Auto - Dealerships
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
SDA vs AIXI vs LPSN vs MSFT vs AMZN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Application
Software - Application
Software - Infrastructure
Specialty Retail
SDA vs AIXI vs LPSN vs MSFT vs AMZN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Auto - Dealerships | Software - Application | Software - Application | Software - Infrastructure | Specialty Retail |
| Market Cap | $50M | $8M | $32M | $3.13T | $2.92T |
| Revenue (TTM) | $467M | $115M | $244M | $318.27B | $742.78B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-15M | $-53M | $-67M | $125.22B | $90.80B |
| Gross Margin | 22.1% | 64.3% | 62.2% | 68.3% | 50.6% |
| Operating Margin | 0.4% | -44.2% | -9.6% | 46.8% | 11.5% |
| Forward P/E | 8.9x | — | — | 25.3x | 34.8x |
| Total Debt | $84M | $46M | $392M | $112.18B | $152.99B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $27M | $847K | $95M | $30.24B | $86.81B |
SDA vs AIXI vs LPSN vs MSFT vs AMZN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Mar 23 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| SunCar Technology G… (SDA) | 100 | 10.0 | -90.0% |
| Xiao-I Corporation (AIXI) | 100 | 1.2 | -98.8% |
| LivePerson, Inc. (LPSN) | 100 | 4.1 | -95.9% |
| Microsoft Corporati… (MSFT) | 100 | 146.0 | +46.0% |
| Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) | 100 | 262.5 | +162.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SDA vs AIXI vs LPSN vs MSFT vs AMZN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SDA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and defensive.
- beta 0.75
- Beta 0.75, current ratio 1.25x
- 21.5% revenue growth vs LPSN's -22.0%
- Lower P/E (8.9x vs 25.3x)
AIXI is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 18.8%, EPS growth 52.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 29.3%
Among these 5 stocks, LPSN doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
MSFT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- 7.9% 10Y total return vs AMZN's 7.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.89, Low D/E 32.7%, current ratio 1.35x
- 39.3% margin vs AIXI's -45.9%
- 0.8% yield; 19-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
AMZN ranks third and is worth considering specifically for valuation efficiency.
- PEG 1.24 vs MSFT's 1.35
- +43.7% vs AIXI's -79.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 21.5% revenue growth vs LPSN's -22.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.9x vs 25.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 39.3% margin vs AIXI's -45.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.75 vs LPSN's 2.05 | |
| Dividends | 0.8% yield; 19-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +43.7% vs AIXI's -79.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 19.2% ROA vs AIXI's -65.3%, ROIC 24.9% vs -34.4% |
SDA vs AIXI vs LPSN vs MSFT vs AMZN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
SDA vs AIXI vs LPSN vs MSFT vs AMZN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
MSFT leads in 2 of 6 categories
SDA leads 1 • AMZN leads 1 • AIXI leads 0 • LPSN leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MSFT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AMZN is the larger business by revenue, generating $742.8B annually — 6486.8x AIXI's $115M. MSFT is the more profitable business, keeping 39.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to AIXI's -45.9%. On growth, MSFT holds the edge at +18.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $467M | $115M | $244M | $318.3B | $742.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $8M | -$49M | -$562,000 | $192.6B | $155.9B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$15M | -$53M | -$67M | $125.2B | $90.8B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$693,001 | -$2M | -$43M | $72.9B | -$2.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +22.1% | +64.3% | +62.2% | +68.3% | +50.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +0.4% | -44.2% | -9.6% | +46.8% | +11.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -3.1% | -45.9% | -27.6% | +39.3% | +12.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -0.1% | -2.0% | -17.4% | +22.9% | -0.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +5.6% | -64.9% | -19.0% | +18.3% | +16.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +104.1% | -29.9% | +79.4% | +23.4% | +74.8% |
Valuation Metrics
SDA leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 30.9x trailing earnings, MSFT trades at a 18% valuation discount to AMZN's 37.8x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), AMZN offers better value at 1.35x vs MSFT's 1.64x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $50M | $8M | $32M | $3.13T | $2.92T |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $107M | $53M | $329M | $3.21T | $2.98T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1.49x | -0.45x | -0.22x | 30.86x | 37.82x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 8.92x | — | — | 25.34x | 34.77x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 1.64x | 1.35x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | 19.72x | 20.47x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.11x | 0.11x | 0.13x | 11.10x | 4.07x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.55x | — | — | 9.15x | 7.14x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 4.44x | — | — | 43.66x | 378.98x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MSFT leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MSFT delivers a 33.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $33 in annual profit, vs $-18 for SDA. MSFT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.33x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SDA's 1.27x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MSFT scores 6/9 vs AIXI's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -17.6% | — | — | +33.1% | +23.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -5.4% | -65.3% | -12.4% | +19.2% | +11.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -35.7% | -34.4% | -6.6% | +24.9% | +14.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -61.8% | -3.4% | -5.8% | +29.7% | +15.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.27x | — | — | 0.33x | 0.37x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $57M | $45M | $297M | $81.9B | $66.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $27M | $846,593 | $95M | $30.2B | $86.8B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $84M | $46M | $392M | $112.2B | $153.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.54x | -14.13x | 0.20x | 55.65x | 39.96x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
