REIT - Industrial
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
SELF vs EXR vs CUBE vs NSA vs SSB
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Industrial
REIT - Industrial
REIT - Industrial
Banks - Regional
SELF vs EXR vs CUBE vs NSA vs SSB — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | REIT - Industrial | REIT - Industrial | REIT - Industrial | REIT - Industrial | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $61M | $30.26B | $9.18B | $3.34B | $9.79B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $13M | $3.38B | $1.13B | $750M | $3.76B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $2M | $974M | $327M | $89M | $799M |
| Gross Margin | 55.2% | 28.4% | 5.8% | 28.4% | 68.3% |
| Operating Margin | 21.6% | 44.1% | 29.5% | 31.9% | 27.9% |
| Forward P/E | 30.1x | 30.8x | 28.4x | 82.3x | 10.3x |
| Total Debt | $16M | $14.97B | $3.53B | $3.43B | $1.31B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $7M | $139M | $6M | $24M | $583M |
SELF vs EXR vs CUBE vs NSA vs SSB — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global Self Storage… (SELF) | 100 | 130.0 | +30.0% |
| Extra Space Storage… (EXR) | 100 | 148.1 | +48.1% |
| CubeSmart (CUBE) | 100 | 141.4 | +41.4% |
| National Storage Af… (NSA) | 100 | 144.4 | +44.4% |
| SouthState Corporat… (SSB) | 100 | 185.3 | +85.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SELF vs EXR vs CUBE vs NSA vs SSB
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SELF has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 0.20, yield 5.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.20, Low D/E 34.0%, current ratio 11.42x
- Beta 0.20, yield 5.4%, current ratio 11.42x
- Beta 0.20 vs SSB's 1.02
EXR is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 104.4% 10Y total return vs NSA's 182.1%
CUBE is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality and efficiency is your priority.
- 28.9% margin vs NSA's 11.9%
- 4.9% ROA vs SSB's 1.2%, ROIC 5.5% vs 9.2%
NSA is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +26.3% vs CUBE's +0.4%
SSB ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure and valuation efficiency.
- Rev growth 57.0%, EPS growth 12.8%
- PEG 0.35 vs NSA's 14.39
- 57.0% NII/revenue growth vs NSA's -2.3%
- Lower P/E (10.3x vs 28.4x), PEG 0.35 vs 2.49
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 57.0% NII/revenue growth vs NSA's -2.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.3x vs 28.4x), PEG 0.35 vs 2.49 | |
| Quality / Margins | 28.9% margin vs NSA's 11.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.20 vs SSB's 1.02 | |
| Dividends | 5.4% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs CUBE's 5.2% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +26.3% vs CUBE's +0.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.9% ROA vs SSB's 1.2%, ROIC 5.5% vs 9.2% |
SELF vs EXR vs CUBE vs NSA vs SSB — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
SELF vs EXR vs CUBE vs NSA vs SSB — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
EXR leads in 1 of 6 categories
SSB leads 1 • CUBE leads 1 • NSA leads 1 • SELF leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
EXR leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SSB is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.8B annually — 295.7x SELF's $13M. CUBE is the more profitable business, keeping 28.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NSA's 11.9%. On growth, EXR holds the edge at +9.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $13M | $3.4B | $1.1B | $750M | $3.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $4M | $2.2B | $597M | $427M | $1.2B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $2M | $974M | $327M | $89M | $799M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $4M | $1.8B | $611M | $297M | $154M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +55.2% | +28.4% | +5.8% | +28.4% | +68.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +21.6% | +44.1% | +29.5% | +31.9% | +27.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +16.0% | +28.8% | +28.9% | +11.9% | +21.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +34.0% | +54.6% | +54.0% | +39.6% | -14.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -0.9% | +9.3% | +3.3% | -1.6% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +4.8% | -7.7% | +60.0% | +30.9% |
Valuation Metrics
SSB leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 12.4x trailing earnings, SSB trades at a 80% valuation discount to NSA's 61.9x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), SSB offers better value at 0.43x vs NSA's 10.82x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $61M | $30.3B | $9.2B | $3.3B | $9.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $70M | $45.1B | $12.7B | $6.7B | $10.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 30.06x | 31.21x | 27.57x | 61.89x | 12.39x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 30.82x | 28.42x | 82.33x | 10.30x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.69x | 7.18x | 2.41x | 10.82x | 0.43x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 16.47x | 20.46x | 17.97x | 14.41x | 8.98x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.83x | 8.96x | 8.17x | 4.44x | 2.61x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.30x | 2.12x | 3.32x | 2.16x | 1.08x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 14.80x | 16.54x | 16.19x | 11.14x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
CUBE leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CUBE delivers a 11.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $4 for SELF. SSB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.15x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NSA's 2.23x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SELF scores 6/9 vs SSB's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +4.3% | +6.7% | +11.7% | +5.7% | +9.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.1% | +3.3% | +4.9% | +1.8% | +1.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +3.5% | +3.9% | +5.5% | +4.1% | +9.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +4.1% | +5.4% | +7.3% | +5.9% | +4.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.34x | 1.05x | 1.27x | 2.23x | 0.15x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $8M | $14.8B | $3.5B | $3.4B | $731M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $7M | $139M | $6M | $24M | $583M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $16M | $15.0B | $3.5B | $3.4B | $1.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 3.39x | 2.68x | 3.90x | 1.73x | 0.97x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NSA leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SELF five years ago would be worth $13,755 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,797 for NSA. Over the past 12 months, NSA leads with a +26.3% total return vs CUBE's +0.