Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
SLNO vs ACAD vs PTCT vs LGND vs RARE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
SLNO vs ACAD vs PTCT vs LGND vs RARE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $2.76B | $3.86B | $5.35B | $4.13B | $2.57B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $190M | $1.10B | $827M | $251M | $669M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $21M | $376M | $-187M | $49M | $-609M |
| Gross Margin | 98.6% | 91.5% | 49.7% | 85.9% | 83.6% |
| Operating Margin | 5.4% | 7.4% | -8.3% | 7.0% | -83.9% |
| Forward P/E | 13.4x | 50.9x | 8.3x | 23.6x | — |
| Total Debt | $3M | $52M | $492M | $7M | $1.28B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $70M | $178M | $985M | $72M | $434M |
SLNO vs ACAD vs PTCT vs LGND vs RARE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Soleno Therapeutics… (SLNO) | 100 | 21.0 | -79.0% |
| ACADIA Pharmaceutic… (ACAD) | 100 | 45.4 | -54.6% |
| PTC Therapeutics, I… (PTCT) | 100 | 127.2 | +27.2% |
| Ligand Pharmaceutic… (LGND) | 100 | 207.1 | +107.1% |
| Ultragenyx Pharmace… (RARE) | 100 | 38.2 | -61.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SLNO vs ACAD vs PTCT vs LGND vs RARE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SLNO ranks third and is worth considering specifically for sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.92, Low D/E 0.6%, current ratio 5.80x
- Beta 0.92, current ratio 5.80x
- Beta 0.92 vs RARE's 1.42
ACAD has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in quality and efficiency.
- 34.3% margin vs RARE's -91.0%
- 26.2% ROA vs RARE's -45.8%, ROIC 10.0% vs -89.4%
PTCT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 114.5%, EPS growth 264.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 35.3%
- 7.3% 10Y total return vs LGND's 73.0%
- 114.5% revenue growth vs ACAD's 11.9%
- Better valuation composite
LGND is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.99
- +99.1% vs SLNO's -29.1%
Among these 5 stocks, RARE doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 114.5% revenue growth vs ACAD's 11.9% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 34.3% margin vs RARE's -91.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.92 vs RARE's 1.42 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +99.1% vs SLNO's -29.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 26.2% ROA vs RARE's -45.8%, ROIC 10.0% vs -89.4% |
SLNO vs ACAD vs PTCT vs LGND vs RARE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
SLNO vs ACAD vs PTCT vs LGND vs RARE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
PTCT leads in 1 of 6 categories
LGND leads 1 • SLNO leads 0 • ACAD leads 0 • RARE leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — SLNO and ACAD and LGND each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ACAD is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.1B annually — 5.8x SLNO's $190M. ACAD is the more profitable business, keeping 34.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to RARE's -91.0%. On growth, LGND holds the edge at +122.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $190M | $1.1B | $827M | $251M | $669M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $12M | $96M | -$37M | $52M | -$536M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $21M | $376M | -$187M | $49M | -$609M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $47M | $212M | -$229M | $31M | -$487M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +98.6% | +91.5% | +49.7% | +85.9% | +83.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +5.4% | +7.4% | -8.3% | +7.0% | -83.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +11.0% | +34.3% | -22.6% | +19.3% | -91.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +24.6% | +19.4% | -27.7% | +12.2% | -72.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +9.7% | -76.8% | +122.8% | -2.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +163.0% | -81.8% | -100.3% | +15.6% | -17.2% |
Valuation Metrics
PTCT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 8.3x trailing earnings, PTCT trades at a 94% valuation discount to SLNO's 135.8x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, PTCT's 5.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than LGND's 322.1x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.8B | $3.9B | $5.3B | $4.1B | $2.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.7B | $3.7B | $4.9B | $4.1B | $3.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 135.77x | 9.85x | 8.29x | -956.05x | -4.48x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 13.41x | 50.91x | — | 23.65x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 158.68x | 26.91x | 5.42x | 322.10x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 14.49x | 3.61x | 3.09x | 24.74x | 3.82x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 6.39x | 3.15x | — | 4.63x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 59.06x | 36.74x | 7.61x | 53.41x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — SLNO and ACAD and PTCT each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ACAD delivers a 35.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $36 in annual profit, vs $-6 for RARE. SLNO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ACAD's 0.04x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SLNO scores 7/9 vs RARE's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +5.9% | +35.6% | — | +5.1% | -6.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +4.6% | +26.2% | -6.8% | +3.3% | -45.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +3.8% | +10.0% | — | -2.3% | -89.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +3.7% | +10.1% | +55.9% | -2.7% | -46.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 6 | 7 | 5 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.01x | 0.04x | — | 0.01x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$67M | -$126M | -$492M | -$65M | $842M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $70M | $178M | $985M | $72M | $434M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $3M | $52M | $492M | $7M | $1.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 4.81x | — | -1.67x | 22.69x | -14.49x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