AMZN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MSFT five years ago would be worth $17,246 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $35 for LPSN. Over the past 12 months, AMZN leads with a +43.7% total return vs AIXI's -79.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AMZN at 36.8% vs AIXI's -75.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -48.1% | +68.1% | -31.1% | -10.8% | +19.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -60.5% | -79.2% | -77.1% | -2.1% | +43.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -88.5% | -98.6% | -95.8% | +39.5% | +156.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -89.1% | -98.6% | -99.7% | +72.5% | +64.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -89.1% | -98.6% | -97.0% | +787.7% | +697.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -51.3% | -75.9% | -65.4% | +11.7% | +36.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — SDA and AMZN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SDA is the less volatile stock with a 0.75 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than LPSN's 2.05 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AMZN currently trades 97.3% from its 52-week high vs LPSN's 12.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.75x | 0.94x | 2.05x | 0.89x | 1.51x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $3.65 | $4.02 | $21.60 | $555.45 | $278.56 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.05 | $0.08 | $2.37 | $356.28 | $185.01 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +29.3% | +18.0% | +12.4% | +75.8% | +97.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 17.0 | 49.3 | 40.3 | 54.0 | 81.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 310K | 60.6M | 148K | 32.5M | 45.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SDA as "Buy", MSFT as "Buy", AMZN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 460.7% upside for SDA (target: $6) vs 13.1% for AMZN (target: $307). MSFT is the only dividend payer here at 0.77% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | — | — | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $6.00 | — | — | $551.75 | $306.77 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 1 | — | — | 81 | 94 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | +0.8% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | 19 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | $3.23 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.6% | 0.0% |
MSFT leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). SDA leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
SDA vs AIXI vs LPSN vs MSFT vs AMZN: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SDA or AIXI or LPSN or MSFT or AMZN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, SunCar Technology Group Inc.
(SDA) is the stronger pick with 21. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -22. 0% for LivePerson, Inc. (LPSN). Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) offers the better valuation at 30. 9x trailing P/E (25. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate SunCar Technology Group Inc. (SDA) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SDA or AIXI or LPSN or MSFT or AMZN?
On trailing P/E, Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) is the cheapest at 30.
9x versus Amazon. com, Inc. at 37. 8x. On forward P/E, SunCar Technology Group Inc. is actually cheaper at 8. 9x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Amazon. com, Inc. wins at 1. 24x versus Microsoft Corporation's 1. 35x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SDA or AIXI or LPSN or MSFT or AMZN?
Over the past 5 years, Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) delivered a total return of +72.
5%, compared to -99. 7% for LivePerson, Inc. (LPSN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MSFT returned +787. 7% versus AIXI's -98. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SDA or AIXI or LPSN or MSFT or AMZN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), SunCar Technology Group Inc.
(SDA) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 75β versus LivePerson, Inc. 's 2. 05β — meaning LPSN is approximately 174% more volatile than SDA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 33% versus 127% for SunCar Technology Group Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SDA or AIXI or LPSN or MSFT or AMZN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), SunCar Technology Group Inc.
(SDA) is pulling ahead at 21. 5% versus -22. 0% for LivePerson, Inc. (LPSN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Xiao-I Corporation grew EPS 52. 7% year-over-year, compared to -132. 3% for SunCar Technology Group Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, AIXI leads at 29. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SDA or AIXI or LPSN or MSFT or AMZN?
Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) is the more profitable company, earning 36.
1% net margin versus -27. 6% for LivePerson, Inc. — meaning it keeps 36. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MSFT leads at 45. 6% versus -18. 3% for AIXI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MSFT leads at 68. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SDA or AIXI or LPSN or MSFT or AMZN more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Amazon. com, Inc. (AMZN) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 24x versus Microsoft Corporation's 1. 35x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, SunCar Technology Group Inc. (SDA) trades at 8. 9x forward P/E versus 34. 8x for Amazon. com, Inc. — 25. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SDA: 460. 7% to $6. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — SDA or AIXI or LPSN or MSFT or AMZN?
In this comparison, MSFT (0.
8% yield) pays a dividend. SDA, AIXI, LPSN, AMZN do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is SDA or AIXI or LPSN or MSFT or AMZN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
89), 0. 8% yield, +787. 7% 10Y return). LivePerson, Inc. (LPSN) carries a higher beta of 2. 05 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MSFT: +787. 7%, LPSN: -97. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SDA and AIXI and LPSN and MSFT and AMZN?
These companies operate in different sectors (SDA (Consumer Cyclical) and AIXI (Technology) and LPSN (Technology) and MSFT (Technology) and AMZN (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: SDA is a small-cap high-growth stock; AIXI is a small-cap high-growth stock; LPSN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MSFT is a mega-cap quality compounder stock; AMZN is a mega-cap quality compounder stock. MSFT pays a dividend while SDA, AIXI, LPSN, AMZN do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.