Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

SANG vs BAND vs TWLO vs LPSN vs NICE

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
SANG
Sangoma Technologies Corporation

Software - Infrastructure

TechnologyNASDAQ • CA
Market Cap$139M
5Y Perf.+191.0%
BAND
Bandwidth Inc.

Software - Infrastructure

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$1.56B
5Y Perf.-56.1%
TWLO
Twilio Inc.

Internet Content & Information

Communication ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$29.86B
5Y Perf.-0.3%
LPSN
LivePerson, Inc.

Software - Application

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$32M
5Y Perf.-99.5%
NICE
NICE Ltd.

Software - Application

TechnologyNASDAQ • IL
Market Cap$5.78B
5Y Perf.-48.6%

SANG vs BAND vs TWLO vs LPSN vs NICE — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
SANG logoSANG
BAND logoBAND
TWLO logoTWLO
LPSN logoLPSN
NICE logoNICE
IndustrySoftware - InfrastructureSoftware - InfrastructureInternet Content & InformationSoftware - ApplicationSoftware - Application
Market Cap$139M$1.56B$29.86B$32M$5.78B
Revenue (TTM)$307M$209.36B$5.30B$244M$2.95B
Net Income (TTM)$-8M$4.11B$104M$-67M$612M
Gross Margin52.8%37.3%48.8%62.2%66.4%
Operating Margin-1.3%-2.2%4.7%-9.6%21.9%
Forward P/E27.4x36.3x8.7x
Total Debt$56M$701M$1.08B$392M$164M
Cash & Equiv.$13M$103M$682M$95M$379M

SANG vs BAND vs TWLO vs LPSN vs NICELong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

SANG
BAND
TWLO
LPSN
NICE
StockMay 20May 26Return
Sangoma Technologie… (SANG)100291.0+191.0%
Bandwidth Inc. (BAND)10043.9-56.1%
Twilio Inc. (TWLO)10099.7-0.3%
LivePerson, Inc. (LPSN)1000.5-99.5%
NICE Ltd. (NICE)10051.4-48.6%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: SANG vs BAND vs TWLO vs LPSN vs NICE

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: NICE leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. Sangoma Technologies Corporation is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility. BAND and TWLO also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
SANG
Sangoma Technologies Corporation
The Income Pick

SANG is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and long-term compounding is your priority.

  • Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 0.16
  • 20.0% 10Y total return vs TWLO's 5.8%
  • Beta 0.16 vs LPSN's 2.05
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
BAND
Bandwidth Inc.
The Momentum Pick

BAND ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.

  • +253.6% vs LPSN's -77.1%
Best for: momentum
TWLO
Twilio Inc.
The Growth Play

TWLO is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 13.7%, EPS growth 131.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 9.8%
  • 13.7% revenue growth vs LPSN's -22.0%
Best for: growth exposure
LPSN
LivePerson, Inc.
The Technology Pick

Among these 5 stocks, LPSN doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: technology exposure
NICE
NICE Ltd.
The Defensive Pick

NICE carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for sleep-well-at-night and defensive.

  • Lower volatility, beta 0.72, Low D/E 4.2%, current ratio 1.55x
  • Beta 0.72, current ratio 1.55x
  • Better valuation composite
  • 20.8% margin vs LPSN's -27.6%
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and defensive
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthTWLO logoTWLO13.7% revenue growth vs LPSN's -22.0%
ValueNICE logoNICEBetter valuation composite
Quality / MarginsNICE logoNICE20.8% margin vs LPSN's -27.6%
Stability / SafetySANG logoSANGBeta 0.16 vs LPSN's 2.05
DividendsTieNone of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)BAND logoBAND+253.6% vs LPSN's -77.1%
Efficiency (ROA)NICE logoNICE11.8% ROA vs LPSN's -12.4%, ROIC 13.2% vs -6.6%

SANG vs BAND vs TWLO vs LPSN vs NICE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

SANGSangoma Technologies Corporation
FY 2025
Services
82.4%$195M
Products
17.6%$42M
BANDBandwidth Inc.
FY 2025
CPaaS, Usage-Based Fees
73.8%$415M
CPaaS, Service Fees
26.2%$147M
TWLOTwilio Inc.
FY 2025
Messaging
73.3%$2.9B
Other Communications
19.0%$747M
Segment
7.7%$303M
LPSNLivePerson, Inc.
FY 2025
Hosted Services - Business
85.2%$208M
Professional Services
14.8%$36M
NICENICE Ltd.
FY 2025
Cloud
76.0%$2.2B
Service
19.0%$560M
Product
5.0%$147M