LGND leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in LGND five years ago would be worth $16,102 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,281 for RARE. Over the past 12 months, LGND leads with a +99.1% total return vs SLNO's -29.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors LGND at 39.5% vs RARE's -17.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +12.3% | -13.7% | -16.0% | +10.6% | +10.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -29.1% | +52.4% | +58.2% | +99.1% | -21.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +152.1% | +4.7% | +16.1% | +171.6% | -44.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -36.4% | +7.1% | +60.3% | +61.0% | -77.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -87.8% | -22.9% | +733.2% | +73.0% | -59.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +36.1% | +1.5% | +5.1% | +39.5% | -17.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — SLNO and LGND each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SLNO is the less volatile stock with a 0.92 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RARE's 1.42 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. LGND currently trades 85.0% from its 52-week high vs SLNO's 58.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.92x | 1.26x | 1.13x | 0.99x | 1.42x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $90.32 | $27.81 | $87.50 | $247.38 | $42.37 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $29.47 | $14.45 | $37.94 | $98.89 | $18.29 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +58.6% | +81.1% | +73.7% | +85.0% | +61.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 77.5 | 44.2 | 45.3 | 59.3 | 66.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3.8M | 1.8M | 1.0M | 226K | 1.8M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SLNO as "Buy", ACAD as "Buy", PTCT as "Buy", LGND as "Buy", RARE as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 97.1% upside for RARE (target: $52) vs 27.3% for LGND (target: $268).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $80.00 | $34.78 | $89.67 | $267.75 | $51.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 13 | 37 | 26 | 17 | 33 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | 1 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +3.6% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
PTCT leads in 1 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics). LGND leads in 1 (Total Returns). 3 tied.
SLNO vs ACAD vs PTCT vs LGND vs RARE: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SLNO or ACAD or PTCT or LGND or RARE a better buy right now?
For growth investors, PTC Therapeutics, Inc.
(PTCT) is the stronger pick with 114. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 11. 9% for ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. (ACAD). PTC Therapeutics, Inc. (PTCT) offers the better valuation at 8. 3x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Soleno Therapeutics, Inc. (SLNO) a "Buy" — based on 13 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SLNO or ACAD or PTCT or LGND or RARE?
On trailing P/E, PTC Therapeutics, Inc.
(PTCT) is the cheapest at 8. 3x versus Soleno Therapeutics, Inc. at 135. 8x. On forward P/E, Soleno Therapeutics, Inc. is actually cheaper at 13. 4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SLNO or ACAD or PTCT or LGND or RARE?
Over the past 5 years, Ligand Pharmaceuticals Incorporated (LGND) delivered a total return of +61.
0%, compared to -77. 2% for Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc. (RARE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PTCT returned +733. 2% versus SLNO's -87. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SLNO or ACAD or PTCT or LGND or RARE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Soleno Therapeutics, Inc.
(SLNO) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 92β versus Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc. 's 1. 42β — meaning RARE is approximately 55% more volatile than SLNO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Soleno Therapeutics, Inc. (SLNO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 4% for ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SLNO or ACAD or PTCT or LGND or RARE?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), PTC Therapeutics, Inc.
(PTCT) is pulling ahead at 114. 5% versus 11. 9% for ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. (ACAD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: PTC Therapeutics, Inc. grew EPS 264. 5% year-over-year, compared to -107. 5% for Ligand Pharmaceuticals Incorporated. Over a 3-year CAGR, PTCT leads at 35. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SLNO or ACAD or PTCT or LGND or RARE?
PTC Therapeutics, Inc.
(PTCT) is the more profitable company, earning 39. 4% net margin versus -85. 4% for Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc. — meaning it keeps 39. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PTCT leads at 49. 5% versus -79. 5% for RARE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SLNO leads at 98. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SLNO or ACAD or PTCT or LGND or RARE more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Soleno Therapeutics, Inc.
(SLNO) trades at 13. 4x forward P/E versus 50. 9x for ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. — 37. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for RARE: 97. 1% to $51. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — SLNO or ACAD or PTCT or LGND or RARE?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is SLNO or ACAD or PTCT or LGND or RARE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, PTC Therapeutics, Inc.
(PTCT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 13), +733. 2% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (PTCT: +733. 2%, RARE: -59. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SLNO and ACAD and PTCT and LGND and RARE?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: SLNO is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ACAD is a small-cap deep-value stock; PTCT is a small-cap high-growth stock; LGND is a small-cap high-growth stock; RARE is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.