Financial - Credit Services
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
SLM vs SYF vs COF vs ALLY
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Financial - Credit Services
Financial - Credit Services
Financial - Credit Services
SLM vs SYF vs COF vs ALLY — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Financial - Credit Services | Financial - Credit Services | Financial - Credit Services | Financial - Credit Services |
| Market Cap | $4.49B | $25.72B | $119.19B | $13.51B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $3.11B | $19.12B | $69.25B | $12.15B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $745M | $3.60B | $2.45B | $852M |
| Gross Margin | 53.1% | 51.0% | 47.3% | 52.0% |
| Operating Margin | 31.9% | 24.2% | 3.3% | 8.6% |
| Forward P/E | 7.3x | 8.0x | 9.8x | 8.2x |
| Total Debt | $5.86B | $15.18B | $51.00B | $21.77B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $4.24B | $14.97B | $57.43B | $10.03B |
SLM vs SYF vs COF vs ALLY — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| SLM Corporation (SLM) | 100 | 298.9 | +198.9% |
| Synchrony Financial (SYF) | 100 | 363.3 | +263.3% |
| Capital One Financi… (COF) | 100 | 283.0 | +183.0% |
| Ally Financial Inc. (ALLY) | 100 | 251.1 | +151.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SLM vs SYF vs COF vs ALLY
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SLM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 7 yrs, beta 1.13, yield 14.9%
- Rev growth 4.1%, EPS growth 29.1%
- 284.8% 10Y total return vs COF's 205.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.13, current ratio 0.28x
SYF is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if valuation efficiency and bank quality is your priority.
- PEG 0.25 vs SLM's 0.81
- NIM 15.5% vs ALLY's 2.7%
- Lower P/E (8.0x vs 9.8x)
- +39.9% vs SLM's -26.5%
COF is the clearest fit if your priority is growth.
- 28.4% NII/revenue growth vs ALLY's -25.7%
ALLY lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 28.4% NII/revenue growth vs ALLY's -25.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.0x vs 9.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs COF's 0.4% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.13 vs COF's 1.58 | |
| Dividends | 14.9% yield, 7-year raise streak, vs SYF's 1.6%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +39.9% vs SLM's -26.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs COF's 0.4% |
SLM vs SYF vs COF vs ALLY — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
SLM vs SYF vs COF vs ALLY — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
SYF leads in 3 of 6 categories
SLM leads 2 • COF leads 0 • ALLY leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SLM leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
COF is the larger business by revenue, generating $69.3B annually — 22.3x SLM's $3.1B. SLM is the more profitable business, keeping 24.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to COF's 3.5%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $3.1B | $19.1B | $69.3B | $12.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $599M | $4.9B | $7.5B | $2.0B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $745M | $3.6B | $2.5B | $852M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $646M | $9.8B | $27.7B | -$295M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +53.1% | +51.0% | +47.3% | +52.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +31.9% | +24.2% | +3.3% | +8.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +24.0% | +18.6% | +3.5% | +7.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +18.5% | +51.5% | +37.7% | — |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +10.0% | +20.1% | +22.1% | +2.7% |
Valuation Metrics
SYF leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 6.5x trailing earnings, SLM trades at a 86% valuation discount to COF's 47.8x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), SYF offers better value at 0.24x vs SLM's 0.73x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $4.5B | $25.7B | $119.2B | $13.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $6.1B | $25.9B | $112.8B | $25.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 6.55x | 7.97x | 47.77x | 18.48x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 7.29x | 7.99x | 9.76x | 8.21x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.73x | 0.24x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 6.14x | 5.05x | 14.95x | 12.84x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.44x | 1.35x | 1.72x | 1.11x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.91x | 1.58x | 0.92x | 0.89x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 7.80x | 2.61x | 4.56x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
SYF leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SLM delivers a 31.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $31 in annual profit, vs $2 for COF. COF carries lower financial leverage with a 0.45x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SLM's 2.39x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SLM scores 7/9 vs ALLY's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +31.0% | +21.4% | +2.4% | +5.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.5% | +3.0% | +0.4% | +0.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +8.8% | +10.8% | +1.3% | +2.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +11.5% | +12.3% | +1.4% | +3.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 7 | 5 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 2.39x | 0.91x | 0.45x | 1.40x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.6B | $209M | -$6.4B | $11.7B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $4.2B | $15.0B | $57.4B | $10.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $5.9B | $15.2B | $51.0B | $21.8B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.70x | 1.13x | 0.14x | 0.22x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SYF leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SYF five years ago would be worth $17,222 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $9,186 for ALLY. Over the past 12 months, SYF leads with a +39.9% total return vs SLM's -26.