Compare Stocks

4 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

SLQT vs EG vs ACGL vs RNR

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
SLQT
SelectQuote, Inc.

Insurance - Brokers

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$201M
5Y Perf.-95.9%
EG
Everest Re Group, Ltd.

Insurance - Reinsurance

Financial ServicesNYSE • BM
Market Cap$14.17B
5Y Perf.+77.2%
ACGL
Arch Capital Group Ltd.

Insurance - Diversified

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • BM
Market Cap$33.67B
5Y Perf.+234.9%
RNR
RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd.

Insurance - Reinsurance

Financial ServicesNYSE • BM
Market Cap$12.98B
5Y Perf.+79.2%

SLQT vs EG vs ACGL vs RNR — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
SLQT logoSLQT
EG logoEG
ACGL logoACGL
RNR logoRNR
IndustryInsurance - BrokersInsurance - ReinsuranceInsurance - DiversifiedInsurance - Reinsurance
Market Cap$201M$14.17B$33.67B$12.98B
Revenue (TTM)$1.64B$17.15B$19.93B$11.49B
Net Income (TTM)$73M$2.03B$4.40B$3.09B
Gross Margin69.8%28.5%37.2%44.6%
Operating Margin3.5%14.2%25.0%35.5%
Forward P/E85.7x6.7x10.1x7.7x
Total Debt$416M$3.59B$2.73B$2.33B
Cash & Equiv.$32M$1.32B$993M$1.73B

SLQT vs EG vs ACGL vs RNRLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

SLQT
EG
ACGL
RNR
StockMay 20May 26Return
SelectQuote, Inc. (SLQT)1004.1-95.9%
Everest Re Group, L… (EG)100177.2+77.2%
Arch Capital Group … (ACGL)100334.9+234.9%
RenaissanceRe Holdi… (RNR)100179.2+79.2%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: SLQT vs EG vs ACGL vs RNR

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: RNR leads in 3 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. Arch Capital Group Ltd. is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility and operational efficiency and capital deployment. SLQT and EG also each lead in at least one category. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
SLQT
SelectQuote, Inc.
The Insurance Pick

SLQT is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 15.5%, EPS growth 106.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 26.0%
  • 15.5% revenue growth vs EG's 1.4%
Best for: growth exposure
EG
Everest Re Group, Ltd.
The Insurance Pick

EG is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and defensive.

  • Dividend streak 13 yrs, beta 0.36, yield 2.3%
  • Beta 0.36, yield 2.3%, current ratio 0.76x
  • 2.3% yield, 13-year raise streak, vs ACGL's 0.0%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
Best for: income & stability and defensive
ACGL
Arch Capital Group Ltd.
The Insurance Pick

ACGL is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.

  • 324.0% 10Y total return vs RNR's 176.9%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.02, Low D/E 11.3%, current ratio 1.21x
  • Beta 0.02 vs SLQT's 1.96, lower leverage
  • 5.9% ROA vs EG's 3.3%, ROIC 15.4% vs 8.1%
Best for: long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night
RNR
RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd.
The Insurance Pick

RNR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for valuation efficiency.

  • PEG 0.26 vs ACGL's 0.35
  • Lower P/E (7.7x vs 10.1x), PEG 0.26 vs 0.35
  • Combined ratio 0.7 vs SLQT's 1.0 (lower = better underwriting)
  • +21.9% vs SLQT's -57.6%
Best for: valuation efficiency
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthSLQT logoSLQT15.5% revenue growth vs EG's 1.4%
ValueRNR logoRNRLower P/E (7.7x vs 10.1x), PEG 0.26 vs 0.35
Quality / MarginsRNR logoRNRCombined ratio 0.7 vs SLQT's 1.0 (lower = better underwriting)
Stability / SafetyACGL logoACGLBeta 0.02 vs SLQT's 1.96, lower leverage
DividendsEG logoEG2.3% yield, 13-year raise streak, vs ACGL's 0.0%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)RNR logoRNR+21.9% vs SLQT's -57.6%
Efficiency (ROA)ACGL logoACGL5.9% ROA vs EG's 3.3%, ROIC 15.4% vs 8.1%

