Electronic Gaming & Multimedia
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
SKLZ vs NVDA vs MSFT vs GOOGL vs AAPL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Semiconductors
Software - Infrastructure
Internet Content & Information
Consumer Electronics
SKLZ vs NVDA vs MSFT vs GOOGL vs AAPL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Electronic Gaming & Multimedia | Semiconductors | Software - Infrastructure | Internet Content & Information | Consumer Electronics |
| Market Cap | $109M | $5.14T | $3.13T | $4.81T | $4.22T |
| Revenue (TTM) | $104M | $215.94B | $318.27B | $422.57B | $451.44B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-70M | $120.07B | $125.22B | $160.21B | $122.58B |
| Gross Margin | 87.5% | 71.1% | 68.3% | 60.4% | 47.9% |
| Operating Margin | -68.3% | 60.4% | 46.8% | 32.7% | 32.6% |
| Forward P/E | — | 25.6x | 25.3x | 29.6x | 33.8x |
| Total Debt | $129M | $11.41B | $112.18B | $59.29B | $112.38B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $195M | $10.61B | $30.24B | $30.71B | $35.93B |
SKLZ vs NVDA vs MSFT vs GOOGL vs AAPL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Skillz Inc. (SKLZ) | 100 | 3.4 | -96.6% |
| NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) | 100 | 2381.7 | +2281.7% |
| Microsoft Corporati… (MSFT) | 100 | 229.7 | +129.7% |
| Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL) | 100 | 555.2 | +455.2% |
| Apple Inc. (AAPL) | 100 | 361.6 | +261.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SKLZ vs NVDA vs MSFT vs GOOGL vs AAPL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SKLZ lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
NVDA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 65.5%, EPS growth 66.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 100.0%
- 239.0% 10Y total return vs AAPL's 11.7%
- PEG 0.27 vs AAPL's 1.89
- 65.5% revenue growth vs AAPL's 6.4%
MSFT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Dividend streak 19 yrs, beta 0.89, yield 0.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.89, Low D/E 32.7%, current ratio 1.35x
- Beta 0.89, yield 0.8%, current ratio 1.35x
- Beta 0.89 vs SKLZ's 2.57, lower leverage
GOOGL ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +163.5% vs MSFT's -2.1%
Among these 5 stocks, AAPL doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 65.5% revenue growth vs AAPL's 6.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (25.6x vs 29.6x), PEG 0.27 vs 0.99 | |
| Quality / Margins | 55.6% margin vs SKLZ's -67.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.89 vs SKLZ's 2.57, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 0.8% yield, 19-year raise streak, vs NVDA's 0.0%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +163.5% vs MSFT's -2.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 58.1% ROA vs SKLZ's -21.8%, ROIC 81.8% vs -148.3% |
SKLZ vs NVDA vs MSFT vs GOOGL vs AAPL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
SKLZ vs NVDA vs MSFT vs GOOGL vs AAPL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
NVDA leads in 3 of 6 categories
SKLZ leads 1 • MSFT leads 1 • GOOGL leads 0 • AAPL leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NVDA leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AAPL is the larger business by revenue, generating $451.4B annually — 4320.2x SKLZ's $104M. NVDA is the more profitable business, keeping 55.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SKLZ's -67.4%. On growth, NVDA holds the edge at +73.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $104M | $215.9B | $318.3B | $422.6B | $451.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$70M | $133.2B | $192.6B | $161.3B | $160.0B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$70M | $120.1B | $125.2B | $160.2B | $122.6B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$70M | $96.7B | $72.9B | $73.3B | $129.2B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +87.5% | +71.1% | +68.3% | +60.4% | +47.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -68.3% | +60.4% | +46.8% | +32.7% | +32.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -67.4% | +55.6% | +39.3% | +37.9% | +27.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -67.3% | +44.8% | +22.9% | +17.3% | +28.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +53.8% | +73.2% | +18.3% | +21.8% | +16.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -24.7% | +97.8% | +23.4% | +81.9% | +21.8% |
Valuation Metrics
SKLZ leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 30.9x trailing earnings, MSFT trades at a 29% valuation discount to NVDA's 43.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), NVDA offers better value at 0.45x vs AAPL's 2.16x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $109M | $5.14T | $3.13T | $4.81T | $4.22T |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $43M | $5.14T | $3.21T | $4.84T | $4.30T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1.55x | 43.16x | 30.86x | 36.82x | 38.53x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 25.55x | 25.34x | 29.61x | 33.78x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.45x | 1.64x | 1.23x | 2.16x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 38.59x | 19.72x | 32.22x | 29.68x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.04x | 23.80x | 11.10x | 11.95x | 10.14x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.97x | 32.85x | 9.15x | 11.72x | 58.49x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 53.17x | 43.66x | 65.72x | 42.72x |
Profitability & Efficiency
NVDA leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
AAPL delivers a 146.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $147 in annual profit, vs $-53 for SKLZ. NVDA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.07x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AAPL's 1.52x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AAPL scores 8/9 vs NVDA's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -52.5% | +76.3% | +33.1% | +39.0% | +146.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -21.8% | +58.1% | +19.2% | +27.4% | +34.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -148.3% | +81.8% | +24.9% | +25.1% | +67.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -34.0% | +97.2% | +29.7% | +30.3% | +69.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 4 | 6 | 7 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.15x | 0.07x | 0.33x | 0.14x | 1.52x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$66M | $807M | $81.9B | $28.6B | $76.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $195M | $10.6B | $30.2B | $30.7B | $35.9B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $129M | $11.4B | $112.2B | $59.3B | $112.