Trucking
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
SLGB vs GLBE vs SHIP vs XPO vs FWRD
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Specialty Retail
Marine Shipping
Integrated Freight & Logistics
Integrated Freight & Logistics
SLGB vs GLBE vs SHIP vs XPO vs FWRD — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Trucking | Specialty Retail | Marine Shipping | Integrated Freight & Logistics | Integrated Freight & Logistics |
| Market Cap | $24M | $5.11B | $348M | $23.01B | $290M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $16M | $962M | $153M | $8.30B | $2.46B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-60M | $68M | $15M | $348M | $-91M |
| Gross Margin | 34.2% | 45.3% | 45.4% | 12.2% | 14.6% |
| Operating Margin | -280.0% | 7.4% | 23.4% | 9.1% | 2.1% |
| Forward P/E | — | 27.1x | 6.0x | 40.1x | — |
| Total Debt | $6K | $42M | $290M | $4.70B | $2.16B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $929.00 | $246M | $63M | $310M | $106M |
SLGB vs GLBE vs SHIP vs XPO vs FWRD — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global-e Online Ltd. (GLBE) | 100 | 92.0 | -8.0% |
| Seanergy Maritime H… (SHIP) | 100 | 164.9 | +64.9% |
| XPO Logistics, Inc. (XPO) | 100 | 385.8 | +285.8% |
| Forward Air Corpora… (FWRD) | 100 | 9.5 | -90.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SLGB vs GLBE vs SHIP vs XPO vs FWRD
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SLGB is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth and stability is your priority.
- 815.0% revenue growth vs SHIP's -5.6%
- Beta 1.04 vs FWRD's 2.18
GLBE ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 27.8%, EPS growth 186.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 33.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.53, Low D/E 4.5%, current ratio 1.93x
- PEG 0.21 vs XPO's 1.45
- Beta 1.53, current ratio 1.93x
SHIP carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for quality and dividends.
- 9.7% margin vs SLGB's -382.5%
- 2.8% yield; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
- +182.6% vs SLGB's -89.1%
XPO is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 19.9% 10Y total return vs GLBE's 18.5%
FWRD is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 8 yrs, beta 2.18
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 815.0% revenue growth vs SHIP's -5.6% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 9.7% margin vs SLGB's -382.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.04 vs FWRD's 2.18 | |
| Dividends | 2.8% yield; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +182.6% vs SLGB's -89.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.7% ROA vs SLGB's -355.7% |
SLGB vs GLBE vs SHIP vs XPO vs FWRD — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
SLGB vs GLBE vs SHIP vs XPO vs FWRD — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
SHIP leads in 2 of 6 categories
GLBE leads 1 • XPO leads 1 • FWRD leads 1 • SLGB leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SHIP leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
XPO is the larger business by revenue, generating $8.3B annually — 533.4x SLGB's $16M. SHIP is the more profitable business, keeping 9.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SLGB's -3.8%. On growth, SLGB holds the edge at +106.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $16M | $962M | $153M | $8.3B | $2.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$44M | $130M | $68M | $1.3B | $206M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$60M | $68M | $15M | $348M | -$91M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$9M | $295M | -$6M | $457M | $38M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +34.2% | +45.3% | +45.4% | +12.2% | +14.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -2.8% | +7.4% | +23.4% | +9.1% | +2.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -3.8% | +7.1% | +9.7% | +4.2% | -3.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -57.7% | +30.6% | -4.2% | +5.5% | +1.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +106.1% | +28.0% | +18.6% | +7.3% | -5.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | +84.4% | +49.1% | +33.9% |
Valuation Metrics
SHIP leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 16.3x trailing earnings, SHIP trades at a 79% valuation discount to GLBE's 77.5x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), GLBE offers better value at 0.59x vs XPO's 2.69x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $24M | $5.1B | $348M | $23.0B | $290M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $24M | $4.9B | $575M | $27.4B | $2.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.81x | 77.51x | 16.31x | 74.25x | -2.64x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 27.05x | 5.96x | 40.14x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.59x | — | 2.69x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 52.98x | 7.45x | 21.92x | 12.40x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.23x | 5.31x | 2.20x | 2.82x | 0.12x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 5.70x | 1.20x | 12.53x | 1.76x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 18.22x | 20.43x | 69.95x | 18.98x |
Profitability & Efficiency
GLBE leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
XPO delivers a 19.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $19 in annual profit, vs $-7672 for SLGB. GLBE carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FWRD's 13.36x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), GLBE scores 6/9 vs SHIP's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -7672.3% | +7.3% | +5.3% | +19.0% | -52.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -3.6% | +4.7% | +2.5% | +4.3% | -3.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +7.7% | +6.1% | +9.3% | +1.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | — | +7.7% | +7.1% | +11.3% | +1.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 6 | 3 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.04x | 1.03x | 2.53x | 13.36x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $5,214 | -$204M | $228M | $4.4B | $2.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $929 | $246M | $63M | $310M | $106M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $6,143 | $42M | $290M | $4.7B | $2.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 17.83x | 1.68x | 3.21x | 0.32x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
