Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

SACH vs FBRT vs BXMT vs RC vs KREF

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
SACH
Sachem Capital Corp.

REIT - Mortgage

Real EstateAMEX • US
Market Cap$53M
5Y Perf.-81.0%
FBRT
Franklin BSP Realty Trust, Inc.

REIT - Mortgage

Real EstateNYSE • US
Market Cap$699M
5Y Perf.-44.6%
BXMT
Blackstone Mortgage Trust, Inc.

REIT - Mortgage

Real EstateNYSE • US
Market Cap$3.23B
5Y Perf.-41.9%
RC
Ready Capital Corporation

REIT - Mortgage

Real EstateNYSE • US
Market Cap$312M
5Y Perf.-87.8%
KREF
KKR Real Estate Finance Trust Inc.

REIT - Mortgage

Real EstateNYSE • US
Market Cap$425M
5Y Perf.-69.6%

SACH vs FBRT vs BXMT vs RC vs KREF — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
SACH logoSACH
FBRT logoFBRT
BXMT logoBXMT
RC logoRC
KREF logoKREF
IndustryREIT - MortgageREIT - MortgageREIT - MortgageREIT - MortgageREIT - Mortgage
Market Cap$53M$699M$3.23B$312M$425M
Revenue (TTM)$38M$401M$1.54B$82M$442M
Net Income (TTM)$6M$72M$104M$-512M$-104M
Gross Margin98.1%59.9%62.6%-183.7%87.1%
Operating Margin42.0%36.9%58.3%-6.8%48.0%
Forward P/E28.1x9.0x12.3x
Total Debt$278M$4.25B$16.16B$5.86B$4.69B
Cash & Equiv.$11M$167M$453M$248M$85M

SACH vs FBRT vs BXMT vs RC vs KREFLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

SACH
FBRT
BXMT
RC
KREF
StockOct 21May 26Return
Sachem Capital Corp. (SACH)10019.0-81.0%
Franklin BSP Realty… (FBRT)10055.4-44.6%
Blackstone Mortgage… (BXMT)10058.1-41.9%
Ready Capital Corpo… (RC)10012.2-87.8%
KKR Real Estate Fin… (KREF)10030.4-69.6%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: SACH vs FBRT vs BXMT vs RC vs KREF

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: SACH leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for capital preservation and lower volatility and recent price momentum and sentiment. Franklin BSP Realty Trust, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. RC also leads in specific categories worth noting. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
SACH
Sachem Capital Corp.
The Real Estate Income Play

SACH carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.

  • Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.40, yield 18.4%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.40, current ratio 0.84x
  • Beta 0.40 vs RC's 1.15, lower leverage
  • +35.6% vs RC's -50.7%
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
FBRT
Franklin BSP Realty Trust, Inc.
The Real Estate Income Play

FBRT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if defensive is your priority.

  • Beta 0.73, yield 18.6%, current ratio 18.43x
  • Better valuation composite
  • 17.9% margin vs RC's -6.2%
Best for: defensive
BXMT
Blackstone Mortgage Trust, Inc.
The Real Estate Income Play

BXMT is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.

  • 50.4% 10Y total return vs RC's 4.2%
Best for: long-term compounding
RC
Ready Capital Corporation
The Real Estate Income Play

RC ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 17.3%, EPS growth 45.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 9.2%
  • 17.3% FFO/revenue growth vs FBRT's -100.0%
  • 35.8% yield, vs FBRT's 18.6%
Best for: growth exposure
KREF
KKR Real Estate Finance Trust Inc.
The REIT Holding

Among these 5 stocks, KREF doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: real estate exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthRC logoRC17.3% FFO/revenue growth vs FBRT's -100.0%
ValueFBRT logoFBRTBetter valuation composite
Quality / MarginsFBRT logoFBRT17.9% margin vs RC's -6.2%
Stability / SafetySACH logoSACHBeta 0.40 vs RC's 1.15, lower leverage
DividendsRC logoRC35.8% yield, vs FBRT's 18.6%
Momentum (1Y)SACH logoSACH+35.6% vs RC's -50.7%
Efficiency (ROA)SACH logoSACH1.3% ROA vs RC's -6.5%, ROIC 4.8% vs 1.2%

SACH vs FBRT vs BXMT vs RC vs KREF — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

SACHSachem Capital Corp.

Segment breakdown not available.

FBRTFranklin BSP Realty Trust, Inc.
FY 2025
Real Estate Owned
50.9%$30M
Agency Business
49.1%$29M
BXMTBlackstone Mortgage Trust, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

RCReady Capital Corporation

Segment breakdown not available.

