Insurance - Brokers
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
SLQT vs EG vs ACGL vs RNR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Insurance - Reinsurance
Insurance - Diversified
Insurance - Reinsurance
SLQT vs EG vs ACGL vs RNR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Insurance - Brokers | Insurance - Reinsurance | Insurance - Diversified | Insurance - Reinsurance |
| Market Cap | $201M | $14.17B | $33.67B | $12.98B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.64B | $17.15B | $19.93B | $11.49B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $73M | $2.03B | $4.40B | $3.09B |
| Gross Margin | 69.8% | 28.5% | 37.2% | 44.6% |
| Operating Margin | 3.5% | 14.2% | 25.0% | 35.5% |
| Forward P/E | 85.7x | 6.7x | 10.1x | 7.7x |
| Total Debt | $416M | $3.59B | $2.73B | $2.33B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $32M | $1.32B | $993M | $1.73B |
SLQT vs EG vs ACGL vs RNR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| SelectQuote, Inc. (SLQT) | 100 | 4.1 | -95.9% |
| Everest Re Group, L… (EG) | 100 | 177.2 | +77.2% |
| Arch Capital Group … (ACGL) | 100 | 334.9 | +234.9% |
| RenaissanceRe Holdi… (RNR) | 100 | 179.2 | +79.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SLQT vs EG vs ACGL vs RNR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SLQT is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 15.5%, EPS growth 106.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 26.0%
- 15.5% revenue growth vs EG's 1.4%
EG is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 13 yrs, beta 0.36, yield 2.3%
- Beta 0.36, yield 2.3%, current ratio 0.76x
- 2.3% yield, 13-year raise streak, vs ACGL's 0.0%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
ACGL is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- 324.0% 10Y total return vs RNR's 176.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.02, Low D/E 11.3%, current ratio 1.21x
- Beta 0.02 vs SLQT's 1.96, lower leverage
- 5.9% ROA vs EG's 3.3%, ROIC 15.4% vs 8.1%
RNR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.26 vs ACGL's 0.35
- Lower P/E (7.7x vs 10.1x), PEG 0.26 vs 0.35
- Combined ratio 0.7 vs SLQT's 1.0 (lower = better underwriting)
- +21.9% vs SLQT's -57.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 15.5% revenue growth vs EG's 1.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (7.7x vs 10.1x), PEG 0.26 vs 0.35 | |
| Quality / Margins | Combined ratio 0.7 vs SLQT's 1.0 (lower = better underwriting) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.02 vs SLQT's 1.96, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.3% yield, 13-year raise streak, vs ACGL's 0.0%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +21.9% vs SLQT's -57.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 5.9% ROA vs EG's 3.3%, ROIC 15.4% vs 8.1% |
SLQT vs EG vs ACGL vs RNR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
SLQT vs EG vs ACGL vs RNR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
RNR leads in 3 of 6 categories
ACGL leads 1 • EG leads 1 • SLQT leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RNR leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ACGL is the larger business by revenue, generating $19.9B annually — 12.1x SLQT's $1.6B. RNR is the more profitable business, keeping 26.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SLQT's 4.5%. On growth, ACGL holds the edge at +7.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.6B | $17.1B | $19.9B | $11.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $63M | $2.5B | $5.2B | $4.1B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $73M | $2.0B | $4.4B | $3.1B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$62M | $2.9B | $6.1B | $4.2B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +69.8% | +28.5% | +37.2% | +44.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +3.5% | +14.2% | +25.0% | +35.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +4.5% | +11.9% | +22.1% | +26.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -3.8% | +16.7% | +30.7% | +36.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +5.6% | -4.0% | +7.3% | -36.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -114.5% | +2.3% | +39.0% | +100.9% |
Valuation Metrics
RNR leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 5.3x trailing earnings, RNR trades at a 94% valuation discount to SLQT's 85.7x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), RNR offers better value at 0.18x vs EG's 0.38x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $201M | $14.2B | $33.7B | $13.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $584M | $16.4B | $35.4B | $13.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 85.71x | 9.29x | 8.13x | 5.31x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 6.70x | 10.05x | 7.66x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.38x | 0.29x | 0.18x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 6.57x | 7.95x | 6.85x | 3.38x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.13x | 0.82x | 1.69x | 1.02x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.36x | 0.94x | 1.47x | 0.70x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 4.16x | 5.50x | 3.51x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ACGL leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ACGL delivers a 19.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $19 in annual profit, vs $12 for SLQT. ACGL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.11x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SLQT's 0.72x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), RNR scores 8/9 vs SLQT's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +12.2% | +13.3% | +19.0% | +16.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +5.7% | +3.3% | +5.9% | +5.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.3% | +8.1% | +15.4% | +16.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +6.7% | +10.9% | +11.6% | +10.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 7 | 7 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.72x | 0.23x | 0.11x | 0.12x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $384M | $2.3B | $1.7B | $598M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $32M | $1.3B | $993M | $1.7B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $416M | $3.6B | $2.7B | $2.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 4.11x | 18.38x | 34.86x | 33.28x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