XPO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in XPO five years ago would be worth $40,592 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,088 for SLGB. Over the past 12 months, SHIP leads with a +182.6% total return vs SLGB's -89.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors XPO at 61.1% vs FWRD's -53.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -57.8% | -20.2% | +82.8% | +41.2% | -63.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -89.1% | -27.1% | +182.6% | +54.9% | -51.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -89.1% | +0.6% | +270.0% | +318.5% | -89.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -89.1% | +18.5% | +89.4% | +305.9% | -87.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -89.1% | +18.5% | -99.7% | +1985.3% | -65.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -52.3% | +0.2% | +54.7% | +61.1% | -53.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — SLGB and SHIP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SLGB is the less volatile stock with a 1.04 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FWRD's 2.18 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SHIP currently trades 98.0% from its 52-week high vs SLGB's 9.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.04x | 1.53x | 1.17x | 1.72x | 2.18x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $6.08 | $43.21 | $16.80 | $231.46 | $32.47 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.50 | $27.80 | $5.81 | $110.78 | $9.18 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +9.4% | +70.0% | +98.0% | +84.7% | +28.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 34.8 | 40.9 | 65.2 | 42.8 | 26.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 412K | 1.2M | 247K | 1.3M | 1.0M |
Analyst Outlook
FWRD leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: GLBE as "Buy", SHIP as "Buy", XPO as "Buy", FWRD as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 90.5% upside for FWRD (target: $18) vs 3.2% for SHIP (target: $17). SHIP is the only dividend payer here at 2.80% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $43.40 | $17.00 | $211.60 | $17.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 14 | 3 | 32 | 21 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +2.8% | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 0 | 2 | 8 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $0.46 | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.4% | 0.0% | +0.5% | +0.3% |
SHIP leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). GLBE leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 1 tied.
SLGB vs GLBE vs SHIP vs XPO vs FWRD: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SLGB or GLBE or SHIP or XPO or FWRD a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Smart Logistics Global Limited Ordinary Shares (SLGB) is the stronger pick with 815.
0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 6% for Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp. (SHIP). Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp. (SHIP) offers the better valuation at 16. 3x trailing P/E (6. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Global-e Online Ltd. (GLBE) a "Buy" — based on 14 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SLGB or GLBE or SHIP or XPO or FWRD?
On trailing P/E, Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp.
(SHIP) is the cheapest at 16. 3x versus Global-e Online Ltd. at 77. 5x. On forward P/E, Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp. is actually cheaper at 6. 0x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Global-e Online Ltd. wins at 0. 21x versus XPO Logistics, Inc. 's 1. 45x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SLGB or GLBE or SHIP or XPO or FWRD?
Over the past 5 years, XPO Logistics, Inc.
(XPO) delivered a total return of +305. 9%, compared to -89. 1% for Smart Logistics Global Limited Ordinary Shares (SLGB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: XPO returned +1985% versus SHIP's -99. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SLGB or GLBE or SHIP or XPO or FWRD?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Smart Logistics Global Limited Ordinary Shares (SLGB) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
04β versus Forward Air Corporation's 2. 18β — meaning FWRD is approximately 110% more volatile than SLGB relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Global-e Online Ltd. (GLBE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 13% for Forward Air Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SLGB or GLBE or SHIP or XPO or FWRD?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Smart Logistics Global Limited Ordinary Shares (SLGB) is pulling ahead at 815.
0% versus -5. 6% for Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp. (SHIP). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Global-e Online Ltd. grew EPS 186. 7% year-over-year, compared to -52. 1% for Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp.. Over a 3-year CAGR, GLBE leads at 33. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SLGB or GLBE or SHIP or XPO or FWRD?
Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp.
(SHIP) is the more profitable company, earning 13. 2% net margin versus -172. 1% for Smart Logistics Global Limited Ordinary Shares — meaning it keeps 13. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SHIP leads at 26. 0% versus -34. 5% for SLGB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GLBE leads at 45. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SLGB or GLBE or SHIP or XPO or FWRD more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Global-e Online Ltd. (GLBE) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 21x versus XPO Logistics, Inc. 's 1. 45x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp. (SHIP) trades at 6. 0x forward P/E versus 40. 1x for XPO Logistics, Inc. — 34. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FWRD: 90. 5% to $17. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — SLGB or GLBE or SHIP or XPO or FWRD?
In this comparison, SHIP (2.
8% yield) pays a dividend. SLGB, GLBE, XPO, FWRD do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is SLGB or GLBE or SHIP or XPO or FWRD better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, XPO Logistics, Inc.
(XPO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+1985% 10Y return). Forward Air Corporation (FWRD) carries a higher beta of 2. 18 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (XPO: +1985%, FWRD: -65. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SLGB and GLBE and SHIP and XPO and FWRD?
These companies operate in different sectors (SLGB (Industrials) and GLBE (Consumer Cyclical) and SHIP (Industrials) and XPO (Industrials) and FWRD (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: SLGB is a small-cap high-growth stock; GLBE is a small-cap high-growth stock; SHIP is a small-cap deep-value stock; XPO is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; FWRD is a small-cap quality compounder stock. SHIP pays a dividend while SLGB, GLBE, XPO, FWRD do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.