Consulting Services
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
RYOJ vs BABA vs JD vs PDD vs VIPS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Specialty Retail
Specialty Retail
Specialty Retail
Specialty Retail
RYOJ vs BABA vs JD vs PDD vs VIPS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Consulting Services | Specialty Retail | Specialty Retail | Specialty Retail | Specialty Retail |
| Market Cap | $21M | $325.19B | $44.83B | $141.60B | $7.86B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $12M | $1.01T | $1.31T | $418.54B | $105.97B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $1M | $123.35B | $19.63B | $102.27B | $6.92B |
| Gross Margin | 38.5% | 41.2% | 9.3% | 56.6% | 23.3% |
| Operating Margin | 16.1% | 10.9% | 0.2% | 22.1% | 7.7% |
| Forward P/E | — | 4.0x | 1.5x | 1.2x | 0.8x |
| Total Debt | $10M | $248.49B | $107.17B | $10.61B | $3.25B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $3M | $181.73B | $149.72B | $57.77B | $26.35B |
RYOJ vs BABA vs JD vs PDD vs VIPS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alibaba Group Holdi… (BABA) | 100 | 64.9 | -35.1% |
| JD.com, Inc. (JD) | 100 | 58.0 | -42.0% |
| PDD Holdings Inc. (PDD) | 100 | 143.2 | +43.2% |
| Vipshop Holdings Li… (VIPS) | 100 | 84.0 | -16.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: RYOJ vs BABA vs JD vs PDD vs VIPS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Among these 5 stocks, RYOJ doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
BABA ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +3.1% vs RYOJ's -35.2%
JD is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 1.04, yield 3.3%
- 3.3% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs BABA's 1.3%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
PDD carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 59.0%, EPS growth 84.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 61.2%
- 258.5% 10Y total return vs BABA's 76.0%
- 59.0% revenue growth vs VIPS's -3.9%
- 24.4% margin vs JD's 1.5%
VIPS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night and valuation efficiency is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.97, Low D/E 7.8%, current ratio 1.26x
- PEG 0.04 vs JD's 0.06
- Beta 0.97, yield 3.2%, current ratio 1.26x
- Lower P/E (0.8x vs 1.5x), PEG 0.04 vs 0.06
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 59.0% revenue growth vs VIPS's -3.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (0.8x vs 1.5x), PEG 0.04 vs 0.06 | |
| Quality / Margins | 24.4% margin vs JD's 1.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.97 vs BABA's 1.23, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.3% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs BABA's 1.3%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +3.1% vs RYOJ's -35.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 16.7% ROA vs JD's 2.8%, ROIC 40.3% vs 0.8% |
RYOJ vs BABA vs JD vs PDD vs VIPS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
RYOJ vs BABA vs JD vs PDD vs VIPS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
PDD leads in 2 of 6 categories
BABA leads 1 • JD leads 1 • RYOJ leads 0 • VIPS leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PDD leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JD is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.31T annually — 113077.8x RYOJ's $12M. PDD is the more profitable business, keeping 24.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to JD's 1.5%. On growth, PDD holds the edge at +9.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $12M | $1.01T | $1.31T | $418.5B | $106.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | — | $114.6B | $11.5B | $93.0B | $9.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | — | $123.4B | $19.6B | $102.3B | $6.9B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | — | $2.6B | $4.8B | $111.4B | $0 |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +38.5% | +41.2% | +9.3% | +56.6% | +23.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +16.1% | +10.9% | +0.2% | +22.1% | +7.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +11.5% | +12.2% | +1.5% | +24.4% | +6.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +5.9% | +0.3% | +0.4% | +26.6% | +5.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +4.8% | +1.5% | +9.0% | -4.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -52.0% | -127.8% | +16.5% | -16.6% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — JD and VIPS each lead in 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 6.9x trailing earnings, VIPS trades at a 60% valuation discount to BABA's 17.1x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), JD offers better value at 0.06x vs VIPS's 0.35x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $21M | $325.2B | $44.8B | $141.6B | $7.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $29M | $335.0B | $38.6B | $134.7B | $4.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | — | 17.07x | 16.58x | 8.56x | 6.90x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 4.00x | 1.49x | 1.16x | 0.81x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 0.06x | — | 0.35x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 12.42x | 12.94x | 22.83x | 8.38x | 2.86x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.83x | 2.22x | 0.23x | 2.44x | 0.49x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 2.02x | 1.08x | 3.07x | 1.28x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 31.05x | 28.26x | 63.35x | 7.95x | 9.59x |
Profitability & Efficiency
PDD leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
RYOJ delivers a 68.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $68 in annual profit, vs $7 for JD. PDD carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to RYOJ's 4.12x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), RYOJ scores 8/9 vs JD's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +68.2% | +11.2% | +6.5% | +26.1% | +16.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +7.8% | +6.7% | +2.8% | +16.7% | +9.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +13.1% | +9.6% | +0.8% | +40.3% | +40.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +15.0% | +10.4% | +0.7% | +42.4% | +21.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 7 | 4 | 7 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 4.12x | 0.23x | 0.36x | 0.03x | 0.08x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $8M | $66.8B | -$42.5B | -$47.2B | -$23.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $3M | $181.7B | $149.7B | $57.8B | $26.4B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $10M | $248.5B | $107.2B | $10.6B | $3.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 24.08x | 15.74x | 10.03x | — | 121.89x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BABA leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PDD five years ago would be worth $7,717 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,071 for JD. Over the past 12 months, BABA leads with a +3.1% total return vs RYOJ's -35.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BABA at 17.7% vs RYOJ's -13.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -29.6% | -13.5% | +10.0% | -17.3% | -14.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -35.2% | +3.1% | -9.9% | -17.7% | +2.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -35.2% | +63.2% | -3.0% | +51.2% | +3.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -35.2% | -36.6% | -49.3% | -22.8% | -37.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -35.2% | +76.0% | +63.4% | +258.5% | +32.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -13.5% | +17.7% | -1.0% | +14.8% | +1.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — JD and VIPS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