RNR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ACGL five years ago would be worth $24,398 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $387 for SLQT. Over the past 12 months, RNR leads with a +21.9% total return vs SLQT's -57.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors RNR at 13.4% vs SLQT's -7.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -16.8% | +5.7% | +0.7% | +10.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -57.6% | +5.1% | +2.0% | +21.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -19.7% | -2.3% | +30.7% | +45.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -96.1% | +41.8% | +144.0% | +87.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -95.8% | +129.5% | +324.0% | +176.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -7.1% | -0.8% | +9.3% | +13.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — EG and RNR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
RNR is the less volatile stock with a -0.03 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SLQT's 1.96 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. EG currently trades 95.5% from its 52-week high vs SLQT's 40.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.96x | 0.36x | 0.02x | -0.03x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.80 | $368.29 | $103.39 | $318.20 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.56 | $302.44 | $82.45 | $231.17 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +40.7% | +95.5% | +91.4% | +94.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 71.7 | 58.9 | 46.3 | 46.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.2M | 310K | 1.9M | 303K |
Analyst Outlook
EG leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SLQT as "Hold", EG as "Hold", ACGL as "Buy", RNR as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 250.9% upside for SLQT (target: $4) vs 0.7% for EG (target: $354). For income investors, EG offers the higher dividend yield at 2.30% vs RNR's 0.55%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $4.00 | $354.00 | $104.00 | $308.33 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 11 | 22 | 34 | 28 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +2.3% | +0.0% | +0.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 13 | 0 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $8.09 | $0.02 | $1.67 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +5.8% | +5.6% | +12.3% |
RNR leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). ACGL leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 1 tied.
SLQT vs EG vs ACGL vs RNR: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SLQT or EG or ACGL or RNR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, SelectQuote, Inc.
(SLQT) is the stronger pick with 15. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 4% for Everest Re Group, Ltd. (EG). RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd. (RNR) offers the better valuation at 5. 3x trailing P/E (7. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Arch Capital Group Ltd. (ACGL) a "Buy" — based on 34 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SLQT or EG or ACGL or RNR?
On trailing P/E, RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd.
(RNR) is the cheapest at 5. 3x versus SelectQuote, Inc. at 85. 7x. On forward P/E, Everest Re Group, Ltd. is actually cheaper at 6. 7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd. wins at 0. 26x versus Arch Capital Group Ltd. 's 0. 35x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SLQT or EG or ACGL or RNR?
Over the past 5 years, Arch Capital Group Ltd.
(ACGL) delivered a total return of +144. 0%, compared to -96. 1% for SelectQuote, Inc. (SLQT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ACGL returned +324. 0% versus SLQT's -95. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SLQT or EG or ACGL or RNR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd.
(RNR) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 03β versus SelectQuote, Inc. 's 1. 96β — meaning SLQT is approximately -6273% more volatile than RNR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Arch Capital Group Ltd. (ACGL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 11% versus 72% for SelectQuote, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SLQT or EG or ACGL or RNR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), SelectQuote, Inc.
(SLQT) is pulling ahead at 15. 5% versus 1. 4% for Everest Re Group, Ltd. (EG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: SelectQuote, Inc. grew EPS 106. 7% year-over-year, compared to 3. 8% for Arch Capital Group Ltd.. Over a 3-year CAGR, RNR leads at 36. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SLQT or EG or ACGL or RNR?
Arch Capital Group Ltd.
(ACGL) is the more profitable company, earning 22. 1% net margin versus 3. 1% for SelectQuote, Inc. — meaning it keeps 22. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: RNR leads at 31. 5% versus 4. 5% for SLQT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RNR leads at 40. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SLQT or EG or ACGL or RNR more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd. (RNR) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 26x versus Arch Capital Group Ltd. 's 0. 35x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Everest Re Group, Ltd. (EG) trades at 6. 7x forward P/E versus 10. 1x for Arch Capital Group Ltd. — 3. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SLQT: 250. 9% to $4. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — SLQT or EG or ACGL or RNR?
In this comparison, EG (2.
3% yield), RNR (0. 6% yield) pay a dividend. SLQT, ACGL do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is SLQT or EG or ACGL or RNR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd.
(RNR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 03), 0. 6% yield, +176. 9% 10Y return). SelectQuote, Inc. (SLQT) carries a higher beta of 1. 96 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (RNR: +176. 9%, SLQT: -95. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SLQT and EG and ACGL and RNR?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: SLQT is a small-cap high-growth stock; EG is a mid-cap deep-value stock; ACGL is a mid-cap deep-value stock; RNR is a mid-cap deep-value stock. EG, RNR pay a dividend while SLQT, ACGL do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.