SANG vs BAND vs TWLO vs LPSN vs NICE — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLNICELAGGINGLPSN

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

NICE leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

BAND is the larger business by revenue, generating $209.4B annually — 859.0x LPSN's $244M. NICE is the more profitable business, keeping 20.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to LPSN's -27.6%. On growth, BAND holds the edge at +1197.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricSANG logoSANGSangoma Technolog…BAND logoBANDBandwidth Inc.TWLO logoTWLOTwilio Inc.LPSN logoLPSNLivePerson, Inc.NICE logoNICENICE Ltd.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$307M$209.4B$5.3B$244M$2.9B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$57M-$4.6B$415M-$562,000$845M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$8M$4.1B$104M-$67M$612M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$43M$1.8B$1.0B-$43M$665M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+52.8%+37.3%+48.8%+62.2%+66.4%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-1.3%-2.2%+4.7%-9.6%+21.9%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-2.5%+2.0%+2.0%-27.6%+20.8%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+14.0%+0.8%+19.0%-17.4%+22.6%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-13.2%+1197.2%+20.0%-19.0%+9.0%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-6.7%+39.8%+3.8%+79.4%+56.5%
NICE leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — SANG and BAND each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 9.9x trailing earnings, NICE trades at a 99% valuation discount to TWLO's 938.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, SANG's 3.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than TWLO's 77.2x.

MetricSANG logoSANGSangoma Technolog…BAND logoBANDBandwidth Inc.TWLO logoTWLOTwilio Inc.LPSN logoLPSNLivePerson, Inc.NICE logoNICENICE Ltd.
Market CapShares × price$139M$1.6B$29.9B$32M$5.8B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$182M$2.2B$30.3B$329M$5.6B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-19.99x-113.15x938.43x-0.22x9.89x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.27.36x36.33x8.74x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.37x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple2.96x50.39x77.16x6.59x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.42x2.07x5.89x0.13x1.96x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.55x3.65x4.03x1.56x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF4.22x0.02x28.91x8.22x
Evenly matched — SANG and BAND each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

NICE leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

NICE delivers a 16.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $-3 for SANG. NICE carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BAND's 1.75x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TWLO scores 7/9 vs BAND's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricSANG logoSANGSangoma Technolog…BAND logoBANDBandwidth Inc.TWLO logoTWLOTwilio Inc.LPSN logoLPSNLivePerson, Inc.NICE logoNICENICE Ltd.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-3.0%+4.0%+1.3%+16.4%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-2.2%+1.7%+1.1%-12.4%+11.8%
ROICReturn on invested capital-0.4%-1.2%+1.6%-6.6%+13.2%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-0.6%-1.6%+1.9%-5.8%+16.1%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–953757
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.22x1.75x0.14x0.04x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$43M$598M$399M$297M-$216M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$13M$103M$682M$95M$379M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$56M$701M$1.1B$392M$164M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-1.29x-10.30x0.20x
NICE leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

BAND leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in SANG five years ago would be worth $12,507 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $35 for LPSN. Over the past 12 months, BAND leads with a +253.6% total return vs LPSN's -77.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BAND at 62.7% vs LPSN's -65.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricSANG logoSANGSangoma Technolog…BAND logoBANDBandwidth Inc.TWLO logoTWLOTwilio Inc.LPSN logoLPSNLivePerson, Inc.NICE logoNICENICE Ltd.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-15.9%+242.2%+42.4%-31.1%-14.6%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-27.5%+253.6%+90.3%-77.1%-40.4%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+17.0%+330.6%+259.4%-95.8%-49.3%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+25.1%-61.3%-35.8%-99.7%-59.1%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+1995.0%+143.3%+584.5%-97.0%+50.7%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+5.4%+62.7%+53.2%-65.4%-20.2%
BAND leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — SANG and BAND each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