VIPS is the less volatile stock with a 0.97 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BABA's 1.23 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. JD currently trades 82.7% from its 52-week high vs RYOJ's 16.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.01x | 1.23x | 1.04x | 1.14x | 0.97x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $11.43 | $192.67 | $38.08 | $139.41 | $21.08 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.81 | $103.71 | $24.51 | $95.24 | $13.36 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +16.4% | +69.9% | +82.7% | +68.7% | +69.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 43.6 | 54.3 | 56.0 | 47.0 | 47.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 21K | 10.5M | 10.4M | 6.7M | 2.0M |
Analyst Outlook
JD leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: BABA as "Buy", JD as "Buy", PDD as "Buy", VIPS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 49.6% upside for VIPS (target: $22) vs 4.4% for JD (target: $33). For income investors, JD offers the higher dividend yield at 3.26% vs BABA's 1.33%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $194.23 | $32.86 | $142.00 | $21.80 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 59 | 45 | 28 | 28 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.3% | +3.3% | — | +3.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $12.14 | $6.97 | — | $3.12 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +4.0% | +7.0% | 0.0% | +7.2% |
PDD leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). BABA leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
RYOJ vs BABA vs JD vs PDD vs VIPS: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is RYOJ or BABA or JD or PDD or VIPS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, PDD Holdings Inc.
(PDD) is the stronger pick with 59. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 9% for Vipshop Holdings Limited (VIPS). Vipshop Holdings Limited (VIPS) offers the better valuation at 6. 9x trailing P/E (0. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA) a "Buy" — based on 59 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — RYOJ or BABA or JD or PDD or VIPS?
On trailing P/E, Vipshop Holdings Limited (VIPS) is the cheapest at 6.
9x versus Alibaba Group Holding Limited at 17. 1x. On forward P/E, Vipshop Holdings Limited is actually cheaper at 0. 8x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Vipshop Holdings Limited wins at 0. 04x versus JD. com, Inc. 's 0. 06x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — RYOJ or BABA or JD or PDD or VIPS?
Over the past 5 years, PDD Holdings Inc.
(PDD) delivered a total return of -22. 8%, compared to -49. 3% for JD. com, Inc. (JD). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PDD returned +258. 5% versus RYOJ's -35. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — RYOJ or BABA or JD or PDD or VIPS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Vipshop Holdings Limited (VIPS) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
97β versus Alibaba Group Holding Limited's 1. 23β — meaning BABA is approximately 27% more volatile than VIPS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, PDD Holdings Inc. (PDD) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 4% for rYojbaba Co. , Ltd. Common Shares — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — RYOJ or BABA or JD or PDD or VIPS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), PDD Holdings Inc.
(PDD) is pulling ahead at 59. 0% versus -3. 9% for Vipshop Holdings Limited (VIPS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: PDD Holdings Inc. grew EPS 84. 8% year-over-year, compared to -100. 0% for rYojbaba Co. , Ltd. Common Shares. Over a 3-year CAGR, PDD leads at 61. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — RYOJ or BABA or JD or PDD or VIPS?
PDD Holdings Inc.
(PDD) is the more profitable company, earning 28. 5% net margin versus 1. 5% for JD. com, Inc. — meaning it keeps 28. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PDD leads at 27. 5% versus 0. 2% for JD. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PDD leads at 60. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is RYOJ or BABA or JD or PDD or VIPS more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Vipshop Holdings Limited (VIPS) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 04x versus JD. com, Inc. 's 0. 06x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Vipshop Holdings Limited (VIPS) trades at 0. 8x forward P/E versus 4. 0x for Alibaba Group Holding Limited — 3. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for VIPS: 49. 6% to $21. 80.
08Which pays a better dividend — RYOJ or BABA or JD or PDD or VIPS?
In this comparison, JD (3.
3% yield), VIPS (3. 2% yield), BABA (1. 3% yield) pay a dividend. RYOJ, PDD do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is RYOJ or BABA or JD or PDD or VIPS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Vipshop Holdings Limited (VIPS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
97), 3. 2% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (VIPS: +32. 3%, RYOJ: -35. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between RYOJ and BABA and JD and PDD and VIPS?
These companies operate in different sectors (RYOJ (Industrials) and BABA (Consumer Cyclical) and JD (Consumer Cyclical) and PDD (Consumer Cyclical) and VIPS (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: RYOJ is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BABA is a large-cap deep-value stock; JD is a mid-cap deep-value stock; PDD is a mid-cap high-growth stock; VIPS is a small-cap deep-value stock. BABA, JD, VIPS pay a dividend while RYOJ, PDD do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.