KREFKKR Real Estate Finance Trust Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

SACH vs FBRT vs BXMT vs RC vs KREF — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLSACHLAGGINGKREF

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

Evenly matched — SACH and FBRT each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

BXMT is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.5B annually — 40.6x SACH's $38M. FBRT is the more profitable business, keeping 17.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to RC's -6.2%. On growth, SACH holds the edge at +145.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricSACH logoSACHSachem Capital Co…FBRT logoFBRTFranklin BSP Real…BXMT logoBXMTBlackstone Mortga…RC logoRCReady Capital Cor…KREF logoKREFKKR Real Estate F…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$38M$401M$1.5B$82M$442M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$17M$159M$948M-$558M$140M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$6M$72M$104M-$512M-$104M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$3M$121M$335M$873M$65M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+98.1%+59.9%+62.6%-183.7%+87.1%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+42.0%+36.9%+58.3%-6.8%+48.0%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+16.7%+17.9%+6.7%-6.2%-23.6%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+6.6%+30.3%+21.8%+10.6%+14.8%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+145.2%+4.0%+35.2%-13.8%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-79.9%-65.0%-3.7%-5.4%
Evenly matched — SACH and FBRT each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — FBRT and RC each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 14.2x trailing earnings, FBRT trades at a 53% valuation discount to BXMT's 29.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, SACH's 11.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than FBRT's 49.0x.

MetricSACH logoSACHSachem Capital Co…FBRT logoFBRTFranklin BSP Real…BXMT logoBXMTBlackstone Mortga…RC logoRCReady Capital Cor…KREF logoKREFKKR Real Estate F…
Market CapShares × price$53M$699M$3.2B$312M$425M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$320M$4.8B$18.9B$5.9B$5.0B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS28.06x14.20x29.89x-1.31x-6.30x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.8.98x12.28x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple11.33x49.02x16.35x47.89x18.36x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue1.12x2.12x0.63x0.93x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.29x0.51x0.93x0.19x0.36x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF21.11x2.40x11.70x6.37x
Evenly matched — FBRT and RC each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

SACH leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

FBRT delivers a 4.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $5 in annual profit, vs $-30 for RC. SACH carries lower financial leverage with a 1.59x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BXMT's 4.61x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SACH scores 6/9 vs KREF's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricSACH logoSACHSachem Capital Co…FBRT logoFBRTFranklin BSP Real…BXMT logoBXMTBlackstone Mortga…RC logoRCReady Capital Cor…KREF logoKREFKKR Real Estate F…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+3.6%+4.7%+2.9%-29.7%-8.4%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+1.3%+1.2%+0.5%-6.5%-1.6%
ROICReturn on invested capital+4.8%+1.2%+4.3%+1.2%+3.4%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+6.2%+1.5%+11.3%+1.4%+4.5%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–966654
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage1.59x2.78x4.61x3.55x3.83x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$267M$4.1B$15.7B$5.6B$4.6B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$11M$167M$453M$248M$85M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$278M$4.3B$16.2B$5.9B$4.7B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense1.25x1.11x0.41x0.84x
SACH leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

BXMT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in BXMT five years ago would be worth $9,766 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,434 for RC. Over the past 12 months, SACH leads with a +35.6% total return vs RC's -50.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BXMT at 14.0% vs RC's -24.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricSACH logoSACHSachem Capital Co…FBRT logoFBRTFranklin BSP Real…BXMT logoBXMTBlackstone Mortga…RC logoRCReady Capital Cor…KREF logoKREFKKR Real Estate F…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+10.6%-8.2%+0.6%-11.2%-17.1%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+35.6%-7.9%+10.5%-50.7%-17.5%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-42.4%+2.6%+48.0%-57.1%-0.4%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-43.6%-10.8%-2.3%-45.7%-35.7%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-5.2%-10.8%+50.4%+4.2%-9.0%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-16.8%+0.9%+14.0%-24.6%-0.1%
BXMT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — SACH and BXMT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

SACH is the less volatile stock with a 0.40 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RC's 1.15 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BXMT currently trades 92.5% from its 52-week high vs RC's 39.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricSACH logoSACHSachem Capital Co…FBRT logoFBRTFranklin BSP Real…BXMT logoBXMTBlackstone Mortga…RC logoRCReady Capital Cor…KREF logoKREFKKR Real Estate F…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.40x0.73x0.74x1.15x0.86x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$1.35$11.84$20.67$4.75$9.98
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$0.80$8.24$17.67$1.51$5.29
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+81.5%+76.7%+92.5%+39.8%+66.2%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10064.951.045.269.054.7
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded158K902K1.4M2.1M1.5M
Evenly matched — SACH and BXMT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

RC leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Analyst consensus: FBRT as "Buy", BXMT as "Hold", RC as "Buy", KREF as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 68.7% upside for FBRT (target: $15) vs 5.9% for KREF (target: $7). For income investors, RC offers the higher dividend yield at 35.85% vs BXMT's 9.87%.

