |
Valuation Metrics
RPAY leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 8.1x trailing earnings, PRTH trades at a 95% valuation discount to FLYW's 161.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, PRTH's 6.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than FLYW's 47.8x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $307M | $451M | $36M | $1.4B | $2.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $629M | $1.4B | $31M | $2.3B | $1.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1.16x | 8.10x | -14.04x | 10.62x | 161.18x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 3.86x | 5.78x | — | 5.97x | 49.50x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 1.18x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 6.98x | 6.95x | — | 7.34x | 47.80x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.99x | 0.47x | 0.43x | 1.54x | 3.40x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.62x | — | 1.97x | 2.11x | 2.71x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 3.37x | 6.01x | 33.67x | 10.62x | 21.41x |
Profitability & Efficiency
EVTC leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
EVTC delivers a 18.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $19 in annual profit, vs $-47 for RPAY. USIO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.14x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to EVTC's 1.58x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), EVTC scores 7/9 vs USIO's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -46.6% | — | -13.5% | +18.7% | +5.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -20.3% | +2.6% | -2.2% | +6.1% | +4.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -1.0% | +13.4% | -12.0% | +10.2% | +2.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -1.0% | +16.0% | -10.4% | +10.5% | +1.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 6 | 3 | 7 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.91x | — | 0.14x | 1.58x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $321M | $969M | -$5M | $824M | -$330M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $116M | $77M | $7M | $306M | $330M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $437M | $1.0B | $3M | $1.1B | $0 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -36.81x | 1.51x | -43.10x | 3.10x | 1.84x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PRTH leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PRTH five years ago would be worth $8,412 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,624 for RPAY. Over the past 12 months, FLYW leads with a +62.7% total return vs EVTC's -31.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PRTH at 14.6% vs RPAY's -17.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -3.6% | +3.6% | -5.1% | -18.4% | +27.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -7.9% | -10.4% | -9.7% | -31.9% | +62.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -44.3% | +50.5% | -33.8% | -31.7% | -40.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -83.8% | -15.9% | -78.3% | -43.3% | -49.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -63.8% | -43.8% | -32.8% | +89.5% | -49.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -17.7% | +14.6% | -12.9% | -11.9% | -15.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — USIO and FLYW each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
USIO is the less volatile stock with a 0.60 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PRTH's 2.12 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FLYW currently trades 98.2% from its 52-week high vs RPAY's 57.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.57x | 2.12x | 0.60x | 0.76x | 1.32x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $6.06 | $8.89 | $2.02 | $38.56 | $18.05 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.30 | $4.44 | $1.03 | $22.83 | $9.79 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +57.6% | +62.0% | +64.9% | +60.6% | +98.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 48.9 | 53.4 | 69.0 | 40.6 | 83.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.0M | 252K | 37K | 431K | 1.9M |
Analyst Outlook
PRTH leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: RPAY as "Buy", PRTH as "Buy", EVTC as "Buy", FLYW as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 99.6% upside for PRTH (target: $11) vs -1.3% for FLYW (target: $18). EVTC is the only dividend payer here at 0.85% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | — | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $6.83 | $11.00 | — | $37.00 | $17.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 17 | 5 | — | 18 | 19 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | +0.8% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 3 | — | 1 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | $0.20 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +12.5% | +2.3% | +2.9% | +4.8% | +3.7% |
PRTH leads in 2 of 6 categories (Total Returns, Analyst Outlook). RPAY leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
RPAY vs PRTH vs USIO vs EVTC vs FLYW: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is RPAY or PRTH or USIO or EVTC or FLYW a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Flywire Corporation (FLYW) is the stronger pick with 26.
6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 2% for Repay Holdings Corporation (RPAY). Priority Technology Holdings, Inc. (PRTH) offers the better valuation at 8. 1x trailing P/E (5. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Repay Holdings Corporation (RPAY) a "Buy" — based on 17 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — RPAY or PRTH or USIO or EVTC or FLYW?
On trailing P/E, Priority Technology Holdings, Inc.
(PRTH) is the cheapest at 8. 1x versus Flywire Corporation at 161. 2x. On forward P/E, Repay Holdings Corporation is actually cheaper at 3. 9x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — RPAY or PRTH or USIO or EVTC or FLYW?
Over the past 5 years, Priority Technology Holdings, Inc.
(PRTH) delivered a total return of -15. 9%, compared to -83. 8% for Repay Holdings Corporation (RPAY). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: EVTC returned +89. 5% versus RPAY's -63. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — RPAY or PRTH or USIO or EVTC or FLYW?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Usio, Inc.
(USIO) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 60β versus Priority Technology Holdings, Inc. 's 2. 12β — meaning PRTH is approximately 253% more volatile than USIO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Usio, Inc. (USIO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 14% versus 158% for EVERTEC, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — RPAY or PRTH or USIO or EVTC or FLYW?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Flywire Corporation (FLYW) is pulling ahead at 26.
6% versus -1. 2% for Repay Holdings Corporation (RPAY). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Flywire Corporation grew EPS 391. 1% year-over-year, compared to -26. 3% for Repay Holdings Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, FLYW leads at 29. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — RPAY or PRTH or USIO or EVTC or FLYW?
EVERTEC, Inc.
(EVTC) is the more profitable company, earning 15. 2% net margin versus -83. 0% for Repay Holdings Corporation — meaning it keeps 15. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: EVTC leads at 20. 0% versus -3. 9% for RPAY. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RPAY leads at 75. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is RPAY or PRTH or USIO or EVTC or FLYW more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Repay Holdings Corporation (RPAY) trades at 3.
9x forward P/E versus 49. 5x for Flywire Corporation — 45. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PRTH: 99. 6% to $11. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — RPAY or PRTH or USIO or EVTC or FLYW?
In this comparison, EVTC (0.
8% yield) pays a dividend. RPAY, PRTH, USIO, FLYW do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is RPAY or PRTH or USIO or EVTC or FLYW better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, EVERTEC, Inc.
(EVTC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 76), 0. 8% yield). Priority Technology Holdings, Inc. (PRTH) carries a higher beta of 2. 12 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (EVTC: +89. 5%, PRTH: -43. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between RPAY and PRTH and USIO and EVTC and FLYW?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: RPAY is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PRTH is a small-cap deep-value stock; USIO is a small-cap quality compounder stock; EVTC is a small-cap deep-value stock; FLYW is a small-cap high-growth stock. EVTC pays a dividend while RPAY, PRTH, USIO, FLYW do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.