SANG is the less volatile stock with a 0.16 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than LPSN's 2.05 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BAND currently trades 98.8% from its 52-week high vs LPSN's 12.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricSANG logoSANGSangoma Technolog…BAND logoBANDBandwidth Inc.TWLO logoTWLOTwilio Inc.LPSN logoLPSNLivePerson, Inc.NICE logoNICENICE Ltd.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.16x1.86x1.51x2.05x0.72x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$6.49$49.25$201.39$21.60$180.61
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$3.63$12.57$91.84$2.37$94.89
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+64.6%+98.8%+97.9%+12.4%+53.0%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10052.290.478.440.340.9
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded4K670K2.2M148K631K
Evenly matched — SANG and BAND each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

SANG leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Analyst consensus: SANG as "Buy", BAND as "Buy", TWLO as "Buy", NICE as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 57.8% upside for NICE (target: $151) vs -6.0% for TWLO (target: $185).

MetricSANG logoSANGSangoma Technolog…BAND logoBANDBandwidth Inc.TWLO logoTWLOTwilio Inc.LPSN logoLPSNLivePerson, Inc.NICE logoNICENICE Ltd.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$46.00$185.17$150.88
# AnalystsCovering analysts1155223
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises410
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+2.0%0.0%+2.9%0.0%+8.5%
SANG leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

NICE leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). BAND leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.

Best OverallNICE Ltd. (NICE)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

SANG vs BAND vs TWLO vs LPSN vs NICE: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is SANG or BAND or TWLO or LPSN or NICE a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Twilio Inc.

(TWLO) is the stronger pick with 13. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -22. 0% for LivePerson, Inc. (LPSN). NICE Ltd. (NICE) offers the better valuation at 9. 9x trailing P/E (8. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Sangoma Technologies Corporation (SANG) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — SANG or BAND or TWLO or LPSN or NICE?

On trailing P/E, NICE Ltd.

(NICE) is the cheapest at 9. 9x versus Twilio Inc. at 938. 4x. On forward P/E, NICE Ltd. is actually cheaper at 8. 7x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — SANG or BAND or TWLO or LPSN or NICE?

Over the past 5 years, Sangoma Technologies Corporation (SANG) delivered a total return of +25.

1%, compared to -99. 7% for LivePerson, Inc. (LPSN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SANG returned +1995% versus LPSN's -97. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — SANG or BAND or TWLO or LPSN or NICE?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Sangoma Technologies Corporation (SANG) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

16β versus LivePerson, Inc. 's 2. 05β — meaning LPSN is approximately 1211% more volatile than SANG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, NICE Ltd. (NICE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 175% for Bandwidth Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — SANG or BAND or TWLO or LPSN or NICE?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Twilio Inc.

(TWLO) is pulling ahead at 13. 7% versus -22. 0% for LivePerson, Inc. (LPSN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Twilio Inc. grew EPS 131. 8% year-over-year, compared to -79. 2% for Bandwidth Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, NICE leads at 10. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — SANG or BAND or TWLO or LPSN or NICE?

NICE Ltd.

(NICE) is the more profitable company, earning 20. 8% net margin versus -27. 6% for LivePerson, Inc. — meaning it keeps 20. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NICE leads at 21. 9% versus -9. 6% for LPSN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NICE leads at 66. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is SANG or BAND or TWLO or LPSN or NICE more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, NICE Ltd.

(NICE) trades at 8. 7x forward P/E versus 36. 3x for Twilio Inc. — 27. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NICE: 57. 8% to $150. 88.

08

Which pays a better dividend — SANG or BAND or TWLO or LPSN or NICE?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

09

Is SANG or BAND or TWLO or LPSN or NICE better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Sangoma Technologies Corporation (SANG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

16), +1995% 10Y return). LivePerson, Inc. (LPSN) carries a higher beta of 2. 05 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SANG: +1995%, LPSN: -97. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between SANG and BAND and TWLO and LPSN and NICE?

These companies operate in different sectors (SANG (Technology) and BAND (Technology) and TWLO (Communication Services) and LPSN (Technology) and NICE (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: SANG is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BAND is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TWLO is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; LPSN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NICE is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

SANG

Quality Business

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 31%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

BAND

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 59862%
  • Gross Margin > 22%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

TWLO

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Communication Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 9%
  • Gross Margin > 29%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

LPSN

Quality Business

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 37%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

NICE

Quality Mega-Cap Compounder

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 12%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform SANG and BAND and TWLO and LPSN and NICE on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(SANG: -13.2% · BAND: 119724.8%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.