MetricSACH logoSACHSachem Capital Co…FBRT logoFBRTFranklin BSP Real…BXMT logoBXMTBlackstone Mortga…RC logoRCReady Capital Cor…KREF logoKREFKKR Real Estate F…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyHoldBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$15.33$2.50$7.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts4181612
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+18.4%+18.6%+9.9%+35.8%+15.1%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises00000
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.20$1.69$1.89$0.68$1.00
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+2.1%+3.4%+21.6%+10.2%
RC leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

SACH leads in 1 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency). BXMT leads in 1 (Total Returns). 3 tied.

Best OverallSachem Capital Corp. (SACH)Leads 1 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

SACH vs FBRT vs BXMT vs RC vs KREF: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is SACH or FBRT or BXMT or RC or KREF a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Ready Capital Corporation (RC) is the stronger pick with 1726% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100.

0% for Franklin BSP Realty Trust, Inc. (FBRT). Franklin BSP Realty Trust, Inc. (FBRT) offers the better valuation at 14. 2x trailing P/E (9. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Franklin BSP Realty Trust, Inc. (FBRT) a "Buy" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — SACH or FBRT or BXMT or RC or KREF?

On trailing P/E, Franklin BSP Realty Trust, Inc.

(FBRT) is the cheapest at 14. 2x versus Blackstone Mortgage Trust, Inc. at 29. 9x. On forward P/E, Franklin BSP Realty Trust, Inc. is actually cheaper at 9. 0x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — SACH or FBRT or BXMT or RC or KREF?

Over the past 5 years, Blackstone Mortgage Trust, Inc.

(BXMT) delivered a total return of -2. 3%, compared to -45. 7% for Ready Capital Corporation (RC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BXMT returned +50. 4% versus FBRT's -10. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — SACH or FBRT or BXMT or RC or KREF?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Sachem Capital Corp.

(SACH) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 40β versus Ready Capital Corporation's 1. 15β — meaning RC is approximately 186% more volatile than SACH relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Sachem Capital Corp. (SACH) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 159% versus 5% for Blackstone Mortgage Trust, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — SACH or FBRT or BXMT or RC or KREF?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Ready Capital Corporation (RC) is pulling ahead at 1726% versus -100.

0% for Franklin BSP Realty Trust, Inc. (FBRT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Blackstone Mortgage Trust, Inc. grew EPS 154. 7% year-over-year, compared to -652. 6% for KKR Real Estate Finance Trust Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SACH leads at 15. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — SACH or FBRT or BXMT or RC or KREF?

Franklin BSP Realty Trust, Inc.

(FBRT) is the more profitable company, earning 17. 9% net margin versus -45. 8% for Ready Capital Corporation — meaning it keeps 17. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BXMT leads at 71. 6% versus 24. 2% for RC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SACH leads at 97. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is SACH or FBRT or BXMT or RC or KREF more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Franklin BSP Realty Trust, Inc.

(FBRT) trades at 9. 0x forward P/E versus 12. 3x for Blackstone Mortgage Trust, Inc. — 3. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FBRT: 68. 7% to $15. 33.

08

Which pays a better dividend — SACH or FBRT or BXMT or RC or KREF?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Ready Capital Corporation (RC) offers the highest yield at 35. 8%, versus 9. 9% for Blackstone Mortgage Trust, Inc. (BXMT).

09

Is SACH or FBRT or BXMT or RC or KREF better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Sachem Capital Corp.

(SACH) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 40), 18. 4% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SACH: -5. 2%, RC: +4. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between SACH and FBRT and BXMT and RC and KREF?

Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: SACH is a small-cap income-oriented stock; FBRT is a small-cap deep-value stock; BXMT is a small-cap income-oriented stock; RC is a small-cap high-growth stock; KREF is a small-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

SACH

High-Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Real Estate
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 72%
  • Net Margin > 9%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

FBRT

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Real Estate
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 10%
  • Dividend Yield > 7.4%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

BXMT

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Real Estate
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 5%
  • Dividend Yield > 3.9%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

RC

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Real Estate
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 17%
  • Dividend Yield > 14.3%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

KREF

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Real Estate
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 52%
  • Dividend Yield > 6.0%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform SACH and FBRT and BXMT and RC and KREF on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(SACH: 145.2% · FBRT: -100.0%)
Net Margin>
%
(SACH: 16.7% · FBRT: 17.9%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(SACH: 28.1x · FBRT: 14.2x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.