SLQT vs EG vs ACGL vs RNR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

SLQTSelectQuote, Inc.
FY 2025
Service
52.1%$798M
Pharmacy
47.6%$729M
Product and Service, Other
0.3%$4M
EGEverest Re Group, Ltd.
FY 2024
Reinsurance
75.1%$11.4B
Insurance
23.6%$3.6B
Other Operating Segment
1.3%$197M
ACGLArch Capital Group Ltd.
FY 2025
Reinsurance Segment
47.6%$8.1B
Insurance Segment
45.5%$7.8B
Mortgage Segment
6.9%$1.2B
RNRRenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd.
FY 2025
Casualty and Specialty Segment
59.9%$5.9B
Property Segment
40.1%$4.0B

SLQT vs EG vs ACGL vs RNR — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLRNRLAGGINGSLQT

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

RNR leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

ACGL is the larger business by revenue, generating $19.9B annually — 12.1x SLQT's $1.6B. RNR is the more profitable business, keeping 26.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SLQT's 4.5%. On growth, ACGL holds the edge at +7.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricSLQT logoSLQTSelectQuote, Inc.EG logoEGEverest Re Group,…ACGL logoACGLArch Capital Grou…RNR logoRNRRenaissanceRe Hol…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$1.6B$17.1B$19.9B$11.5B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$63M$2.5B$5.2B$4.1B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$73M$2.0B$4.4B$3.1B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$62M$2.9B$6.1B$4.2B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+69.8%+28.5%+37.2%+44.6%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+3.5%+14.2%+25.0%+35.5%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+4.5%+11.9%+22.1%+26.9%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-3.8%+16.7%+30.7%+36.7%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+5.6%-4.0%+7.3%-36.4%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-114.5%+2.3%+39.0%+100.9%
RNR leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

RNR leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 5.3x trailing earnings, RNR trades at a 94% valuation discount to SLQT's 85.7x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), RNR offers better value at 0.18x vs EG's 0.38x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricSLQT logoSLQTSelectQuote, Inc.EG logoEGEverest Re Group,…ACGL logoACGLArch Capital Grou…RNR logoRNRRenaissanceRe Hol…
Market CapShares × price$201M$14.2B$33.7B$13.0B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$584M$16.4B$35.4B$13.6B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS85.71x9.29x8.13x5.31x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.6.70x10.05x7.66x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.38x0.29x0.18x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple6.57x7.95x6.85x3.38x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.13x0.82x1.69x1.02x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.36x0.94x1.47x0.70x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF4.16x5.50x3.51x
RNR leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

ACGL leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

ACGL delivers a 19.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $19 in annual profit, vs $12 for SLQT. ACGL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.11x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SLQT's 0.72x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), RNR scores 8/9 vs SLQT's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricSLQT logoSLQTSelectQuote, Inc.EG logoEGEverest Re Group,…ACGL logoACGLArch Capital Grou…RNR logoRNRRenaissanceRe Hol…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+12.2%+13.3%+19.0%+16.6%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+5.7%+3.3%+5.9%+5.7%
ROICReturn on invested capital+5.3%+8.1%+15.4%+16.0%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+6.7%+10.9%+11.6%+10.7%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–94778
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.72x0.23x0.11x0.12x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$384M$2.3B$1.7B$598M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$32M$1.3B$993M$1.7B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$416M$3.6B$2.7B$2.3B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense4.11x18.38x34.86x33.28x
ACGL leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

RNR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in ACGL five years ago would be worth $24,398 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $387 for SLQT. Over the past 12 months, RNR leads with a +21.9% total return vs SLQT's -57.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors RNR at 13.4% vs SLQT's -7.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricSLQT logoSLQTSelectQuote, Inc.EG logoEGEverest Re Group,…ACGL logoACGLArch Capital Grou…RNR logoRNRRenaissanceRe Hol…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-16.8%+5.7%+0.7%+10.6%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-57.6%+5.1%+2.0%+21.9%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-19.7%-2.3%+30.7%+45.7%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-96.1%+41.8%+144.0%+87.1%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-95.8%+129.5%+324.0%+176.9%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-7.1%-0.8%+9.3%+13.4%
RNR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — EG and RNR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

RNR is the less volatile stock with a -0.03 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SLQT's 1.96 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. EG currently trades 95.5% from its 52-week high vs SLQT's 40.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricSLQT logoSLQTSelectQuote, Inc.EG logoEGEverest Re Group,…ACGL logoACGLArch Capital Grou…RNR logoRNRRenaissanceRe Hol…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.96x0.36x0.02x-0.03x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$2.80$368.29$103.39$318.20
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$0.56$302.44$82.45$231.17
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+40.7%+95.5%+91.4%+94.5%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10071.758.946.346.9
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded1.2M310K1.9M303K
Evenly matched — EG and RNR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

EG leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: SLQT as "Hold", EG as "Hold", ACGL as "Buy", RNR as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 250.9% upside for SLQT (target: $4) vs 0.7% for EG (target: $354). For income investors, EG offers the higher dividend yield at 2.30% vs RNR's 0.55%.