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SYF at 41.3% vs SLM's 17.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -16.9% | -11.9% | -22.0% | -3.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -26.5% | +39.9% | +4.7% | +38.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +63.4% | +181.9% | +124.7% | +89.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +20.1% | +72.2% | +30.2% | -8.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +284.8% | +176.3% | +205.6% | +209.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +17.8% | +41.3% | +31.0% | +23.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — SLM and ALLY each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SLM is the less volatile stock with a 1.13 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than COF's 1.58 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ALLY currently trades 92.6% from its 52-week high vs SLM's 64.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.13x | 1.52x | 1.58x | 1.42x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $34.97 | $88.77 | $259.64 | $47.27 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $17.77 | $53.23 | $174.98 | $32.28 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +64.8% | +83.4% | +74.2% | +92.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 51.6 | 54.3 | 50.3 | 58.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3.9M | 3.6M | 4.6M | 3.5M |
Analyst Outlook
SLM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SLM as "Buy", SYF as "Buy", COF as "Buy", ALLY as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 38.8% upside for COF (target: $267) vs 21.8% for ALLY (target: $53). For income investors, SLM offers the higher dividend yield at 14.91% vs SYF's 1.61%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $29.50 | $90.55 | $267.18 | $53.33 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 25 | 41 | 56 | 38 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +14.9% | +1.6% | +1.7% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 7 | 4 | 3 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $3.38 | $1.19 | $3.27 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +8.2% | +11.4% | +3.4% | 0.0% |
SYF leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). SLM leads in 2 (Income & Cash Flow, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
SLM vs SYF vs COF vs ALLY: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SLM or SYF or COF or ALLY a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Capital One Financial Corporation (COF) is the stronger pick with 28.
4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -25. 7% for Ally Financial Inc. (ALLY). SLM Corporation (SLM) offers the better valuation at 6. 5x trailing P/E (7. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate SLM Corporation (SLM) a "Buy" — based on 25 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SLM or SYF or COF or ALLY?
On trailing P/E, SLM Corporation (SLM) is the cheapest at 6.
5x versus Capital One Financial Corporation at 47. 8x. On forward P/E, SLM Corporation is actually cheaper at 7. 3x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Synchrony Financial wins at 0. 25x versus SLM Corporation's 0. 81x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SLM or SYF or COF or ALLY?
Over the past 5 years, Synchrony Financial (SYF) delivered a total return of +72.
2%, compared to -8. 1% for Ally Financial Inc. (ALLY). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SLM returned +284. 8% versus SYF's +176. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SLM or SYF or COF or ALLY?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), SLM Corporation (SLM) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
13β versus Capital One Financial Corporation's 1. 58β — meaning COF is approximately 40% more volatile than SLM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Capital One Financial Corporation (COF) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 45% versus 2% for SLM Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SLM or SYF or COF or ALLY?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Capital One Financial Corporation (COF) is pulling ahead at 28.
4% versus -25. 7% for Ally Financial Inc. (ALLY). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Ally Financial Inc. grew EPS 31. 7% year-over-year, compared to -65. 2% for Capital One Financial Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SLM or SYF or COF or ALLY?
SLM Corporation (SLM) is the more profitable company, earning 24.
0% net margin versus 3. 5% for Capital One Financial Corporation — meaning it keeps 24. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SLM leads at 31. 9% versus 3. 3% for COF. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SLM leads at 53. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SLM or SYF or COF or ALLY more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Synchrony Financial (SYF) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 25x versus SLM Corporation's 0. 81x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, SLM Corporation (SLM) trades at 7. 3x forward P/E versus 9. 8x for Capital One Financial Corporation — 2. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for COF: 38. 8% to $267. 18.
08Which pays a better dividend — SLM or SYF or COF or ALLY?
In this comparison, SLM (14.
9% yield), COF (1. 7% yield), SYF (1. 6% yield) pay a dividend. ALLY does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is SLM or SYF or COF or ALLY better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, SLM Corporation (SLM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.
13), 14. 9% yield, +284. 8% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SLM: +284. 8%, ALLY: +209. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SLM and SYF and COF and ALLY?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: SLM is a small-cap deep-value stock; SYF is a mid-cap deep-value stock; COF is a mid-cap high-growth stock; ALLY is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. SLM, SYF, COF pay a dividend while ALLY does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.