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -7.08x | 545.03x | 55.65x | 392.15x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NVDA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NVDA five years ago would be worth $142,893 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $222 for SKLZ. Over the past 12 months, GOOGL leads with a +163.5% total return vs MSFT's -2.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NVDA at 93.6% vs SKLZ's -16.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +58.3% | +12.0% | -10.8% | +26.4% | +6.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +34.7% | +80.7% | -2.1% | +163.5% | +47.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -42.7% | +625.9% | +39.5% | +270.8% | +67.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.8% | +1328.9% | +72.5% | +239.8% | +124.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -96.5% | +23902.3% | +787.7% | +996.1% | +1174.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -16.9% | +93.6% | +11.7% | +54.8% | +18.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — MSFT and GOOGL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MSFT is the less volatile stock with a 0.89 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SKLZ's 2.57 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GOOGL currently trades 99.5% from its 52-week high vs SKLZ's 34.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.57x | 1.73x | 0.89x | 1.26x | 0.99x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $20.00 | $216.80 | $555.45 | $400.10 | $292.13 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.23 | $112.28 | $356.28 | $147.84 | $193.25 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +34.9% | +97.6% | +75.8% | +99.5% | +98.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 54.4 | 60.7 | 54.0 | 83.4 | 69.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.2M | 164.5M | 32.5M | 28.3M | 39.8M |
Analyst Outlook
MSFT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SKLZ as "Hold", NVDA as "Buy", MSFT as "Buy", GOOGL as "Buy", AAPL as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 931.5% upside for SKLZ (target: $72) vs 2.1% for GOOGL (target: $406). For income investors, MSFT offers the higher dividend yield at 0.77% vs GOOGL's 0.21%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $72.00 | $278.83 | $551.75 | $406.28 | $317.11 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 7 | 79 | 81 | 82 | 110 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.0% | +0.8% | +0.2% | +0.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 2 | 19 | 2 | 14 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.04 | $3.23 | $0.82 | $1.03 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +8.5% | +0.8% | +0.6% | +0.9% | +2.1% |
NVDA leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). SKLZ leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
SKLZ vs NVDA vs MSFT vs GOOGL vs AAPL: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SKLZ or NVDA or MSFT or GOOGL or AAPL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) is the stronger pick with 65.
5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 6. 4% for Apple Inc. (AAPL). Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) offers the better valuation at 30. 9x trailing P/E (25. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) a "Buy" — based on 79 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SKLZ or NVDA or MSFT or GOOGL or AAPL?
On trailing P/E, Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) is the cheapest at 30.
9x versus NVIDIA Corporation at 43. 2x. On forward P/E, Microsoft Corporation is actually cheaper at 25. 3x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: NVIDIA Corporation wins at 0. 27x versus Apple Inc. 's 1. 89x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SKLZ or NVDA or MSFT or GOOGL or AAPL?
Over the past 5 years, NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) delivered a total return of +1329%, compared to -97.
8% for Skillz Inc. (SKLZ). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NVDA returned +239. 0% versus SKLZ's -96. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SKLZ or NVDA or MSFT or GOOGL or AAPL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
89β versus Skillz Inc. 's 2. 57β — meaning SKLZ is approximately 190% more volatile than MSFT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 7% versus 152% for Apple Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SKLZ or NVDA or MSFT or GOOGL or AAPL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) is pulling ahead at 65.
5% versus 6. 4% for Apple Inc. (AAPL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: NVIDIA Corporation grew EPS 66. 7% year-over-year, compared to -67. 0% for Skillz Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, NVDA leads at 100. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SKLZ or NVDA or MSFT or GOOGL or AAPL?
NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) is the more profitable company, earning 55.
6% net margin versus -67. 4% for Skillz Inc. — meaning it keeps 55. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NVDA leads at 60. 4% versus -68. 3% for SKLZ. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SKLZ leads at 87. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SKLZ or NVDA or MSFT or GOOGL or AAPL more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 27x versus Apple Inc. 's 1. 89x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) trades at 25. 3x forward P/E versus 33. 8x for Apple Inc. — 8. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SKLZ: 931. 5% to $72. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — SKLZ or NVDA or MSFT or GOOGL or AAPL?
In this comparison, MSFT (0.
8% yield), AAPL (0. 4% yield), GOOGL (0. 2% yield) pay a dividend. SKLZ, NVDA do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is SKLZ or NVDA or MSFT or GOOGL or AAPL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
89), 0. 8% yield, +787. 7% 10Y return). Skillz Inc. (SKLZ) carries a higher beta of 2. 57 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MSFT: +787. 7%, SKLZ: -96. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SKLZ and NVDA and MSFT and GOOGL and AAPL?
These companies operate in different sectors (SKLZ (Technology) and NVDA (Technology) and MSFT (Technology) and GOOGL (Communication Services) and AAPL (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: SKLZ is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NVDA is a mega-cap high-growth stock; MSFT is a mega-cap quality compounder stock; GOOGL is a mega-cap high-growth stock; AAPL is a mega-cap quality compounder stock. MSFT pays a dividend while SKLZ, NVDA, GOOGL, AAPL do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.