MetricSLQT logoSLQTSelectQuote, Inc.EG logoEGEverest Re Group,…ACGL logoACGLArch Capital Grou…RNR logoRNRRenaissanceRe Hol…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldHoldBuyHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$4.00$354.00$104.00$308.33
# AnalystsCovering analysts11223428
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+2.3%+0.0%+0.6%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises11301
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$8.09$0.02$1.67
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+5.8%+5.6%+12.3%
EG leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

RNR leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). ACGL leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 1 tied.

Best OverallRenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd. (RNR)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

SLQT vs EG vs ACGL vs RNR: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is SLQT or EG or ACGL or RNR a better buy right now?

For growth investors, SelectQuote, Inc.

(SLQT) is the stronger pick with 15. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 4% for Everest Re Group, Ltd. (EG). RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd. (RNR) offers the better valuation at 5. 3x trailing P/E (7. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Arch Capital Group Ltd. (ACGL) a "Buy" — based on 34 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — SLQT or EG or ACGL or RNR?

On trailing P/E, RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd.

(RNR) is the cheapest at 5. 3x versus SelectQuote, Inc. at 85. 7x. On forward P/E, Everest Re Group, Ltd. is actually cheaper at 6. 7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd. wins at 0. 26x versus Arch Capital Group Ltd. 's 0. 35x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — SLQT or EG or ACGL or RNR?

Over the past 5 years, Arch Capital Group Ltd.

(ACGL) delivered a total return of +144. 0%, compared to -96. 1% for SelectQuote, Inc. (SLQT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ACGL returned +324. 0% versus SLQT's -95. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — SLQT or EG or ACGL or RNR?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd.

(RNR) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 03β versus SelectQuote, Inc. 's 1. 96β — meaning SLQT is approximately -6273% more volatile than RNR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Arch Capital Group Ltd. (ACGL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 11% versus 72% for SelectQuote, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — SLQT or EG or ACGL or RNR?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), SelectQuote, Inc.

(SLQT) is pulling ahead at 15. 5% versus 1. 4% for Everest Re Group, Ltd. (EG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: SelectQuote, Inc. grew EPS 106. 7% year-over-year, compared to 3. 8% for Arch Capital Group Ltd.. Over a 3-year CAGR, RNR leads at 36. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — SLQT or EG or ACGL or RNR?

Arch Capital Group Ltd.

(ACGL) is the more profitable company, earning 22. 1% net margin versus 3. 1% for SelectQuote, Inc. — meaning it keeps 22. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: RNR leads at 31. 5% versus 4. 5% for SLQT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RNR leads at 40. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is SLQT or EG or ACGL or RNR more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd. (RNR) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 26x versus Arch Capital Group Ltd. 's 0. 35x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Everest Re Group, Ltd. (EG) trades at 6. 7x forward P/E versus 10. 1x for Arch Capital Group Ltd. — 3. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SLQT: 250. 9% to $4. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — SLQT or EG or ACGL or RNR?

In this comparison, EG (2.

3% yield), RNR (0. 6% yield) pay a dividend. SLQT, ACGL do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is SLQT or EG or ACGL or RNR better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd.

(RNR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 03), 0. 6% yield, +176. 9% 10Y return). SelectQuote, Inc. (SLQT) carries a higher beta of 1. 96 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (RNR: +176. 9%, SLQT: -95. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between SLQT and EG and ACGL and RNR?

Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: SLQT is a small-cap high-growth stock; EG is a mid-cap deep-value stock; ACGL is a mid-cap deep-value stock; RNR is a mid-cap deep-value stock. EG, RNR pay a dividend while SLQT, ACGL do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

SLQT

Quality Business

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Gross Margin > 41%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

EG

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 7%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.9%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

ACGL

Quality Mega-Cap Compounder

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 13%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

RNR

Quality Mega-Cap Compounder

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 16%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.5%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform SLQT and EG and ACGL and RNR on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(SLQT: 5.6% · EG: -4.0%)
Net Margin>
%
(SLQT: 4.5% · EG: 11.9%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(SLQT: 85.7x · EG: 9.3x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.