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SSB at 17.5% vs CUBE's 0.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +7.5% | +10.6% | +16.7% | +57.4% | +4.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +7.8% | +1.7% | +0.4% | +26.3% | +14.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +24.9% | +3.7% | +0.0% | +31.9% | +62.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +37.6% | +18.1% | +18.0% | +18.0% | +20.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +69.9% | +104.4% | +74.2% | +182.1% | +67.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +7.7% | +1.2% | 0.0% | +9.7% | +17.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — SELF and NSA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SELF is the less volatile stock with a 0.20 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SSB's 1.02 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NSA currently trades 98.4% from its 52-week high vs SSB's 89.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.20x | 0.52x | 0.53x | 0.81x | 1.02x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $5.89 | $155.19 | $44.13 | $44.02 | $108.46 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $4.73 | $125.71 | $35.09 | $27.43 | $84.48 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +91.9% | +92.3% | +91.2% | +98.4% | +89.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 60.4 | 57.1 | 58.3 | 62.0 | 55.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 29K | 1.1M | 2.2M | 1.8M | 841K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — SELF and CUBE and SSB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: EXR as "Hold", CUBE as "Hold", NSA as "Hold", SSB as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 21.3% upside for SSB (target: $118) vs -23.1% for NSA (target: $33). For income investors, SELF offers the higher dividend yield at 5.40% vs SSB's 2.36%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Hold | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $149.13 | $41.50 | $33.33 | $118.20 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 28 | 29 | 19 | 20 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +5.4% | +4.5% | +5.2% | +5.3% | +2.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 4 | 0 | 16 | 2 | 16 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.29 | $6.49 | $2.08 | $2.28 | $2.30 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.5% | +0.4% | 0.0% | +2.4% |
EXR leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). SSB leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
SELF vs EXR vs CUBE vs NSA vs SSB: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SELF or EXR or CUBE or NSA or SSB a better buy right now?
For growth investors, SouthState Corporation (SSB) is the stronger pick with 57.
0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 3% for National Storage Affiliates Trust (NSA). SouthState Corporation (SSB) offers the better valuation at 12. 4x trailing P/E (10. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate SouthState Corporation (SSB) a "Buy" — based on 20 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SELF or EXR or CUBE or NSA or SSB?
On trailing P/E, SouthState Corporation (SSB) is the cheapest at 12.
4x versus National Storage Affiliates Trust at 61. 9x. On forward P/E, SouthState Corporation is actually cheaper at 10. 3x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: SouthState Corporation wins at 0. 35x versus National Storage Affiliates Trust's 14. 39x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SELF or EXR or CUBE or NSA or SSB?
Over the past 5 years, Global Self Storage, Inc.
(SELF) delivered a total return of +37. 6%, compared to +18. 0% for National Storage Affiliates Trust (NSA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NSA returned +182. 1% versus SSB's +67. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SELF or EXR or CUBE or NSA or SSB?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Global Self Storage, Inc.
(SELF) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 20β versus SouthState Corporation's 1. 02β — meaning SSB is approximately 418% more volatile than SELF relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, SouthState Corporation (SSB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 15% versus 2% for National Storage Affiliates Trust — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SELF or EXR or CUBE or NSA or SSB?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), SouthState Corporation (SSB) is pulling ahead at 57.
0% versus -2. 3% for National Storage Affiliates Trust (NSA). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Extra Space Storage Inc. grew EPS 13. 9% year-over-year, compared to -40. 7% for National Storage Affiliates Trust. Over a 3-year CAGR, EXR leads at 19. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SELF or EXR or CUBE or NSA or SSB?
CubeSmart (CUBE) is the more profitable company, earning 29.
7% net margin versus 9. 8% for National Storage Affiliates Trust — meaning it keeps 29. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: EXR leads at 44. 1% versus 20. 5% for SELF. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SSB leads at 68. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SELF or EXR or CUBE or NSA or SSB more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, SouthState Corporation (SSB) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 35x versus National Storage Affiliates Trust's 14. 39x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, SouthState Corporation (SSB) trades at 10. 3x forward P/E versus 82. 3x for National Storage Affiliates Trust — 72. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SSB: 21. 3% to $118. 20.
08Which pays a better dividend — SELF or EXR or CUBE or NSA or SSB?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Global Self Storage, Inc. (SELF) offers the highest yield at 5. 4%, versus 2. 4% for SouthState Corporation (SSB).
09Is SELF or EXR or CUBE or NSA or SSB better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Global Self Storage, Inc.
(SELF) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 20), 5. 4% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SELF: +69. 9%, SSB: +67. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SELF and EXR and CUBE and NSA and SSB?
These companies operate in different sectors (SELF (Real Estate) and EXR (Real Estate) and CUBE (Real Estate) and NSA (Real Estate) and SSB (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: SELF is a small-cap income-oriented stock; EXR is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; CUBE is a small-cap income-oriented stock; NSA is a small-cap income-oriented stock; SSB is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.